A modern Ercoupe?

This forum has been developed to discuss aviation related topics.

Moderators: sky's the limit, sepia, Sulako, lilfssister, North Shore, I WAS Birddog

lownslow
Rank (9)
Rank (9)
Posts: 1790
Joined: Fri Mar 07, 2008 8:56 am

Re: A modern Ercoupe?

Post by lownslow »

complexintentions wrote:Just don't be dissin' the MU2. :mrgreen:
Flown it. Love it. Then again, so far I've really enjoyed every airplane I've flown.

I'd love to get the chance to fly an Ercoupe some day, the earlier the model the better. I bet they're just a ball to toot around in.
---------- ADS -----------
 
boeingboy
Rank (9)
Rank (9)
Posts: 1646
Joined: Wed Mar 03, 2004 2:57 pm
Location: West coast

Re: A modern Ercoupe?

Post by boeingboy »

Never did understand why Beech put Garretts on a King Air.....
....because they are just plain all round better than the PT6! :D
---------- ADS -----------
 
User avatar
Beefitarian
Top Poster
Top Poster
Posts: 6610
Joined: Wed Dec 01, 2010 10:53 am
Location: A couple of meters away from others.

Re: A modern Ercoupe?

Post by Beefitarian »

Old Dog Flying wrote:Rob: I also found the 'Coupe to be interesting while operating out of the grass strip at AK3 but no real challenge in a Xwind with a little planning. I think that "Beef" is confusing you V tail (vertical tail) with the Bonanza V tail. Poor Beef.

Barney
I was not intending to mislead. I was talking about the Bonanza. ~shudders~
---------- ADS -----------
 
Post Reply

Return to “General Comments”