Not to slag WJA but I find that comment ridiculous. Exactly what type of behaviour are you guaranteeing against? No "wildcat" strikes, no private deals between the workers and management or no behaviour that is unethical? Upon what information can you make such bold all-encompasing claims?
WJA is unorganized so technically can't strike. Even an organized withdrawl of work would most likely be preceeded by some form of Unionization anyway as a result of the dissatisfaction that generates the need to withdraw work in the first place - that's kinda why its done - power in numbers from pissed off employees etc.
Are you saying WJA would never enter into local deals with employees? I thought that occured all the time and was part of its success LR wise? Without a collective agreement they are completly free to do whatever they want.
Failing some form of agreement, are you saying WJA employees would never do something unethical? That no one would knowingly allow it? Guess we'll find that out in a couple months when the court case wraps up.
BTW I like WJA, I just find that comment a little too optomistic. Maybe there is something in the koolaid







