Rouge

Discuss topics relating to Air Canada.

Moderators: North Shore, sky's the limit, sepia, Sulako, lilfssister, I WAS Birddog

User avatar
Dark Helmet
Rank 6
Rank 6
Posts: 493
Joined: Mon Oct 23, 2006 6:59 pm

Re: Rouge

Post by Dark Helmet »

LeadingEdge wrote:
teacher wrote::shock: Wow and the AC folks were accusing Jazz of bringing the bar down when our 757 rate was $155 (status pay aside).
You can thank your Canadian Federal Government for lowering the bar here, ACPA was forced into it against their will...
Actually you can ACPA for getting the ball rolling for the government to lower the bar....
---------- ADS -----------
 
Rockie
Top Poster
Top Poster
Posts: 8433
Joined: Sat Oct 08, 2005 7:10 am

Re: Rouge

Post by Rockie »

Dark Helmet wrote:Actually you can ACPA for getting the ball rolling for the government to lower the bar....
Do you actually think the government looked at ACPA and said "hey look at them, they got things headed down the crapper so let's accelerate it for them"?

Really?
---------- ADS -----------
 
mbav8r
Rank 10
Rank 10
Posts: 2325
Joined: Sun Jul 02, 2006 8:11 am
Location: Manitoba

Re: Rouge

Post by mbav8r »

Rockie, with all due respect, is Sky Regional the chicken or the egg?
The odds of AC getting a LCC and LCR in FOS, if Sky wasn't already a reality, are pretty slim. Guess will never know, but I don't think they would've risked it, do you?
---------- ADS -----------
 
Rockie
Top Poster
Top Poster
Posts: 8433
Joined: Sat Oct 08, 2005 7:10 am

Re: Rouge

Post by Rockie »

mbav8r wrote:Rockie, with all due respect, is Sky Regional the chicken or the egg?
The odds of AC getting a LCC and LCR in FOS, if Sky wasn't already a reality, are pretty slim. Guess will never know, but I don't think they would've risked it, do you?
There's no doubt SkyRegional is the egg. There's also no doubt that ACPA hasn't exactly helped themselves as you no doubt know, or rather the Air Canada pilots which is completely different than ACPA.

This government is springloaded to give Canadian corporations whatever they want regarding labour relations, so Air Canada could have asked for the moon (which they did) and gotten it. No rationalization required. If Air Canada says it's good for them and Canada then that's good enough for the government.

We don't help ourselves, but even if we were completely unified (loud guffaw here) and 100% politically competent we still wouldn't have stood a chance with this government.
---------- ADS -----------
 
Mig29
Rank (9)
Rank (9)
Posts: 1213
Joined: Thu Aug 12, 2004 7:47 pm

Re: Rouge

Post by Mig29 »

Rockie wrote:We don't help ourselves, but even if we were completely unified (loud guffaw here) and 100% politically competent we still wouldn't have stood a chance with this government
I know it's obviously little late now, but I'm curious what can a government do to 3000+ pilots if they just simply refused to fly??
---------- ADS -----------
 
vic777
Rank 6
Rank 6
Posts: 421
Joined: Wed Oct 20, 2010 9:00 am

Re: Rouge

Post by vic777 »

Mig29 wrote: I know it's obviously little late now, but I'm curious what can a government do to 3000+ pilots if they just simply refused to fly??
nothing
---------- ADS -----------
 
flyer 1492
Rank 7
Rank 7
Posts: 561
Joined: Thu Jan 27, 2005 7:55 pm

Re: Rouge

Post by flyer 1492 »

Law suit filed by the company against ACPA, Good luck getting everyone on side. Like someone said earlier, we are our own worst enemy.
---------- ADS -----------
 
CanadianEh
Rank 7
Rank 7
Posts: 564
Joined: Thu Jan 29, 2009 2:00 pm
Location: YYZ

Re: Rouge

Post by CanadianEh »

Power in numbers. If everyone that day (when a bunch of pilots called in sick) had called in sick, the message would have been clearly received. Our totalitarian fascist government doesnt help.
---------- ADS -----------
 
Mig29
Rank (9)
Rank (9)
Posts: 1213
Joined: Thu Aug 12, 2004 7:47 pm

Re: Rouge

Post by Mig29 »

flyer 1492 wrote:Law suit filed by the company against ACPA, Good luck getting everyone on side. Like someone said earlier, we are our own worst enemy.
Flyer, you are being too analytical my friend, I'm just saying this from my heart....what can the Gov't do?? Lock us out? Fine us, jail thousands of pilots for refusing to work?? Unless we live in Nazi state (which we don't).
---------- ADS -----------
 
trey kule
Rank 11
Rank 11
Posts: 4766
Joined: Fri Aug 19, 2005 7:09 pm

Re: Rouge

Post by trey kule »

I know it's obviously little late now, but I'm curious what can a government do to 3000+ pilots if they just simply refused to fly??
Mig, you did not specify Canadian government, and maybe are a bit young to remember Ronald Regan's term. But spend a little time googling flight controllers in the US....Every single one was fired...They simply thought they were to important and the government would not act. None of them ever went back to work as air traffice controllers, and, I understand had some future difficulties with anything connected withthe government afterwards. I hope I recalled it all correctly.

Reagan fires 11,000 striking air traffic controllers Aug. 5, 1981
http://www.politico.com/news/stories/0808/12292.html

And in Canada, they could theoretically be put in jail for contempt..Not sure of the practical or probable chance of that, but the law is there...
It is an interesting scenario.. Air Canada, with its head office legislated to remain in Montreal, and a darling of every stripe of federal government, I would be careful before I decided to ignore legislation..Might just find you dont have a pilots license at the end of it..Or at least enough grief with the proceedings to take you out of the market for a year or two...Pure speculation...when push comes to shove, most Canadians will not defy the government unless they think it is pretty much consequence free.
---------- ADS -----------
 
flyer 1492
Rank 7
Rank 7
Posts: 561
Joined: Thu Jan 27, 2005 7:55 pm

Re: Rouge

Post by flyer 1492 »

Mig,
All I am saying is if the company can prove a breech of contract, then ACPA and it's members would be held in contempt. The resullting lawsuit would surly bankrupt the union. All they would have to do is read this forum.
---------- ADS -----------
 
Tiny Tyke
Rank 3
Rank 3
Posts: 128
Joined: Wed Sep 26, 2007 4:56 am
Location: The big smoke.

Re: Rouge

Post by Tiny Tyke »

Best play would be to follow the NHL/NFL and decertify. The company needs Unionization as much as we do. If it can't be win/win, we have to make it lose/lose.
---------- ADS -----------
 
Last edited by Tiny Tyke on Wed Dec 26, 2012 5:38 pm, edited 1 time in total.
User avatar
Dark Helmet
Rank 6
Rank 6
Posts: 493
Joined: Mon Oct 23, 2006 6:59 pm

Re: Rouge

Post by Dark Helmet »

Rockie wrote:
Dark Helmet wrote:Actually you can ACPA for getting the ball rolling for the government to lower the bar....
Do you actually think the government looked at ACPA and said "hey look at them, they got things headed down the crapper so let's accelerate it for them"?

Really?
Rockie,

ACPA was not LR's first victim. This happened to Jazz, Canada Post, and the other labour groups at AC.

I can literaly write an essay and point our were ACPA went wrong in your negotiations campaign (many mistakes were made, not just one.)

To keep it short, arbitration rulings are usually based on precedence. Look at the FAs, Ground handlers, etc. They all got the contract close or identical to the TAs that their MECs initially agreed upon and took it to their members for a vote.

Once ACPA agreed to TA1 and brought it to the membership for a vote, it was basically over....
---------- ADS -----------
 
User avatar
Cat Driver
Top Poster
Top Poster
Posts: 18921
Joined: Sun Feb 15, 2004 8:31 pm

Re: Rouge

Post by Cat Driver »

Deleted
---------- ADS -----------
 
yycflyguy
Rank 10
Rank 10
Posts: 2784
Joined: Tue Feb 24, 2004 9:18 am

Re: Rouge

Post by yycflyguy »

Dark Helmet wrote:
Rockie wrote:
Dark Helmet wrote:Actually you can ACPA for getting the ball rolling for the government to lower the bar....
Do you actually think the government looked at ACPA and said "hey look at them, they got things headed down the crapper so let's accelerate it for them"?

Really?
Rockie,

ACPA was not LR's first victim. This happened to Jazz, Canada Post, and the other labour groups at AC.

I can literaly write an essay and point our were ACPA went wrong in your negotiations campaign (many mistakes were made, not just one.)

To keep it short, arbitration rulings are usually based on precedence. Look at the FAs, Ground handlers, etc. They all got the contract close or identical to the TAs that their MECs initially agreed upon and took it to their members for a vote.

Once ACPA agreed to TA1 and brought it to the membership for a vote, it was basically over....


Nope. You are getting your groups wrong. Negotiating Committee 1 (NC1) presented the TA to the MEC. The MEC then put it out for ratification to the membership (ACPA) WITHOUT AN MEC RECOMMENDATION where it was defeated.

ACPA never agreed to anything. Only a NC1 agreed to the TA with the company. Basically the government is now of the opinion that the ratification process of collective bargaining is irrelevant. In retrospect, you are right. Once NC1 agreed to bring the failed TA to the membership it was game over.
---------- ADS -----------
 
Rockie
Top Poster
Top Poster
Posts: 8433
Joined: Sat Oct 08, 2005 7:10 am

Re: Rouge

Post by Rockie »

Dark Helmet wrote:To keep it short, arbitration rulings are usually based on precedence.
Your thinking is still pre-Conservative. Harper is rewriting the laws in Canada stripping away labour rights and precedents are now irrelevant. This is a new world order so forget the words "usual", "normal" and "precedent" because they don't apply anymore.
---------- ADS -----------
 
Old fella
Rank 10
Rank 10
Posts: 2486
Joined: Mon Jan 29, 2007 7:04 am
Location: I'm retired. I don't want to'I don't have to and you can't make me.

Re: Rouge

Post by Old fella »

Question . Can anybody tell me(as a paying passenger) what the new AC Rouge will do for me that I can’t have on mainline AC. I am on the AC web distribution list for destination sales and there are some very good deals floating about……. Is Rouge gonna beat those.
---------- ADS -----------
 
jjj
Rank 7
Rank 7
Posts: 746
Joined: Thu Feb 26, 2004 12:53 am

Re: Rouge

Post by jjj »

WestJet Captain hourly rate - pay step 1 as of May 2012 - $132.61.

Our contract is up in May and people like Teacher suggest that the downward pressure on WS wages will come from Encore. I think any downward pressure has been adequately discussed in this thread and it doesn't come internally at WS.

JJJ
---------- ADS -----------
 
biatch
Rank 2
Rank 2
Posts: 70
Joined: Thu Apr 05, 2012 11:43 am

Re: Rouge

Post by biatch »

Your contract being due in May is irrelevant at this point since Encore will barely have started. It's in a few years after WJE is up and running full steam that these pressures will come. You're a proud Westjetter JJJ and there's nothing wrong with that, but GS has begun bending you over and you haven't even noticed.
---------- ADS -----------
 
vic777
Rank 6
Rank 6
Posts: 421
Joined: Wed Oct 20, 2010 9:00 am

Re: Rouge

Post by vic777 »

Rockie wrote:
Dark Helmet wrote:To keep it short, arbitration rulings are usually based on precedence.
Your thinking is still pre-Conservative. Harper is rewriting the laws in Canada stripping away labour rights and precedents are now irrelevant. This is a new world order so forget the words "usual", "normal" and "precedent" because they don't apply anymore.
Rockie, my question is a thread shift but I value your opinion. With the re-election of Obama and his penchant for Quantitative Easing, do you think this will lead to Hyper Inflation and an American default on debts? How would this affect Canadian Investors? What will happen to the Canadian Dollar, will it remain at Par with the US Dollar? In a similar vein, with the shrinkage of the US Military is our North Secure? How do we defend Canada without American Support?
---------- ADS -----------
 
User avatar
Takeoff OK
Rank 4
Rank 4
Posts: 268
Joined: Wed Jun 09, 2010 12:21 am

Re: Rouge

Post by Takeoff OK »

vic777 wrote:
Rockie wrote:
Dark Helmet wrote:To keep it short, arbitration rulings are usually based on precedence.
Your thinking is still pre-Conservative. Harper is rewriting the laws in Canada stripping away labour rights and precedents are now irrelevant. This is a new world order so forget the words "usual", "normal" and "precedent" because they don't apply anymore.
Rockie, my question is a thread shift but I value your opinion. With the re-election of Obama and his penchant for Quantitative Easing, do you think this will lead to Hyper Inflation and an American default on debts? How would this affect Canadian Investors? What will happen to the Canadian Dollar, will it remain at Par with the US Dollar? In a similar vein, with the shrinkage of the US Military is our North Secure? How do we defend Canada without American Support?
Do you ever post anything worth reading, vic?
---------- ADS -----------
 
Fanblade
Rank (9)
Rank (9)
Posts: 1772
Joined: Mon Mar 28, 2011 8:50 pm

Re: Rouge

Post by Fanblade »

yycflyguy wrote:
Dark Helmet wrote:
Once ACPA agreed to TA1 and brought it to the membership for a vote, it was basically over....



Nope. You are getting your groups wrong. Negotiating Committee 1 (NC1) presented the TA to the MEC. The MEC then put it out for ratification to the membership (ACPA) WITHOUT AN MEC RECOMMENDATION where it was defeated.

ACPA never agreed to anything. Only a NC1 agreed to the TA with the company. Basically the government is now of the opinion that the ratification process of collective bargaining is irrelevant. In retrospect, you are right. Once NC1 agreed to bring the failed TA to the membership it was game over.
Fly guy,

Dark helmet is correct. Read the CUPE arbitration for the correct precedence. An MOA. A memorandum of agreement by the negotiating committee becomes the benchmark in arbitration. Negotiating committee. Not the MEC. Not the membership.

It was done the SECOND NC1 recommended TA1.

The only hope was avoid arbitration.
---------- ADS -----------
 
yycflyguy
Rank 10
Rank 10
Posts: 2784
Joined: Tue Feb 24, 2004 9:18 am

Re: Rouge

Post by yycflyguy »

We are saying the same thing Fanblade.
---------- ADS -----------
 
airchaos
Rank 0
Rank 0
Posts: 1
Joined: Tue Jan 08, 2013 7:37 am

Re: Rouge

Post by airchaos »

So much for Bilingulism. Air Canada Rouge. How come the writing on the aircraft does not say
AIR CANADA ROUGE/RED
---------- ADS -----------
 
YYCcrew
Rank 3
Rank 3
Posts: 119
Joined: Wed Jan 03, 2007 12:55 pm
Location: Calgary

Re: Rouge

Post by YYCcrew »

Any AC people know when rouge will be posting for Cabin Crew positions?
---------- ADS -----------
 
Post Reply

Return to “Air Canada”