Air Canada Flt#88

Topics related to accidents, incidents & over due aircraft should be placed in this forum.

Moderators: sky's the limit, sepia, Sulako, lilfssister, North Shore

Old fella
Rank 10
Rank 10
Posts: 2539
Joined: Mon Jan 29, 2007 7:04 am
Location: I'm retired. I don't want to'I don't have to and you can't make me.

Re: Air Canada Flt#88

Post by Old fella »

I wish stupid passengers would listen up to flight crew instructions when flying through and in an around areas of turbulence. I witnessed countless examples of silly people not adhering to instructions when flight conditions are rough. I have zero sympathy for those who do not strap in when seated if they are injured as a result of a rough ride.
---------- ADS -----------
 
tbaylx
Rank (9)
Rank (9)
Posts: 1231
Joined: Fri Jun 25, 2004 6:30 pm

Re: Air Canada Flt#88

Post by tbaylx »

Old fella wrote:I wish stupid passengers would listen up to flight crew instructions when flying through and in an around areas of turbulence. I witnessed countless examples of silly people not adhering to instructions when flight conditions are rough. I have zero sympathy for those who do not strap in when seated if they are injured as a result of a rough ride.
I believe this was a painful lesson for those that didn't have their belts fastened. I would bet that in the future they will do so. Most pax don't fasten belts through ignorance of the consequences, hopefully some learn through the mistakes of others.
---------- ADS -----------
 
crazyaviator
Rank 7
Rank 7
Posts: 671
Joined: Sun Oct 21, 2007 7:52 pm
Location: Ontario

Re: Air Canada Flt#88

Post by crazyaviator »

Having a few dozen experiences in the cabin wherin the seat belt light was on for no "apparent" reason, I can understand why the ignorant travelling public loose the sense of urgency. There are also those personality types , equipped with past experience, and with an air of invincibility , throw caution to the wind and dare to challenge the status-quo and keep those pesky seat belts off. All is well until the inevitible head meets ceiling experience, followed by the lower body firmly contacting something solid and painful and destructive ! :D
---------- ADS -----------
 
av8ts
Rank 8
Rank 8
Posts: 848
Joined: Fri Apr 08, 2011 8:31 am

Re: Air Canada Flt#88

Post by av8ts »

Passengers not wearing seatbelts will be subject to natural selection
---------- ADS -----------
 
esp803

Re: Air Canada Flt#88

Post by esp803 »

Darwin is the "Seat Belt Sign" of Chisel air.

E
---------- ADS -----------
 
ragbagflyer
Rank 7
Rank 7
Posts: 720
Joined: Wed Feb 01, 2006 10:45 pm
Location: Somewhere rocky or salty.

Re: Air Canada Flt#88

Post by ragbagflyer »

Anybody have any insight on why the rules or regs can't or don't state that seat belts are required at all times when the seatbelt light is OFF with the exception to this rule being when passengers have to go to move up and down the aisle or access the overhead bins? It seems pretty straight forward. Meanwhile they make a point of saying to keep buckled up for the entire taxi to the gate - a prudent practice, but to my knowledge dozens of people have never been injured and hospitalized between the runway and the gate (sombody will probably prove me wrong on this point....)
---------- ADS -----------
 
"I don't know which is worse, ...that everyone has his price, or that the price is always so low." - Calvin (of Calvin and Hobbes)
jschnurr
Rank 3
Rank 3
Posts: 179
Joined: Sat Sep 29, 2007 5:42 pm

Re: Air Canada Flt#88

Post by jschnurr »

Meanwhile they make a point of saying to keep buckled up for the entire taxi to the gate - a prudent practice, but to my knowledge dozens of people have never been injured and hospitalized between the runway and the gate (sombody will probably prove me wrong on this point....)
Not sure if anyone was injured here or not, but I wouldn't want to be unbuckled when it hit...
https://youtu.be/SpLd-t1tcJU
---------- ADS -----------
 
Broken Slinky
Rank 4
Rank 4
Posts: 238
Joined: Fri Feb 21, 2014 10:47 am

Re: Air Canada Flt#88

Post by Broken Slinky »

crazyaviator wrote:Having a few dozen experiences in the cabin wherin the seat belt light was on for no "apparent" reason, I can understand why the ignorant travelling public loose the sense of urgency.
The last 50+ commercial flights I've been on, the pre-flight safety blah blah blah has stated that when we are in our seats, whether the belt light is on or not, we should buckle our belts for safety.
Unfortunately it takes events like this to enlighten people as to why they make that statement.
---------- ADS -----------
 
Heliian
Rank (9)
Rank (9)
Posts: 1976
Joined: Wed Apr 29, 2009 2:14 pm

Re: Air Canada Flt#88

Post by Heliian »

Broken Slinky wrote:enlighten people

Ha, good one.


I was talking with a non-aviation friend and they said that this article was an eye opener and that they had once scoffed at the need for a belt but will be now following the recommended usage of belts.

For those travelling with small children, may I reccomend the c.a.r.e.s. harness.
---------- ADS -----------
 
Stubby Phillips
Rank 0
Rank 0
Posts: 14
Joined: Tue Apr 01, 2014 4:17 pm

Re: Air Canada Flt#88

Post by Stubby Phillips »

Doesn't matter how much you weigh. At -1g a 300lb mangiacake is gonna be airborne.
I just hope he doesn't crash down on top of me. Wear your bloody seatbelts everyone.
---------- ADS -----------
 
pelmet
Top Poster
Top Poster
Posts: 8060
Joined: Tue Jun 14, 2005 2:48 pm

Re: Air Canada Flt#88

Post by pelmet »

Here was the first flight...

"The Air Canada Boeing 777-200 aircraft, C-FNNH, operating as flight ACA016, was en route from
Chek Lap Kok/Hong Kong Intl, China (VHHH) to Toronto/LBPIA, ON (CYYZ). During cruise at
FL350, approximately 55 nautical miles NE of Anchorage, AK while in US airspace, the flight
encountered sustained moderate turbulence over a period of twenty minutes. On two occasions
during this period, the turbulence briefly intensified to severe. Due to a SIGMET, the turbulence
was anticipated by the crew and the fasten seat belt sign was turned on approximately 15 minutes
before the encounter. During one of the periods of severe intensity, a flight attendant received a
minor injury in the crew rest area. The flight crew filed a PIREP with ATC and relayed the details of
the encounter to company dispatch. The aircraft continued to destination and landed without
further event.

A company aircraft (ACA088, B777), approximately 90 minutes in trail of ACA016, encountered the
same area of turbulence and suffered more serious injuries (A15F0165)."
---------- ADS -----------
 
crazyaviator
Rank 7
Rank 7
Posts: 671
Joined: Sun Oct 21, 2007 7:52 pm
Location: Ontario

Re: Air Canada Flt#88

Post by crazyaviator »

In trail, 90 min warning ? Why were the flight attendants still not buckled in ???
---------- ADS -----------
 
co-joe
Rank 11
Rank 11
Posts: 4786
Joined: Mon Feb 16, 2004 2:33 am
Location: YYC 230 degree radial at about 10 DME

Re: Air Canada Flt#88

Post by co-joe »

Stubby Phillips wrote:Doesn't matter how much you weigh. At -1g a 300lb mangiacake is gonna be airborne.
I just hope he doesn't crash down on top of me. Wear your bloody seatbelts everyone.
Bwa ha ha what's that? I googled it and the first hit was "the 300 Lb Vegan"
---------- ADS -----------
 
hydro
Rank 4
Rank 4
Posts: 216
Joined: Sun Feb 15, 2004 9:53 pm

Re: Air Canada Flt#88

Post by hydro »

Mangia Cake
"Cake eater". A derogatory term used by blue collar Italo-Canadians used to describe commercialized middle-class WASPs. Italo-Canadians would view the typical daily diet of fellow WASP workers to be based on refined white flour and sugar.
---------- ADS -----------
 
Post Reply

Return to “Accidents, Incidents & Overdue Aircraft”