Edmonton Airspace Redesign

This forum has been developed to discuss aviation related topics.

Moderators: North Shore, sky's the limit, sepia, Sulako, lilfssister, I WAS Birddog

Post Reply
KnownIce
Rank 3
Rank 3
Posts: 160
Joined: Wed Jan 04, 2006 8:57 pm

Edmonton Airspace Redesign

Post by KnownIce »

The AIC outlining Edmonton's post-city centre airspace has been published effective May 29th.

http://www.navcanada.ca/EN/products-and ... 13.pdf#top

While similar to the proposals sent out for comment last fall, NavCanada has slipped in a Mode C requirement to much of the new Class E airspace underneath the 7000' Class C ring.
---------- ADS -----------
 
leftoftrack
Rank 8
Rank 8
Posts: 826
Joined: Fri Jun 21, 2013 3:10 pm

Re: Edmonton Airspace Redesign

Post by leftoftrack »

WTF is that
---------- ADS -----------
 
Krimson
Rank 7
Rank 7
Posts: 585
Joined: Tue Apr 17, 2012 4:54 pm

Re: Edmonton Airspace Redesign

Post by Krimson »

Blueprints for the new deathstar.
---------- ADS -----------
 
Cessna driver
Rank 5
Rank 5
Posts: 393
Joined: Fri Feb 22, 2013 10:55 pm
Location: The sky

Re: Edmonton Airspace Redesign

Post by Cessna driver »

Yep and of course no mention of parkland, which is awesome, even more aircraft to buzz through the mf without knowing its there
---------- ADS -----------
 
ScreaminBanshee
Rank 1
Rank 1
Posts: 42
Joined: Tue Sep 24, 2013 12:17 pm

Re: Edmonton Airspace Redesign

Post by ScreaminBanshee »

Edmonton airspace is ridiculous. Last night talking to for 30 minutes Terminal there was about 6 planes going into Parkland and dead quiet for YEG. I am hoping that they at least raise the airspace to 4600 above Parkland in the next airspace change so you can at least over fly the field at 1500'. I wonder what they will do when Parkland's approaches are published.
---------- ADS -----------
 
KnownIce
Rank 3
Rank 3
Posts: 160
Joined: Wed Jan 04, 2006 8:57 pm

Re: Edmonton Airspace Redesign

Post by KnownIce »

From what was outlined at a recent talk by NavCanada, I think the chance of raising the Class C above Parkland to be very unlikely. Approach paths for YEG are being tweaked in a way that is going to be putting more and more controlled traffic over Parkland. Their suggestion was to get clearance over the airport in Class C which obviously would be the most prudent thing to do. I pointed out that those who do not will be flying at the exact pattern height of Parkland as they skirt under the airspace. That did not seem to be a concern to NavCanada.

The fix for this it seems as advertised is that the back of the VTA is going to have suggested routing in and out of Parkland.

I have never owned a VTA.
---------- ADS -----------
 
User avatar
1000 HP
Rank (9)
Rank (9)
Posts: 1090
Joined: Sat Sep 18, 2004 8:00 am
Location: South-East Asia

Re: Edmonton Airspace Redesign

Post by 1000 HP »

Krimson wrote:Blueprints for the new deathstar.
Hehehe..
I never figured out the first plan so whatever...
:rolleyes:
---------- ADS -----------
 
Drinking lots of coffee lately, at a nice safe jungle desk, wishing I were flying......
User avatar
cyeg66
Rank 6
Rank 6
Posts: 413
Joined: Tue Nov 24, 2009 1:59 pm
Location: of my mind is in gutter.

Re: Edmonton Airspace Redesign

Post by cyeg66 »

ScreaminBanshee wrote:Edmonton airspace is ridiculous. Last night talking to for 30 minutes Terminal there was about 6 planes going into Parkland and dead quiet for YEG. I am hoping that they at least raise the airspace to 4600 above Parkland in the next airspace change so you can at least over fly the field at 1500'. I wonder what they will do when Parkland's approaches are published.
Shouldn't be required. Look at Airdrie's proximity to YYC's approaches. It'll be almost directly under 17L and provides only 1500' AAE. Children, get out of daddy's way.
---------- ADS -----------
 
Turn right/left heading XXX, vectors for the hell of it.
Post Reply

Return to “General Comments”