MOH requirements.....why not salary?

Got a hot employment or interview tip to help a fellow aviator find a job or looking for a little job advice place your posting here.

Moderators: North Shore, sky's the limit, sepia, Sulako

Post Reply
saucer_driver
Rank 2
Rank 2
Posts: 90
Joined: Sat Mar 03, 2007 2:43 pm
Location: far far away

MOH requirements.....why not salary?

Post by saucer_driver »

Hey I have a concept and please let me know if it is already in place. If MOH is going to have strict requirements as to hours required for medivacs etc... Why not help the pilots out by having a required salary for the crew doing this type of work......
---------- ADS -----------
 
bater
Rank 3
Rank 3
Posts: 149
Joined: Sat May 21, 2005 11:32 am

Post by bater »

I guess cause it's typical for a large corporation/Government(what's the difference anyway?) to get as much as they can out of their people for as little cost as possible, with little or no regard to those people doing the work. They'll tell you they care, but it's all just window dressing... Man, I've been listening to WAY too much anti-flag! haha
---------- ADS -----------
 
"The price one pays for pursuing any profession or calling is an intimate knowledge of its ugly side. -- James Baldwin "
Doc
Top Poster
Top Poster
Posts: 9241
Joined: Mon Feb 16, 2004 6:28 am

Post by Doc »

Because.....they always give the contracts to the LOWEST bidder. Ya gets what ya pays for! And, it's none of MOH's business what operators pay their pilots. MOH sticks their nose into our business enough already without giving them even more control. They know NOTHING about aviation. Their only interest is to "milk" something for nothing out of operators. We don't set pay rates for their people...they shouldn't set them for ours.
If you don't like what you're being paid, find another job.
Most operators are being brought to their financial knees by the overpriced back end staff!
---------- ADS -----------
 
User avatar
Fresh Prince of King Air
Rank 3
Rank 3
Posts: 145
Joined: Sun May 22, 2005 11:02 am

Post by Fresh Prince of King Air »

Alberta is going the Salary route. Contrail actually strongly suggest that companies not use a "flight hour" based pay system. Exxon Mobil is this way as well.
---------- ADS -----------
 
saucer_driver
Rank 2
Rank 2
Posts: 90
Joined: Sat Mar 03, 2007 2:43 pm
Location: far far away

Post by saucer_driver »

[quote]They know NOTHING about aviation. [/quote]

But apparently you do and are cool with people earning very little to be pilots....

I don't know it seems like a good idea to me, you are basically working for them why not throw in a clause you must pay your pilots x amount to gain this contract. I am sure it is done other places.

Plus I am happy with my current job and pay, so i think i will keep it...thanks for the advice though
---------- ADS -----------
 
twnotter
Rank 2
Rank 2
Posts: 54
Joined: Fri Apr 21, 2006 5:35 am

Post by twnotter »

If you better pay, go drive a bus!!!!!!!!!!!! :roll:
---------- ADS -----------
 
desksgo
Rank 10
Rank 10
Posts: 2850
Joined: Thu Feb 19, 2004 12:05 pm
Location: Toy Poodle Town, Manitoba
Contact:

Post by desksgo »

twnotter wrote:If you better pay, go drive a bus!!!!!!!!!!!! :roll:
God knows a bus driver could formulate a better sentence.



The query itself is a valid one, and perhaps if this industry came by a little more solidarity it could happen. For instance, no medevac captain should work for less than 65,000 (just for arguments sake). But guess what, some genious would come along and do it for 30K because flyin' "is just so dang fun and I dunnwanna be unemployed". We're responsible for this, not the MOH nor the operators.

We've got supply and demand on our side right now, so go out and get what you're worth. Stick by the companies that treat pilots well, heck, flock to them, abandon those that don't.

Other than that, what Doc and Bater stated is perfectly logical. For the MOH or anyone else in that position, a pilot is a pilot and whoever does it for less is the favourite.

I do appreciate the thought saucerdriver, as you at least are thinking and aspiring for better things for this industry.
---------- ADS -----------
 
User avatar
Scuba_Steve
Rank 7
Rank 7
Posts: 660
Joined: Mon Oct 18, 2004 9:10 pm

Post by Scuba_Steve »

They are going to UP the requirments? damn good luck finding new pilots.

At least this will give good Ole' walstens a boost since doc is the least senior driver :)
---------- ADS -----------
 
Doc
Top Poster
Top Poster
Posts: 9241
Joined: Mon Feb 16, 2004 6:28 am

Post by Doc »

We don't do medevacs anymore! That makes me a very happy puppy!
---------- ADS -----------
 
User avatar
No Brakes
Rank 1
Rank 1
Posts: 40
Joined: Tue Feb 06, 2007 11:47 pm

Post by No Brakes »

I thought that the medevac captains at VAL on the ka200 where making 50g because of an MOH requirement and that otherwise they would be making 35g or so.

Am I wrong?
---------- ADS -----------
 
No Brakes
"Flying is simple. You just throw yourself at the ground and miss." Hitchhiker's Guide To The Galaxy
Rudy
Rank (9)
Rank (9)
Posts: 1171
Joined: Mon Feb 16, 2004 10:00 am
Location: N. Ont

Post by Rudy »

Amen Doc. I thank Jesus that I never worked for a medevac company. I don't know how you guys do it. There's several posts about how crappy the lifestyle is.
---------- ADS -----------
 
flyinhigh
Rank 11
Rank 11
Posts: 3120
Joined: Mon Apr 19, 2004 7:42 pm
Location: my couch

Post by flyinhigh »

No Brakes wrote:I thought that the medevac captains at VAL on the ka200 where making 50g because of an MOH requirement and that otherwise they would be making 35g or so.

Am I wrong?
Yeah your wrong the 100 drivers are making 36K or something around there I THINK. The 200 drivers wage has nothing to do with MOH
---------- ADS -----------
 
User avatar
magellan
Rank 3
Rank 3
Posts: 133
Joined: Tue Feb 17, 2004 12:47 am
Location: alberta

Post by magellan »

Depending where you work the medevac lifestyle isnt all that bad. My company does 12 hours shifts with 10 days on and 5 off. When I'm on call I can hang out in my backyard or anywhere within 15 min of the airport. The cell phone umbilical cord gets a bit old after a while but the pay is pretty good so it works out.
---------- ADS -----------
 
MUSKEG
Rank 8
Rank 8
Posts: 872
Joined: Fri Sep 03, 2004 11:49 am

Post by MUSKEG »

Hey Doc. When the owners are forced to sell theirs Boats, BMW's, Lexus, Caddilac Escalades, Lincoln Navigaters, Summer cottages, House Boats and numerous other things that the working public only dreams of, then and only then will I believe that companies are 1 bad flight away from demise.
---------- ADS -----------
 
sprucegoose
Rank 2
Rank 2
Posts: 75
Joined: Fri Oct 07, 2005 7:25 pm

Post by sprucegoose »

Flying High: I have heard that too; that it was upon MOH request that the dedicated crews got salary and not milleage pay. Anybody care to back up the rumour?
---------- ADS -----------
 
BE20
Rank 0
Rank 0
Posts: 11
Joined: Wed Mar 03, 2004 1:02 pm
Location: YYC

Post by BE20 »

When I did medevacs at VAL the captains started at 50G and it went up from there. There was a raise every year, and there was also overtime. They are short guys right now so there is lots of overtime to be had. The pay was not based on mileage.
VAL might not be the best place but it sure isn't the worst. If you are not in North Bay, then you are away from the chaos and politics and peering eyes of management.

The dedicated medevac crews have to be at the hangar ready to go, so there is a schedule with scheduled time off. You know when you work, none of this call out from home at 3 am.

Of course this was all 2 years ago, but I don't think much has changed except the pilots.
---------- ADS -----------
 
Post Reply

Return to “Employment Forum”