Ferrying aircraft for time building

This forum has been developed to discuss aviation related topics.

Moderators: North Shore, sky's the limit, sepia, Sulako, lilfssister, I WAS Birddog

Post Reply
User avatar
Bede
Rank 11
Rank 11
Posts: 4839
Joined: Tue Mar 09, 2004 5:52 am

Re: Ferrying aircraft for time building

Post by Bede »

AirFrame wrote: Sat Mar 05, 2022 10:04 am
photofly wrote: Fri Mar 04, 2022 11:49 amAnd remember the definition of reward includes “any payment”, of which reimbursement is one. The intent seems unarguable and unambiguous to me.
And "reward" can include the time built if the intent is for the person to continue to a commercial license.

One possible "out" for PPL's doing this is the case where a PPL offers to take another pilot's plane somewhere, but that PPL has no intentions of becoming a CPL, he's just out for some experience in another plane.
That's incorrect in Canada. True in the US though.
---------- ADS -----------
 
User avatar
AirFrame
Rank 10
Rank 10
Posts: 2610
Joined: Sun Oct 11, 2009 10:27 pm
Location: Sidney, BC
Contact:

Re: Ferrying aircraft for time building

Post by AirFrame »

Bede wrote: Sat Mar 05, 2022 10:40 am That's incorrect in Canada. True in the US though.
Oh? Do you have a reference that confirms time building is not considered compensation?
---------- ADS -----------
 
photofly
Top Poster
Top Poster
Posts: 11306
Joined: Tue Jan 18, 2011 4:47 pm
Location: Hangry and crankypated

Re: Ferrying aircraft for time building

Post by photofly »

In Canada we can say it's not considered compensation because there is no published tribunal case or even an opinion where it has been considered as such. That stands in contrast to the situation in the USA, where it has explicitly been judged a benefit.

I think the opinion from the FAA legal counsel was in respect of parachute operations or glider towing - and that the pilot could refuse the "benefit" by omitting the hours so flown from their experience claimed. This is rather silly - that the legality of a flight at a time A depends on some entry or absence of entry at a future time B.
---------- ADS -----------
 
DId you hear the one about the jurisprudence fetishist? He got off on a technicality.
User avatar
Bede
Rank 11
Rank 11
Posts: 4839
Joined: Tue Mar 09, 2004 5:52 am

Re: Ferrying aircraft for time building

Post by Bede »

AirFrame wrote: Sun Mar 06, 2022 8:22 am
Bede wrote: Sat Mar 05, 2022 10:40 am That's incorrect in Canada. True in the US though.
Oh? Do you have a reference that confirms time building is not considered compensation?
Sorry I don't. That's not really how it works though. TC won't put out of list of things that they allow/don't allow. What you can do though is go through the TATC decisions that deal with this CAR (start with Bellefleur) and the one's dealing with operating a commercial air service (see Selwan). You can get a pretty good idea what's allowed and what's not. (Illegal: taking people sightseeing, including "free" flight to lodge, flying real estate clients for "free", etc.) Other common activities for PPL holders (glider towing, minnow trapping, selling items out of the back of your airplane, camp checks, ferrying airplanes) have never been brought before the tribunal. That should give you a pretty good indication how the regulator interprets this CAR.

BTW, I don't think it's a good idea for a low time pilot to ferry aircraft and I don't see this as being a viable proposition. First, ferry flying is some of the most demanding flying out there. Unless it's a common type, getting insurance will be difficult too.
---------- ADS -----------
 
Post Reply

Return to “General Comments”