I waste too much time on here reading Doc's valuable posts. I should spend my time watching Dr. Phil and eating Cheetos.
-istp

Moderators: North Shore, sky's the limit, sepia, Sulako, lilfssister, I WAS Birddog
That is not racist it is reality.Quote:
Hey, you can run a 747 three times a day, as long as it's a native owned venture. Just "milk" the tax payers. Not that it would be a novel idea?
This post wrongly and offensively implies that First Nation people of Canada "milk" the tax payers. So who is going to remove Doc.
that's exactly what I'm talking aboutI give Doc high marks for the technical contents of his posts and his opinions.
I don't think he's much of a moderator but then again, moderation is a foreign concept on this site.
these amongst other comments mainly due to saftey.Just Curious very aptly quoted the rules of the forumQuote:
You agree not to post any abusive, obscene, vulgar, slanderous, hateful, threatening, sexually-oriented or any other material that may violate any applicable laws. Doing so may lead to you being immediately and permanently banned
Then Flyinphil informed me of what the moderators job is(thank you).
My question is who moderates the moderator when they post offensive material. Doc wrote:Quote:
Hey, you can run a 747 three times a day, as long as it's a native owned venture. Just "milk" the tax payers. Not that it would be a novel idea?
This post wrongly and offensively implies that First Nation people of Canada "milk" the tax payers. So who is going to remove Doc.
This is the reason Tofo started this thread.
Apparently it is O.K. to make racist posts if A). YOU ARE THE MODERATOR
B) THESE RACIST COMMENTS ARE DIRECTED TOWARD THE FIRST NATIONS
P.S. These comments made by Doc were not posted in the "Political Debate" section they were posted in the General Comments under (YWG 1900)
P.P.S. I vote to give him the boot seeing as he can't follow the rules
//start thread-jackCID wrote:
I don't think he's much of a moderator but then again, moderation is a foreign concept on this site.
Under your bed beside the tissues and the handcream, where you left it last night.Sulako wrote: ps: you wouldn't know where I can get my hands on some dwarf scat porn, would you? No reason...
Doc:
Hey CID, all I see are "opinions", you're welcome to PM other mods for their opinions, maybe they will see something I don't and remove the thread. In fact, I would recommend you seek another opinion on the matter.
Considering this is a qualifier for the later statement, I have to wonder if the accuser knows the meaning of racism.Got to be a native owned operator. Private guys can't make money with a northern sked on a 1900D...
Given this definition, and the fact that native-owned operations DO have advantages over non-native owned ops, it seems that the racists are the ones who give and accept those discriminatory advantages.Main Entry: rac·ism
Pronunciation: 'rA-"si-z&m also -"shi-
Function: noun
1 : a belief that race is the primary determinant of human traits and capacities and that racial differences produce an inherent superiority of a particular race
2 : racial prejudice or discrimination
It is precisely this mis-information that I'm talking about. I would like you to tell me what edge or advantage "native" owned airlines have over non-native owned.Given this definition, and the fact that native-owned operations DO have advantages over non-native owned ops, it seems that the racists are the ones who give and accept those discriminatory advantages