http://www.747sp.com/History.asp?22805
History of said 747, that engine failure was the 3rd in 5 days for china airlines
BOEING 747SP IN THUNDER BAY!
Moderators: sky's the limit, sepia, Sulako, lilfssister, North Shore, I WAS Birddog
-
water wings
- Rank 8
- Posts: 928
- Joined: Tue Jan 18, 2005 8:09 pm
-
Flightstar
- Rank 0
- Posts: 9
- Joined: Wed Jul 13, 2005 8:54 pm
Lav's and Yucky Smells
Knowing these people as well as I do, my guess is that they forgot to do that! When the plane was recently on the ground in Mumbai, not only did they forget to service the lavs, they did not take off the food....when the next crew got the plane there were maggots all over the galley!!
talkinghead wrote:Question 4 you Boeing drivers.
How long can you let the engine sit and wind-mill, before you start to get some type of damage (if any)?
That thing is sitting there with NO intake covers, you can hear all 4 engines click/clanking away in the wind, 24/7.
Long time. I don't thing any damage occurs when the intake blades spin, some of our B747's sit weeks without any kind of cover. In fact, I have never seen a cover on a B747 engine. (not saying there aren't any - just never seen it)
-
Babel Fish
- Rank 3
- Posts: 171
- Joined: Thu Jan 06, 2005 12:53 pm
- Location: town to town, up and down the dial...
You might want to check that out before you start renting them out by the hour...cool idea about the club/bar/rub'ntug...if things work out, just keep flying west...it's never last call!!water wings wrote:here's a thought... that thing has been sitting outside in the T-Bay temperatures of 30+ humidity... do you think they had the lavs emptied before hand? yucky.
I like long walks, especially when they are taken by people who annoy me.
- Fred Allen
- Fred Allen
To answer the engine care question.
There are 2 answers, one depends on the type of engine. The mainteanace manual will have what is needed to keep that particular model serviceable i.e. P&W,GE.
In my experience the minimum I have seen for short term storage, which this is is a an engine run at idle power every 7days. I have also seen as long as 30 days between runs. As for the engines spinning no damage done and covers are not essential they are only preventative.
The other answer is some companies have their own regs for short or long term storage. On Delta airlines an aircrfat must be run every 3 days if it has not flown.
After the engines are concerned there is the rest of the a/c to be considered, most maintenece manual will require that the a/c's tires be rolled every 7 days and tire pressures be done as well.
If the aircraft is not officially in storage it will continue to need a daily check each day and service checks as well to keep it airworthy.
I could go on and on. Basically you should see a mech out there at least once a week depending on what the status of that a/c is.
Hope this helps.
There are 2 answers, one depends on the type of engine. The mainteanace manual will have what is needed to keep that particular model serviceable i.e. P&W,GE.
In my experience the minimum I have seen for short term storage, which this is is a an engine run at idle power every 7days. I have also seen as long as 30 days between runs. As for the engines spinning no damage done and covers are not essential they are only preventative.
The other answer is some companies have their own regs for short or long term storage. On Delta airlines an aircrfat must be run every 3 days if it has not flown.
After the engines are concerned there is the rest of the a/c to be considered, most maintenece manual will require that the a/c's tires be rolled every 7 days and tire pressures be done as well.
If the aircraft is not officially in storage it will continue to need a daily check each day and service checks as well to keep it airworthy.
I could go on and on. Basically you should see a mech out there at least once a week depending on what the status of that a/c is.
Hope this helps.
-
talkinghead
- Rank 4
- Posts: 237
- Joined: Tue Jan 04, 2005 6:14 am
-
Flightstar
- Rank 0
- Posts: 9
- Joined: Wed Jul 13, 2005 8:54 pm
Really Grounded
Seems that the FAA has pulled the certificate for this plane as of July 18. Non compliance of maintenance and airworthiness directives.
Guess GPI is going to be hustling to make some bucks to get it back in the air...or they are going to fly it out of there thinking no one will know the difference.
Guess GPI is going to be hustling to make some bucks to get it back in the air...or they are going to fly it out of there thinking no one will know the difference.
747's permit to fly pulled
By Julio Gomes - The Chronicle-Journal
July 21, 2005
The Boeing 747 jet that arrived in Thunder Bay last week may be shrouded in mystery and trailing allegations of skipping out on its bills, but local airport officials aren’t yet worried they won’t see their money.
“It’s not the first airplane to land at the airport with a spotty history. That’s something that happens. This is now of (media) interest because it’s a larger airplane, but it’s not all that uncommon an occurrence,” Ed Schmidtke, manager of business development at Thunder Bay International Airport, said Wednesday.
A 747-SP (special performance) jumbo jet landed at the airport last Wednesday from Cincinnati. Dubbed Global Peace One, the aircraft is operated by Global Peace Initiative, a Houston-based humanitarian relief organization.
This type of aircraft has the ability to land on shorter runways than larger cargo or passenger jets. It’s the first 747 that Schmidtke’s seen land in Thunder Bay in his 15 years at the airport.
When it takes off is uncertain. The U.S. Federal Aviation Administration has pulled its permit to fly on the basis of failing to comply with airworthiness directives and improper maintenance.
“The aircraft now has no legal basis on which to fly,” FAA spokesman Paul Turk confirmed Wednesday.
Transport Canada officials were unavailable for comment.
GPI was founded in 1999 by Dr. K.A. Paul, an India-born Christian evangelist who formed Gospel to the Unreached Millions in 1993 to organize rallies in Africa and the Indian subcontinent.
In March 2004, the refurbished 747-SP was turned over to GPI. Since then, it has flown to the Middle East and areas of southeast Asia ravaged by December’s tsunami.
One member of the flight crew said the plane made a recent visit to Syria and Libya with just Paul and an assistant on board.
“It was a giant waste of money,” Ann Meili told The Chronicle-Journal.
She works as a corporate flight attendant and served on six flights aboard Global Peace One. Her work allowed her to see the inner workings of Paul and GPI.
“They just don’t pay,” Meili said from her Florida home. “They owe me money, they owe my entire crew money, they owe their director of PR (public relations) money.”
On June 22, a lawsuit was filed in Los Angeles County alleging GPI and several of its officers breached a contract to fly 92 people to Poland for the 60th anniversary of the liberation of Auschwitz and then to Israel for a week’s stay.
The lawsuit on behalf of the Friends of the Israel Defense Forces alleges they paid $800,000 for space on the 90-seat plane, but the flight didn’t take place. They are asking for more than $9 million in damages.
“Though GPI and (Gospel to the Unreached Millions) are ostensibly charitable organizations, they are merely conduits that permit monies from contributors and donors to flow to the individually named defendants, leaving the corporations without sufficient working capital to pay creditors,” the lawsuit claims.
None of the allegations have been proven in court.
Meili was to act as purser on that proposed flight. She said she has been privy to conference calls and e-mails involving Paul and GPI, and is concerned that Thunder Bay airport won’t be paid.
Global Peace One incurred a $2,800 fee to land in Thunder Bay and has been billed, Schmidtke said. If the plane stays the anticipated four weeks on the tarmac, it’ll rack up $2,000 in additional fees.
Schmidtke said airport officials will make every effort to collect the bill.
“We’re going to go every distance to make sure we get paid — guaranteed. That’s what we have to do,” he said. “But exactly how and where this finishes, I don’t know that.”
Repeated calls to Paul and a GPI spokesman have gone unanswered.
http://www.chroniclejournal.com/story.shtml?id=28157
By Julio Gomes - The Chronicle-Journal
July 21, 2005
The Boeing 747 jet that arrived in Thunder Bay last week may be shrouded in mystery and trailing allegations of skipping out on its bills, but local airport officials aren’t yet worried they won’t see their money.
“It’s not the first airplane to land at the airport with a spotty history. That’s something that happens. This is now of (media) interest because it’s a larger airplane, but it’s not all that uncommon an occurrence,” Ed Schmidtke, manager of business development at Thunder Bay International Airport, said Wednesday.
A 747-SP (special performance) jumbo jet landed at the airport last Wednesday from Cincinnati. Dubbed Global Peace One, the aircraft is operated by Global Peace Initiative, a Houston-based humanitarian relief organization.
This type of aircraft has the ability to land on shorter runways than larger cargo or passenger jets. It’s the first 747 that Schmidtke’s seen land in Thunder Bay in his 15 years at the airport.
When it takes off is uncertain. The U.S. Federal Aviation Administration has pulled its permit to fly on the basis of failing to comply with airworthiness directives and improper maintenance.
“The aircraft now has no legal basis on which to fly,” FAA spokesman Paul Turk confirmed Wednesday.
Transport Canada officials were unavailable for comment.
GPI was founded in 1999 by Dr. K.A. Paul, an India-born Christian evangelist who formed Gospel to the Unreached Millions in 1993 to organize rallies in Africa and the Indian subcontinent.
In March 2004, the refurbished 747-SP was turned over to GPI. Since then, it has flown to the Middle East and areas of southeast Asia ravaged by December’s tsunami.
One member of the flight crew said the plane made a recent visit to Syria and Libya with just Paul and an assistant on board.
“It was a giant waste of money,” Ann Meili told The Chronicle-Journal.
She works as a corporate flight attendant and served on six flights aboard Global Peace One. Her work allowed her to see the inner workings of Paul and GPI.
“They just don’t pay,” Meili said from her Florida home. “They owe me money, they owe my entire crew money, they owe their director of PR (public relations) money.”
On June 22, a lawsuit was filed in Los Angeles County alleging GPI and several of its officers breached a contract to fly 92 people to Poland for the 60th anniversary of the liberation of Auschwitz and then to Israel for a week’s stay.
The lawsuit on behalf of the Friends of the Israel Defense Forces alleges they paid $800,000 for space on the 90-seat plane, but the flight didn’t take place. They are asking for more than $9 million in damages.
“Though GPI and (Gospel to the Unreached Millions) are ostensibly charitable organizations, they are merely conduits that permit monies from contributors and donors to flow to the individually named defendants, leaving the corporations without sufficient working capital to pay creditors,” the lawsuit claims.
None of the allegations have been proven in court.
Meili was to act as purser on that proposed flight. She said she has been privy to conference calls and e-mails involving Paul and GPI, and is concerned that Thunder Bay airport won’t be paid.
Global Peace One incurred a $2,800 fee to land in Thunder Bay and has been billed, Schmidtke said. If the plane stays the anticipated four weeks on the tarmac, it’ll rack up $2,000 in additional fees.
Schmidtke said airport officials will make every effort to collect the bill.
“We’re going to go every distance to make sure we get paid — guaranteed. That’s what we have to do,” he said. “But exactly how and where this finishes, I don’t know that.”
Repeated calls to Paul and a GPI spokesman have gone unanswered.
http://www.chroniclejournal.com/story.shtml?id=28157
...so I'm in YQT right now....and I went over and had a look...
...
...
...
...
...
...wft?
Apparently there are buckets all around it because she dripping and leaking all over the ramp.
I'll try to get pictures 2moro morning.
What a sad looking a/c. However...
I'll take her over an Airbus ALL DAY LONG
...
...
...
...
...
...wft?
Apparently there are buckets all around it because she dripping and leaking all over the ramp.
I'll try to get pictures 2moro morning.
What a sad looking a/c. However...
I'll take her over an Airbus ALL DAY LONG
-
Flaps30Greenlight
- Rank 1
- Posts: 47
- Joined: Thu Apr 07, 2005 7:48 pm
- Location: Back in YYZ hotel again
- Contact:
yep im a truck driver
uhhh, will a 47 be able to get outta yqt, the longest runway there is only like 6000 feet.
Wish I could see it though, that would be truely a beautiful site
No Man , they figured if the make it in (to YQT) they will just take the wings off and part the rest out...duh. Of course it can get out. Have you ever landed an aircraft at an airport you could not depart from????
cant afford Cookies...
-
scotothedoublet
- Rank 3
- Posts: 172
- Joined: Sun Aug 29, 2004 7:59 pm
- Contact:
I have no idea what t/o distance it would need but I'm guessing the next destination will have to be pretty close.Have you ever landed an aircraft at an airport you could not depart from????
http://www.narita-airport.or.jp/ais/e/model/747.html
From that site on the post above it lists the required takeoff distance to be 7950 feet. For anyone with experience in this, how much range would they have to sacrifice to get off the ground? Or could they even do it?
I know someone used to fly 747's out of Regina's 7900 foot runway, but even then they had to restrict passenger loads and takeoff with only enough fuel to make Calgary, but Thunder Bay has only 6200 feet avaliable.
I know someone used to fly 747's out of Regina's 7900 foot runway, but even then they had to restrict passenger loads and takeoff with only enough fuel to make Calgary, but Thunder Bay has only 6200 feet avaliable.
-
Flightstar
- Rank 0
- Posts: 9
- Joined: Wed Jul 13, 2005 8:54 pm
GPI
That link that is posted is for a 747-100 not an SP which, I believe, had different specs,
-
ice ice baby
- Rank 4
- Posts: 202
- Joined: Wed Feb 02, 2005 5:02 pm
- Location: BC
-
chazzerguy
- Rank 0
- Posts: 3
- Joined: Sat Jul 30, 2005 6:00 am
That plane should have plenty of room... If it's lightly fueled it should get off with room to spare.
The 741 that was donated to the SAA museum in Rand allegedly managed to depart JNB using only about 3000 feet. Not sure if I believe that but...
Regardless, an SP can scoot. I would bet 5000-5500 feet would do the trick.
The 741 that was donated to the SAA museum in Rand allegedly managed to depart JNB using only about 3000 feet. Not sure if I believe that but...
Regardless, an SP can scoot. I would bet 5000-5500 feet would do the trick.
-
oldncold
- Rank (9)
- Posts: 1079
- Joined: Thu May 13, 2004 11:17 am
- Location: south of 78N latitude , north of 30'latitude
747hood ornament
well passed through tbay this week they seem to have turned it around so the wind out of the west isn't driveing the night fss guy up the wall with that tick ing of the turbine blades/ or more ramp space .here is a better idea since you all said the o/c is pulled . how about
a simulated crash- then the tactical squad storms it then gets caught on fire the airport fire dept gets to put the whole thing out and use the thing as a training aid. in lieu of parking fees.OK I was watching the Movie "airport" on the late show BUT HEY.
-
Scuba_Steve
- Rank 7
- Posts: 660
- Joined: Mon Oct 18, 2004 9:10 pm
-
Flying Low
- Rank 8
- Posts: 928
- Joined: Sun Feb 15, 2004 7:22 pm
- Location: Northern Ontario...why change now?
The whole purpose of it's relocation is so that it can be used in lieu of wing covers. There is currently a Beech Skipper and a Piper Tomahawk sheltered under it and room for more. 
"The ability to ditch an airplane in the Hudson does not qualify a pilot for a pay raise. The ability to get the pilots, with this ability, to work for 30% or 40% pay cuts qualifies those in management for millions in bonuses."
-
Flightstar
- Rank 0
- Posts: 9
- Joined: Wed Jul 13, 2005 8:54 pm
SP
The owner is in India...am guessing that the landing and parking fees have not been paid. Liens on the plane outweigh the value!
-
Mitch Cronin
- Rank 8
- Posts: 914
- Joined: Fri Feb 27, 2004 9:15 am
- Location: Right beside my dog again...
Every time this thread comes back to the top I'm thinkin' "it's gone!"... then I read and... ... I dunno who's gonna get it out of there, but from the look of things, and from what I recall, according to the charts, it'll need a sling shot to help it out....
I think those Canador folks might wind up with a fine addition to their inventory of toys to play with.
[edit]
Wait now... Thunder Bay Mitch, not North Bay! 
Oh well, whats a few hundred miles between friends?
... I dunno who's gonna get it out of there, but from the look of things, and from what I recall, according to the charts, it'll need a sling shot to help it out.... I think those Canador folks might wind up with a fine addition to their inventory of toys to play with.
[edit]
Wait now... Thunder Bay Mitch, not North Bay! Oh well, whats a few hundred miles between friends?-
duplicate2
- Rank 5
- Posts: 307
- Joined: Tue Feb 17, 2004 10:54 am
- Location: Limbo
-
chazzerguy
- Rank 0
- Posts: 3
- Joined: Sat Jul 30, 2005 6:00 am
She's outta there
Well, so much for the argument about whether you can get a 747SP out of YQT... Looks like they did it... And took it on a fairly long trip at that... Down to Tijuana...
