ATR versus Dash

This forum has been developed to discuss aviation related topics.

Moderators: North Shore, sky's the limit, sepia, Sulako, lilfssister, I WAS Birddog

midwingcrisis
Rank 5
Rank 5
Posts: 371
Joined: Wed Feb 23, 2005 1:54 pm

Re: ATR versus Dash

Post by midwingcrisis »

Why the ATR-72 sells better than the Q400

http://theflyingengineer.com/2012/01/30 ... -the-q400/
---------- ADS -----------
 
imarai
Rank 4
Rank 4
Posts: 236
Joined: Fri Aug 11, 2006 5:59 am
Location: Lethbridge

Re: ATR versus Dash

Post by imarai »

Dash-8 territory..

Image
---------- ADS -----------
 
rigpiggy
Rank 10
Rank 10
Posts: 2947
Joined: Sun Jan 16, 2005 7:17 pm
Location: west to east and west again

Re: ATR versus Dash

Post by rigpiggy »

last production figure I had shows over 400 q400's delivered. how many 72's have been delivered?
---------- ADS -----------
 
User avatar
Beefitarian
Top Poster
Top Poster
Posts: 6610
Joined: Wed Dec 01, 2010 10:53 am
Location: A couple of meters away from others.

Post by Beefitarian »

imarai where is that?
---------- ADS -----------
 
User avatar
CL-Skadoo!
Rank 8
Rank 8
Posts: 819
Joined: Wed May 18, 2005 6:41 pm
Location: Intensity in Ten Cities.

Re: ATR versus Dash

Post by CL-Skadoo! »

imarai wrote:Dash-8 territory..

Image
Wouldn't want to put an ATR in there would ya?

Image
---------- ADS -----------
 
Last edited by CL-Skadoo! on Mon Jan 30, 2012 7:42 am, edited 1 time in total.
Skyhunter
Rank 4
Rank 4
Posts: 276
Joined: Thu Oct 30, 2008 8:15 am
Location: Near YOW

Re: ATR versus Dash

Post by Skyhunter »

imaria, would be no issue putting an ATR in there at all.
---------- ADS -----------
 
Donald
Rank 10
Rank 10
Posts: 2429
Joined: Mon Feb 16, 2004 8:34 am
Location: Canada

Re: ATR versus Dash

Post by Donald »

Beefitarian wrote:imarai where is that?
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Honningsv% ... ort,_Valan
---------- ADS -----------
 
User avatar
Beefitarian
Top Poster
Top Poster
Posts: 6610
Joined: Wed Dec 01, 2010 10:53 am
Location: A couple of meters away from others.

Post by Beefitarian »

Thanks Donald. Norway probably has a few spots like that. Add some winter WX and early darkness. Yikes.
---------- ADS -----------
 
User avatar
yak8
Rank 1
Rank 1
Posts: 18
Joined: Wed Nov 05, 2008 4:40 am

Re: ATR versus Dash

Post by yak8 »

midwingcrisis thank you.
I got my answer.
Too bad.
---------- ADS -----------
 
Rudy
Rank (9)
Rank (9)
Posts: 1171
Joined: Mon Feb 16, 2004 10:00 am
Location: N. Ont

Re: ATR versus Dash

Post by Rudy »

So the Q400 out climbs/cruises the ATR but doesn't sell because it burns more fuel. What happens if you just pull the power back a bit?
---------- ADS -----------
 
imarai
Rank 4
Rank 4
Posts: 236
Joined: Fri Aug 11, 2006 5:59 am
Location: Lethbridge

Re: ATR versus Dash

Post by imarai »

You go slower and burn a little less fuel..
---------- ADS -----------
 
pilotman329
Rank 0
Rank 0
Posts: 1
Joined: Thu Jun 07, 2012 4:24 pm

Re: ATR versus Dash

Post by pilotman329 »

onspeed wrote:In terms of cargo compartment the ATR have both forward and aft which make the weight and balance simpler.
So do the Dash Q4s, and they are way easier to trim when they are fully booked than the ATRs... Plus the Dash Q4s don't need a tail stand to be loaded, whereas the ATR 72 does. All of our customers using ATR 72 (mainly OK and LOT) have SOPs regulating the loding of the aft compartment only to started after the first passengers have / are boarded, so the chance of tail tipping is minimized. LOT even goes further and forbids a loading where the aft compartment will have more weight than the front. All that is unnecessary with the Dash, as it is pretty nose heavy.
---------- ADS -----------
 
bic
Rank 2
Rank 2
Posts: 65
Joined: Thu Aug 04, 2005 5:52 pm

Re: ATR versus Dash

Post by bic »

---------- ADS -----------
 
station60
Rank 3
Rank 3
Posts: 104
Joined: Wed Mar 08, 2006 10:26 am

Re: ATR versus Dash

Post by station60 »

CL-Skadoo! wrote:
imarai wrote:The Dash-8 series carries ice much better than the ATR-42 -72 series. With the exception of the Q400, the ATRs are a wee bit faster in cruise.
Have you flown the ATR in ice? Because I will argue with you all day on that point. The Dash 8 does just fine with ice as does the ATR.
I've never flown a Dash-8, but the ATR42 & 72 carry ice just fine. If you people are referring to the Roselawn accident in 1994 as an example of how the ATR doesn't carry ice then you're out to lunch.
---------- ADS -----------
 
pelmet
Top Poster
Top Poster
Posts: 7713
Joined: Tue Jun 14, 2005 2:48 pm

Re: ATR versus Dash

Post by pelmet »

The ATR has a poor record in icing conditions relative to the Dash-8.
---------- ADS -----------
 
GARRETT
Rank 3
Rank 3
Posts: 176
Joined: Wed Mar 03, 2004 11:46 pm

Re: ATR versus Dash

Post by GARRETT »

pelmet wrote:The ATR has a poor record in icing conditions relative to the Dash-8.
Pelmet, it's been said before, unless you have actually flown the ATR, how can you even comment on its icing characteristics? If you are referring to Roselawn, any large turboprop in the same conditions would likely have had the same outcome.
I've flown the ATR for 6.5 years in Canada and have never had an icing issue. Enough about the icing already, the ATR is quite capable of handling ice.
---------- ADS -----------
 
teacher
Rank 10
Rank 10
Posts: 2450
Joined: Thu Feb 19, 2004 3:25 pm

Re: ATR versus Dash

Post by teacher »

The ATR accident in ice was poor procedures that have been changed. They were holding with some flap down which allowd ice to accumulate behind the boots. On the dash we avoid that for this exact reason. I believe ATR operators have changed their procedures as well to avoid this situation.
---------- ADS -----------
 
Post Reply

Return to “General Comments”