What to do when TC Inspector Calls???

This forum has been developed to discuss aviation related topics.

Moderators: sky's the limit, sepia, Sulako, lilfssister, North Shore, I WAS Birddog

Samolin
Rank 1
Rank 1
Posts: 23
Joined: Thu Jul 08, 2004 5:13 pm
Location: Toronto

What to do when TC Inspector Calls???

Post by Samolin »

I was contact by an Inspector last week regarding an incident that took place in January; WHAT SHOULD I DO; I did return his phone call and sounded friendly and said that he just wants to TRY and close my case as soon as possible; he asked me to write in via fax detailing what happened on the flight;

I have heard of some stories which are not comforting through friends and wanted to find out what would be the best course of action;

any advise would be appreciated!!!!
---------- ADS -----------
 
Out of Control
Rank 5
Rank 5
Posts: 379
Joined: Wed Mar 24, 2004 3:26 pm
Location: IMC

Post by Out of Control »

Be a man and call him back. Whats a violation between fellow pilots.
---------- ADS -----------
 
Say again, your coming in stupid
User avatar
motherfokker
Rank 2
Rank 2
Posts: 76
Joined: Wed Jun 16, 2004 7:02 am

Post by motherfokker »

Ah yes..... the TC cavity search, joy :evil:
---------- ADS -----------
 
snoopy
Rank (9)
Rank (9)
Posts: 1118
Joined: Wed Feb 25, 2004 6:19 pm
Location: The Dog House

Post by snoopy »

Your best bet is to do as you did - contact them back righta away and find out exactly what they want. Get it in writing if you can. If you don't already know (ie you declared an emergency and its been routed through the official channels) find out what brought the matter to their attention and what kind of resolution are they looking for (explanation, general ass-covering paper trail, lynching, reason why they shouldn't violate you etc.)
Before you put anything on paper, check the CARS and any other applicable regulations very carefully to ensure your detailed actions/observations/written statement is/are within the law. If the incident was a serious one, its not a bad idea to consult with a lawyer before submitting a written statement. Proof-read very carefully and consult with a neutral party for a second opinion.
Any writtn communication with TC is guaranteed to be kept on file for a very long time. However, it is important not to be completely guided by paranoia. Try to temper caution with good sense and arm yourself by being familiar with the regulations and standards you are expected to uphold. If you do all this and are not in the wrong, you have nothing to be afraid of.
Good luck,
Snoopy
---------- ADS -----------
 
“Never interrupt someone doing something you said couldn’t be done.” Amelia Earhart
User avatar
Yoyoma
Rank (9)
Rank (9)
Posts: 1465
Joined: Fri Feb 27, 2004 4:01 am
Location: Somewhere in time...

Post by Yoyoma »

Yeah...follow the advice given above and you'll be digging your grave...!

Just Fax him what he really wants...A naked picture of yourself...! :shock:
---------- ADS -----------
 
Image In the business world, the rearview mirror is always clearer than the windshield...W. Buffett
User avatar
Cat Driver
Top Poster
Top Poster
Posts: 18921
Joined: Sun Feb 15, 2004 8:31 pm

Post by Cat Driver »

Snoopy, Snoopy what has happened to you?

Having done nothing wrong means nothing if they decide you need a lesson taught to you, fairness is a word some of them do not even come close to understanding.

Taking such such well meant advice as Snoop just posted, can really get you in deep trouble.

You should never, never talk to any TC enforcement person without legal council, your career can be badly damaged by giving out more than is required by law.

You are required to produce certain documents on demand, ( produce does not mean hand them to any inspector, produce means show them. ) you have the right to remain silent until you have legal council.

Answering any question on the phone is stupid, doing it on paper is beyond stupid.

Anyone who thinks that TC enforcement inspectors can be trusted would be better off in another line of work.

Cat
---------- ADS -----------
 
The hardest thing about flying is knowing when to say no


After over a half a century of flying no one ever died because of my decision not to fly.
Redwine
Rank 4
Rank 4
Posts: 203
Joined: Wed Feb 25, 2004 10:20 pm
Location: FLINE@9

Post by Redwine »

In all fairness to MOT, they have been very resaonable to me regarding an infraction. I simply wrote a registered letter explaining my version of the event and the case was dropped. Play hardball, and they WILL win....
IMHO
---------- ADS -----------
 
...Seems they are going to remove the axe and the control column from the cockpits for security reasons.
User avatar
Cat Driver
Top Poster
Top Poster
Posts: 18921
Joined: Sun Feb 15, 2004 8:31 pm

Post by Cat Driver »

Redwine:

So you are advising people to expose themselves to possible unfair prosecution based on your experience?

Do you really believe that there are no enforcement people who abuse their authority?

Cat.
---------- ADS -----------
 
The hardest thing about flying is knowing when to say no


After over a half a century of flying no one ever died because of my decision not to fly.
Benwa
Rank 8
Rank 8
Posts: 850
Joined: Sun Feb 15, 2004 8:28 pm
Location: CYQB

Post by Benwa »

The main problem I see is you never know who you're dealing with !

As far as I am concerned, I would play safe and go with Cat's way...

Benwa
---------- ADS -----------
 
patter
Rank 3
Rank 3
Posts: 153
Joined: Mon Mar 08, 2004 9:56 am

Post by patter »

Do not respond to the phone call. Wait for Transport to send you a letter about it. Just wait. On your own write down and keep it to yourself all the details you can remember.
---------- ADS -----------
 
Notta Simfalt
Rank 2
Rank 2
Posts: 85
Joined: Mon Feb 16, 2004 8:09 am
Location: not Pickle Lake
Contact:

Post by Notta Simfalt »

Sometimes, if it's something simple like an altitude bust for example, they have the option of closing the case over the phone. If it's something you know they have you on, and the worst that could happen is a fine, you may be better off being polite and getting off. For more severe accusations I would get legal advice. ALPA dues get you a free lawyer.
---------- ADS -----------
 
Redwine
Rank 4
Rank 4
Posts: 203
Joined: Wed Feb 25, 2004 10:20 pm
Location: FLINE@9

Post by Redwine »

I am sure MOST people at MOT are reasonable and fair. (That has just been with my own personal experiences). Sure, there are and always will be bad apples in the bunch who abuse powers etc, which is sad. All I meant to say is that if the gentleman/woman in question here knows what he/she did or did not do was right and in the name of the game of air safety, I am sure he/she will do just fine. Just state the facts, and if you have a good conscience, you will be OK. Is it really worth all the hassle of getting more people involved? I 'm sure the man at MOT really just wants to close the case and move on. If you screwed up, well then take it like a man, face the music and move on. This is just my own opinion, don't forget. If I had a clear conscience about a situation and a good reasonable explanation, I would see no reason to post a question on here regarding dealing with MOT,... unless I knew I was in the wrong and was looking for ideas to get out of the situation..... :D (No offence CAT. I'm sure you are quite justified in your dealings with MOT)
By no means am I an expert on the subject though, so take my opinion with a grain of salt.
Good Luck and fly safe!!
---------- ADS -----------
 
...Seems they are going to remove the axe and the control column from the cockpits for security reasons.
N8
Rank 3
Rank 3
Posts: 139
Joined: Tue Feb 17, 2004 11:28 am

Post by N8 »

Just a thought here.....

You know those Ex-Copper folks? They are retired police officers who now lend their services to help drivers get out of tickets, fines, etc... They are good because they know the law and the tricks.

Does anyone know an Ex-MOT that can do / does the same thing? It might be worth looking into.
---------- ADS -----------
 
snoopy
Rank (9)
Rank (9)
Posts: 1118
Joined: Wed Feb 25, 2004 6:19 pm
Location: The Dog House

Post by snoopy »

Cat, did you actually read my post?????
Anyway, like all advice, its plenty and its free and you're not obligated to use it. If you want good advice, get a lawyer.
And for the record, Samolin's post is a very vague description of his/her situation. No mention is made about enforcement, or about the seriousness of the supposed "incident". If you walk into every minor situation with Transport armed with a big stick, a lawyer and ignorance of the laws both sides are expected to adhere to, your future contact with TC will likely by rocky. Bring out the big guns for the big battles, for the little battles use water pistols.

Cheers,
Snoopy
---------- ADS -----------
 
“Never interrupt someone doing something you said couldn’t be done.” Amelia Earhart
Doc
Top Poster
Top Poster
Posts: 9241
Joined: Mon Feb 16, 2004 6:28 am

Post by Doc »

We've been through this before....BUT, in case you missed it:

1. TC is NOT your friend...they are NOT there to help you.
2. NEVER admit ANYTHING, EVER!!!
3. Dont return their calls.
4. Put NOTHING in writting...EVER.
5. There's a river called "Da Nile"...spend time on this river.
6. Ignore the "Snoop" on this one, and listen to the "Cat"

Remember, they're in the business to nail your sorry ass..it's true..dont let them use anything you say against you. You're not a lawyer, and unless you stayed in a Hoilday Inn Express last night, dont act like one.

And, Redwine....you're real new to this, arnt ya! What you did could have really jumped up and screwed ya. NEVER PUT ANYTHING IN WRITTING!!
---------- ADS -----------
 
User avatar
Cat Driver
Top Poster
Top Poster
Posts: 18921
Joined: Sun Feb 15, 2004 8:31 pm

Post by Cat Driver »

Hi Doc, Wave

Snoopy my dear friend, I know that you mean well however if you examine your own caution regarding TC taking revenge against a pilot for refusing to possibly incrimminate her / him self by offering information not required by law then you are stating that TC will unjustly punish you.

You can't have it two ways Snoop, if you are in danger of retaliation for refusing to offer information not lawfully required then you are admitting they are corrupt.

Hows the dog doing, and are you still flying my favourite airplane C-FTBD?

Cat.
---------- ADS -----------
 
The hardest thing about flying is knowing when to say no


After over a half a century of flying no one ever died because of my decision not to fly.
Wilbur
Rank (9)
Rank (9)
Posts: 1181
Joined: Fri Feb 27, 2004 11:26 am

Post by Wilbur »

What department was the inspector from? Is he enforcement, safety systems, or something else.

If he wants your side in writing, I suspect enforcement. If that's the case, see a lawyer before you say or write anything. NOBODY on this board fully understands what they are talking about with regard to your rights and responsibilities versus those of the TC inspector. It all falls under the umbrella of "administrative law," the rules of which are much different than criminal law.

Administrative law is governed by common, or case, law for the most part, and the principles of fundemental justice. The only way you can know the "rules" of the process is to have a thorough understanding of previous federal and supreme court rulings in similar cases.

Simply put, the TC inspector may be a nice guy and just looking to close the file, he may honestly have no idea where it will go at this point, or he may be setting you up to make a confession to expidite his filing charges against you. You have know way of knowing what his intentions are without the help of good legal advice.

Take my advice as you see fit, but do so with the knowlege that I work in the criminal and administrative justice systems, and have both prosecuted and adjudicated hundreds of cases.

Good Luck.
---------- ADS -----------
 
User avatar
TenForTwelve
Rank 3
Rank 3
Posts: 115
Joined: Fri Jul 09, 2004 1:13 pm
Location: AB

Post by TenForTwelve »

I got a call from enforcement once. I won't go into the details of my mistake, but suffice it to say it was a minor infraction, inadvertent and unintentional and all that. I had pretty much the same conversation, wanted me to write up my side of the story and so on. The inspector outlined the whole process for me, including the action that would likely be taken, and on the whole, he was friendly and helpful. I got a letter some months later stating that given my explanation, TC was choosing not to take further action. I know that some inspectors are pricks, but apparently not all of them are. I was also informed that if there is a record of infractions on your file, you can apply to have them removed after 2 years if there are no further infractions. Not sure if this helps, but take it for what it's worth.
---------- ADS -----------
 
ahramin
Rank Moderator
Rank Moderator
Posts: 6324
Joined: Tue Feb 17, 2004 5:21 pm
Location: Vancouver

Post by ahramin »

Like Benwa said, the problem is that you do not know who you are dealing with. In some cases it is far better to genuflect and show the proper penitent attitude. In other cases this is career suicide. Try to figure out what sort of person you are dealing with before saying anything. If they sound reasonable, then the best bet may be being reasonable in return. But if they are full of bluster and baloney, you are in for a nightmare no matter what you do.
---------- ADS -----------
 
W0X0F
Rank 3
Rank 3
Posts: 143
Joined: Mon Mar 01, 2004 11:00 am
Location: Right of the Rocks

Post by W0X0F »

If it's Enforcement, lawyer the f$%k up!
---------- ADS -----------
 
snoopy
Rank (9)
Rank (9)
Posts: 1118
Joined: Wed Feb 25, 2004 6:19 pm
Location: The Dog House

Post by snoopy »

Its CF-TBD now, the way it should be....
;)
---------- ADS -----------
 
“Never interrupt someone doing something you said couldn’t be done.” Amelia Earhart
User avatar
Cat Driver
Top Poster
Top Poster
Posts: 18921
Joined: Sun Feb 15, 2004 8:31 pm

Post by Cat Driver »

And the way it was. :mrgreen:
---------- ADS -----------
 
The hardest thing about flying is knowing when to say no


After over a half a century of flying no one ever died because of my decision not to fly.
Samolin
Rank 1
Rank 1
Posts: 23
Joined: Thu Jul 08, 2004 5:13 pm
Location: Toronto

Post by Samolin »

thx for all the feedback....

Since I do not know if the TC Inspector is a nice guy or just a bad apple in a bunch.....I will take the safer route and consult with the lawyer...

if anyone knows of any good Avaition Lawyers in Toronto Area....let me know.....

thx again for all the help...
---------- ADS -----------
 
User avatar
A.W.
Rank 1
Rank 1
Posts: 46
Joined: Thu Feb 19, 2004 4:38 pm
Location: Saltspring
Contact:

Post by A.W. »

qqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqq
---------- ADS -----------
 
Last edited by A.W. on Mon Aug 09, 2004 10:01 pm, edited 1 time in total.
My Bud the Cat
User avatar
hz2p
Rank (9)
Rank (9)
Posts: 1086
Joined: Wed Apr 21, 2004 9:38 am

Post by hz2p »

Count me in the . & Doc. Transport does NOT have your best interests at heart - you can count on that.

It is a fact that anything you say to them can be used against you. You are not obligated to talk to them, so don't.

I think I know where A.W.'s pension is coming from, and it's sure not the private sector.
---------- ADS -----------
 
Post Reply

Return to “General Comments”