Jetsgo in the News yet again.

Jaques Strappe · Post by **Jaques Strappe** » Wed Mar 09, 2005 1:33 pm

Rebel

You hit the nail right on the head here. Obviously, you are the only one who sees the REAL story here.

The fact that the GTAA did not immediately close the runway pending an inspection is very disturbing to say the least.

The GTAA pulls stupid stunts daily and never gets called on it. I am sick of seeing those slime balls pushing it all on to the airlines. Remember the de-icing fluid fiasco? Taxiways and aprons never ploughed causing major delays. Sorry, but Jetsgo is not at fault here.

The GTAA is a disgrace.

DA900 · Post by **DA900** » Wed Mar 09, 2005 1:37 pm

Hey disco don't forget "noone"

....... · Post by **.......** » Wed Mar 09, 2005 1:47 pm

Disco and DA900...

instead of nitpicking on typos that are made by someone who's, maybe, going out of his way to respond to you in a language other than his "mother tongue", why don't you try and bring something constructive to the debate?

Guess I'm getting sick of that attitude...

C-150Pilot · Post by **C-150Pilot** » Wed Mar 09, 2005 1:57 pm

Whats funny is....You get what you pay for. And when you pay little you put your life in danger. So fly AC!

disco · Post by **disco** » Wed Mar 09, 2005 2:21 pm

Ok Skylounger,

Point taken. You must admit however that you are asking me to "add something to the debate" with reference to a half-wit who says "XX company sucks royally" and the planes are crap etc.

What is one really to say to such an intellectual?

Something like, "no way man, it's not true, they don't and we don't and they aren't...

Please pardon me if I would prefer to communicate with someone who is a little further along the evolutionary chain.

DA900 · Post by **DA900** » Wed Mar 09, 2005 3:22 pm

SkyLounger wrote:Disco and DA900...

instead of nitpicking on typos that are made by someone who's, maybe, going out of his way to respond to you in a language other than his "mother tongue", why don't you try and bring something constructive to the debate?

Guess I'm getting sick of that attitude...

I can't help it that was too funny

and disco is right. If capt. had made a proper retort I think it would not have been as funny, but to spew out "jetsgo sucks royally" followed by some words that not even Keith Richards could comprehend, well it serves them right!

....... · Post by **.......** » Wed Mar 09, 2005 3:48 pm

disco wrote:Ok Skylounger,

Point taken. You must admit however that you are asking me to "add something to the debate" with reference to a half-wit who says "XX company sucks royally" and the planes are crap etc.

What is one really to say to such an intellectual?

Something like, "no way man, it's not true, they don't and we don't and they aren't...

Please pardon me if I would prefer to communicate with someone who is a little further along the evolutionary chain.

I wasn't trying to defend the quality or the intellectuality of the poster, merely the fact that bandwith and time would be better spent in a constructive manner instead of pointing out mistakes made by people who aren't talking and writing their native language... that's all!

split s · Post by **split s** » Thu Mar 10, 2005 8:50 am

skylounger wrote:

"I wasn't trying to defend the quality or the intellectuality of the poster, merely the fact that bandwith and time would be better spent in a constructive manner instead of pointing out mistakes made by people who aren't talking and writing their native language... that's all!"

I can't see that changing much from what is posted here on a daily basis.
Anyone can say that a company sucks, but it really only matters to people who work there and pax who fly with them. I can say that McDonalds sucks, but apparently there are 66 billion served that diagree, so my opinion would'nt really mean s#!t.