Cold temperature correction

This forum has been developed to discuss aviation related topics.

Moderators: sky's the limit, sepia, Sulako, lilfssister, North Shore, I WAS Birddog

Post Reply
turbine works fine
Rank 2
Rank 2
Posts: 54
Joined: Mon Feb 23, 2004 6:28 am

Cold temperature correction

Post by turbine works fine »

HI all!!

I just have a question concerning cold temperature correction. Is there a faster way to calculate the correction altitude or is the manner shown in the CAP the only way :?:

Thanks for any help!!
---------- ADS -----------
 
User avatar
Right Seat Captain
Rank Moderator
Rank Moderator
Posts: 1237
Joined: Sun Feb 15, 2004 7:51 pm
Location: Various/based CYOW

Post by Right Seat Captain »

You can do it with a standard flight computer...but I'd rather go with the CAP myself.
---------- ADS -----------
 
User avatar
cyyz
Rank 11
Rank 11
Posts: 4150
Joined: Mon Mar 15, 2004 11:05 am
Location: Toronto

Post by cyyz »

Are Cold Temp Corrections "mandatory"?

I had a TC employee do my ride and he said it's upto the pilot if he wants to add them or not.

Another said it's a "must".

But the Cap Gen doesn't say. "Must"?? Thoughts?

Thanks in advance.
---------- ADS -----------
 
SourApple
Rank 1
Rank 1
Posts: 37
Joined: Wed Feb 18, 2004 4:22 pm

Post by SourApple »

According to the AIP's "plain English" it's a definate maybe....

RAC 9-14 (Fig9.1): In conditions of extreme cold weather, pilots should add the values derived from the Altitude Correction Chart ..... (same as in the CAP)

RAC 9-15 (9.17.1): The calculated MSAs must be adjusted when ambient temperature on the surface is much lower .....

Depends on if you want to hit stuff or not...
---------- ADS -----------
 
User avatar
cyyz
Rank 11
Rank 11
Posts: 4150
Joined: Mon Mar 15, 2004 11:05 am
Location: Toronto

Post by cyyz »

"pilots should add "

Exactly. Perfect.. Thanks for the Rac link too..

"Depends on if you want to hit stuff or not..."

Oh, I agree. PIC takes full responsibilty, add correction or don't PIC takes blame.

Like our last NewsLetter(might have been a magazine article) where the pilots stopped talking, so the box wouldn't record them go below mda, they ended up dead.

Just having a "discussion" about it with the staff....

Thanks again for the RAC #..
---------- ADS -----------
 
SourApple
Rank 1
Rank 1
Posts: 37
Joined: Wed Feb 18, 2004 4:22 pm

Post by SourApple »

You're welcome.
---------- ADS -----------
 
bcflyer
Rank (9)
Rank (9)
Posts: 1359
Joined: Mon Feb 16, 2004 8:35 am
Location: Canada

Post by bcflyer »

When I flew in NW Ont we very rarely applied any cold weather correction. When I started flying out west in the rocks we applied them ALL the time. A difference of 400-500 feet can really but a damper on your day flying in the mountains!!
---------- ADS -----------
 
User avatar
Panama Jack
Rank 11
Rank 11
Posts: 3265
Joined: Fri Feb 20, 2004 8:10 am
Location: Back here

Post by Panama Jack »

Here is one idea on how to do this.

If there is a destination that you fly into often, or all your airports are at the same elevation-- in some spare time you can make up a little table with different temperatures to use often regularly. Air Canada plates have this for a few airports (Wabush, Labrador comes to mind).

For me, the most important altitude (where I want to be most precise) is the MDA or DH. The lower you get, the less the difference is. I don't care that instead of 900 feet on the second step down, it is 960 feet. Heck, I'll happily go at 1000 or even 1100.

I've met some pilots who are hesitant to do the temperature corrections because they "don't want to fly higher" and want to be able to "get in." Obviously, a fundamental misunderstanding of the concepts here. :roll:
---------- ADS -----------
 
“If it moves, tax it. If it keeps moving, regulate it. If it stops moving, subsidize it.”
-President Ronald Reagan
Post Reply

Return to “General Comments”