Fedex, Purolator, and CargoJet
Moderators: sky's the limit, sepia, Sulako, lilfssister, North Shore, I WAS Birddog
- Troubleshot
- Rank (9)
- Posts: 1291
- Joined: Sat May 27, 2006 12:00 pm
Fedex, Purolator, and CargoJet
when these guys wear out their 727's what will they use next? any rumors, thoughts?
FedEx has already stated they will go with the 757 to replace the 727. It'll sad to see the smokers go.
Or are you talking about Morningstar?
Or are you talking about Morningstar?
Last edited by oates76 on Tue Jan 16, 2007 8:37 am, edited 1 time in total.
- invertedattitude
- Rank 10
- Posts: 2353
- Joined: Tue Jul 06, 2004 1:12 pm
- Troubleshot
- Rank (9)
- Posts: 1291
- Joined: Sat May 27, 2006 12:00 pm
Fuel burn is 13% less on the 57, plus you get 3 extra cans and 350 cube in the belly. You get rid of one pilot/FE and 1 engine thus maintenance costs are much less on the 57, MDR is much better enabling better utilization. When the dreamliner starts rolling off the line a 57 airframe will be had for 5.0 million. Many years ago there were people who said that the 727 will never replace the DC6 freighter. KFCpilot, why is Barry building a 757 hangar???KFCpilot wrote:The 757 can carry 3 more cans than the 727, fuel burn YHM - YWG almost the same, 757 cost 18 million plus cargo door installation, , 727 1-3 million. Won’t be any changes in Canada in my opinion.
18 million doesn't buy you a B757 anymore. There is hardly any available for sale or lease at the moment for a reasonable price. Boeing's B757 Cargo conversions with the cargo door plug are close to $40 million for the airplane. All the other proposed conversions for the B757, which is cutting a cargo door a la B727, needs a structural bulkhead by the 1L door (like the B727-200) which would waste space for 1 can.
The B757 is not very economical to operate on the typical 2 - 2 1/2 hour sector Canadian domestic cargo operators flying. A B757 makes sense on 4 1/2 hour or longer sectors. Plus a typical daily utilization of minimum 10 flight hours is necessary to offset capital cost. This would be probably the main hurdle for a fleet renewal as the typical cargo operator in Canada don't operate on weekends and usually utilizes it's aircraft around 6 flight hours a night.
I doubt there will be any B757 replacement for the B727 soon as there is still a high demand for these aircraft with passenger airlines.
The B757 is not very economical to operate on the typical 2 - 2 1/2 hour sector Canadian domestic cargo operators flying. A B757 makes sense on 4 1/2 hour or longer sectors. Plus a typical daily utilization of minimum 10 flight hours is necessary to offset capital cost. This would be probably the main hurdle for a fleet renewal as the typical cargo operator in Canada don't operate on weekends and usually utilizes it's aircraft around 6 flight hours a night.
I doubt there will be any B757 replacement for the B727 soon as there is still a high demand for these aircraft with passenger airlines.
- invertedattitude
- Rank 10
- Posts: 2353
- Joined: Tue Jul 06, 2004 1:12 pm
757's
From a relable sorce, FedEx is looking to replace there 727 with 757. this is a long term change over and will start to take place in the U.S. very soon. As for morningstar the do not own the FedEx planes that they operate the are operating them in Canada for FedEx and yes they are slated to be switched over as well. The FedEx loads are getting bigger all of the time in Canada and the bigger aircraft would mean that they would not have to put cans on Cargo Jet to move them as often as they do now.
winter sucks
-
- Rank 11
- Posts: 3239
- Joined: Tue Jun 08, 2004 11:58 am
-
- Rank 10
- Posts: 2119
- Joined: Wed Aug 17, 2005 1:04 am
- Location: Pilot Purgatory
I've seen Cascade in YXX do a few 57 conversions. I think they were mainly for US companies, but it's certainly happening. There's no doubt the 27 will hang around for a while, but eventually it will need to be replaced. Can't fix 'em forever...
Dyslexics of the world... UNTIE!
Yup. I've heard that only 2 extra cans can go in. Seems like a lot of $$$ for 2 extra cans. If I had to bet on anything, it would be the slow introduction of 767s into the fleet for the longer haul domestic runs. Now that's an increase in capacity!TAT wrote:Actually most of the 757's that would be had by canadian company's would be Freighter conversions. These will not give you the extra 3 positions you actually loose 1 or 2 positions in the process because of the position of the L1 door.
The 727 isn't going anywhere for a while folks...IMHO the only thing that will get rid of it is increasing noise abatement requirements. And at under 5 million with doors and floors installed, how can you go wrong?
Yup, but fuel (at least at one of the mentioned carriers) is paid for by the courier company, not the contract provider.linecrew wrote:I'm sure there must be a lot of factors that make it a good choice...cost of maintenance and fuel for starters.Pugster wrote:Seems like a lot of $$$ for 2 extra cans.
The Canadian cargo industry is totally different than the US one. The main difference is that most B727 routes are domestic cargo routes (Flightcraft/Morningstar) and operate on an East - West corridor 200 miles wide, parallel to the US border. So most sectors are stop and go while in the US cargo works on a hub and spoke system making the B757 a good choice as a B727 replacement for FedEx with longer sectors and higher utilization. Also, Canadian cargo operators like Flightcraft (Purolator) and Morningstar (FedEx) operate domestic only, while the US counterparts like FedEx, UPS, DHL operate also international routes, with sector lengths ideal for the B757. That said the B757 freighter would be probably a viable choice in the future for Flair Airlines with their Toronto - Cuba run if the loads would support a daily return flight and prices for the B757 are becoming more affordable.