Bi-annual pitot static, cor. Check
Moderators: North Shore, sky's the limit, sepia, Sulako
Bi-annual pitot static, cor. Check
Where to go in Southern Ontario for a reasonably priced bi-annual pitot static check ?
Re: Bi-annual pitot static, cor. Check
"reasonably priced" means $400 - $500 without any leaks or errors on a single system at their location. Travel time is extra in most cases unless they can bundle a few together.
Kitchener Aero or Brant Aero...but there'll probably be a wait time so make arrangements soon.
It's getting harder to find places. There used to be a place in London - Trek - but I'm not sure if they still do them or even if they're still open.
Good luck!
Kitchener Aero or Brant Aero...but there'll probably be a wait time so make arrangements soon.
It's getting harder to find places. There used to be a place in London - Trek - but I'm not sure if they still do them or even if they're still open.
Good luck!
- Colonel Sanders
- Top Poster
- Posts: 7512
- Joined: Sun Jun 14, 2009 5:17 pm
- Location: Over Macho Grande
Re: Bi-annual pitot static, cor. Check
TC has succeeded in shutting down most
of the AMO's around here. Typical total
cost is around $2000 to fly to someplace
to get it done.
When you figure that most private aircraft
probably fly around 25 hours per year (that
may be optimistic these days), TC thinks
that people should be paying:
$2000 / 2 x 25 = $40 per hour just for the
cost of their 2 year pitot/static test.
Sometimes, you have to wonder precisely
what they are smoking in Tower C.
of the AMO's around here. Typical total
cost is around $2000 to fly to someplace
to get it done.
When you figure that most private aircraft
probably fly around 25 hours per year (that
may be optimistic these days), TC thinks
that people should be paying:
$2000 / 2 x 25 = $40 per hour just for the
cost of their 2 year pitot/static test.
Sometimes, you have to wonder precisely
what they are smoking in Tower C.
-
- Rank (9)
- Posts: 1409
- Joined: Sat Jun 21, 2008 9:34 pm
Re: Bi-annual pitot static, cor. Check
Triple post
Last edited by azimuthaviation on Mon May 12, 2014 11:38 pm, edited 1 time in total.
-
- Rank (9)
- Posts: 1409
- Joined: Sat Jun 21, 2008 9:34 pm
Re: Bi-annual pitot static, cor. Check
Maybe I should set up a shop in Ottawa. Any lots opening up in Smith Falls neighbour?Colonel Sanders wrote:TC has succeeded in shutting down most
of the AMO's around here.
-
- Rank (9)
- Posts: 1409
- Joined: Sat Jun 21, 2008 9:34 pm
-
- Top Poster
- Posts: 8133
- Joined: Tue Apr 15, 2008 12:25 pm
- Location: Winterfell...
Re: Bi-annual pitot static, cor. Check
You mean..... you guys don't just call up Terminal or Centre and ask them to read back the altitudes displayed on the screen? 

Geez did I say that....? Or just think it....?
Re: Bi-annual pitot static, cor. Check

...there used to be a guy at Boundary Bay that used to do just that...and charge the customer for a 2 year re-cert.
Re: Bi-annual pitot static, cor. Check
Azimuth,
Southwestern Ontario is in need of an Avionics AMO badly.
I've heard of a maintenance shop that turns literally hundreds of pitot-static recerts away and thousands of ELT recerts away each year because they are not qualified.
Brant and Kitchener Aero just can't handle them all.
Southwestern Ontario is in need of an Avionics AMO badly.
I've heard of a maintenance shop that turns literally hundreds of pitot-static recerts away and thousands of ELT recerts away each year because they are not qualified.
Brant and Kitchener Aero just can't handle them all.
- Colonel Sanders
- Top Poster
- Posts: 7512
- Joined: Sun Jun 14, 2009 5:17 pm
- Location: Over Macho Grande
Re: Bi-annual pitot static, cor. Check
Same in Eastern Ontario. TC has shut downSouthwestern Ontario is in need of an Avionics AMO badly
all the avionics AMO's. Everyone here spends
the $2000 to go to Quebec for the pitot/static.
Sometimes you have to wonder if TC is even
aware of the existence of private certified
aircraft. I get the impression from TC that
there are commercial ops (which are crippled
with an overdose of regulations) and homebuilts
(which are the wild west where anything goes)
and nothing else.
Re: Bi-annual pitot static, cor. Check
It would be nice to have an Avionics shop in eastern ON ... dunno why the last one didn't survive ...
I'm headed to Lachute for my 24-month tomorrow if the weather is OK ...
I got my last 2 done at Kitchener Aero, and was completely satisfied ... I used the excuse to go for a trip from Ottawa visit some friends/family in that region, but this year I wanted to stick close by ... so Lachute it is.
I don't expect it'll be 2000$ by the time I'm done ... 1000$ at most, including the flying.
I'm headed to Lachute for my 24-month tomorrow if the weather is OK ...
I got my last 2 done at Kitchener Aero, and was completely satisfied ... I used the excuse to go for a trip from Ottawa visit some friends/family in that region, but this year I wanted to stick close by ... so Lachute it is.
I don't expect it'll be 2000$ by the time I'm done ... 1000$ at most, including the flying.
- Colonel Sanders
- Top Poster
- Posts: 7512
- Joined: Sun Jun 14, 2009 5:17 pm
- Location: Over Macho Grande
Re: Bi-annual pitot static, cor. Check
I didn't know there was a surviving avionics
AMO at Lachute. Everyone here goes to Dorval
which includes NavCan fee, airport fee, etc
which adds up to $2000 when you include transit
costs and HST on all of the above.
AMO at Lachute. Everyone here goes to Dorval
which includes NavCan fee, airport fee, etc
which adds up to $2000 when you include transit
costs and HST on all of the above.
-
- Rank (9)
- Posts: 1409
- Joined: Sat Jun 21, 2008 9:34 pm
Re: Bi-annual pitot static, cor. Check
Didnt two open up in London just a couple years ago?NeverBlue wrote:Southwestern Ontario is in need of an Avionics AMO badly.
Re: Bi-annual pitot static, cor. Check
what about Brant Aero?
DId you hear the one about the jurisprudence fetishist? He got off on a technicality.
Re: Bi-annual pitot static, cor. Check
It can be a month wait I've heard.
... the Field's are great guys...very knowledgable and trustworthy.
It would be my first choice.
Davwire in London tried it for a while but they've shut down I think.
Trek used to do it but the new owner is not qualified I hear and doesn't have an E on staff.
XU aviation doesn't do avionics
... the Field's are great guys...very knowledgable and trustworthy.
It would be my first choice.
Davwire in London tried it for a while but they've shut down I think.
Trek used to do it but the new owner is not qualified I hear and doesn't have an E on staff.
XU aviation doesn't do avionics
-
- Rank (9)
- Posts: 1409
- Joined: Sat Jun 21, 2008 9:34 pm
Re: Bi-annual pitot static, cor. Check
yeah those were the two I was thinking of Davwire and Trek. I thought I saw Davwires equipment in someone elses shop, I guess they did sell them. Trek didnt seem like it was off to a great start, Im not surprised they didnt last.
Re: Bi-annual pitot static, cor. Check
Trek Aviation in London is still open and doing very well both in the maintenace side as well as the avionics side, we probably do anywhere from 8-10 24 month recertifications a week, we are booking a week in advance right now. The base cost is $400 for the whole package, $150 for an extra altimeter or ADC, of course if there's leaks then there will be extra diagnostic charges. Feel free to give us a call at 519-636-9380 or email us at info@trekaviation.com
Re: Bi-annual pitot static, cor. Check
The shop in Lachute:
http://www.avion-tech.ca/
There's also a couple of AME's and a paint shop.
Here's one of them:
http://aero-fax.com/nos-services/
http://www.avion-tech.ca/
There's also a couple of AME's and a paint shop.
Here's one of them:
http://aero-fax.com/nos-services/
Re: Bi-annual pitot static, cor. Check
What about flying south and having it done in the USA?
TC accepted a FAA bi-annual on an import for me a couple years ago. You just have to be specify you wish to have the "IFR" check done not the "VFR" check irregardless of whether you fly VFR or IFR. TC's requirements match the IFR check in the US as far as I understand it.
Another option is to have your AME pull your Transponder, Encoder & Altimeter and send them away to be certified. You then only need to re-install them and do a static leak check (could be done with surgical tubing).
TC accepted a FAA bi-annual on an import for me a couple years ago. You just have to be specify you wish to have the "IFR" check done not the "VFR" check irregardless of whether you fly VFR or IFR. TC's requirements match the IFR check in the US as far as I understand it.
Another option is to have your AME pull your Transponder, Encoder & Altimeter and send them away to be certified. You then only need to re-install them and do a static leak check (could be done with surgical tubing).
-
- Rank (9)
- Posts: 1409
- Joined: Sat Jun 21, 2008 9:34 pm
Re: Bi-annual pitot static, cor. Check
And pitot leak check and correlation and inspect the entire systemcgartly wrote:You then only need to re-install them and do a static leak check
- Colonel Sanders
- Top Poster
- Posts: 7512
- Joined: Sun Jun 14, 2009 5:17 pm
- Location: Over Macho Grande
Re: Bi-annual pitot static, cor. Check
If everything has a green tag why would
you need to do a correlation check?
Surely you're not suggesting that the AME's
who signed off the tags are incompetent?
you need to do a correlation check?
Surely you're not suggesting that the AME's
who signed off the tags are incompetent?
Re: Bi-annual pitot static, cor. Check
I'm with AA on this one.cgartly wrote: You then only need to re-install them and do a static leak check (could be done with surgical tubing).
I think you'd find it a little tricky doing the system integration test with nothing but a chunk of surgical tubing. (Or the static leak test for that matter... that would require lifting a slightly higher dollar item from the Dr.'s office during your medical)
-
- Rank (9)
- Posts: 1409
- Joined: Sat Jun 21, 2008 9:34 pm
Re: Bi-annual pitot static, cor. Check
Because you have to test the aircrafts altitude reporting system. If the components test fine on the bench theyre not very useful if they arent getting power or ground, Gray code lines are broken or air lines are blocked or otherwise malfunctioning.Colonel Sanders wrote:If everything has a green tag why would
you need to do a correlation check?
Plus you have to test them together. The pressure altitude readings from the encoder should match the pressure altitude of the altimeter. I guess thats why they call it a correlation test.
-
- Rank (9)
- Posts: 1409
- Joined: Sat Jun 21, 2008 9:34 pm
Re: Bi-annual pitot static, cor. Check
Now granted if you fly unpressurized aircraft out of uncontrolled airspace in VFR conditions, that probably has little value to you. But if you fly in congested airspace where your TCAS and ATC are getting their data from that system or in a pressurized aircraft where a leak in your static system can cause wild readings as the aircraft climbs and the cabin pressurizes it becomes a little more serious.
Re: Bi-annual pitot static, cor. Check
Speaking of Appendix B, here's a question for the instrument specialists:
A while back there were two AMOs on the same field, both offering altimeter system re-certification.
One would do it in 4 business days and charge $700.
The other would do it same day for only $400.
The difference being, for $700, the altimeters were removed, sent to an instrument shop for re-cert and reinstalled prior to static leak check; at the other shop, for $400, the altimeters never came out of the panel.
(all numbers rough approximations)
Was the $400 shop able to somehow legally meet the requirements of Appendix B with the altimeters never leaving the aircraft?
A while back there were two AMOs on the same field, both offering altimeter system re-certification.
One would do it in 4 business days and charge $700.
The other would do it same day for only $400.
The difference being, for $700, the altimeters were removed, sent to an instrument shop for re-cert and reinstalled prior to static leak check; at the other shop, for $400, the altimeters never came out of the panel.
(all numbers rough approximations)
Was the $400 shop able to somehow legally meet the requirements of Appendix B with the altimeters never leaving the aircraft?