It doesn't matter who you talk to, regardless of their ideas or plans at/for CYTZ... The one common thing that doesn't change is the closing of 33/15 and turning it into a taxiway.
Now my question is this: Is it not better to keep a runway and be able to always use it as a taxiway; instead of converting it to a taxiway and never being able to use it as a runway? This applies to other airports as well.
Am I missing something here? Thoughts?
CYTZ 33/15 - Possible future closure.
Moderators: sky's the limit, sepia, Sulako, lilfssister, North Shore, I WAS Birddog
CYTZ 33/15 - Possible future closure.
Meatservo wrote:I just slap 'em in there. I don't even make sure they are lined up properly.
-
upintheair_
- Rank 5
- Posts: 332
- Joined: Thu Jul 16, 2015 4:40 pm
Re: CYTZ 33/15 - Possible future closure.
Why would they want to use it as a runway again?
Re: CYTZ 33/15 - Possible future closure.
For GA. Cameron, and ORNGE also still use it when the winds call for it.
Meatservo wrote:I just slap 'em in there. I don't even make sure they are lined up properly.
-
Driving Comet
- Rank 3
- Posts: 149
- Joined: Fri Jun 05, 2009 7:27 pm
Re: CYTZ 33/15 - Possible future closure.
Does the TPA care about GA, Cameron Air or ORNGE?xchox wrote:For GA. Cameron, and ORNGE also still use it when the winds call for it.
Re: CYTZ 33/15 - Possible future closure.
"A good traveller has no fixed plan and is not intent on arriving." -Lao Tzu
-
checkremarks
- Rank 3
- Posts: 117
- Joined: Sun Apr 28, 2013 3:31 pm
Re: CYTZ 33/15 - Possible future closure.
N/A
Last edited by checkremarks on Wed Nov 04, 2015 6:00 am, edited 1 time in total.
"There are no traffic jams along the extra mile"
"Why don't you knock it off with all them negative waves"
"Why don't you knock it off with all them negative waves"
Re: CYTZ 33/15 - Possible future closure.
Helicopters are ordinarily permitted to land on taxiways, aren't they? So Ornge wouldn't be affected.
DId you hear the one about the jurisprudence fetishist? He got off on a technicality.
