Weight and Ballance question

This forum has been developed to discuss flight instruction/University and College programs.

Moderators: sky's the limit, sepia, Sulako, Right Seat Captain, lilfssister, North Shore

Post Reply
blueskies777
Rank 1
Rank 1
Posts: 28
Joined: Mon Jul 14, 2008 6:22 am

Weight and Ballance question

Post by blueskies777 »

I can do the weight and ballance of a 150 no problem.

The POH says that its ok to do it when the seat is so my inches forward and aft of the CG.

How about if you put your seat more forward or aft then the POH specifies?
---------- ADS -----------
 
Big Pistons Forever
Top Poster
Top Poster
Posts: 5959
Joined: Wed Feb 18, 2004 7:17 pm
Location: West Coast

Re: Weight and Ballance question

Post by Big Pistons Forever »

The range for the seat arm (33 to 41 in) is determined by the length of the seat track so it is impossible to have the seat outside this range.
---------- ADS -----------
 
blueskies777
Rank 1
Rank 1
Posts: 28
Joined: Mon Jul 14, 2008 6:22 am

Re: Weight and Ballance question

Post by blueskies777 »

Ok.

But what if my seat was full back and my passengers is full forward?

The POH says its based on average occupant.

Thanks,
---------- ADS -----------
 
MichaelP
Rank (9)
Rank (9)
Posts: 1815
Joined: Mon Jun 25, 2007 3:15 pm
Location: Out

Re: Weight and Ballance question

Post by MichaelP »

If you are being really picky you can determine the seat position for each occupant and use the exact inches.
Then you must consider fat legs against thin ones and the distribution of the body mass.

I think that providing your average calculations lie within the weight and balance limits and are not close to or on either boundary then there's room for the small deviations from exactitude your calculations will be.

In a Cessna 150, providing the people and baggage are within the weight limits you can't be too far out.
Two fat people means less baggage or no baggage and so there should not be a W+B problem
Two little people are worse because they can now carry a lot of baggage, and I think the baggage position will become more important to you.

In many aeroplanes you need to take ballast if the pilot is too light.
In the Cessna 206 with Wipline amphibs and the Seneca series putting ballast in the rear is essential! Don't assume that the aeroplane is within W+B with two people on board.
I was shocked to find the amphib 206 was well forward of the forward limit with two on board, only after I had landed it flat with power assist :oops: I put a 20 litre plastic bottle full of water in the very back after this incident!
---------- ADS -----------
 
mcrit
Rank (9)
Rank (9)
Posts: 1973
Joined: Sun Feb 15, 2004 9:01 pm

Re: Weight and Ballance question

Post by mcrit »

I wish the ballast in the Seneca could have come in the form of bigger ailerons :D
---------- ADS -----------
 
____________________________________
I'm just two girls short of a threesome.
Hedley
Top Poster
Top Poster
Posts: 10430
Joined: Thu May 27, 2004 6:40 am
Location: CYSH
Contact:

Re: Weight and Ballance question

Post by Hedley »

Never seen a Seneca with spades on the ailerons -
might be an idea, though! :wink:
---------- ADS -----------
 
MichaelP
Rank (9)
Rank (9)
Posts: 1815
Joined: Mon Jun 25, 2007 3:15 pm
Location: Out

Re: Weight and Ballance question

Post by MichaelP »

The Seneca is always wonky in the flare and hold off, it never seems to be happy.
I don't think spades will work very well on it... Probably better to change the wings entirely to a better section than the old Cherrytree one.
---------- ADS -----------
 
Post Reply

Return to “Flight Training”