Flight instructing vs Working the ramp. Doesn't add up?

This forum has been developed to discuss aviation related topics.

Moderators: North Shore, sky's the limit, sepia, Sulako, lilfssister, I WAS Birddog

User avatar
Colonel Sanders
Top Poster
Top Poster
Posts: 7512
Joined: Sun Jun 14, 2009 5:17 pm
Location: Over Macho Grande

Re: Flight instructing vs Working the ramp. Doesn't add up?

Post by Colonel Sanders »

no PIC time, which means you don't get an ATPL
For some reason, people who live the Cinderella story - ie right
seat in a twin turbine at 250TT - don't seem to get much sympathy :wink:

Last summer, a pilot who had over 4000TT couldn't get her ATPL
without those magic hours. Flew her *ss off on the 172, got it
done, got her ATPL. It's not the end of the world.
---------- ADS -----------
 
Flightman7
Rank 1
Rank 1
Posts: 49
Joined: Wed Jun 01, 2011 2:15 pm

Re: Flight instructing vs Working the ramp. Doesn't add up?

Post by Flightman7 »

From what I understand Sunwest goes somewhere along the lines of Ramp-Ramp and part time F/O on Navajo-Full time on Navajo right seat-Right seat Metro-Captain Navajo-and so on. It is a system that allows you to become a captain with an ATPL in the future. If that wasn't the case, why would they invest money training on type if the pilot could never be captain on the aircraft? As far as being hired by jazz out of college goes, its 10 years right seat for promotion to captain. In that time you will be well over requirements. Once again, dont you think jazz considers these things? Wouldn't you be happy being a captain at jazz making >70k a year when you in your early thirties? Thats a sweet gig.
---------- ADS -----------
 
User avatar
Chaxterium
Rank 7
Rank 7
Posts: 674
Joined: Sun Dec 17, 2006 12:28 pm

Re: Flight instructing vs Working the ramp. Doesn't add up?

Post by Chaxterium »

Flightman7 wrote:As far as being hired by jazz out of college goes, its 10 years right seat for promotion to captain. In that time you will be well over requirements. Once again, dont you think jazz considers these things? Wouldn't you be happy being a captain at jazz making >70k a year when you in your early thirties? Thats a sweet gig.

Not so much Flightman. One of the requirements to get your ATPL, among many others, is 250 hours PIC. If you're hired directly out of flight school to an airline you will not have 250 hours PIC and you will have no way of getting it. Coming out of flight school you'd have typically around 100 hours PIC so that means you could be an FO for 100 years and still never get your ATPL. I know a few people who have run into this. In this scenario there are only a few options; quit your job and find a job as pic on something much smaller, or rent a plane and pay for the time. This is why a number of people on this thread have stressed the fact that getting PIC time as soon as possible is paramount.
---------- ADS -----------
 
User avatar
C-GGGQ
Rank 10
Rank 10
Posts: 2130
Joined: Mon May 21, 2007 12:33 pm

Re: Flight instructing vs Working the ramp. Doesn't add up?

Post by C-GGGQ »

Man I should have instructed for 10 more hours (Well really I should have instructed for 1000 more hours, but lets assume I still would have quit to join the military) I have 240 PIC. Guess its time for some rentals.
---------- ADS -----------
 
User avatar
Colonel Sanders
Top Poster
Top Poster
Posts: 7512
Joined: Sun Jun 14, 2009 5:17 pm
Location: Over Macho Grande

Re: Flight instructing vs Working the ramp. Doesn't add up?

Post by Colonel Sanders »

I must be missing something. Is it really that hard to fly a piston single?

I've been doing it for 40 years now, and I just don't see what the big
deal is. Why quit your job?
---------- ADS -----------
 
Diadem
Rank 8
Rank 8
Posts: 911
Joined: Fri Mar 05, 2010 10:16 pm
Location: A sigma left of the top of the bell curve

Re: Flight instructing vs Working the ramp. Doesn't add up?

Post by Diadem »

Flightman7 wrote:From what I understand Sunwest goes somewhere along the lines of Ramp-Ramp and part time F/O on Navajo-Full time on Navajo right seat-Right seat Metro-Captain Navajo-and so on.
Indeed, but to re-quote you, "I think picking up a ramp job at say Sunwest or Perimeter would be pretty smart. I mean 1-2 years ramp and then your logging PIC on the navajo?" I was merely pointing out that you won't be going left seat on a Navajo with 200 hours at Sunwest, and probably not anywhere else for that matter. Sunwest has instituted an effective training policy to allow their pilots to obtain an ATPL and multi-PIC requirements for Contrails, but that isn't the case at every company, and I simply wanted to make you aware of that before you spend a year or two ramping somewhere that only operates two-crew aircraft.
Flightman7 wrote:As far as being hired by jazz out of college goes, its 10 years right seat for promotion to captain. In that time you will be well over requirements. Once again, dont you think jazz considers these things?
There's absolutely nothing to say that you'll be "well over requirements" after ten years of flying. You can have 10000 hours and only 100 PIC, just like float pilots can have 10000 hours and no night time at all. As Colonel Sanders pointed out, the Jazz pilots hired out of college are responsible for obtaining the requisite hours for their licences on their own; Jazz doesn't hold their hands. Some companies have instituted pilot-in-command-under-supervision programs, but that only provides 100 hours at the most, and the candidate must already have 150 hours PIC before beginning. That means you need to get at least 50 hours of PIC, perhaps as much as 150 if the company isn't permitted to operate the PIC-U/S program. At $150 per hour, that's an expensive venture that not every F/O can afford, especially with a family to feed and a mortgage to pay; getting hired onto the ramp at a company like CMA right out of flight school might seem like a dream, but when you get to 2800 hours and realize you don't have nearly enough PIC for an ATPL, and that you only make $28000 a year, it can quickly become a nightmare. Alternatively, imagine getting on with a company in Calgary that only operates under Contrails, and you have no multi-PIC; your options are to pay for 500 hours of rentals in a twin, or find another job that will let you get that experience. The company is under no obligation whatsoever to ensure you are upgradeable. That's your responsibility, and they expect you to take care of it.
I'm just playing devil's advocate. I've worked the ramp, dock and dispatch, and I've instructed, and they all have their benefits and detriments. All I'm trying to say is that you should know what you're getting into before you make a choice that will affect the rest of your career. Plan out your future five or ten years in advance, and always have a number of options for how you can advance to the next step; never bank on getting on with one specific company or aircraft if that's the only way for you to move forward. If you're going to work for a company at which an ATPL is required for an upgrade, make sure you have a plan for how to get your licence, and don't expect to be coddled by your employer.
---------- ADS -----------
 
Flightman7
Rank 1
Rank 1
Posts: 49
Joined: Wed Jun 01, 2011 2:15 pm

Re: Flight instructing vs Working the ramp. Doesn't add up?

Post by Flightman7 »

Wow, huge eye opener. This is why I love AVcanada, one question and I've already added a wealth of information to my original understanding of the industry. I really don't understand why jazz would invest in employees that may be forced to quit in the future cause they cant get their ATPL. Shocker.

This is actually good news for me, because I wanted to get my Degree after I do flight training, like a 3 year Bsc at Guelph (Yes it exists) and maybe log some time during the summers, but I was stuck deciding whether to go to college to get my license because of the possibilities at jazz, But this would put me out an extra 3-4 years which would put me way behind. Now the college route doesn't seem so appealing and it will be just as well to get it done at a private school.

So what i've gathered is ramp jobs are, For the most part, a complete waste of time unless they have single crew aircraft, or some other way of getting you PIC. Other then that, Instructing is the way to go.
---------- ADS -----------
 
User avatar
Colonel Sanders
Top Poster
Top Poster
Posts: 7512
Joined: Sun Jun 14, 2009 5:17 pm
Location: Over Macho Grande

Re: Flight instructing vs Working the ramp. Doesn't add up?

Post by Colonel Sanders »

you need to get at least 50 hours of PIC, perhaps as much as 150 if the company isn't permitted to operate the PIC-U/S program. At $150 per hour, that's an expensive venture
Going to a flight school for (eg) 100 hrs of PIC is like buying your groceries at the corner convenience store. Yes, it's easy, but Holy Christ that's expensive. If you only need say 10 hrs of night PIC x/c I can see doing that, but there are cheaper options.

Wander around any smaller airport and you're going to see a whole whack of under-utilitized aircraft.

You can tell because the grass is growing up around them, the tires are low, etc. Write down their registrations. There are going to be even more in hangars, too. Contact the owners - use the TC aircraft registry - and let them know that you'd like to buy a block of 100 hrs from them. That's a nice chunk of change for the owner, to help with his expenses. Nine out of 10 might say "no". That's ok, the 10th one said "yes".

You put the gas in it yourself - I might suggest mogas to save some more money, just make sure it has no alcohol in it. Heck, the owner could even ride along if he wanted to - you're logging PIC.

Perhaps this is too entrepreneurial for this crowd, but I rather enjoy doing stuff like that.

The assumption here seems to be that all light singles in Canada are owned and operated by flight school. While that might be a common dream of both Transport and ATAC, fortunately that's NOT the case.
---------- ADS -----------
 
Big Pistons Forever
Top Poster
Top Poster
Posts: 5927
Joined: Wed Feb 18, 2004 7:17 pm
Location: West Coast

Re: Flight instructing vs Working the ramp. Doesn't add up?

Post by Big Pistons Forever »

Flightman7 wrote:
So what i've gathered is ramp jobs are, For the most part, a complete waste of time unless they have single crew aircraft, or some other way of getting you PIC. Other then that, Instructing is the way to go.
Any job in aviation is better than no job when looking at starting your career. If the company with no upgrade is hiring and it is a good company, my advice is take the job for 3 reasons.

1) There is a lot more to being successful as a pilot then driving the airplane, particularly at the low end of the industry. The airplane ultimately is a tool, you are the tool operator and the aim of every flight is to safely get the job done while incurring the minimum expenses for the company and creating the maximum profit while keeping your customers happy. Learning in a practical way, the business end of the job is valuable, and will make you a better line pilot.

2) If you keep your mouth shut and your ears open there will be a lot of good practical info informally shared just talking to the pilots, and most importantly

3) Most hiring is by word of mouth. If you are a low maintenance, hard worker that gets the job done and gets along with your fellow workers it, will be noticed. By working in the in the industry even in a non flying job you, you will hear about job openings and pilot movement before anybody else and therefore give you an advantage when that entry level upgrade -able job open as well as a aviation reference that your non aviation competition won't have.

Bottom line it is better to be in the industry looking out than the other way around.

BTW the same thing applies to flying instructors. I strongly encouraged prospective flight instructors to work as a dispatcher while finishing their CPL and doing their flight instructor rating. My last 3 flight instructor students did this and there is no question in my mind that they were better Class 4's then those that had not worked in an FTU before their first instructing job.
---------- ADS -----------
 
Flightman7
Rank 1
Rank 1
Posts: 49
Joined: Wed Jun 01, 2011 2:15 pm

Re: Flight instructing vs Working the ramp. Doesn't add up?

Post by Flightman7 »

Yes but every pilot knows that in order to be successful you have to work hard, be positive and keep your mouth shut(except for the select few with the thick skull). So you wont really stand out from the crowd with a great attitude working on the ramp (This is based on my interpretation of the industry from the outside however). I must say though Colonel that idea you got to build PIC is very innovative and pretty damn clever. Funding it at a flight school is a joke unless you marry a rich spouse :lol:

I still think im going to find a company with single crew aircraft like sunwest and work the ramp, that way ill have a good solid job for a while with less jumping from job to job all the time. One pilot said 3 1/2 years is around the time it take for the left seat navajo (Sunwest is the example AGAIN :wink: ). Say you start working there when you 22-23. by age 26 thats a failry decent gig, and it will only get better. Another thought is I've talked to a few people in the industry and they said its fairly tough to get a good intructer job. The busy schools are obviously highly competitive and hours are low everywhere else. Its certainly not a pick and choose situation out there, you have to take the best you can get.
---------- ADS -----------
 
Last edited by Flightman7 on Sun Feb 19, 2012 12:47 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Big Pistons Forever
Top Poster
Top Poster
Posts: 5927
Joined: Wed Feb 18, 2004 7:17 pm
Location: West Coast

Re: Flight instructing vs Working the ramp. Doesn't add up?

Post by Big Pistons Forever »

Flightman

Since you seem to have it all figured out I guess you don't need the advice from guys who have actually worked their way up the industry. Good luck on your career, you will need it.
---------- ADS -----------
 
Flightman7
Rank 1
Rank 1
Posts: 49
Joined: Wed Jun 01, 2011 2:15 pm

Re: Flight instructing vs Working the ramp. Doesn't add up?

Post by Flightman7 »

I didn't mean to sound like I have it all figured out, I certainly dont. I need not say you couldn't even count the experience you have over me. Im just putting my thoughts out there to see what experienced people think, hoping for them to correct me and modify my understanding for the better.

Where have I gone wrong on my last post?
---------- ADS -----------
 
Flightman7
Rank 1
Rank 1
Posts: 49
Joined: Wed Jun 01, 2011 2:15 pm

Re: Flight instructing vs Working the ramp. Doesn't add up?

Post by Flightman7 »

Hmm, Rereading your post I see how I've undermined everything you said, my apologies.
---------- ADS -----------
 
User avatar
KAG
Rank 11
Rank 11
Posts: 3619
Joined: Wed Feb 18, 2004 11:24 pm

Re: Flight instructing vs Working the ramp. Doesn't add up?

Post by KAG »

Working the ramp for the right company is a great way to get to fly the line.
Take North Wright Air in Norman wells, they hire a ton of rampies and promote no time guys to the fleet of single pistons, over time you move up to multi turbine.
As many have pointed out getting PIC time is key, and without it you can get stuck.

Case in point I went the instructor route and it got me onto a king air. By the time I had 2500 I already had ATPL (had that by 1550 hours) 700 PIC on the king air where some of my FO's had 2500 hours and no PIC and no ATPL.

There is really no right or wrong way to build time and there isn't one type of flying that will completely build a solid resume. A good variety of flying and locations will open different doors.
You may get lucky and find a company that does it all, or you may need to make a few moves.
Either way do not base your education choices on an extremely small chance of getting on with a specific company.
---------- ADS -----------
 
loopa
Rank (9)
Rank (9)
Posts: 1500
Joined: Fri Apr 24, 2009 11:57 am

Re: Flight instructing vs Working the ramp. Doesn't add up?

Post by loopa »

Flightman7 wrote:Yeah but sometimes putting in hard work to get you in a good position, makes sense, even if its unrelated hard work. So what if you have 2000 hours PIC on a 150 and maybe 50-100 hours multi? The reason that time is valuable is because it can get you a good Multi Gig. The same type of Gig the guy that worked the ramp has been in for a year. So your analogy isn't always applicable to aviation. Although it is an extremely valid point. I'm just offering an alternative point of view, not arguing. also consider that I know nothing about aviation, I've only flown a plane twice. Thanks for the post.
Flightman, this comment is not in effort to make you feel like crap. But your lack of experience really shines through this reply to Supercharged.

The idea of 2000 hours in a C150 is all PIC time. Let me tell you of a scenario.

I know of a very bright girl, she's currently a 737 F/O at Sunwing. Really smart!

She did the CMA route, got on their B1900, had about 3500 hours on a transport category aircraft. Her name came up for a Captain upgrade on the B1900 the same day she got the call for a 737 ground school with Sunwing. Long story short, she took the 737 job, and because she has a great lack of "PIC" time, she will never see the left seat at Sunwing or any other operator for that matter even though she's a seasoned 6000 hour pilot now. This is what you call F/O for life.

Be very careful on how you enter the industry and how you move on about the industry. The PIC time on a C150 for this individual would be the difference between a Captain seat and Not.

Like I said, not trying to slug away at your inexperience - I'm by no means a ridiculously experienced individual in the field, but I thought I would give you some insight on your opinion about time in a C150.

As well, you will learn to become a way better pilot even if it is demoing the good old boring side slip in a 15kt xwind for 1500 hours than you ever will losing currency and tossing bags. Your appreciation for the rampies will however increase as a ramp guy. Which one is more applicable to your career? You make the call.

I wish you all the best ! 8)
---------- ADS -----------
 
Flightman7
Rank 1
Rank 1
Posts: 49
Joined: Wed Jun 01, 2011 2:15 pm

Re: Flight instructing vs Working the ramp. Doesn't add up?

Post by Flightman7 »

Thanks a lot Kag and Loopa, Ill be the first to admit Im and idiot when it comes to aviation. I wasnt aware of atpl and contrail requirments. Knowing what I know now I feel pretty stupid :oops:

Anyways, its been worth the embarrassment as this has potentially helped me avoid putting myself in a bad spot. So thanks again.

Flightman7
---------- ADS -----------
 
Tom H
Rank 7
Rank 7
Posts: 671
Joined: Thu Apr 10, 2008 4:29 pm

Re: Flight instructing vs Working the ramp. Doesn't add up?

Post by Tom H »

Sorry hit the wrong button!
---------- ADS -----------
 
loopa
Rank (9)
Rank (9)
Posts: 1500
Joined: Fri Apr 24, 2009 11:57 am

Re: Flight instructing vs Working the ramp. Doesn't add up?

Post by loopa »

KAG wrote:Working the ramp for the right company is a great way to get to fly the line.
Take North Wright Air in Norman wells, they hire a ton of rampies and promote no time guys to the fleet of single pistons, over time you move up to multi turbine.
As many have pointed out getting PIC time is key, and without it you can get stuck.

Case in point I went the instructor route and it got me onto a king air. By the time I had 2500 I already had ATPL (had that by 1550 hours) 700 PIC on the king air where some of my FO's had 2500 hours and no PIC and no ATPL.

There is really no right or wrong way to build time and there isn't one type of flying that will completely build a solid resume. A good variety of flying and locations will open different doors.
You may get lucky and find a company that does it all, or you may need to make a few moves.
Either way do not base your education choices on an extremely small chance of getting on with a specific company.
+1

It seems to me that the opportunities for instructor's (even though the first couple of years is spent in the circuit and what is biased to be flying in blue sky conditions) roll about with a bit more confidence than for rampies. As an instructor you are paying your dues for a right seat, most likely on a turbine twin. After a year or two you are now going to be captain on that turbine twin because of primarily two things: you have PIC time from instructing, and you have 703/704 experience to take on a leadership role in that job. Flying around for a year or 2 on that turbine will most likely land you a Jet job or a transport category turboprop job. Do either or in the right seat for a bit, then left seat for a bit, then you start getting recognized by the airlines.

This is only ONE of many routes for candidates like instructors, but it seems to be the most common route instructor's take. On average the time from Instructing to the right seat at WJA/AC takes 5-7 years. While it might take longer, you enter the airline world with a well rounded aviation career. All cause of that significant PIC time you gathered in a 172? Pretty valuable stuff when you look at your career for the long term.

Yes, the Rampie and the Instructor might see the same WJA g/s, but which of the two has more command time reflecting responsibility to save his/her butt? In more cases than not, the instructor.

This is my opinion - there are people who will slug me across the board for ever daring to say that instructing is the way to go, because to them the northern flying is where the real learning and real flying exists. To each his own.

Cheers
---------- ADS -----------
 
Flightman7
Rank 1
Rank 1
Posts: 49
Joined: Wed Jun 01, 2011 2:15 pm

Re: Flight instructing vs Working the ramp. Doesn't add up?

Post by Flightman7 »

loopa wrote:It seems to me that the opportunities for instructor's (even though the first couple of years is spent in the circuit and what is biased to be flying in blue sky conditions) roll about with a bit more confidence than for rampies. As an instructor you are paying your dues for a right seat, most likely on a turbine twin. After a year or two you are now going to be captain on that turbine twin because of primarily two things: you have PIC time from instructing, and you have 703/704 experience to take on a leadership role in that job. Flying around for a year or 2 on that turbine will most likely land you a Jet job or a transport category turboprop job. Do either or in the right seat for a bit, then left seat for a bit, then you start getting recognized by the airlines.

This is only ONE of many routes for candidates like instructors, but it seems to be the most common route instructor's take. On average the time from Instructing to the right seat at WJA/AC takes 5-7 years. While it might take longer, you enter the airline world with a well rounded aviation career. All cause of that significant PIC time you gathered in a 172? Pretty valuable stuff when you look at your career for the long term.


This is incredibly helpful to me I cant thank you enough. I've always been looking to find some sort of a play by play of the ladder in aviation starting from instructing. I've never seen intructing in such a positive light, fantastic insight.

Thanks again
---------- ADS -----------
 
User avatar
KAG
Rank 11
Rank 11
Posts: 3619
Joined: Wed Feb 18, 2004 11:24 pm

Re: Flight instructing vs Working the ramp. Doesn't add up?

Post by KAG »

Flightman7
Your in grade 11? Trust me your ahead of the curve. I went into this blind only knowing that this is what I want to do. in this industry you learn to roll with the punches. You can plan your entire career from PPL to which airline you want to end up at and I guarantee your best laid plans will end up the same place your first bottle of rum will end up - down the sh!ter.

Have you taken any flights yet? If not head off to your local flying club and get an intro flight, see if this is really for you. Maybe try to get your next summer job at the airport, get some exposure to aviation.

Good luck.
---------- ADS -----------
 
Double Wasp
Rank 3
Rank 3
Posts: 142
Joined: Sun Feb 29, 2004 12:08 am

Re: Flight instructing vs Working the ramp. Doesn't add up?

Post by Double Wasp »

Flightman,

While free advice is usually worth what you pay for it here is mine anyway.

The main issue that I have with instructing to build time after completing your CPL is the fact that you are in effect still learning your trade while you are teaching someone else. 200 hrs difference is not a big deal when you are talking about someone who has 2400 training someone who has 2200 hour. A whole different story when a 200 hour instructor is training someone with 0.

When you complete your CPL the learning curve is very steep and it is very beneficial to have your first job where you gain experience from someone who is sitting beside your rather than having to do it all on your own. There still will be times when you get nervous once you are a captain as stuff does happen however, the well of experience that you will have to draw from is far deeper after having the benefit of sitting beside someone who has seen the issues before.

There is no right or wrong way. There are as many ways to get through this career as there are pilots flying. The choices you make have to be right for you, not anyone else. Just try to remember that life is about the journey and the stories that you will be telling your grandchildren one day. The most important thing is to get the job done as safely as possible so you are around to tell those stories.

Cheers
DW

Edited for relevance
---------- ADS -----------
 
Last edited by Double Wasp on Sun Feb 19, 2012 9:39 pm, edited 2 times in total.
User avatar
Colonel Sanders
Top Poster
Top Poster
Posts: 7512
Joined: Sun Jun 14, 2009 5:17 pm
Location: Over Macho Grande

Re: Flight instructing vs Working the ramp. Doesn't add up?

Post by Colonel Sanders »

on the subject of FO time counting half towards ATPL ...

Look at FAA FAR part 61.159: http://tinyurl.com/7axgonc

I don't see anything there about FO time counting half towards
an FAA ATP. Does anyone else?

All it says is:
(c) A commercial pilot may credit the following second-in-command flight time or flight-engineer flight time toward the 1,500 hours of total time as a pilot required by paragraph (a) of this section:

(1) Second-in-command time, provided the time is acquired in an airplane—

(i) Required to have more than one pilot flight crewmember by the airplane's flight manual, type certificate, or the regulations under which the flight is being conducted;

(ii) Engaged in operations under subpart K of part 91, part 121, or part 135 of this chapter for which a second in command is required; or

(iii) That is required by the operating rules of this chapter to have more than one pilot flight crewmember.
---------- ADS -----------
 
Slats
Rank 6
Rank 6
Posts: 478
Joined: Sun Feb 04, 2007 7:35 pm

Re: Flight instructing vs Working the ramp. Doesn't add up?

Post by Slats »

/
---------- ADS -----------
 
Last edited by Slats on Tue Mar 07, 2023 4:10 am, edited 1 time in total.
Flightman7
Rank 1
Rank 1
Posts: 49
Joined: Wed Jun 01, 2011 2:15 pm

Re: Flight instructing vs Working the ramp. Doesn't add up?

Post by Flightman7 »

Double Wasp wrote:There is no right or wrong way. There are as many ways to get through this career as there are pilots flying. The choices you make have to be right for you, not anyone else. Just try to remember that life is about the journey and the stories that you will be telling your grandchildren one day. The most important thing is to get the job done as safely as possible so you get home to tell those stories.

Cheers
DW
What a great way to look at life. Thanks for the post and advice.
Slats wrote:Step 4: Email, voice mail, snail mail, teletype and otherwise alert these operators to your existence and desire to work there. Pester them just enough that they will know who you are but not so much that they begin to wish ill upon you. Once this is done plan a way to get some face time in (search "road trip" on this site). If you get face time, this is good-you're doing it right.

Step 5: Get hired. If you are hired to fly a C-172, C-185, C-206 while also working ramp/dock/dispatch-this is good. You're doing it right.
Similar ideas have been outlines by James ball The author of "So you want to be a pilot eh". It appears you certainly know the ins and outs of the industry. This is a fairly unique and well thought out path and I will be sure to incorporate your tips into my career. Thanks alot for the advice, and informing me of TC operators search, I hadn't found that yet. Dont ask me how.
---------- ADS -----------
 
loopa
Rank (9)
Rank (9)
Posts: 1500
Joined: Fri Apr 24, 2009 11:57 am

Re: Flight instructing vs Working the ramp. Doesn't add up?

Post by loopa »

While slats has a point about instructing being left to the ones in the know (I fully support that idea, but for that idea to fall through you need an aviation industry that supports it with a hierarchy of career progression) I can honestly say that I really enjoyed my instructing days and I found it to really improve my outlook on not only aviation, but self-improvement, two crew coordination, safety & risk assessment, hands and feet, theory, etc and etc. Like mentioned several times, there's not one way to do it, hence why Slats way is certainly not the only way to grant aviation success - certainly one of the better ones when evaluating the logging of PIC time versus SIC.

Ultimately, chase the pilot in command hours and when you have that, chase the quality pilot in command hours (turbine, ifr, above 12,577lb aircraft, etc), and once you have a bit of that, chase the life style you want - not the airline, air plane, destinations, and etc.

Cheers 8)
---------- ADS -----------
 
Post Reply

Return to “General Comments”