David Duke gives Blitzer an ass-kickin.

swede · Post by **swede** » Wed Dec 13, 2006 10:08 pm

Interesting interview by Blitzer, you have to scroll down a few lines to find it. Something about how the Zionists, through AIPAC, embroiled the U.S. (as proxy to zionism) into Iraq. Mr. Duke is pretty well on the mark. As well, he would like to know why there can be no free speech, anywhere, on certain issues? While the zionist controlled media wants to paint the Tehran conference as a hot bed consortium of ethnic hate, Mr. Duke has some other thoughts as a participant.

http://davidduke.com/

Also here if you want the youtube version:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-v2f-WC4cjo

grimey · Post by **grimey** » Wed Dec 13, 2006 10:28 pm

America got into Iraq because of W's "he tried to kill my dad", or because of a mistaken belief regarding WMDs, not because of some massive conspiracy. Duke is also the former leader of the KKK. Good to see you've given him your support, swede.

Jesus swede, stop drinking for a day at least.

swede · Post by **swede** » Wed Dec 13, 2006 10:39 pm

My friend, you have no more a clue why the U.S. attacked Iraq than trying to find your ass with both hands. You listen to that interview once more, then you come back and refute it. I dare ya

grimey · Post by **grimey** » Wed Dec 13, 2006 10:40 pm

wearing a bedsheet for a hat swede?

swede · Post by **swede** » Wed Dec 13, 2006 10:45 pm

Looks like the brown line on your forehead indicates your down a quart, - did you even listen to the interview - Nope

grimey · Post by **grimey** » Wed Dec 13, 2006 10:51 pm

KKK affiliation was 30 years ago: wrong, he left in 1978. Then he founded the NAAWP, which is essentially the same thing.

So what's to refute, other than that? That he's not ferverently against jews? It's blatantly obvious that he is.

Have you read any of the accounts of WW2? Have you seen any of the records? There's a reason that the Germans still feel guilty over their acts 60 years ago, and it's not because the Americans don't like them. Read Elie Weisel's "Night", and tell me you can still support Duke, you anti semetic ass.

And for the record, I was raised Anglican, and (to the best of my knowledge) have no jewish roots whatsoever.

grimey · Post by **grimey** » Wed Dec 13, 2006 10:51 pm

swede wrote:Looks like the brown line on your forehead indicates your down a quart, - did you even listen to the interview - Nope

Yes jerky, I did.

swede · Post by **swede** » Wed Dec 13, 2006 11:01 pm

grimey wrote:KKK affiliation was 30 years ago: wrong, he left in 1978. Then he founded the NAAWP, which is essentially the same thing.

So what's to refute, other than that? That he's not ferverently against jews? It's blatantly obvious that he is.

Have you read any of the accounts of WW2? Have you seen any of the records? There's a reason that the Germans still feel guilty over their acts 60 years ago, and it's not because the Americans don't like them. Read Elie Weisel's "Night", and tell me you can still support Duke, you anti semetic ass.

And for the record, I was raised Anglican, and (to the best of my knowledge) have no jewish roots whatsoever.

Yup here we go with trotting out the old anti semitic act. what a pathetic loser line that one is. I am less of an anti semite than you. You can refute nothing that duke said, get your tin foil hat out and take a hike.

swede · Post by **swede** » Wed Dec 13, 2006 11:02 pm

People like you buy every pathetic line of crap that comes down the pike, as long as its msm that is, your stupidity is astounding

grimey · Post by **grimey** » Wed Dec 13, 2006 11:02 pm

Occam's Razor, swede: What's simpler, that tens of thousands of jews tattooed unique numbers on their forearms to screw over other people for generations, or that, as is supported by every relevant historical account, the Germans killed over 6 million of them systematically? What's simpler, that a country wants to punish a traditional enemy for past sins, or that a small minority of people from outside that country have engineered a war that is contrary to the interests of all inside it? What's simpler, that a famous racist still harbors racist view about jews, or that he's reformed, but has somehow discovered a massive conspiracy perpetrated by those he claims to no longer hate?

Pull your head out of your ass.

grimey · Post by **grimey** » Wed Dec 13, 2006 11:04 pm

swede wrote:People like you buy every pathetic line of crap that comes down the pike, as long as its msm that is, your stupidity is astounding

Amazing rebuttal. Pot, kettle is calling.

swede · Post by **swede** » Wed Dec 13, 2006 11:04 pm

And the next time assholes like you will be calling for extermination of all Muslims. Your freakin pathetic

grimey · Post by **grimey** » Wed Dec 13, 2006 11:06 pm

swede wrote:And the next time assholes like you will be calling for extermination of all Muslims. Your freakin pathetic

Where have I done that? I specifically said that the Iraq war wasn't based on what would be seen as legitimate causes. Take your strawmen and burn them elsewhere.

swede · Post by **swede** » Wed Dec 13, 2006 11:11 pm

No the Iraq war was not based on legitimate causes, on that we can agree, and that is all that duke is saying. He also would like to know why david irving is in jail, maybe you want to comment on that. Why do we have to go to Tehran of all places, to have freedom of speech? Duke may be wrong and he may have been formerly kkk, that does not impune him as nothing for eternity, seems to me the guy has a few more credentials to back himself than what he was doing 30 years ago. Does he deny the holocaust? i dont think so, but any academic who even raises the issue is immediately branded anti semitic and you can here the screeching of the main stream press for miles. That is not free speech, that is tyranny.

swede · Post by **swede** » Wed Dec 13, 2006 11:25 pm

There is also a book just out by Jimmy Carter, in which he makes the astonishing announcement that Palestinians are actually something above dogs, among other posits. President Carter figures that most Jews, and Palestinians, do want peace. There is a small faction of Jews, according to Carter, who will not accept peace. That is a large part of why the middle east is where it's at.

grimey · Post by **grimey** » Wed Dec 13, 2006 11:30 pm

swede wrote:No the Iraq war was not based on legitimate causes, on that we can agree, and that is all that duke is saying. He also would like to know why david irving is in jail, maybe you want to comment on that.

Because he violated Austrian law, and was silly enough to travel to Austria after having done so.

Why do we have to go to Tehran of all places, to have freedom of speech?

Apparently you missed the numerous rallies that the KKK has, that are defended by the first ammendment of the US constitution, that deny the Holocaust.

Duke may be wrong and he may have been formerly kkk, that does not impune him as nothing for eternity, seems to me the guy has a few more credentials to back himself.

And his thesis statement from his degree still points towards his bigotry.

Does he deny the holocaust? i dont think so, but any academic who even raises the issue is immediately branded anti semitic and you can here the screeching of the main stream press for miles. That is not free speech, that is tyranny.

He's speaking at the anti-holocaust conference. Or didn't you notice that?

grimey · Post by **grimey** » Wed Dec 13, 2006 11:31 pm

swede wrote:There is also a book just out by Jimmy Carter, in which he makes the astonishing announcement that Palestinians are actually something above dogs, among other posits. President Carter figures that most Jews, and Palestinians, do want peace. There is a small faction of Jews, according to Carter, who will not accept peace. That is a large part of why the middle east is where it's at.

And?

swede · Post by **swede** » Wed Dec 13, 2006 11:39 pm

Did you listen to the interview, why dont you go ahead and pick it apart, point by point. After all, your obviously a rocket scientist, or is it a rhodes scholar?

swede · Post by **swede** » Wed Dec 13, 2006 11:41 pm

Maybe you could also tell me why it is a violation of austrian law to question in any way shape or form the events around WW2 as related to concentration camps??? Did you happen to know, that somewhere in the neighbourhood of 60 million non jewish souls lost their lives due to purges throughout Europe in and around the two world wars. God, the ignorance with you is beyond belief. I lost relatives in that shit, did you??- As I said, you refute everything Duke said, point by point, then shoot your mouth off, otherwise, can it, shut it, and go build a rocket.

hazatude · Post by **hazatude** » Thu Dec 14, 2006 12:08 am

Swede is denying the Holocost...nice!

WTF?

bmc · Post by **bmc** » Thu Dec 14, 2006 5:20 am

He is?

Nark · Post by **Nark** » Thu Dec 14, 2006 5:39 am

Swede,

Despite my dislike for you, God stills loves you.

grimey · Post by **grimey** » Thu Dec 14, 2006 7:31 am

swede wrote:Maybe you could also tell me why it is a violation of austrian law to question in any way shape or form the events around WW2 as related to concentration camps??? Did you happen to know, that somewhere in the neighbourhood of 60 million non jewish souls lost their lives due to purges throughout Europe in and around the two world wars. God, the ignorance with you is beyond belief. I lost relatives in that shit, did you??- As I said, you refute everything Duke said, point by point, then shoot your mouth off, otherwise, can it, shut it, and go build a rocket.

Apparently my not explaining the history of the world means I'm clueless. We were talking about Duke's comments, not the history of WW2, not who was more evil, Stalin or Hitler. Burn strawmen elsewhere, swede.

Anyway, I did repond to your questions point by point. As for why it's a violation of Austrian law, your question makes no sense as it's currently phrased, but I'll explain how Irving violated Austrian law. It is a crime in Austria (and in Germany) to deny the events surrounding the holocaust. Irving did this in an interview he gave in 1989 in Austria. He was then declared persona-non-grata by Austria and Germany. With full knowledge that he wasn't permitted to enter the country, he went to Austria in 2005. He got arrested, charged, and sentenced as a result.

niss · Post by **niss** » Thu Dec 14, 2006 8:13 am

So let me get this straight....you are praising a former KKK leader about his cahones for denying the events surrounding the holocaust and his taking part in a forum in Iran regarding the denial of the holocaust.

And both he and you question freedom and civil liberties?:smt104

Are you and Duke lawyers? It seems to me that both of you are trying to defend your clients innocence after they addmited guilt.

Duke may be wrong and he may have been formerly kkk, that does not impune him as nothing for eternity, seems to me the guy has a few more credentials to back himself.

Last time I checked credentials and accademics had nothing to do with being a good person. Hitler was very intelligent. Do you think what he did should scar him as a bad person for eternity? Well that all depends on whether or not you believe what he did was a bad thing or if he actually did "what the zionists claim" he did.

Where do you fall swede?

swede · Post by **swede** » Thu Dec 14, 2006 9:29 am

Anyways, Grimey, lets just go back to the start of this. You say that Iraq has been turned from a country with some order, to complete and utter chaos and civil war, and that Bushco has squandered 3/4 trillion dollars, 3000 U.S. lives, 40 - 50,000 U.S. maimed (and all of this mounting disaster growing exponentially by the hour), in order that dubya could get even with sadam for calling poppy bush out and attempting to assassinate poppy bush. Incidentally, dubya and poppy dont talk much anymore. A war that is unwinnable (by all accounts, and that bush will not extract from, unless he is ordered by his handlers to do so), and which the U.S has been engaged in, longer than it spent in WW2. Duke, on the other hand, contends that the U.S attacked Iraq, at the behest of AIPAC, and the Zionist lobby group, which exerts extreme influence throughout Washington, and owns the U.S. mainstream media. If the evidence supporting each side of this argument was presented in a court, which side would present the majority of evidence. Who had the most to gain by the outright destruction of Iraq? Well, thats a rhetorical question, you and the tin hat group would be going home empty handed (along with empty headed, but you already new that). So, if it makes you feel better, go ahead and keep believing the drivel you are spoon fed day by day by fox and cnn and the talking head sycophants of bush, stephen harper and the like, just keep it your problem, not mine. You choose to believe the drivel, live with it.