FO time towards ATPL, new rule?

This forum has been developed to discuss aviation related topics.

Moderators: sky's the limit, sepia, Sulako, lilfssister, North Shore, I WAS Birddog

Post Reply
Buzz Lightyear
Rank 5
Rank 5
Posts: 309
Joined: Fri Apr 02, 2004 10:05 am

FO time towards ATPL, new rule?

Post by Buzz Lightyear »

Hi everyone,

Does anyone know if TC will soon implement the new ICAO rule regarding FO hours being counted as 1 for 1 towards the ATPL for 2 crew certified aircraft?

Thanks!

M.
---------- ADS -----------
 
Born to fly, forced to work
desksgo
Rank 10
Rank 10
Posts: 2850
Joined: Thu Feb 19, 2004 12:05 pm
Location: Toy Poodle Town, Manitoba
Contact:

Post by desksgo »

Heard from a TC employee that is to come in the next 8 months. Anyone have a firm date?
---------- ADS -----------
 
Buzz Lightyear
Rank 5
Rank 5
Posts: 309
Joined: Fri Apr 02, 2004 10:05 am

Post by Buzz Lightyear »

And I guess it won't be retro-active?

I need my ATPL hours before December next year or I'll have to rewrite the exams and as it is now I don't fly enough as a FO to meet the deadline!

Thank god they accept the good old C150 PIC hours towards it though :)

p.s: can you confirm that dual time counts as 1 for 1 as well?
---------- ADS -----------
 
Born to fly, forced to work
niko
Rank 3
Rank 3
Posts: 154
Joined: Wed Feb 18, 2004 9:21 pm

Post by niko »

Absolutely.
---------- ADS -----------
 
TopperHarley
Rank (9)
Rank (9)
Posts: 1870
Joined: Fri Feb 20, 2004 2:56 pm

Post by TopperHarley »

When I went to go write my A's a few months back they told me there is no plan to implement this any time soon. They heard about it, but said it would most likely still be a while before it happens.
---------- ADS -----------
 
‎"Never travel faster than your guardian angel can fly." - Mother Theresa
User avatar
oldtimer
Rank 10
Rank 10
Posts: 2296
Joined: Mon Feb 16, 2004 7:04 pm
Location: Calgary

Post by oldtimer »

BL, and for the most part, all others.. This is just a heads up when dealing with TC and new regulations.
It has been my experience that when TC introduce or simplify certian requirements or regulations, they only give away a small bit at a time. There may be other requirements that render many changes either ineffective or very restrictive. Other times, there is a complete overhaul of the whole process. It is important to read the whole regulation carefully to competely understand where you stand.

Two crew aircraft are an example.

When you talk about a two crew certified aircraft, there is, OR MAY BE a difference between a CERTIFIED two crew airplane such as a Dash 8 or certified single pilot airplanes such as the Metro 11 that require two crew when carrying more than 9 paying passengers or airplanes such as a Navajo where the customer requires or wants two pilots. Then there are airplanes that are certified as a single pilot airplane in the USA but TC requires two pilots, aka Metro 111. Is a Metro 111 a certified two pilot airplane? The FAA says no, TC says yes, but there are lets where TC says the 111 can be operated as a single pilot airplane.
I am not the big expert, maybe TC Guy is, but some people may get caught up in the literal interpetation of the regs. I remember in 1996, when TC sent inspectors around the country to introduce the new regs and one thing that was stressed was to read the whole chapter. Headlines were not adequate.
But I do hope the new ruling will include airplanes operated as a two crew airplane. That may require a PPC as opposed to a PCC or "the warm body in the other seat".
Just read carefully and make sure you qualify. Meanwhile, lots of luck and give'r hell.
---------- ADS -----------
 
The average pilot, despite the somewhat swaggering exterior, is very much capable of such feelings as love, affection, intimacy and caring.
These feelings just don't involve anyone else.
groundtoflightdeck
Rank 6
Rank 6
Posts: 416
Joined: Sun Feb 15, 2004 9:56 pm

Post by groundtoflightdeck »

TC descided that that rule will not be implemented now. They see the need for it, but the new ICAO standards have been inturpreated and TC feels that using 2 crew FO time does not follow the standard. So keep taking the extra trips for now.
---------- ADS -----------
 
Buzz Lightyear
Rank 5
Rank 5
Posts: 309
Joined: Fri Apr 02, 2004 10:05 am

Post by Buzz Lightyear »

Thanks to you all for the answers.

I'm currently flying the Embraer 110 which is a 2 crew certified/required aircraft.....not that it helps if TC doesn't implement the new rule though!

I thought every country falling under ICAO regulations had to follow their initiatives, at least within a certain timeframe.

Safe flights!
---------- ADS -----------
 
Born to fly, forced to work
drifter
Rank 2
Rank 2
Posts: 55
Joined: Thu Apr 13, 2006 9:18 am

Post by drifter »

I was once told that if you get a type rating on a 2 crew aircraft once you write the exam, you have as long as you need to get the time. The exams just get "frozen" from my understanding.
---------- ADS -----------
 
User avatar
Cap'n P8
Rank 7
Rank 7
Posts: 715
Joined: Mon Feb 16, 2004 7:23 pm
Location: Dorval (rarely)

Post by Cap'n P8 »

You are right drifter, they are locked in, and you won't have to do them again if you do a type rating.
---------- ADS -----------
 
"Hell, I'll fly up your ass if the money's right!"
Orlando Jones - Say It Isn't So
Buzz Lightyear
Rank 5
Rank 5
Posts: 309
Joined: Fri Apr 02, 2004 10:05 am

Post by Buzz Lightyear »

Do you guys mean that I DO NOT need to complete my hours within 2 years of writting the ATPL since I have a PPC on the Embraer?!

I need to call TC!
---------- ADS -----------
 
Born to fly, forced to work
groundtoflightdeck
Rank 6
Rank 6
Posts: 416
Joined: Sun Feb 15, 2004 9:56 pm

Post by groundtoflightdeck »

Yeah a quick call to liscencing will clear everything up. Don't forget to shop around at different offices, they all have subtle differences that could make your life better or worse.

That ICAO rule wasn't exactly written in such a way that FOs on 2 crew machines needed to get 1-1 time, so TC isn't going to implement it.
---------- ADS -----------
 
Post Reply

Return to “General Comments”