low time guy with a bit extra

Got a hot employment or interview tip to help a fellow aviator find a job or looking for a little job advice place your posting here.

Moderators: North Shore, sky's the limit, sepia, Sulako

ocud
Rank 0
Rank 0
Posts: 6
Joined: Fri Oct 18, 2013 7:36 am

Re: low time guy with a bit extra

Post by ocud »

Krimson wrote:Pay for PPL? OK
CPL? OK
Multi? OK
IFR? OK
Type Rating? Not OK
Spend hundreds on a road trip? OK
Spend thousands to fly out for an interview and move to new city? OK
Take a large pay cut to fly for Air Canada? OK

Who makes these rules?
I agree with you here. I was told this is the way the Canadian business runs. You work on the ramp 1-3 years to earn your spot on the line. Now i might not agree with this method, but who cares. It wont change anything. I got this opportunity presented to me to possibly fly for a company outside Canada who require to pay for your own Twin Otter training. I took a huge gamble. I asked my fellow respected peers in the business and took their advice into consideration. In the end, it didnt work out this year. I will certainly apply to the company again next spring. But for now im stuck at square one again and with the training that i paid for, who wouldnt try to apply at a Twin Otter company in Canada, USA, etc etc. If companies think im trying to cheat the system, i dont see how. Yes im a low time guy, i dont expect to apply for a company and get put on the Twin Otter right away (atleast in Canada). But working the ramp for a respectable amount of time then moving up will save the company money in the long run, i dont see how that could be a problem. They dont pay for my training, i already have. I am open to every single company that flies Twin Otters and in no way am i avoiding to fly up North/South/East/West. Im a single young guy who wants to get the hell out of my parents basement. Now i have been applying all over the place to companies that do and dont fly Twin Otters. At this point i just want a job to start working towards a eventual flight position. As "Notpaying" said, aviation is about the journey not the destination. As for me its been an awsome journey so far. Do i regret taking this course? hmm hard to say. Maybe it will pay off within the next couple of years. Paying for my own training and not putting it on my resume? I think that is a waste of money, so im going to leave it on there.

Once again thanks to everyone for the advice and help. Always appreciated to get a different perspective on things then my own.
Cheers
---------- ADS -----------
 
Krimson
Rank 7
Rank 7
Posts: 585
Joined: Tue Apr 17, 2012 4:54 pm

Re: low time guy with a bit extra

Post by Krimson »

You can never go wrong with more training.

If you look at it from a different perspective, what about all the flight instructors? Every single one of them is paying $7-10000 for on the job training with no hope of a job yet. But they will still tell you spending $6000 on a TR is wrong.

If you were offered three jobs with 200 hours, I think it's a pretty simple choice that everyone would make.
1: Buy a TR on a 1900, fly right seat 3 years (cost $6500)
2: Buy a Class IV instructor rating, fly a C172 for 2 years (cost $8500)
3: Hired to work on the ramp, don't fly for 2 years (cost: shit pay, cost of renewals, not flying)

You'll likely be making the most right off the bat with option 1, spent the least amount of money, and be the happiest since it's actually what you wanted to do. You'll also be more marketable after a few years if you need to move, get laid off, etc.
---------- ADS -----------
 
notpaying
Rank 2
Rank 2
Posts: 74
Joined: Fri Mar 02, 2012 5:12 pm

Re: low time guy with a bit extra

Post by notpaying »

I have taken a few steps to help you out. Check out these links for entry level 200 hour jobs that one could get:

Directory of aviation companies in the world (all continents) // Air Labrador has an add for F/Os requiring 200hrs
http://www.pilotcareercenter.com

Directory of worlwide dropzones including Canada
http://www.dropzone.com/dropzone/North_America/Canada/
Banner towing companies
http://www.trilliumair.ca/other/aerial-advertising/
---------- ADS -----------
 
Last edited by notpaying on Fri Nov 01, 2013 4:29 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Krimson
Rank 7
Rank 7
Posts: 585
Joined: Tue Apr 17, 2012 4:54 pm

Re: low time guy with a bit extra

Post by Krimson »

Isn't a flight instructor buying his way into a job?

The case of having the money to "buy a way in" isn't required. How many of us have huge debt from flight school? What's adding another 12% to actually get a job? What about working your ass off to be able to afford to get that first job via a type rating? Why is it considered worse than working on a ramp; not flying is not flying. Why not get paid double and enjoy what you do in the meantime?

For 200 hour pilot not being hired at the airline level, Jazz and Georgian both have programs for right out of college pilots. No experience at all. AC has a new cadet program that just begun. I can think of one other company that is starting to put 200 hour pilots on dash-8s. That is all off the top of my head.


It's not anyone looking to jump any line, there isn't a Canadian wide line that you have to wait for your job. A job is a job. There are multiple ways to get hired.
---------- ADS -----------
 
notpaying
Rank 2
Rank 2
Posts: 74
Joined: Fri Mar 02, 2012 5:12 pm

Re: low time guy with a bit extra

Post by notpaying »

Krimson wrote:Isn't a flight instructor buying his way into a job?

The case of having the money to "buy a way in" isn't required. How many of us have huge debt from flight school? What's adding another 12% to actually get a job? What about working your ass off to be able to afford to get that first job via a type rating? Why is it considered worse than working on a ramp; not flying is not flying. Why not get paid double and enjoy what you do in the meantime?

For 200 hour pilot not being hired at the airline level, Jazz and Georgian both have programs for right out of college pilots. No experience at all. AC has a new cadet program that just begun. I can think of one other company that is starting to put 200 hour pilots on dash-8s. That is all off the top of my head.


It's not anyone looking to jump any line, there isn't a Canadian wide line that you have to wait for your job. A job is a job. There are multiple ways to get hired.
I mentioned a few links one could benefit from, why not take advantage of them?
---------- ADS -----------
 
Last edited by notpaying on Fri Nov 01, 2013 4:31 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Krimson
Rank 7
Rank 7
Posts: 585
Joined: Tue Apr 17, 2012 4:54 pm

Re: low time guy with a bit extra

Post by Krimson »

I am just showing the no paying thing everyone is so gung-ho about isn't an all encompassing guideline. Sure if I had an option to do something I like and not pay, I would take it; which I did when I first started. If at the time I had a wife, house and established life, I would not be leaving on rotational work for 6 months. Not a chance.

I would not take on debt either, I would continue with my previous work to be able to afford a TR and make the switch. I am not "jumping" anyone in line either, this isn't high school, it's my career, I'm going to do what it takes to make my life sustainable just like in any other profession. I'm not screwing anybody, in fact I help everyone when I can, it's just how the corporate world works. Welcome. Work to get what you want, one way or another.

Ps. Don't think because you "earn" your way up in a company they won't bag you in a second without thought if their finances aren't working out
---------- ADS -----------
 
Big Pistons Forever
Top Poster
Top Poster
Posts: 5927
Joined: Wed Feb 18, 2004 7:17 pm
Location: West Coast

Re: low time guy with a bit extra

Post by Big Pistons Forever »

The bottom line here is pretty simple.

A brand new CPL wannabe pilot doesn't bring anything to the job. A brand new CPL with a shiny new certificate from Flight Safety still doesn't bring anything to the job. The reality is that companies can get Twin Otter/King Air/SW3 FO's that bring actual experience working in the industry, even if it is only on the ramp, but will often have actual flight experience and will still pay for the training.

Therefore unless you absolutely have a guaranteed job offer in your hand, buying training on spec is pretty much always a bad idea. Going into debt to pay for training on spec is IMO absolute insanity.

BTW most of the guys who have that guaranteed seat after they pay for training already have some connection to the company either because they already work on the ramp/dispatch and therefore are a known quantity or are already working in the industry and use their contacts to get the internal recommend. The slight glimmer of hope for these folks is that for the better companies they will be on a bond that involves no up front money, and if they complete their time, they will not have directly paid for any training.

Is this a Shitty situation, Absolutely. Will it change any time soon Not a Chance. Is it going to be different for you ? Almost Never. If this is all a big surprise to you then frankly my sympathy level is low as any kind of serious research will give you a very good idea of the reality of life for a new CPL.

Is my post harsh and unsympathetic, I guess so but rather than blowing smoke up your ass I have given you this posters honest and dispassionate appreciation of the industry. It is one data point and what you choose to do with it is totally up to you
---------- ADS -----------
 
N1 Green
Rank 1
Rank 1
Posts: 46
Joined: Fri Apr 26, 2013 7:56 am

Re: low time guy with a bit extra

Post by N1 Green »

notpaying wrote: I just see paying for a type rating as a matter of laziness and lack of motivation and ambition. You are BUYING your way into a job. It only tells SO MUCH about a person's personality. Ok so you have money enough to buy your way in, good for you guys. This isn't the case for everyone.
a 26 year old man walks in. it's an interview for LR55 FO. 680TT, 210MIFR-PIC , and Flight Safety Lear rated. Nice guy.
The owner of the company asks him directly, how could you afford TR if I may ask and flying MIFR PIC on a PA23 for 210 hours.
Thy guys says: I got my MIFR CPL when I was 21. the day after my flight test I signed a car loan for an F150 and bought some tools. started driving from site to site trying to find some labor work. today I got 5 guys wroking for me and I am running my own roofing company.
Mike looks at us, looks back at him and said: "my only concern when hiring you is that you might buy my company one day" , and hired him. company still paid for full type as his type expired.


I had the chance to chat with him one time about it. he told me: "I am not a slave, I would NOT work for free! Insted of cleaning hangars at 11PM and getting paid 10.23 an hour , I work hard during the day, making 95 a year and saving my $$ - later used it for training.

There is nothing wrong about it. he did not rob a CIBC branch. he worked like a man and save his $$.
Just like the other examples I wrote down about an I.T guy that pays for his Microsoft training, same here - no diffrence if you pay 10000$ for CFI rating for 14000$ for DCH6 type. different patch, thats all.
---------- ADS -----------
 
Last edited by N1 Green on Wed Oct 23, 2013 7:52 pm, edited 1 time in total.
N1 Green
Rank 1
Rank 1
Posts: 46
Joined: Fri Apr 26, 2013 7:56 am

Re: low time guy with a bit extra

Post by N1 Green »

Big Pistons Forever wrote: Is this a Shitty situation, Absolutely. Will it change any time soon Not a Chance. Is it going to be different for you ? Almost Never.
30 years ago it was very common to see companies paying for MULTI IFR training! - (for fresh 250 hr pilots)
If I would to open this post in 1977 and write that "I paid for my Type Rating" - people think I am crazy.
so toady in 2013 we moved to the next step. not only in Aviation..!
in 20 years from now, paying for TR would be NORMAL, it would be part of your training just like MIFR.
Europe is one step ahead of us with paying for training. TR to be paid by the pilot is part of the game is europe.
---------- ADS -----------
 
notpaying
Rank 2
Rank 2
Posts: 74
Joined: Fri Mar 02, 2012 5:12 pm

Re: low time guy with a bit extra

Post by notpaying »

N1 Green wrote:
Big Pistons Forever wrote: Is this a Shitty situation, Absolutely. Will it change any time soon Not a Chance. Is it going to be different for you ? Almost Never.
30 years ago it was very common to see companies paying for MULTI IFR training! - (for fresh 250 hr pilots)
If I would to open this post in 1977 and write that "I paid for my Type Rating" - people think I am crazy.
so toady in 2013 we moved to the next step. not only in Aviation..!
in 20 years from now, paying for TR would be NORMAL, it would be part of your training just like MIFR.
Europe is one step ahead of us with paying for training. TR to be paid by the pilot is part of the game is europe.
It is hard for me to believe that this is the next step, even if we are in 2013.
---------- ADS -----------
 
Last edited by notpaying on Fri Nov 01, 2013 4:32 pm, edited 1 time in total.
N1 Green
Rank 1
Rank 1
Posts: 46
Joined: Fri Apr 26, 2013 7:56 am

Re: low time guy with a bit extra

Post by N1 Green »

Why is it not normal?
---------- ADS -----------
 
Diadem
Rank 8
Rank 8
Posts: 911
Joined: Fri Mar 05, 2010 10:16 pm
Location: A sigma left of the top of the bell curve

Re: low time guy with a bit extra

Post by Diadem »

When I was doing my flight training, I worked on the ramp for a company that absolutely under no circumstances would ever move a rampie into a flying position; I did it because I needed to make money, and I loved being around airplanes. After I finished my flight training, I worked on the ramp for another company which doesn't move rampies into flying positions; I did it because I needed to make money, and I loved being around airplanes. I had exhausted every possibility of going directly into a cockpit, so naturally when a company offered me a position in dispatch and the promise of a flying job in a year, I took it. Why? Because I needed to keep working until a job opened up, and it only made sense to take a job with the company for which I wanted to work as a pilot. Should I have refused and gone to work at McDonald's because I was a licenced pilot and it was beneath me to do anything in aviation except work as a pilot? Not all of us are lucky enough to find flying jobs right away, and in the meantime we have to do something to make money, so why not start working for an air operator in some other capacity? It's not about paying one's dues, it's about there not being jobs right now, but there probably will be in the future, and the chief pilots would rather hire someone they know. We're not doctors, we're not perpetually in demand, and 200-hour pilots can't expect to walk straight into a cockpit. I don't see the difference between a non-pilot working on the ramp to make money and a pilot working on the ramp to make money.
As for buying type ratings, I think the reason it's so uncommon in Canada is because there's so much more to flying here than there is in Europe and Asia, not to mention that actual flying skills are important in aircraft without complex autopilots and flight data computers. How many Canadian pilots walk down the jetbridge, take a seat in the cockpit, program the FMS, and sit back while the autopilot flies? Paying for training on a King Air or a Navajo wouldn't get that pilot any further ahead because he or she hasn't demonstrated the ability to haul freight, survive in sub-zero temperatures, or operate his/her own GSE without breaking the airplane. CPs want pilots who are more than computer programmers, they want people with work ethic and the ability to handle harsh working conditions. That's where working the ramp to show one's abilities is so important: if you can't cut it on the ramp, how are you going to cut it doing the same stuff as a pilot?
---------- ADS -----------
 
N1 Green
Rank 1
Rank 1
Posts: 46
Joined: Fri Apr 26, 2013 7:56 am

Re: low time guy with a bit extra

Post by N1 Green »

Do you really think that employers hire you to work the ramp so they can "sense your abilities" ?

Working the ramp is an old Canadian method that must be eliminated.


Risk:
It takes 12-24 months to upgrade a ramp pilot to the right seat.
2 years of almost zero flying.
later you take this young man and expect him to program the G530 in the B200 and fly RNAV SID in IMC manually after 2 years of non flying time.
few words from my previous post:
N1 Green wrote:
Big Pistons Forever wrote: Work hard keep your mouth shut and your eyes and ears open and you can earn a good flying job.
2 years later he is getting his first pilot job he "EARN" and go fly b200. 10 minutes later the Capt drops 10 knots below reff, one thing for sure: our newbie F/O will keep his mouth shut. he doesnt want to say anything, not now, not after he cleaned the office toilets for 2 years and now he is getting a chance to fly...
which by the way, I am sure he will do great after not flying for 2 years. .

Benefit for business owners:
Ask yourself: in an average 703 operation, who is getting paid fairly ?

-AME’s ? (40 an hour?)
-OFFICE (15-25 an hour?)
-ACCOUNTING (25 an hour?)-
-HR (60-70 a year?)
-Building Maintenance (50 a year?)
-Ramp supervisor (60 a year?)

-Full Time Ramp guy with no intention to became a pilot (20$ an hour say after 3 years?)
-Full time Ramp guy with his name on the board waiting for Dave to check him out on the Navajo (12.50 an hour?)


If the owner would have to hire new guys to work the ramp and give them a stable job, he would have to pay them 20$ an hour on their 3rd-4th year.
why would someone work the ramp for 12.50 with no intention to became a pilot? I would prefer to work Tims and stay warm -
and the owner knows that.
He/She understands that providing fuel services in the airport would cost him 120,000 a year. but hold on, what if he hires 9 ramp guys for 10.20 an hour and reduces the yearly cost to 60 a year!

In order to justify this method of abusing , employers start using all kind of professional sayings like:
“If he can work the ramp he can fly the plane safe”
“You will have to work the ramp first so we can assure that you are the right guy for this complex 703 operation”
“always work hard young man, you will only see good things out of it”



IS HE THE RIGHT GUY FOR THIS MISSION ?
If you want to make sure that your new pilot can handle all of the operation aspects - you must have the correct screening process.
How do you do that? How can you screen the right guy without working with him first for a year?
ANSWER: you build the right screening system according to your needs.
I’ll give you an example:

Let's say I am running a 703 ops up north.
I am looking to hire 5 FOs for a local B200 operation.
We are flying to remote areas. let's say it's similar to the Buffalo Airways concept - just for the example.

The hiring process is published to be 7 days. 20 candidates to start, 5 will get the job.
no it's not just an "interview" or "Sim evaluation".. let's just call it "Buffalo Hiring Camp" - just so you get my point.


Day1: Interview.

Regular interview – but not just someone from the office asking you some questions, but a real interview , with the owner! With HR! with the chief pilot!
When the young candidate find out that Buffalo take it seriously , he will take it seriously as well. Whereas some ramp sup will let you file some paperwork and 5 minutes later tells you “you got the job – go get the blue boxes from the hanger”
You always make sure that once a task is completed (say an interview), the candidate goes back to the same room where the others are waiting. You always monitor the group , you are looking for personality highlights – will talk about it in a second.
At the end of the day all of the candidates are staying in the hanger and spent the night with sleeping bags.
No cell phones or any method of time indication is allowed (clocks/watches/phones/talking to other staff).


Day2: SIM

Starting at 4AM

Wake up everyone. get them out of the warm hanger. Put a white board and some seats out on the ramp. Give each one of them flashlights. paper and a pen.
Brief them for the sim!. Sim is based on 2 major parts:
1.Solo concept.
2.CRM concept.

The idea is to give them goals for the sim. Not just to fly an NDB APP in IMC (that as well), but more like giving them goals (say a w/b and navigation planning scenario).
you let them pick their partners for the sim. You let them figure out who is going in first to the Sim , who is last. Say every team that finish sim get to go back to sleep.
It will create some conflicts – that’s ok, it’s part of the personality profiling process.


DAY3:
Teamwork eval,
You get all of them into one room, and start giving them team based missions.
Examples:
Mission A – you bring an IKEA complicated furniture into the class. No manual, no original screws – only 10 screws and 2 screwdrivers for example.
You asked them to built it in the dark. You asked them to report you every 10 minutes about their ETA (what time they think this furniture would be built). You give them 30 minutes for the mission, where is should take about an hour to figure it out.
You add more elements of teamwork potential conflicts. The main goal is to create as many conflicts as we can. The idea is to identify the right guy that is able
to stay sharp , stay focused on the mission and trim the team to follow his ideas.

Mission B – Same concept as A , but with more realistic conditions. For example: you ask them to load a trailer with a forklift. They can only use the forklift 4 times. Having 6 skids for example.
the idea is to identify maturity, identify who is able to stick to the main goal under dynamic and changing environment.
More missions with the same concept during day 3…

At the end of the day: Sociometry exam. Means that each one of them answers 100 questions exam. Every question evaluate the other members of the group, for example:

1.During the first Teamwork mission, who Impressed you the most? (1 – LOW/ 5 – HIGH)

DAVE - 3
BRIAN – 3
DON – 5
BROCK- 1

2.During the first Teamwork mission, who Impressed the team but did not Impressed you? (1 – LOW/ 5 – HIGH)

DAVE - 3
BRIAN – 3
DON – 5
BROCK- 1



3.would you feel combatable to fly a plane under an emergency situation with: (1 – LOW/ 5 – HIGH)

DAVE - 5
BRIAN – 1
DON – 1
BROCK- 2

4. Say you need to pick one of your group friends to became Buffalo General manager, who would you pick ? (1 – LOW/ 5 – HIGH)

DAVE - 1
BRIAN – 1
DON – 1
BROCK- 4



DAY4 to DAY6
Field operations.
You fly/drive the group to a remote area to set up a camp.
They don’t have any sense of time (no phones/no watch/clock).

It is a combination of all of the previous stages, but outdoor with bad weather. The idea is again to issue missions. (build a 2000 foot strip for example) and to evaluate them as indivisuals and as a team.

DAY 7 – Final Sociometry exam to evaluate changes made during the field operations.

---------
The idea is to find the right person. It must be done professionally, means that a Psychologist must analyze the Sociometry exams and monitor the team during all of the 7 days. He/She should stand on the side and write notes about each one of the team members.
The ideal candidate would show:

1.Maturity.

2.Assertiveness

3.High level of evaluation by the rest of the group (Sociometry exams results)

4.Mission focused, zero emotional behavior – super rational thinking under stress AND under normal conditions. (very important to evaluate rational thinking under normal conditions. More people tend to go emotional under normal conditions).

5.Open mind, creative thinking – use all available sources. Create new sources when needed.



once you figure out your new 5 FO’s, let them work the ramp for 30 days so they understand the other side of the cockpit. And start their ground school on the 31st day. No delays.
Let them fly jump seat for 4 weeks during ground school.
By creating such a process you bring pride to the job, to the company. You bring the right people and make better pilots.

Looking at the current process today, anyone who can load a van and work the ramp for 2 years will get the right seat. But is he the right guy!?

Every screening process has to match the final goal.
If you are hiring a bush pilot so use the example above, if you are hiring a 737 CRM environment pilot, make sure he tells his PF “LNAV Green” up loud when flying the SID.
If you are hiring a skydive pilot, make sure he can do the same mission over and over with respect to routine. After 200 jump flights some pilots tend to shortcut what they have learned on the first day.


MCC training will catch up in Canada in the next couple of years. I hope that one day , a guy with 201 hours would get a job because he is the right guy for the job, not because everyone likes him and he “worked his ass” on the ramp.

Keep your ass warm! Use your brain.
---------- ADS -----------
 
airspeed250
Rank 2
Rank 2
Posts: 53
Joined: Wed May 15, 2013 8:07 pm

Re: low time guy with a bit extra

Post by airspeed250 »

notpaying wrote:You are BUYING your way into a job. It only tells SO MUCH about a person's personality.
How is this different than buying your MBA, MSc, MA, CA, CFA, MD, DMD, JD?
---------- ADS -----------
 
longjon
Rank 7
Rank 7
Posts: 723
Joined: Mon Mar 20, 2006 7:35 pm

Re: low time guy with a bit extra

Post by longjon »

Good on you for trying, too bad the job never panned out. There are no rules, you don,t think most of these posters wouldnt stab you in the back, pay the same for the training and take that job if they knew they could be flying a Twin Otter.
You do what you gotta do, as people have done in the past, resulting in the endentured servent mentality we see today. Don,t let them kid you, one newbe not going the ramp route is not going to change diddly squat.
---------- ADS -----------
 
digits_
Top Poster
Top Poster
Posts: 6755
Joined: Mon Feb 14, 2011 2:26 am

Re: low time guy with a bit extra

Post by digits_ »

N1 Green wrote:
Big Pistons Forever wrote: Europe is one step ahead of us with paying for training. TR to be paid by the pilot is part of the game is europe.
More or less: it's like that at most low cost airlines. At the other airlines, the "big, decent" ones, your typerating will be substracted from your monthly salary for the first 1/2 years. That means, if they decide to fire you, you will have had a (partially) free typerating and a somewhat decent salary.
---------- ADS -----------
 
User avatar
single_swine_herder
Rank 7
Rank 7
Posts: 627
Joined: Tue Feb 07, 2012 9:35 pm

Re: low time guy with a bit extra

Post by single_swine_herder »

Well said Krimson.

When I'm screening and interviewing, I look for something to set one applicant apart from the sea of resumes. Initiative and dedication rank highly in my factors. I'm looking for something to set a person aside from the rest ..... whether that is supporting skills in other fields of endevour, education, worldly experience, for something .... anything .... to make an applicant pop out ahead of the nameless, faceless pack of "drivers," and looking for "pilots" in the same way the US Navy looks for "Aviators."

I'd give this fellow a shot at speaking with the Chief Pilot and I ...... if I were looking looking for a so-called "Low Timer" to fill a position. Unfortunately for him, our entry level bar is set higher in total time, examinations completed, and life experience for our F/O positions.

I never understood this segment of the industry that seeks to impose some form of Communistic code of conduct on their "fellow pilots" because they show some "gumption" and want to better themselves relative to the Bozo who does nothing beginning the day after he receives his or her CPL and somehow thinks he's joined a union or guild and is entitled to a job based upon some misguided sense of entitlement conferred by that document.

Heaven forbid you should actually find this whole area of employment interesting, and only study something because ..... (gulp) ..... you find it fascinating while some Bluto-brain beside you won't crack a book unless its to skim through it only enough to obtain a marginal pass mark on an exam they are paid to write at the end of a crummy ground school presentation.

To some, "driving an airplane" is the same as driving a forklift at the local lumber yard, and spending the day placing a pallet of 2 x 4's on a shelf for the public to buy. I'm not looking to hire that attitude or mentality and introduce that low level of performance to the rest of my staff and make them work beside a lowest common denominator type of personality.

Some years ago, I heard a saying which describes this creed well ..... "You never need to have lid on a pail of crabs, because just as one starts to climb out, the others pull it back down. The same is true for pilots."

More power to this young man for showing some desire to get ahead relative to his less motivated, or less financially able peers in my opinion. The concept that there is some form of formal line of pilots entitled to the next job in aviation based on your licence number as if you were in a line at a concert, and somebody has cut in front of you to get to the ticket wicket and select a better seat is just drivel.

This is a free enterprise system, not the Soviet Union, nor the Pipe Fitters Union. There actually is competition out there in the real world, and "participant trophies" aren't given out.
---------- ADS -----------
 
ocud
Rank 0
Rank 0
Posts: 6
Joined: Fri Oct 18, 2013 7:36 am

Re: low time guy with a bit extra

Post by ocud »

longjon wrote:Good on you for trying, too bad the job never panned out.
single_swine_herder wrote: More power to this young man for showing some desire to get ahead relative to his less motivated, or less financially able peers in my opinion. The concept that there is some form of formal line of pilots entitled to the next job in aviation based on your licence number as if you were in a line at a concert, and somebody has cut in front of you to get to the ticket wicket and select a better seat is just drivel.
Thanks for the encouraging words fellas!
Diadem wrote: As for buying type ratings, I think the reason it's so uncommon in Canada is because there's so much more to flying here than there is in Europe and Asia, not to mention that actual flying skills are important in aircraft without complex autopilots and flight data computers. How many Canadian pilots walk down the jetbridge, take a seat in the cockpit, program the FMS, and sit back while the autopilot flies? Paying for training on a King Air or a Navajo wouldn't get that pilot any further ahead because he or she hasn't demonstrated the ability to haul freight, survive in sub-zero temperatures, or operate his/her own GSE without breaking the airplane. CPs want pilots who are more than computer programmers, they want people with work ethic and the ability to handle harsh working conditions. That's where working the ramp to show one's abilities is so important: if you can't cut it on the ramp, how are you going to cut it doing the same stuff as a pilot?
Interesting points being made here. I guess it comes down to how your resume looks. For me i worked as a snowboard instructor for many years and while doing my flight training i had a ramp job for a company at that same airport . So its really more about the things you do while you're not actually flying the plane, because lets face it. I think i'm more competent at flying a twin otter in IMC etc, etc, now then i will be in 2 years time.

Also some interesting points about Europe and the rest of the world. Seems that Canada and maybe the U.S are the only places where it is frowned upon to get your own type rating. But hey, ive still got my Dutch Citizenship and passport so maybe ill have a go there :wink: .

Cheers
---------- ADS -----------
 
shimmydampner
Rank (9)
Rank (9)
Posts: 1764
Joined: Sat Feb 21, 2004 3:59 pm

Re: low time guy with a bit extra

Post by shimmydampner »

With each cycle of this debate the posts get more and more asinine.
---------- ADS -----------
 
homesick
Rank 1
Rank 1
Posts: 42
Joined: Sun Oct 21, 2007 6:45 am
Location: Where the streets have no names

Re: low time guy with a bit extra

Post by homesick »

Pay for TR vs ramping.

Both have an opportunity cost attached. Question is figuring which one you are willing to bear at that point in life. I personally call shenanigans on the proving your worth doing something completely unrelated to your intended eventual position. You are adding absolutely nothing to your skills column relating to a flying career. I'd rather pay a certain amount for that opportunity than pay with the most precious thing I have, time. Building character??? I'll leave that to the local politician to achieve.

What I find disturbing though is this systemic overt contempt for someone who chooses an alternative path (wrt Canadian norms) to a job. There is credence in both arguments. We all have our opinions and can disagree with conflicting opinions, but painting the opposing view in such a negative light only exposes prejudicial attitudes which I certainly hope are not the norm in Canadian aviation.

I couldn't stomach ramping it for 2-3 years on poverty level wages. So opted to do the next worse thing, got myself bonded for a 737 TR.

Unlike ocud (so far), it's worked out for me. Someone out there will pick you up with a PPC on a popular aircraft type. Just a matter of time. You have the humility and maturity to understand the ramifications of your decision and are looking for all the help you can get in correcting it. That, to me, speaks volumes about your character.

Good luck.
---------- ADS -----------
 
Diadem
Rank 8
Rank 8
Posts: 911
Joined: Fri Mar 05, 2010 10:16 pm
Location: A sigma left of the top of the bell curve

Re: low time guy with a bit extra

Post by Diadem »

Let's create a hypothetical situation based on my post above, in which a low-time pilot shows up at an air operator asking for a flying job, only to be told by the chief pilot that there's nothing available. "But hey, I'll tell you what, in six months or a year we'll almost certainly have an opening. Hang around until then and if I still like you, you'll be at the top of the list for that spot because you were here first. Hell, if you want, there's an opening on the ramp that you can take to make money in the meantime. You'll be paid and treated the same as all of our non-pilot rampies." The low-timer considers doing this, or working at the local fast food restaurant for significantly less money and not working with airplanes. He has exhausted every option of getting a job directly into a cockpit, and this seems to be his best shot of ever working in aviation. He has no other skills or education, nor any desire to do anything else, which means that regardless of the job he takes for the next six months or a year he's going to be doing menial labour for low pay. Why the hell wouldn't he want to get to know the operation better and show the CP that he's competent and hard-working? It has nothing to do with paying his dues or seeing who can tough it out, it's simple economics: there are more pilots than there are jobs, which means a certain number will be out of work at any one time, and they'll need to take jobs doing something else to pay their bills. Why not tow airplanes rather than get grease burns, and make contacts to get that flying job? Everyone on AvCanada is always going on and on about how getting a job depends on who one knows, and I really don't see the negative side to doing that within the same company for which one wants to work.
Now, low-timer came from a low-income family, and spent everything he had ever made, plus some student loans, on his flight training. He didn't have an extra $10000 to spend on an instructor rating, or type training, let alone the cost to travel to and stay in Toronto, all while not working. That was me: I spent every dime I had and then some, and while I was working 70 hours a week between two jobs I was barely making a living wage. I couldn't have taken a few weeks off to mosey on over to the other side of the country and drop a few grand on training in the hopes that it would make me more employable. So how do you think low-timer feels when rich boy shows up with the same amount of flying time, but twenty hours in a sim for which rich boy's parents paid while rich boy was on an all-expenses-paid vacation to Toronto? (Note: this has absolutely nothing to do with ocud; I have no idea how he paid for his training, and he could have worked quite hard to earn it all himself. However, too damn often in this industry I've encountered spoiled little rich brats with a sense of entitlement that, because daddy owns an airplane or because mommy flies for AC, they don't need to work as hard as those of us without such fortune to gain the same rewards) Anyway, rich boy swaggers up to the CP and shows him the fancy certificate from FlightSafety which demonstrates proficiency on that type of aircraft. What would be the appropriate response? Should the CP give the next available pilot position to rich boy because it would save a bit on training costs, or should he hire the guy who's shown up on time every day for the last year, worked his ass off in horrendous weather conditions without complaining, and done his best for the company because he takes pride in his job? The CP didn't make low-timer do that to prove anything, he just didn't have an opening and offered another job in order to earn an income, yet low-timer demonstrated all of the qualities that the CP looks for in a pilot. Meanwhile, rich boy showed up and expected to be handed a job based on the fact that his parents were wealthier than low-timer's. Is it really fair that rich boy should get the job when low-timer never even had the opportunity to obtain the same qualifications?
Essentially what I'm saying is that not all of us are born with the luxuries of the world bestowed upon us, and we actually had to work our nads off to get where we are. I would have loved to go directly into a jet with 200 hours, but I couldn't afford it. I would have loved to go directly into a King Air with 200 hours, but there weren't any jobs available. I would have loved to work as a doctor to pay my bills while I was waiting for a flying position to become available, but I had to choose between flight school or university, not both. It's simple enough to say that people should go work in the oil patch for a couple of years to make enough money to buy a type rating, but I don't have those skills, nor would I be likely to develop them, and I tend not to fit in well with the type of people found on those jobsites. I have no discernible skills or education besides flying, which makes me qualified to do exactly one thing, and when there were no openings to utilize that skill my options were limited: I could work the ramp and get to know the operation, make connections, etc, or I could flip burgers and not get any further ahead than I would have been had I not gone to flight school at all. Was it my preference? Absolutely not. It was necessary, which seems to be something that a lot of people on here don't understand: I did what I had to do to survive, and it also happened to help me advance my career. I didn't do it willy-nilly because it was fun, or because I wanted to be on Ice Pilots, or because it was my dream to sit right seat in a King Air after a year of not flying; I did it because there were no better options. So while you're in Toronto or Florida or wherever spending daddy's money, or the money you earned from the job that you got because of the education for which daddy paid, in order to get a type rating because you feel that it's beneath you to throw bags and pump fuel while you wait for a job to open up, remember that not all of us are as lucky as you. For example: "There are million ways to waste million $." That's very nice for you, but I didn't have a million dollars to begin with. If aviation becomes a business in which employees have to pay for all of their training, at every single level, then it's going to become the exclusive realm of the rich; anyone who isn't gifted with wealth is going to be locked out of that exclusive club. How long will it be before airlines begin insisting that pilots pay for their recurrent training as well? Will the responses still be the same on here?
As for getting an instructor rating, that's a generic qualification that's valid at any flight school anywhere in the country, just like a commercial licence is a generic permit to work for any air operator. Doctors get specialties and IT professionals take courses which allow them to work at any hospital or company in their field; if they need to get training to work in a specific company, for instance getting certified on proprietary software, I guarantee that the employee doesn't pay for it. Why would they if they couldn't use that training in the event of layoffs? "what about an I.T guy that pays for his Microsoft Training to get a job after he already graduated from school. what about doctors that fly to Vegas for a 3 day seminar for 4000$ ? (my brother just did that), just so he can put himself on a diffrent level. what about an electrician paying 10,000$ to get his saftey core so maybe.. if he is lucky - he might win the bid and get the job." All of these are useful on a broad scale, and make these employees more marketable to every employer out there, not just those who operate a specific piece of equipment that's only found at one or two hospitals or proprietary software only used in one or two companies. When you "[buy] your MBA, MSc, MA, CA, CFA, MD, DMD, JD" you can take those qualifications to any business in Canada that requires those skills, because they're generic certifications of your abilities, not company-specific or type-specific training. The aviation equivalent would be getting a rating on seaplanes, or multi-engine aircraft, or an instructor rating: these things make the pilot more valuable to any company that hires him/her, even if the certification isn't directly utilized. Getting a type rating banks on flying one specific type of aircraft and working for a limited number of companies, perhaps as few as one, which operate that type, because the person getting the rating has enough spare cash lying around to take a gamble on getting one of those few jobs. When I got my CPL, I would have taken a job on any airplane anywhere in the world; when a person gets a type rating on a 737, it's because they can afford to say "I'm going to work for WestJet/Canjet/Sunwing/Ryanair, because flying paradrops or pipeline patrol is beneath me". When a pilot gets an instructor rating, they can go to any school in Canada and ask for a job, just like any CPL can go to any air operator and ask for a job. A pilot with a 737 type rating isn't going to go to Air Tindi or Wabusk looking for work; they got that training to become more appealing to specific operators because they could afford to not just take any job out there. It's utterly beneath them to fly a Navajo or a 206, and only a peasant would ever get into anything with piston engines. Not everyone has the luxury of buying a type rating, and for the rest of us that usually means doing something low-paying that doesn't in any way involve flying while we hope to find a better opportunity; I sure wish I had the money to be able to say that "I couldn't stomach ramping it for 2-3 years on poverty level wages", and that I could have taken a pass, but I was too busy trying to make enough money to feed myself, doing any job at my disposal. Luckily, the highest-paying job I was able to find also helped me in my career aspirations. If my choices were between working the ramp or taking orders at McDonald's, there's no question in my mind which option I would take. It doesn't make me any worse a pilot for it, I'm just not as lucky as some of you.
---------- ADS -----------
 
notpaying
Rank 2
Rank 2
Posts: 74
Joined: Fri Mar 02, 2012 5:12 pm

Re: low time guy with a bit extra

Post by notpaying »

+1 Awesome writing skills. You couldn't have summed it up any better.
---------- ADS -----------
 
notpaying
Rank 2
Rank 2
Posts: 74
Joined: Fri Mar 02, 2012 5:12 pm

Re: low time guy with a bit extra

Post by notpaying »

homesick wrote:I'd rather pay a certain amount for that opportunity than pay with the most precious thing I have, time. I couldn't stomach ramping it for 2-3 years on poverty level wages. So opted to do the next worse thing, got myself bonded for a 737 TR.
I don't understand quite exactly. You got yourself bonded or you paid for it ? THat's two different things. Did you even take any steps to find a flying job once you finished school ? Or you simply said, I don't wanna ramp and walked into a TR training institution?

I am asking this because I have the feeling that some fellow aviators might have simply assumed that there are no flying jobs, did not want to ramp and consequently walked into a TR training facility. That is a huge problem. There was tremendous movement in Canadian Aviation during the past year and it might have slowed down slightly, however one CAN secure a flying job with a fresh CPL and without paying for any training. As I have mentioned it in a previous post on the same subject, there are entry level jobs with 200 hours out there... are you ready to move away and take the necessary steps to secure them ?
---------- ADS -----------
 
Positiveclimb
Rank 0
Rank 0
Posts: 10
Joined: Tue Feb 12, 2013 12:27 pm

Re: low time guy with a bit extra

Post by Positiveclimb »

@notpaying,

You are only partly right in saying that 200 hour pilots can get jobs straight out of school. Demand for inexperienced pilots is extremely elastic in nature and there will ALWAYS be a surplus of fresh pilots in the market, that gap will always exist, NOT everyone is going to get hired, that isn't economically possible.

For every FO job, there are hundreds even thousands of applicants. There will be Chief Pilots and DFO's out there willing to give entry level work to people but most of the time they will look at previous experience as their primary criteria for hiring.

I agree in what you are saying, you have to try , take a road trip, network a much as you can and keep following up but don't be disappointed if you don't get called back, you are amongst so many out there that need to either start on the ramp, work dispatch, go abroad, become an instructor or finally take a gamble and pay for a type endorsement. This is your career, you have to do what is right for you.

If you have no experience I always tell kids starting out to look at Cadet programs or MPL programs. It's never going to be easy, luck and timing plays a major role in getting hired for that first job.
---------- ADS -----------
 
airspeed250
Rank 2
Rank 2
Posts: 53
Joined: Wed May 15, 2013 8:07 pm

Re: low time guy with a bit extra

Post by airspeed250 »

notpaying,

I post this respectfully. Not trying to start an argument.

I'm making a BIG assumption here... simply because I don't know the job market as I don't yet hold a CPL. If a 250 hour pilot can go direct entry into a Dash8 or a B1900D, then why not try to get one of those positions right from the start? Obviously the skills gained in towing a banner, dropping skydivers, are not needed to fly a ME turbo-prop as college grads are going straight to Jazz or King Airs. If a potential employer told me that if I had a B1900 rating (or anything similar), I can then have good odds working for them right off the bat, I would drop that 10 or 15k tomorrow. Who wouldn't? You are losing much more than 15k with spending 1-3 years working for very low pay either on the ramp or towing banners versus what you can make later in life as a captain.

Again, assuming, an operator would even hire a 250 hour pilot with a type rating, if the person shows promise in terms of a great resume, such as university and perhaps some non-aviation experience, maturity, proven work ethic; then I would think dropping the money now on a type rating is well worth it. It would be encouraging to read companies hiring pilots based on skills, education, previous non aviation work experience, personality, maturity, a quick flight test, willing to commit to the company, rather than work ethic on a ramp as many are forced to do. Sorry, but in my shoes, in my mid thirties and excellent education and work experience, a TR makes financial sense IF (huge IF) someone would take a chance on me with low hours. Like I said above, this gives two more years as a captain someday versus investing two years now on experience that might not even be highly valued.

I guess the biggest question is: will a TR and little experience actually get you hired in Canada, even with a great non aviation resume? If not, then it's a total waste of money. If yes, then spending the money now, and not spending time on a ramp/instructing/banner towing, is well worth it. Just my opinion... with a lot of assumptions.
---------- ADS -----------
 
Post Reply

Return to “Employment Forum”