Nark said [quote]I think the poll should add, "Will Canada go?"
And then add, "Will you go if Canada does[/quote]
Love to break the news to you Nark; Canada (i hope) won't follow your asshole USA in "the new american century"
It would be a laugh to see you, Nark (or any one ), run a poll on Canada being game for action against Iran. You know the answer.
You write like a typical ignorant american asshole, challenging us up North to follow in US folly.
If you want war. March for war.
If you want peace, march for PEACE.
I march for the latter.
Paradise
Iran
Moderators: North Shore, sky's the limit, sepia, Sulako, lilfssister
It is funny to see the views from people who know nothing about the region, or politics. Iran has no strike capabilities, and is seven years away from producing atomic weapons. What is the urgency? Yes Ahmadinejad said that he would like to kick Israel in the a*s, but then again a lot of leaders also said it. That no reason to start a war.
Actually Colonel Gadafi used stronger words before.
It is not even about oil, because prices would go so high is there was a war, that the US would be losing a lot more. It is not about enrichment either, as Russia is already building a power plant there.
Then what is the real reason?
The only possible explanation is that the US wants a war. It is war monging country that is using any reason it wants to start wars, but cannot finish them.They want a war just to fight. That way the rest of the world stagnates, and the US war machine gets bigger and bigger. It is also a dream of theirs to pit Sunni Arabs in another war with the Shia Persians. They have funded and benefited from such a war before.
The US have been provocating Iran for the past five years.
Yes, there could be a war, because the monkey in Washington is still there.
I am working in a conflict environment, and the truth is that it will take fifty years to rebuilt this country.
From a business point of view, it makes sense to destroy potential rivals.
There is also in Washington the influence of a lot of Jews in the administration, that take pleasure in seeing there neighbours killing each others.
The propaganda that CNN and BBC show you has nothing to do with reality. The infotainment that they give the west is part of the game, and they would benefit a lot from another war coverage.
All these embedded reporters must clear their stories with the PA officers before releasing them. So they send a lot of propaganda.
Cheers,
Actually Colonel Gadafi used stronger words before.
It is not even about oil, because prices would go so high is there was a war, that the US would be losing a lot more. It is not about enrichment either, as Russia is already building a power plant there.
Then what is the real reason?
The only possible explanation is that the US wants a war. It is war monging country that is using any reason it wants to start wars, but cannot finish them.They want a war just to fight. That way the rest of the world stagnates, and the US war machine gets bigger and bigger. It is also a dream of theirs to pit Sunni Arabs in another war with the Shia Persians. They have funded and benefited from such a war before.
The US have been provocating Iran for the past five years.
Yes, there could be a war, because the monkey in Washington is still there.
I am working in a conflict environment, and the truth is that it will take fifty years to rebuilt this country.
From a business point of view, it makes sense to destroy potential rivals.
There is also in Washington the influence of a lot of Jews in the administration, that take pleasure in seeing there neighbours killing each others.
The propaganda that CNN and BBC show you has nothing to do with reality. The infotainment that they give the west is part of the game, and they would benefit a lot from another war coverage.
All these embedded reporters must clear their stories with the PA officers before releasing them. So they send a lot of propaganda.
Cheers,
Success in life is when the cognac that you drink is older than the women you drink it with.
-
Dust Devil
- Rank 11
- Posts: 4027
- Joined: Fri Jun 24, 2005 10:55 am
- Location: Riderville
The hurry is the 15 brits held captive. This has gone beyond Irans nuclear capability. Canada should be involved and the mission should be only be to get in get the sailors out then leave.
This is a situation however that the brits are quite capable of handling on their own, But if they were to ask for our help I think we should give it.
This is a situation however that the brits are quite capable of handling on their own, But if they were to ask for our help I think we should give it.
-
mellow_pilot
- Rank 10
- Posts: 2119
- Joined: Wed Aug 17, 2005 1:04 am
- Location: Pilot Purgatory
More than capable of handling on their own. If diplomacy fails, SAS team with RN and RAF support... I think they can handle it.Dust Devil wrote:
This is a situation however that the brits are quite capable of handling on their own, But if they were to ask for our help I think we should give it.
Dyslexics of the world... UNTIE!
