True and correct

This forum has been developed to discuss aviation related topics.

Moderators: sky's the limit, sepia, Sulako, lilfssister, North Shore, I WAS Birddog

Sqwak_Ident
Rank 1
Rank 1
Posts: 37
Joined: Thu Mar 08, 2007 7:55 am

True and correct

Post by Sqwak_Ident »

I am leaving my job this week. Do I absolutely need the CP to certify my log book?
---------- ADS -----------
 
sissyphus
Rank 5
Rank 5
Posts: 354
Joined: Sat Jan 13, 2007 4:10 pm

Re: True and correct

Post by sissyphus »

Nope.
---------- ADS -----------
 
The mouth is the anus of the mind.
sky's the limit
Rank Moderator
Rank Moderator
Posts: 4614
Joined: Sat Jan 22, 2005 11:38 am
Location: Now where's the starter button on this thing???

Re: True and correct

Post by sky's the limit »

Nope. X2
---------- ADS -----------
 
Rowdy
Top Poster
Top Poster
Posts: 5166
Joined: Thu Jun 09, 2005 12:26 pm
Location: On Borrowed Wings

Re: True and correct

Post by Rowdy »

Nope X 3
---------- ADS -----------
 
roger.roger
Rank 3
Rank 3
Posts: 176
Joined: Sun Dec 14, 2008 7:10 pm

Re: True and correct

Post by roger.roger »

the only people interested in my logbook certification were the panel at my first airline interview.
---------- ADS -----------
 
I think that if you stick to the dotted lines when making the folds your might have some aviation success.
Donald
Rank 10
Rank 10
Posts: 2460
Joined: Mon Feb 16, 2004 8:34 am
Location: Canada

Re: True and correct

Post by Donald »

You might not *need* it, but it sure comes in handy when it's demanded of you in an interview 3, 5, 10 years later.
---------- ADS -----------
 
flyinthebug
Rank (9)
Rank (9)
Posts: 1689
Joined: Wed Feb 18, 2004 8:36 am
Location: CYPA

Re: True and correct

Post by flyinthebug »

Although you do not "need" it,..If you dont have your ATPL yet, it just makes the process with TC that much smoother if your times are consistantly certified true & correct by your CP. If its organized and easy to read .. along with a certification by your Chief Pilot(s)..It saves the inspector some time and usually speeds up the process. Thats been my experience. If you already have your "A" then I cant forsee you ever "needing" a certified logbook.

Hope that helps.
Fly safe all.
---------- ADS -----------
 
sky's the limit
Rank Moderator
Rank Moderator
Posts: 4614
Joined: Sat Jan 22, 2005 11:38 am
Location: Now where's the starter button on this thing???

Re: True and correct

Post by sky's the limit »

Donald wrote:You might not *need* it, but it sure comes in handy when it's demanded of you in an interview 3, 5, 10 years later.

Therein lies a major issue in FW aviation.... "Demanded?"

5 minutes in a sim with a qualified and experienced Check Pilot and they will know one way or another. "Certified true and correct" is just as easy to forge as the times...

You can either do what you say you can do, or you can't. Personally, if unqualified or Parker Pilots get hired, good on them as any company employing staff in a position to hire should be able to catch it. And if they can't, well, I guess the person actually is qualified.

stl
PS Flyingthebug is correct, in that it makes that process easier at TC, but after a number of licenses in FW and RW, in Canada and out. I've never had an issue yet - or a certification outside a flight school.
---------- ADS -----------
 
User avatar
Cat Driver
Top Poster
Top Poster
Posts: 18921
Joined: Sun Feb 15, 2004 8:31 pm

Re: True and correct

Post by Cat Driver »

Is there an industry standard for certifying a pilots personal log book?

Or is the certification just written in the book by whoever does it in any wording that they choose?

How do the people who are examining a pilots personal log book decide if the certification is genuine?
---------- ADS -----------
 
The hardest thing about flying is knowing when to say no


After over a half a century of flying no one ever died because of my decision not to fly.
User avatar
Strega
Rank (9)
Rank (9)
Posts: 1767
Joined: Sun Oct 02, 2005 8:44 am
Location: NWO

Re: True and correct

Post by Strega »

you need to have your former CFI certify it. Otherwise you will be screwed forever. :wink:
---------- ADS -----------
 
Rule books are paper - they will not cushion a sudden meeting of stone and metal.
— Ernest K. Gann, 'Fate is the Hunter.
Rockie
Top Poster
Top Poster
Posts: 8433
Joined: Sat Oct 08, 2005 7:10 am

Re: True and correct

Post by Rockie »

You absolutely do not need it. And when you're sitting in front of your next interview board and the guy asks for it, tell him so. Or you could cover your bases and just get the stupid thing signed. I'm pretty sure it doesn't cost anything.

I don't know why people continue to ask this question. You absolutely don't need insurance either...until you need it.
---------- ADS -----------
 
User avatar
Cat Driver
Top Poster
Top Poster
Posts: 18921
Joined: Sun Feb 15, 2004 8:31 pm

Re: True and correct

Post by Cat Driver »

Do interview boards check with the person who certifies a pilot log book to find out if it is genuine?
---------- ADS -----------
 
The hardest thing about flying is knowing when to say no


After over a half a century of flying no one ever died because of my decision not to fly.
Donald
Rank 10
Rank 10
Posts: 2460
Joined: Mon Feb 16, 2004 8:34 am
Location: Canada

Re: True and correct

Post by Donald »

Rockie wrote:You absolutely do not need it. And when you're sitting in front of your next interview board and the guy asks for it, tell him so. Or you could cover your bases and just get the stupid thing signed. I'm pretty sure it doesn't cost anything.

I don't know why people continue to ask this question. You absolutely don't need insurance either...until you need it.
So let's say that there is a specific airline that you would like to work for. You have applied, and re-applied. One day you finally get called, as do many others, for an interview. The airline has specified that you must produce your logbook, with your times certified by previous CP's. You will now tell them that "you do not need it"?

I never said it was a legal requirement, nor proof of a superior pilot, simply that it might come in handy.
---------- ADS -----------
 
Check Pilot
Rank 6
Rank 6
Posts: 426
Joined: Mon Feb 16, 2004 4:26 am

Re: True and correct

Post by Check Pilot »

You can choose to do what you want. If you want the time certified by the Chief Pilot, get it done. If you want it done to get it done for a Transport Canada Licence application, it's imperative, because time that's uncertified is worth absolutely nothing to TC when you might want to attest to an amount of time you might have when applying for a higher Licence. As a former Personnel Licensing Inspector, if the time was not certified by the employer- i.e. the Chief Pilot or Operations Manager, the time meant absolutely zero. This is only from a perspective of meeting a legal requirement for a Licence upgrade. Employers obviously have standards of their own that you might have to meet.
---------- ADS -----------
 
Check Pilot
Rank 6
Rank 6
Posts: 426
Joined: Mon Feb 16, 2004 4:26 am

Re: True and correct

Post by Check Pilot »

Sorry,

By the way, we still check with people that certify logs, whether they are really correct or not.
---------- ADS -----------
 
Tim
Rank (9)
Rank (9)
Posts: 1026
Joined: Mon May 15, 2006 6:16 pm

Re: True and correct

Post by Tim »

so if i dont have my log book cert'ed or get some type of letter from my CP and i send it in for my A's theyll send it back with a PFO note? not to sound like a broken record but is there a reference for this? I'm not trying to accuse anyone of lying intentionally or anything like that, id just really like to read the reg for myself.
---------- ADS -----------
 
Rockie
Top Poster
Top Poster
Posts: 8433
Joined: Sat Oct 08, 2005 7:10 am

Re: True and correct

Post by Rockie »

Donald wrote:
Rockie wrote:You absolutely do not need it. And when you're sitting in front of your next interview board and the guy asks for it, tell him so. Or you could cover your bases and just get the stupid thing signed. I'm pretty sure it doesn't cost anything.

I don't know why people continue to ask this question. You absolutely don't need insurance either...until you need it.
So let's say that there is a specific airline that you would like to work for. You have applied, and re-applied. One day you finally get called, as do many others, for an interview. The airline has specified that you must produce your logbook, with your times certified by previous CP's. You will now tell them that "you do not need it"?

I never said it was a legal requirement, nor proof of a superior pilot, simply that it might come in handy.
I was being facetious. There's nothing in the CAR's requiring a pilot to wear a suit to an interview either, but a pilot probably should. If you want to get a higher licence or some rating, Transport Canada requires that it get certified. If you want to get a flying job with someone they might want to see your times certified, and yes...as CP says they might actually check. If you fake a signature and it is found out you can kiss your job and reputation goodbye.

Moral of the story?

Who cares if it's required or not. It costs nothing but a small inconvenience, and maybe not even that much. Just get the stupid thing signed. And if it isn't possible to get it signed then pay a Notary Public to say the times are correct.
---------- ADS -----------
 
User avatar
Cat Driver
Top Poster
Top Poster
Posts: 18921
Joined: Sun Feb 15, 2004 8:31 pm

Re: True and correct

Post by Cat Driver »

And if it isn't possible to get it signed then pay a Notary Public to say the times are correct.
Rockie has pointed out the fall back position if you are unable to produce a record of your flying certified by xxx.

When you use a Notary Public to swear an affidavit you are producing a document that is a legal document that states you are telling the truth.

However all the documents on earth will not help you actually fly anything.
---------- ADS -----------
 
The hardest thing about flying is knowing when to say no


After over a half a century of flying no one ever died because of my decision not to fly.
User avatar
Strega
Rank (9)
Rank (9)
Posts: 1767
Joined: Sun Oct 02, 2005 8:44 am
Location: NWO

Re: True and correct

Post by Strega »

If you want to get a higher licence or some rating, Transport Canada requires that it get certified.

Can you quote the CAR ref for this?
---------- ADS -----------
 
Rule books are paper - they will not cushion a sudden meeting of stone and metal.
— Ernest K. Gann, 'Fate is the Hunter.
User avatar
Strega
Rank (9)
Rank (9)
Posts: 1767
Joined: Sun Oct 02, 2005 8:44 am
Location: NWO

Re: True and correct

Post by Strega »

Cat,

The problem with what you describe, (ie you can tell a persons experience from the way they fly) is that MOST CP's today, are such terrible pilots themselves, they wouldnt be able to spot the good from the badll!
---------- ADS -----------
 
Rule books are paper - they will not cushion a sudden meeting of stone and metal.
— Ernest K. Gann, 'Fate is the Hunter.
Rockie
Top Poster
Top Poster
Posts: 8433
Joined: Sat Oct 08, 2005 7:10 am

Re: True and correct

Post by Rockie »

Strega wrote:Cat,

The problem with what you describe, (ie you can tell a persons experience from the way they fly) is that MOST CP's today, are such terrible pilots themselves, they wouldnt be able to spot the good from the badll!
Oh? Can you quote a reference for that?
---------- ADS -----------
 
Hedley
Top Poster
Top Poster
Posts: 10430
Joined: Thu May 27, 2004 6:40 am
Location: CYSH
Contact:

Re: True and correct

Post by Hedley »

Can you quote the CAR ref for this?
You've got style, I'll give you that, Strega, but you are
obviously quite naive. Why do you think that Transport
has to observe the law?
---------- ADS -----------
 
User avatar
Cat Driver
Top Poster
Top Poster
Posts: 18921
Joined: Sun Feb 15, 2004 8:31 pm

Re: True and correct

Post by Cat Driver »

Cat,

The problem with what you describe, (ie you can tell a persons experience from the way they fly) is that MOST CP's today, are such terrible pilots themselves, they wouldnt be able to spot the good from the badll!
Could that also be part of the reason that when people ask " WHY " after someone smashes up a perfectly good airplane they are jumped on for being to inquisitive?

Is it because the industry has been so dumbed down critical thinking has been discouraged to protect the status quo?
---------- ADS -----------
 
The hardest thing about flying is knowing when to say no


After over a half a century of flying no one ever died because of my decision not to fly.
User avatar
Strega
Rank (9)
Rank (9)
Posts: 1767
Joined: Sun Oct 02, 2005 8:44 am
Location: NWO

Re: True and correct

Post by Strega »

Hedley,

I have an ATPL and US ATP, and not once have I had show a "certified by some dumbass" (well other than myself :wink: ) logbook to anyone.
---------- ADS -----------
 
Rule books are paper - they will not cushion a sudden meeting of stone and metal.
— Ernest K. Gann, 'Fate is the Hunter.
Johnny
Rank 4
Rank 4
Posts: 255
Joined: Tue Jan 04, 2005 7:37 pm
Location: Toronto

Re: True and correct

Post by Johnny »

Cat Driver wrote:When you use a Notary Public to swear an affidavit you are producing a document that is a legal document that states you are telling the truth.
One small correction. Notarization does not state anything towards the veracity of a document or its contents. A notary, when he/she notarizes a statement, is simply affirming that he/she witnessed YOU sign the paper (or that the document is a true likeness of its original). As for a claim of veracity, there is none from a notary.

A notarized document would have little to no effect against a hiring panel or regulator who was intent on either discrediting or rejecting your submitted information.
---------- ADS -----------
 
Post Reply

Return to “General Comments”