Well that didnt take long... 787 Glich

This forum has been developed to discuss aviation related topics.

Moderators: sky's the limit, sepia, Sulako, lilfssister, North Shore, I WAS Birddog

azimuthaviation
Rank (9)
Rank (9)
Posts: 1409
Joined: Sat Jun 21, 2008 9:34 pm

Well that didnt take long... 787 Glich

Post by azimuthaviation »

---------- ADS -----------
 
BingBong
Rank 6
Rank 6
Posts: 478
Joined: Wed Jun 01, 2005 2:54 pm

Re: Well that didnt take long... 787 Glich

Post by BingBong »

warranty???
---------- ADS -----------
 
sanjet
Rank 8
Rank 8
Posts: 920
Joined: Mon Jan 10, 2005 8:54 am

Re: Well that didnt take long... 787 Glich

Post by sanjet »

BingBong wrote:warranty???
Most likely if there was any damage. Pretty sure there are some Boeing engineers and a pilot on board to monitor for first few days of flying for this new model as kinks do come out when you're flying the line with a brand new model.
---------- ADS -----------
 
User avatar
KAG
Rank 11
Rank 11
Posts: 3619
Joined: Wed Feb 18, 2004 11:24 pm

Re: Well that didnt take long... 787 Glich

Post by KAG »

Every new plane has it's glitches. Our NG's have snags galore for the first few months.
---------- ADS -----------
 
The feet you step on today might be attached to the ass you're kissing tomorrow.
Chase lifestyle not metal.
azimuthaviation
Rank (9)
Rank (9)
Posts: 1409
Joined: Sat Jun 21, 2008 9:34 pm

Re: Well that didnt take long... 787 Glich

Post by azimuthaviation »

http://news.yahoo.com/ana-operated-boei ... nance.html

Japanese airlines ground Boeing 787s after emergency landing

So whats the cause of this economic and technological fiasco? Misplaced priorities in the USA and the resulting degradation of the value of the American product? A lack of capability on their part? Or as some like to believe a consequence of outsourcing critical assemblies to third party companies in countries that were until recently third world?
---------- ADS -----------
 
bombardierfixer
Rank 7
Rank 7
Posts: 564
Joined: Sun Oct 21, 2007 8:26 am
Location: YYC

Re: Well that didnt take long... 787 Glich

Post by bombardierfixer »

That's what you get for being a early adopter...I always like to wait for the second generation. I like to think I'm a early majority guy, but I'm probably late.

JAL Is stuck in the "Chasm" :shock:

http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/c ... ecycle.png
---------- ADS -----------
 
azimuthaviation
Rank (9)
Rank (9)
Posts: 1409
Joined: Sat Jun 21, 2008 9:34 pm

Re: Well that didnt take long... 787 Glich

Post by azimuthaviation »

The deHaviland Comet, DC-10, and Lockheed Electra never made it to a second run. Design flaws and bad publicity early on killed them off.
---------- ADS -----------
 
200hr Wonder
Rank 10
Rank 10
Posts: 2212
Joined: Tue Apr 26, 2005 1:52 pm
Location: CYVR
Contact:

Re: Well that didnt take long... 787 Glich

Post by 200hr Wonder »

Though aircraft like 747 had early bugs that did get sorted out. Only time will tell.
---------- ADS -----------
 
cgzro
Rank (9)
Rank (9)
Posts: 1735
Joined: Wed Jul 25, 2007 7:45 am

Re: Well that didnt take long... 787 Glich

Post by cgzro »

I can't think of any new aircraft that did not have problems.
Last year people were all over Airbus 380 because of those el cheapo Rolls Royce engines:)
---------- ADS -----------
 
User avatar
Brantford Beech Boy
Rank 7
Rank 7
Posts: 668
Joined: Tue Feb 17, 2004 9:34 am
Location: Brantford? Not so much...

Re: Well that didnt take long... 787 Glich

Post by Brantford Beech Boy »

azimuthaviation wrote:The deHaviland Comet, DC-10, and Lockheed Electra never made it to a second run. Design flaws and bad publicity early on killed them off.
ummm, MD-11.

and I suspect the 707 and DC-8 had more to do with Electra not being more popular.
The public doesn't like those spinny things on the engine......

BBB
---------- ADS -----------
 
L382Medman
Rank 1
Rank 1
Posts: 23
Joined: Tue Feb 17, 2004 12:15 pm
Location: botswana

Re: Well that didnt take long... 787 Glich

Post by L382Medman »

so what old airplanes have snags and no one cares, killer pitot tubes people still fly errorbus
---------- ADS -----------
 
Sidebar
Rank 7
Rank 7
Posts: 522
Joined: Sat May 09, 2009 4:26 pm
Location: Winterpeg

Re: Well that didnt take long... 787 Glich

Post by Sidebar »

Brantford Beech Boy wrote:The public doesn't like those spinny things on the engine......
I once was waiting for my flight (DHC-8) to board. Several passengers were looking out the window at the plane and saying "We're not going on that, are we?"
---------- ADS -----------
 
Old fella
Rank 10
Rank 10
Posts: 2539
Joined: Mon Jan 29, 2007 7:04 am
Location: I'm retired. I don't want to'I don't have to and you can't make me.

Re: Well that didnt take long... 787 Glich

Post by Old fella »

Sidebar wrote:
Brantford Beech Boy wrote:The public doesn't like those spinny things on the engine......
I once was waiting for my flight (DHC-8) to board. Several passengers were looking out the window at the plane and saying "We're not going on that, are we?"
I hear that commentary along with quiet solitude/puzzled looks as they look out and see a B1900 as their mode........... I witness one lady in YHZ who refused to board a B1900 when she realized it was that small - she hates those little planes, told the gate people to get her on something bigger, she didn't care the routing and the extra cost. Ya hear and see it all.
---------- ADS -----------
 
bmc
Rank 11
Rank 11
Posts: 4014
Joined: Tue May 16, 2006 10:06 pm
Location: Switzerland

Re: Well that didnt take long... 787 Glich

Post by bmc »

When Canadian took delivery of its first B767-300, immediately after the media fanfare at YVR, the plane took off supposedly for Abbottsford and training. In truth, it went back to the factory to address a "many" snags.
---------- ADS -----------
 
teacher
Rank 10
Rank 10
Posts: 2450
Joined: Thu Feb 19, 2004 3:25 pm

Re: Well that didnt take long... 787 Glich

Post by teacher »

All airlines should immediately cancel all 787s purchases and hold an open and transparent competition for the next airliner. This is unproven technology and expensive compared to buying off he shelf already proven designs. Atleast it has 2 engines though!

In reality any new design whether military or civilian is going to have teething problems. Not surprisingly the military ones get the most negative attacks. Different paint scheme same problems. In a few years when the kinks are ironed out it will become a great success.
---------- ADS -----------
 
frosti
Rank 6
Rank 6
Posts: 461
Joined: Fri Jan 14, 2011 10:25 pm

Re: Well that didnt take long... 787 Glich

Post by frosti »

teacher wrote: Not surprisingly the military ones get the most negative attacks.
That is because everyone is an expert after playing a few video games.
---------- ADS -----------
 
Instructor_Mike
Rank 3
Rank 3
Posts: 157
Joined: Sun Aug 12, 2012 2:40 pm
Location: Manitoba

Re: Well that didnt take long... 787 Glich

Post by Instructor_Mike »

frosti wrote:
teacher wrote: Not surprisingly the military ones get the most negative attacks.
That is because everyone is an expert after playing a few video games.
Or military spending is exclusive tax payer money where airliners are private enterprise (with tax breaks). If I don't like the way an airline works, I don't fly on that airline. We are stuck with our government until possibly the next election or you leave the country.
---------- ADS -----------
 
CFR
Rank 8
Rank 8
Posts: 784
Joined: Mon Jul 12, 2010 6:51 pm
Location: CYAV

Re: Well that didnt take long... 787 Glich

Post by CFR »

azimuthaviation wrote:The deHaviland Comet, DC-10, and Lockheed Electra never made it to a second run. Design flaws and bad publicity early on killed them off.
The Comet resumed service with BOAC in 1958 after the reason for the accidents was discovered and the aircraft modified. These were the first to fly the Atlantic route. The 707 and DC-8 came along shortly after and carried more passengers and were more efficent to operate which led to BOAC replaced their comets with 707's. The Comet made it to the 4C version and was in service with a number of smaller airlines, leaving regular service with Dan-Air in 1981. The last 2 aircraft built were used to develop the Nimrod prototype.

The RCAF flew flew a few comets until 1963.
---------- ADS -----------
 
User avatar
I WAS Birddog
Rank Moderator
Rank Moderator
Posts: 378
Joined: Sat Dec 25, 2010 6:38 am
Location: dude...I just walk the earth.
Contact:

Re: Well that didnt take long... 787 Glich

Post by I WAS Birddog »

frosti wrote: That is because everyone is an expert after playing a few video games.
:lol:

Boeing is designed and built by engineers.

AirBus is designed by corporate suits that have never turned a wrench and put together by the factory workers at LEGO. #Junk

Everyone relax. It's an avant-garde technology airplane.

"Drive European built cars....fly North American built aircraft"
---------- ADS -----------
 
cgzro
Rank (9)
Rank (9)
Posts: 1735
Joined: Wed Jul 25, 2007 7:45 am

Re: Well that didnt take long... 787 Glich

Post by cgzro »

. AirBus is designed by corporate suits that have never turned a wrench and put together by the factory workers at LEGO. #Junk
What is it about the Internet that reduces people's IQ by 50 points.

What a ridiculous statement....why bother ?
---------- ADS -----------
 
Canadian Skyhawk
Rank 2
Rank 2
Posts: 61
Joined: Tue Jun 08, 2010 6:28 pm
Location: Muntree-all

Re: Well that didnt take long... 787 Glich

Post by Canadian Skyhawk »

Amen. Both Boeng and Airbus are excellent aircraft. There's just different design philosophies behind them - nothing wrong with that. The bugs will eventually get worked out of the 787 - like any new clean-sheet design.
---------- ADS -----------
 
User avatar
I WAS Birddog
Rank Moderator
Rank Moderator
Posts: 378
Joined: Sat Dec 25, 2010 6:38 am
Location: dude...I just walk the earth.
Contact:

Re: Well that didnt take long... 787 Glich

Post by I WAS Birddog »

cgzro wrote:
. AirBus is designed by corporate suits that have never turned a wrench and put together by the factory workers at LEGO. #Junk
What is it about the Internet that reduces people's IQ by 50 points.

What a ridiculous statement....why bother ?
:D

Yes it is son...yes it is.

Now hold still while I remove the hook from your mouth.
This thread is still young.

8) iWbd
---------- ADS -----------
 
User avatar
dashx
Rank (9)
Rank (9)
Posts: 1227
Joined: Sat Dec 23, 2006 11:51 am

Re: Well that didnt take long... 787 Glich

Post by dashx »

Oops!
Story has been removed. Or was it a glitch??????

Yahoo!!!
---------- ADS -----------
 
azimuthaviation
Rank (9)
Rank (9)
Posts: 1409
Joined: Sat Jun 21, 2008 9:34 pm

Re: Well that didnt take long... 787 Glich

Post by azimuthaviation »

dashx wrote:
Oops!
Story has been removed. Or was it a glitch??????

Yahoo!!!
The first post was over a year ago (I had a hunch this aircraft would be problematic early on), then these incidents that caused Japanese airlines to ground the fleet, now apparentlty the FAA has grounded all 787's.
---------- ADS -----------
 
User avatar
I WAS Birddog
Rank Moderator
Rank Moderator
Posts: 378
Joined: Sat Dec 25, 2010 6:38 am
Location: dude...I just walk the earth.
Contact:

Re: Well that didnt take long... 787 Glich

Post by I WAS Birddog »

azimuthaviation wrote: ..... these incidents that caused Japanese airlines to ground the fleet.
Nonsense. They are still pissed about WW2 bombs over Tokyo.

We never made that big of a fuss when their Toyotas went crazy with faulty gas pedals. Bunch of drama queens they are.



#TEAMBOEING!!!

:)
---------- ADS -----------
 
Post Reply

Return to “General Comments”