
Who let the dogs out?
Moderators: lilfssister, North Shore, sky's the limit, sepia, Sulako, I WAS Birddog



My dick is a lot cleaner then any sink in a public restroomco-joe wrote: ↑Fri Feb 28, 2020 12:29 amWell actually unless they had oral sex with a carrier of the virus, not washing their hands (although totally gross) would make them less likely to spread it because they didn't touch the sink.mixturerich wrote: ↑Fri Feb 28, 2020 12:12 am When I’m in the bathroom at the airport and I see like three people in a row take a piss and leave without washing their hands, I think no f*cking wonder it’s spreading so fast. People are so ignorant, lazy, and complacent about it.

That's exactly what needs to be done imho. This is how outbreaks were handled in the past - it has proven to be an effective strategy.
The Flu deaths so far this year are "estimates" from the CDC.Those who do not remember the past are condemned to repeat it.
George Santayana
No, an effective strategy that has been used in the past to contain outbreaks of infectious diseases are quarantines/cordon sanitaire. Thus far, the quarantines in China have actually done a lot more than some people seem to think, in containing the virus - imagine if there hadn't been any attempts at containment in China? Do you think the majority of cases would still be in China, or spread more evenly around the world?Eric Janson wrote: ↑Sun Mar 01, 2020 12:34 amThat's exactly what needs to be done imho. This is how outbreaks were handled in the past - it has proven to be an effective strategy.





No they have been in trouble for a long time. This was just the final nail in the coffin


Hmm. Who are "they"?

More like an excuse. All Virgin and the other buyers ever wanted were the slots at Heathrow. Coronavirus my arse.


Don’t hoard masks and food. Figure out how to help seniors and the immunosuppressed stay healthy.
This still largely comes down to hygiene and isolation. But in particular, we need to focus on the right people and the right places. Nursing homes, not schools. Hospitals, not planes. We need to up the hygienic and isolation ante primarily around the subset of people who can’t simply contract SARS-CoV-2 and ride it out the way healthy people should be able to.
I’ve been to China. No hurry to go back. However I could live in Europe

Meanwhile I feel so incredibly relieved after hearing the comments of the “Stable Genius” on the crisis at CDC yesterday -mixturerich wrote: ↑Sat Mar 07, 2020 4:34 am https://news.yahoo.com/coronavirus-spre ... 52222.html
“New modeling from The Australian National University looks at seven scenarios of how the outbreak might affect the world's wealth, ranging from low severity to high severity.
In the low-severity model — or best-case scenario of the seven — ANU researchers estimate a global GDP loss of $2.4 trillion, with an estimated death toll of 15 million.”
Here’s the study:
https://cdn.uc.assets.prezly.com/f608a9 ... inline/no/
Compared to SARS...
According to the World Health Organization (WHO), a total of 8,098 people worldwide became sick with SARS during the 2003 outbreak. Of these, 774 died.
Hold on to your hats, boys.
Edit: Here’s the worst case model if you’re morbidly curious...
“In the high-severity model — modeled after the Spanish flu pandemic, which killed an estimated 17 million to 50 million globally from 1918 to 1920 — the global GDP loss could be as high as $9 trillion. In that model, the death toll is estimated to surpass 68 million.”