Page 6 of 19

Re: Enerjet

Posted: Sat Jun 13, 2009 9:09 pm
by whiteguy
Huge Hammer wrote:
From where?
YYC. One arriving just after midnight tonight from MBJ!

Re: Enerjet

Posted: Sun Jun 14, 2009 10:29 am
by Huge Hammer
whiteguy wrote:
Huge Hammer wrote:
From where?
YYC. One arriving just after midnight tonight from MBJ!
Did not know that, Thanks. I wonder if it is a private charter because Transat is not showing a YYC-MBJ program.

Re: Enerjet

Posted: Sun Jun 14, 2009 10:40 am
by CanadaEH
I've seen Enerjet flying into YVR a few times in the past 2 weeks. Not sure where, though.

Re: Enerjet

Posted: Sun Jun 14, 2009 4:08 pm
by boeingboy
YVR - To Puta Cana and Montego bay

Re: Enerjet

Posted: Sun Jun 14, 2009 4:12 pm
by frog
EuuuH PuNta Cana :wink:

You don't want to know what "puta" means in spanish...

Re: Enerjet

Posted: Sun Jun 14, 2009 8:34 pm
by amraam
Charters have been from YVR, YEG and YYC

Re: Enerjet

Posted: Mon Jun 15, 2009 9:59 pm
by Jastapilot
If, in fact, Transat is chartering Enerjet, it's official, Transat execs are morons. They're going to charter themselves out of western Canada, if not out of business. You'd think they learned their lesson with Westjet. :?

Re: Enerjet

Posted: Wed Jun 17, 2009 8:22 am
by Huge Hammer
I still don't see where Transat is doing Punta Cana and MBJ from Western Canada. I also have to wonder what the crew duty day is on these routes, seems like it would be pretty close to 14 hours.

Re: Enerjet

Posted: Thu Jun 18, 2009 3:13 pm
by roger.roger
If, in fact, Transat is chartering Enerjet, it's official, Transat execs are morons. They're going to charter themselves out of western Canada, if not out of business. You'd think they learned their lesson with Westjet.
I just don't know why the @#$! they didn't consult with you justa? I mean they run the largest vertically intergrated vacation company in canada turning a $45 million dollar profit in the same quater that conquest vacations whent bankrupt, they pay their pilots well and most people their are happy. But they should destableize their airline operations for a few narrow body trips during the peak season.

Re: Enerjet

Posted: Fri Jun 19, 2009 7:25 am
by CitationSov
roger.roger wrote:
If, in fact, Transat is chartering Enerjet, it's official, Transat execs are morons. They're going to charter themselves out of western Canada, if not out of business. You'd think they learned their lesson with Westjet.
I just don't know why the @#$! they didn't consult with you justa? I mean they run the largest vertically intergrated vacation company in canada turning a $45 million dollar profit in the same quater that conquest vacations whent bankrupt, they pay their pilots well and most people their are happy. But they should destableize their airline operations for a few narrow body trips during the peak season.

:smt014 :prayer: :lol:

Re: Enerjet

Posted: Fri Jun 19, 2009 5:05 pm
by gulfan
Website has been updated! Hello 737 :prayer:

Re: Enerjet

Posted: Sat Jun 20, 2009 2:51 pm
by gulfan

Re: Enerjet

Posted: Sat Jun 20, 2009 3:08 pm
by Troubleshot
kevin.snaden wrote:enerjet flight sim model

http://jalbum.net/browse/user/album/236040/
Wrong series (that's an -800)...... I know, I know picky but the truth hurts. Nice model though.

Re: Enerjet

Posted: Mon Jun 22, 2009 3:49 am
by bcflyer
boeingboy wrote:YVR - To Puta Cana and Montego bay
Does the 737 have the range to do YVR-Punta Cana? The wife and I went there a few years ago on AC. They used a 767 and if memory serves me correctly it was over 8hrs coming back.

Re: Enerjet

Posted: Mon Jun 22, 2009 7:11 am
by CitationSov
bcflyer wrote:
boeingboy wrote:YVR - To Puta Cana and Montego bay
Does the 737 have the range to do YVR-Punta Cana? The wife and I went there a few years ago on AC. They used a 767 and if memory serves me correctly it was over 8hrs coming back.
I think they are making a stop somewhere ie Edmonton

Re: Enerjet

Posted: Mon Jun 22, 2009 10:02 am
by gulfan
CitationSov wrote:
bcflyer wrote:
boeingboy wrote:YVR - To Puta Cana and Montego bay
Does the 737 have the range to do YVR-Punta Cana? The wife and I went there a few years ago on AC. They used a 767 and if memory serves me correctly it was over 8hrs coming back.
I think they are making a stop somewhere ie Edmonton
That's correct Vancouver - Edmonton - Punta Cana

Re: Enerjet

Posted: Mon Jun 22, 2009 11:43 pm
by Jastapilot
roger.roger wrote:
If, in fact, Transat is chartering Enerjet, it's official, Transat execs are morons. They're going to charter themselves out of western Canada, if not out of business. You'd think they learned their lesson with Westjet.
I just don't know why the @#$! they didn't consult with you justa? I mean they run the largest vertically intergrated vacation company in canada turning a $45 million dollar profit in the same quater that conquest vacations whent bankrupt, they pay their pilots well and most people their are happy. But they should destableize their airline operations for a few narrow body trips during the peak season.
And I argue the narrow body charters will bite them in the ass some day.

btw they couldn't afford my consulting fees! :smt040

Re: Enerjet

Posted: Tue Jun 23, 2009 2:40 am
by roger.roger
And I argue the narrow body charters will bite them in the ass some day.

btw they couldn't afford my consulting fees! :smt040
ahhhhhhhhhh. I get it, enerjet is planning on setting up thousands of travel agencies as well as buying 40 000+ rooms world wide at resorts then selling them as resort packages. having a billion+ dollars in revenue and going head to head with Transat. despite their business plan being very specific as too not doing that. With all the reaserch you've done on this I can see why your consulting fees are so high.

Thanks for the tip justa

Re: Enerjet

Posted: Tue Jun 23, 2009 11:08 am
by Jastapilot
Classic. They grossly underestimated WJ in it's infancy too. Did you forget there's a significant portion of those WJ day-oner's over at Enerjet? Throwing EJ even measly scraps could give them the foothold they need to make a big headache for someone 'big' and 'comfortable' in their market position.

Hey, but wtf do I know, according to you I shouldn't have an opinion.

Re: Enerjet

Posted: Tue Jun 23, 2009 1:41 pm
by roger.roger
Classic. They grossly underestimated WJ in it's infancy too. Did you forget there's a significant portion of those WJ day-oner's over at Enerjet? Throwing EJ even measly scraps could give them the foothold they need to make a big headache for someone 'big' and 'comfortable' in their market position.

Hey, but wtf do I know, according to you I shouldn't have an opinion.
your a very confused individual if you think that the charters that WJ was doing for Transat were a signifigant factor in where they are today. your a complete moron if you think WJ vacations is a concern for Transat. I never said don't have an opinion, just don't be suprised when you get bitch slapped for being dumb.

Re: Enerjet

Posted: Tue Jun 23, 2009 2:13 pm
by Jastapilot
I admire your confidence, but if you're stupid enough to think that WJ had no bearing on how profitable Transat was then you, my friend, need a crisp bitch slap to the head.

Re: Enerjet

Posted: Tue Jun 23, 2009 11:17 pm
by roger.roger
I admire your confidence, but if you're stupid enough to think that WJ had no bearing on how profitable Transat was then you, my friend, need a crisp bitch slap to the head.
right, so your thought's are that enerjet is going to take over the vacation business in the narrow body market with no infastructure and 2 airplanes?

Re: Enerjet

Posted: Wed Jun 24, 2009 6:04 am
by Jastapilot
roger.roger wrote:
I admire your confidence, but if you're stupid enough to think that WJ had no bearing on how profitable Transat was then you, my friend, need a crisp bitch slap to the head.
right, so your thought's are that enerjet is going to take over the vacation business in the narrow body market with no infastructure and 2 airplanes?
Are you seriously that near sighted with tunnel vision?

Re: Enerjet

Posted: Wed Jun 24, 2009 2:10 pm
by roger.roger
Are you seriously that near sighted with tunnel vision?
Have you even read enerjets business plan??????? the man behind the company left WS cause they moved away from the original vision of the company. The one thing they have stated over and over is they are not going into larger markets and they are not going head to head with any of the major players.

Do a little reasearch, who knows maybe one day you could be a little more than jastapilot?

Re: Enerjet

Posted: Wed Jun 24, 2009 4:48 pm
by ivanhoe
roger.roger wrote:
Are you seriously that near sighted with tunnel vision?
Have you even read enerjets business plan??????? the man behind the company left WS cause they moved away from the original vision of the company. The one thing they have stated over and over is they are not going into larger markets and they are not going head to head with any of the major players.

Ya , right.

He's the same guy who was part of the cabal that said over and over again that WestJet would never go east of Winnipeg. We all know how that played out.