Transport Canada placed on short leash by Treasury Board

This forum has been developed to discuss aviation related topics.

Moderators: lilfssister, North Shore, sky's the limit, sepia, Sulako, I WAS Birddog

Post Reply
plhought
Rank 7
Rank 7
Posts: 501
Joined: Mon Oct 18, 2004 11:02 am
Location: Calgary

Transport Canada placed on short leash by Treasury Board

Post by plhought »

http://www.theglobeandmail.com/news/pol ... e29094083/

The Liberal government has placed Transport Canada under special oversight for repeatedly missing internal financial targets, The Globe and Mail has learned – a highly unusual move targeting a federal department.

A special envoy has been sent by Treasury Board, the central agency that reviews and approves government spending, to oversee the department’s budget decisions.

The move comes in the wake of concerns that Transport Canada officials have regularly overshot spending during the current fiscal year, which began April 1, 2015, largely due to a significant spike in hiring at the start of the year.

A recent shuffle of the department’s senior leadership means it will have had three different deputy ministers over the course of a year.

Executives in the department were called to a special meeting last week where managers were told that spending will be scaled back in order to manage salary costs.

As The Globe reported Tuesday, outgoing-deputy minister Jean-François Tremblay sent a note to staff Friday informing them that the “budget situation is going to continue to be difficult for the year ahead.”

The department has been under intense public scrutiny in recent years, largely because of the 2013 Lac-Mégantic disaster that saw a parked train carrying crude oil roll down a hill and explode in the centre of the small Quebec town, killing 47 people.

The deadly explosion coincided with a dramatic increase in the volume of crude oil travelling the country by rail because of a pipeline capacity shortage.

A spokesperson for Transport Canada confirmed the department is under external oversight.

“In its efforts to internally realign its resources, Transport Canada is working closely with central agencies. Transport Canada and the Treasury Board Secretariat agreed to assign a former chief financial officer with extensive experience to work as adviser to the department,” said the official, who did not identify the Treasury Board official.

Sources say the decision to appoint an outside envoy was approved by Treasury Board President Scott Brison and Transport Minister Marc Garneau in January.

A 2013 Auditor-General’s report found “significant weaknesses” in the department’s approach to rail safety, including a failure to assess whether it had the right number of inspectors with the right skills to provide proper oversight of federal railways.

Internal frustration at the slow pace of hiring new inspectors in the wake of that report appears to have inspired the 2015 hiring spree that ultimately raised the alarms of financial managers.

The department’s then-deputy minister, Louis Lévesque, retired from the public service in July and is now a senior fellow with the C.D. Howe Institute. He was replaced on July 20 by Mr. Tremblay, who came from the Privy Council Office.

Both Mr. Lévesque and Mr. Tremblay also had responsibility for the Infrastructure and Communities file during their time as deputy minister of Transport.

However, Prime Minister Justin Trudeau announced on March 2 that those duties would be split in two, with Mr. Tremblay keeping responsibility for infrastructure. Michael Keenan, the former associate deputy minister of Natural Resources, will take over as deputy minister of Transport on Monday.

Signs of tension inside the department over staffing issues surfaced publicly in March, 2015, when the then-deputy minister, Mr. Lévesque, appeared before the House of Commons transport committee alongside the then-transport minister, Lisa Raitt.

During the meeting, Mr. Lévesque blamed officials in his department for failing to maintain staffing levels in response to a turnover rate of about seven per cent per year.

“What happened is that certain managers did not take the appropriate measures quickly enough to replace the people who were naturally going to have to retire,” he said.

As a result, Mr. Lévesque said managers had been reminded of the need to fill vacancies and hiring shot up by about 240 employees as the department went “full tilt” on recruitment.

In an interview Tuesday, Mr. Lévesque said he had to take into account that the department had a pattern of overestimating its hiring plans and then falling short at the end of the year.

“You’re always in a risk situation,” he said. “There’s a balancing act to be done.”

Mr. Lévesque said the timing of his retirement was not related to this issue.

Staffing at Transport Canada has fluctuated considerably in recent years. It rose from 4,970 in 2006 to 5,553 in 2011 before dropping to 4,771 in 2014 and then back up to 5,205 as of March 31, 2015.

Mr. Garneau, the Transport Minister, and Mr. Tremblay, the outgoing deputy minister, are scheduled to appear Wednesday before the Transport committee to discuss spending in the department.

“The minister is dealing with the difficult financial situation he inherited from the previous government,” said Mr. Garneau’s spokesman Marc Roy.

Ms. Raitt, the Conservative MP and former transport minister, said she plans to attend the committee. She said Tuesday the increased hiring was in response to recommendations from the Auditor-General and the Transportation Safety Board and she was not aware of any internal budget concerns.

“They needed to be hired in order to fulfill the deficiencies that were pointed out by independent officers,” she said, adding that she would have argued for more money later in the year, if necessary. “I certainly would hope that Minister Brison and Minister Garneau are doing this in order to ensure that safety is paramount.”

With a report from Grant Robertson

Look, i'm not one usually to criticize a little oversight on what usually are bloated, inefficient government ministries - but..

TC fails to meet it's own service standards regularly, many could argue the oversight is pretty poor, and those that have to deal with them even on a semi-regular basis find the process very tedious...

They've got a list the length of a Twin-Otter with TSB recommendations, not to mention the usual day-to-day business that seems to take ages.

Is money the real issue though?
---------- ADS -----------
 
Rockie
Top Poster
Top Poster
Posts: 8433
Joined: Sat Oct 08, 2005 7:10 am

Re: Transport Canada placed on short leash by Treasury Board

Post by Rockie »

Could be just what TC wants. They get to tell Cabinet they need more resources to do everything they're responsible for and another department comes in to take resources away. Responsibility shifted.
---------- ADS -----------
 
User avatar
tellyourkidstogetarealjob
Rank 5
Rank 5
Posts: 390
Joined: Mon Nov 28, 2005 12:11 am
Location: Cascadia

Re: Transport Canada placed on short leash by Treasury Board

Post by tellyourkidstogetarealjob »

Government managers don't think that way. No manager wants to lose responsibility. There is no profit motive in government so success is measured by the number of underlings you have or the number of different programs you are responsible for.

If a government manager with 12 peons sits down for lunch with a manager with 13 peons then they both know who has the bigger....antlers. That's the one the gets to breed the most and pass on his (or her) genes to the various impressionable youngsters in the herd.

*************************************************************************

In this case one can already see the excuses for failure happening when there's a reference to the previous government. It has nothing to do with either the Cons or Libs. It's about poor management.

In business in general, and North America in particular, the trend has been to hire more and more management while asking them to accept less and less consequences for poor decisions. An old fashioned guillotining (figuratively) of a few senior management heads would probably do more to improve TC's efficiency than a decade of Auditor General findings. That, of course, will never happen.
---------- ADS -----------
 
CpnCrunch
Rank 11
Rank 11
Posts: 4194
Joined: Mon Feb 08, 2010 9:38 am

Re: Transport Canada placed on short leash by Treasury Board

Post by CpnCrunch »

TC has finally gotten their act together and hired more inspectors, and for some reason the government seems surprised that the salaries of these inspectors actually costs money.
---------- ADS -----------
 
Meatservo
Rank 10
Rank 10
Posts: 2581
Joined: Wed Mar 16, 2005 11:07 pm
Location: Negative sequencial vortex

Re: Transport Canada placed on short leash by Treasury Board

Post by Meatservo »

tellyourkidstogetarealjob wrote:Government managers don't think that way. No manager wants to lose responsibility. There is no profit motive in government so success is measured by the number of underlings you have or the number of different programs you are responsible for.

If a government manager with 12 peons sits down for lunch with a manager with 13 peons then they both know who has the bigger....antlers. That's the one the gets to breed the most and pass on his (or her) genes to the various impressionable youngsters in the herd.

In this case one can already see the excuses for failure happening when there's a reference to the previous government. It has nothing to do with either the Cons or Libs. It's about poor management.

In business in general, and North America in particular, the trend has been to hire more and more management while asking them to accept less and less consequences for poor decisions. An old fashioned guillotining (figuratively) of a few senior management heads would probably do more to improve TC's efficiency than a decade of Auditor General findings. That, of course, will never happen.




Oh my God, I just loved this post SO MUCH I decided to quote it even though I have no useful comment to make myself. This is the absolute truth.
---------- ADS -----------
 
If I'd known I was going to live this long, I'd have taken better care of myself
Ricktye
Rank 1
Rank 1
Posts: 31
Joined: Mon Oct 29, 2012 11:23 am

Re: Transport Canada placed on short leash by Treasury Board

Post by Ricktye »

Remember, aviation is only a small segment of Transport Canada's mandate. Rail, shipping etc play a greater part of their work. Of course whwn we see anything about TC, we naturally just think about aviation, not the whole picture.

CpnCrunch wrote:TC has finally gotten their act together and hired more inspectors, and for some reason the government seems surprised that the salaries of these inspectors actually costs money.
---------- ADS -----------
 
CpnCrunch
Rank 11
Rank 11
Posts: 4194
Joined: Mon Feb 08, 2010 9:38 am

Re: Transport Canada placed on short leash by Treasury Board

Post by CpnCrunch »

Ricktye wrote:Remember, aviation is only a small segment of Transport Canada's mandate. Rail, shipping etc play a greater part of their work. Of course whwn we see anything about TC, we naturally just think about aviation, not the whole picture.
If you read the original article (quoted in the first comment in this thread), you'll see it says they needed to hire more railway inspectors. It's also clear that they have been on a big hiring spree for aviation inspectors in the last year as well.
---------- ADS -----------
 
User avatar
I WAS Birddog
Rank Moderator
Rank Moderator
Posts: 378
Joined: Sat Dec 25, 2010 6:38 am
Location: dude...I just walk the earth.
Contact:

Re: Transport Canada placed on short leash by Treasury Board

Post by I WAS Birddog »

I think the fine folks at TC should ALL get raises, year end bonus, hot yoga spa sessions and a whole shoe box of Tim Horton's gift certificates.

....that's what I think. They're awesome. :smt006
---------- ADS -----------
 
Before you plot your revenge on someone, make sure to dig two graveyard plots.
http://twitter.com/@iwasbirddog
av8ts
Rank 8
Rank 8
Posts: 848
Joined: Fri Apr 08, 2011 8:31 am

Re: Transport Canada placed on short leash by Treasury Board

Post by av8ts »

I WAS Birddog wrote:I think the fine folks at TC should ALL get raises, year end bonus, hot yoga spa sessions and a whole shoe box of Tim Horton's gift certificates.

....that's what I think. They're awesome. :smt006
I'm a little confused, in the beginning of your post it sounds like you want to reward them, then at the end your punishing then by making them drink Tim's swill.
---------- ADS -----------
 
User avatar
I WAS Birddog
Rank Moderator
Rank Moderator
Posts: 378
Joined: Sat Dec 25, 2010 6:38 am
Location: dude...I just walk the earth.
Contact:

Re: Transport Canada placed on short leash by Treasury Board

Post by I WAS Birddog »

av8ts wrote: I'm a little confused, in the beginning of your post it sounds like you want to reward them, then at the end your punishing then by making them drink Tim's swill.
....
....
.... :smt104
---------- ADS -----------
 
Before you plot your revenge on someone, make sure to dig two graveyard plots.
http://twitter.com/@iwasbirddog
Post Reply

Return to “General Comments”