Porter Airlines-Off end of Runway

Topics related to accidents, incidents & over due aircraft should be placed in this forum.

Moderators: North Shore, sky's the limit, sepia, Sulako, lilfssister

onspeed
Rank 3
Rank 3
Posts: 136
Joined: Wed Apr 04, 2007 10:48 pm
Location: yyz

Re: Porter Airlines-Off end of Runway

Post by onspeed »

Cat Driver wrote:If my copilot misses the 1000' mark at Fort Simpson, Inuvik, or Yellowknife, he gets his ass spanked a pretty pink colour, and threatened with no take-offs or landings for the next 5 years. A simple "mental-discipline" adjustment is all that is required.
Thats got to be the best quote of the year! I hope you bring that up in your next CRM EPT class if you do work at 7f
---------- ADS -----------
 
User avatar
Cat Driver
Top Poster
Top Poster
Posts: 18921
Joined: Sun Feb 15, 2004 8:31 pm

Re: Porter Airlines-Off end of Runway

Post by Cat Driver »

Except I didn't make it. :mrgreen:
---------- ADS -----------
 
swordfish
Rank 7
Rank 7
Posts: 745
Joined: Sun May 16, 2004 12:18 am
Location: CYZF

Re: Porter Airlines-Off end of Runway

Post by swordfish »

Guilty as charged. I don't work for 7F
---------- ADS -----------
 
pdw
Rank (9)
Rank (9)
Posts: 1705
Joined: Tue Jan 24, 2012 6:51 am
Location: right base 24 CYSN

Re: Porter Airlines-Off end of Runway

Post by pdw »

Colonel Sanders wrote:Kinetic energy is directly proportional to mass - see above.
Hey, this ties the 172 (veering) example to this as well. There's hope !

When contemplating the question on the subject/context at hand, one that is worthy to ask on an exam for VFR or iFR approach, it could be in the format similar to "#37" ... or perhaps using "least wrong" to set the trap.

Let me see ... I guess I better try and get back to you on that
---------- ADS -----------
 
User avatar
Colonel Sanders
Top Poster
Top Poster
Posts: 7512
Joined: Sun Jun 14, 2009 5:17 pm
Location: Over Macho Grande

Re: Porter Airlines-Off end of Runway

Post by Colonel Sanders »

Sure, but did you get the irony of Robert Pirsig's son being
killed after leaving the San Francisco Zen Center?

I am NOT making this up:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Robert_M._ ... sonal_life
---------- ADS -----------
 
Morav
Rank 4
Rank 4
Posts: 209
Joined: Mon Jan 15, 2007 12:19 pm
Location: earth

Re: Porter Airlines-Off end of Runway

Post by Morav »

This thread is a disgrace to Avcanada.
---------- ADS -----------
 
swordfish
Rank 7
Rank 7
Posts: 745
Joined: Sun May 16, 2004 12:18 am
Location: CYZF

Re: Porter Airlines-Off end of Runway

Post by swordfish »

Only parts of it are a "disgrace". The real disgrace is the fact that a Q-400 went off the end of a runway, like a D-8 going off the end of Thunder Bay.
---------- ADS -----------
 
User avatar
Colonel Sanders
Top Poster
Top Poster
Posts: 7512
Joined: Sun Jun 14, 2009 5:17 pm
Location: Over Macho Grande

Re: Porter Airlines-Off end of Runway

Post by Colonel Sanders »

Reminds me of these Freddy Mercury song lyrics:
Buddy you're a boy make a big noise
Playin' in the street gonna be a big man some day
You got mud on yo' face
You big disgrace
Kickin' your can all over the place
Singin'
We will we will rock you
We will we will rock you
For years, I thought the above "you big disgrace"
was actually "your big disc brakes". Say them both
out load with an English accent and you'll see what
I mean.

It didn't make any sense to me, but many things
don't make any sense to me.

PS This is actually an on-topic posting. What kind
of brakes does a dash 8 have, hm?
---------- ADS -----------
 
Donald
Rank 10
Rank 10
Posts: 2430
Joined: Mon Feb 16, 2004 8:34 am
Location: Canada

Re: Porter Airlines-Off end of Runway

Post by Donald »

Morav wrote:This thread is a disgrace to Avcanada.
Agreed. If this site was decently moderated, every post by myself, Cat Driver, Hedl..Col Sanders, Swordfish, and PDW would be removed from this thread.
swordfish wrote:Only parts of it are a "disgrace". The real disgrace is the fact that a Q-400 went off the end of a runway, like a D-8 going off the end of Thunder Bay.
I think you mean North Bay there champ, if you're going to slam someone, at least get it right.
---------- ADS -----------
 
User avatar
JigglyBus
Rank 6
Rank 6
Posts: 497
Joined: Wed Feb 18, 2004 5:09 pm

Re: Porter Airlines-Off end of Runway

Post by JigglyBus »

A few of the posts in this thread have left me unsure if I understand english. There are words which I recognize, and they appear to be organized into strings, which from a distance look like sentences, but then I try to 'read' them and they might as well be dutch.

Am I alone on this? Should I get mentally evaluated by a professional?
---------- ADS -----------
 
User avatar
Siddley Hawker
Rank 11
Rank 11
Posts: 3353
Joined: Tue Aug 10, 2004 6:56 pm
Location: 50.13N 66.17W

Re: Porter Airlines-Off end of Runway

Post by Siddley Hawker »

What kind of brakes does a dash 8 have, hm?
Hayes expander tube? :)
---------- ADS -----------
 
User avatar
AOW
Rank 6
Rank 6
Posts: 465
Joined: Fri May 20, 2005 2:23 pm

Re: Porter Airlines-Off end of Runway

Post by AOW »

Colonel Sanders wrote: PS This is actually an on-topic posting. What kind
of brakes does a dash 8 have, hm?
Hamilton Standard?
---------- ADS -----------
 
GyvAir
Rank (9)
Rank (9)
Posts: 1810
Joined: Mon Mar 12, 2012 7:09 pm

Re: Porter Airlines-Off end of Runway

Post by GyvAir »

Can't quite make out the mfr..
---------- ADS -----------
 
Attachments
Brake.jpg
Brake.jpg (27.92 KiB) Viewed 2040 times
7thirtyseven
Rank 3
Rank 3
Posts: 190
Joined: Thu Mar 08, 2012 8:05 pm

Re: Porter Airlines-Off end of Runway

Post by 7thirtyseven »

JigglyBus wrote:A few of the posts in this thread have left me unsure if I understand english. There are words which I recognize, and they appear to be organized into strings, which from a distance look like sentences, but then I try to 'read' them and they might as well be dutch.

Am I alone on this? Should I get mentally evaluated by a professional?
No my friend, you are doing allright, in fact your post is the only one that makes sense... and was funny too.
A few of the gentlemen posting are deep into some form of age-related brain degeneration and have conviniently forgoten the times they just plane got lucky, or perhaps theyve degenerated far enough they have drifted back to their teens and are once again invincible sky-gods.

A long time ago I witnessed a fine well respected gentleman drive a dash-8 into a snowbank.... and learned that if HE can do it, all the rest of us sad sacks are only a breath away.
---------- ADS -----------
 
User avatar
Colonel Sanders
Top Poster
Top Poster
Posts: 7512
Joined: Sun Jun 14, 2009 5:17 pm
Location: Over Macho Grande

Re: Porter Airlines-Off end of Runway

Post by Colonel Sanders »

I think you've hit the nail on the head - safety is purely a matter of luck.
---------- ADS -----------
 
User avatar
Cat Driver
Top Poster
Top Poster
Posts: 18921
Joined: Sun Feb 15, 2004 8:31 pm

Re: Porter Airlines-Off end of Runway

Post by Cat Driver »

Exactly, colonel.

All the airplanes that land and don't run off the runway are lucky.

Now if someone could figure out which flight is going to be unlucky that would be the way to improve safety.

We could just cancell that flight.
---------- ADS -----------
 
User avatar
Colonel Sanders
Top Poster
Top Poster
Posts: 7512
Joined: Sun Jun 14, 2009 5:17 pm
Location: Over Macho Grande

Re: Porter Airlines-Off end of Runway

Post by Colonel Sanders »

I think we could improve aviation safety by cancelling all flights. That way, no one would need to be lucky, to not have an accident. Everyone would be lucky!
---------- ADS -----------
 
User avatar
Cat Driver
Top Poster
Top Poster
Posts: 18921
Joined: Sun Feb 15, 2004 8:31 pm

Re: Porter Airlines-Off end of Runway

Post by Cat Driver »

Actually colonel you have this one all wrong.

The answer to safe flying is to identify the " Lucky " pilots.

If companies only hire lucky pilots safety will be guranteed.

As the decades passed and my luck held they kept giving me higher licenses until they ran out of licenses they thought I would accept.

Then one day I woke up and a higher power spoke to me and said, . your luck is going to run out on October 06 so I retired on October 05.

My run of luck had lasted fifty two years which means I was more lucky than most pilots.

P.S....

I still fly privately and my luck meter must have been reset because I still haven't run out. :mrgreen: :mrgreen:
---------- ADS -----------
 
pdw
Rank (9)
Rank (9)
Posts: 1705
Joined: Tue Jan 24, 2012 6:51 am
Location: right base 24 CYSN

Re: Porter Airlines-Off end of Runway

Post by pdw »

Thank you JigB (I seriously thought you may have meant the metar "english").

CD, I'd formulate a tricky exam approach question ... flying out of HI to LO .. set up so that the best answer interprets "290V20" (found in the metar that applied only/immediately after the landing, just before 1300Z) or the "300V360" as the lesser Veering warning earlier in the "1200Z" (of the hour prior) to this approach. Most people may still be thinking V means negligeable-variable wind ... and never/nothing to worry about ... until the rare exception (not saying here .. just that it could be contributing only because it is in the metar).

(CS, ... and of a covert design where d is a 'least wrong' answer.)
---------- ADS -----------
 
Johnny#5
Rank 7
Rank 7
Posts: 558
Joined: Tue May 06, 2008 6:04 pm

Re: Porter Airlines-Off end of Runway

Post by Johnny#5 »

I'm sorry, you exceeded your (bracket) allowance.
---------- ADS -----------
 
chu me
Rank 3
Rank 3
Posts: 191
Joined: Tue Oct 03, 2006 3:48 pm

Re: Porter Airlines-Off end of Runway

Post by chu me »

Oh my god it's hot today! I am way up north....should be cooler! Oh wait a minute....I left my computer on.......thats where all that hot air is coming from.
---------- ADS -----------
 
MrElm
Rank 0
Rank 0
Posts: 9
Joined: Thu May 19, 2011 1:57 pm

Re: Porter Airlines-Off end of Runway

Post by MrElm »

GyvAir wrote:Can't quite make out the mfr..
Q400 NextGen uses Goodrich carbon brakes.
---------- ADS -----------
 
User avatar
Cat Driver
Top Poster
Top Poster
Posts: 18921
Joined: Sun Feb 15, 2004 8:31 pm

Re: Porter Airlines-Off end of Runway

Post by Cat Driver »

What is the minimum runway length requirements for the Q400 Mr.Elm?
---------- ADS -----------
 
User avatar
Lost Lake
Rank (9)
Rank (9)
Posts: 1164
Joined: Wed Mar 19, 2008 5:11 am
Location: On top

Re: Porter Airlines-Off end of Runway

Post by Lost Lake »

I'm sure TC will amend the cars to include retrofitting gusto meters on all A/C over 12,500. After all everytime 1 idiot does something wrong, they come up with an intelligent solution to ensure it won't happen again. :roll: TCAS for all aircraft will mean no more CFITs, using real pax weiughts in 703 operations means no more over weight A/C.

How come with all the "for dummies" books out, there isn't a flying for dummies yet?
---------- ADS -----------
 
User avatar
JigglyBus
Rank 6
Rank 6
Posts: 497
Joined: Wed Feb 18, 2004 5:09 pm

Re: Porter Airlines-Off end of Runway

Post by JigglyBus »

pdw wrote:Thank you JigB (I seriously thought you may have meant the metar "english").

CD, I'd formulate a tricky exam approach question ... flying out of HI to LO .. set up so that the best answer interprets "290V20" (found in the metar that applied only/immediately after the landing, just before 1300Z) or the "300V360" as the lesser Veering warning earlier in the "1200Z" (of the hour prior) to this approach. Most people may still be thinking V means negligeable-variable wind ... and never/nothing to worry about ... until the rare exception (not saying here .. just that it could be contributing only because it is in the metar).
Boy, I'm really getting an education here. So in the metar you're referring to....

METAR CYTZ 101300Z AUTO 34004KT 290V020 9SM CLR 24/12 A3006 RMK SLP180 DENSITY ALT 1100FT

....the 290V020 means 290 veering to 020?

We really need to start a page on here where we can write these lessons down, so future pilots don't have any misunderstanding.
---------- ADS -----------
 
Locked

Return to “Accidents, Incidents & Overdue Aircraft”