Toronto Hospital 70% Unvaccinated

Covid related topics that are connected to travel or the aviation industry.
DanWEC
Rank 10
Rank 10
Posts: 2537
Joined: Sun Jul 26, 2009 1:05 pm
Location: 404

Re: Toronto Hospital 70% Unvaccinated

Post by DanWEC »

Posthumane wrote: Fri Jan 14, 2022 12:43 am
Posthumane, thanks for a rational response. Good points, and justifies a proper reply.

First off, I am far from a statistician. I've had to use modelling and population economics in the past in some genetics studies, but stats can be utterly bonkers to try and reign in the more levels you add. You know the expression about stats!

I wouldn't say taking the face value statistics from the ICU is crude, it's simply unadjusted or interpreted, because of the fact that it simply "is". It's the end result. There is no prediction or bias in the sample group. It encompasses everyone in the population from neonatal units to geriatrics, so there shouldn't need to be a correction of any kind unless I'm misinterpreting your point.

Since the ICU percentage really is the end result of what the efficacy of vaccinations should represent, it should just be as simple as ICU True/False and Vaccinated True/False, compared to the population. And since, in our health care system, there isn't a bias or barrier in the sample group, it should be an accurate cross-section and theoretically should yield a near 0% residual.

The ironic part, and why I hate statistics, is that the mere fact that the sample group, as a first order result, is .003% of the population, and data from that size could be rendered irrelevant depending how you look at it. I got a rough margin of error around 6%, but I feel that might be too low. I also forget off the top of my head as I'm writing this on a break how to do a correlation, not just instances, which will change the efficacy based on the pure numbers a bit. Enough to make your head spin.

Regardless, I'm standing by my own opinion, based on my own observations on published data, and peer-reviewed studies without funding or beneficiaries from any pharmaceuticals- and no wacko third party sources or websites. Yes, immunization absolutely has an positive effect, but I don't personally believe the benefits justify this insane division we've created amongst ourselves. It's utterly tragic the rhetoric and vitriol from "both sides" (Ug). We need to be a bit nicer, this will hopefully be long gone in a year and there doesn't need to be lasting scars from our own actions.

Everyone is entitled to their own opinion and ability to govern themselves in whatever way necessary to feel safe. I absolutely won't ascribe my opinions onto anyone else, hurl any insults or give those received any credibility. I'm merely describing how I've arrived at my own conclusions in recent months.

Cheers.
---------- ADS -----------
 
Posthumane
Rank 7
Rank 7
Posts: 650
Joined: Sat May 09, 2009 6:16 pm

Re: Toronto Hospital 70% Unvaccinated

Post by Posthumane »

DanWEC wrote: Fri Jan 14, 2022 11:05 am I wouldn't say taking the face value statistics from the ICU is crude, it's simply unadjusted or interpreted, because of the fact that it simply "is". It's the end result. There is no prediction or bias in the sample group. It encompasses everyone in the population from neonatal units to geriatrics, so there shouldn't need to be a correction of any kind unless I'm misinterpreting your point.
That is what the word crude means: unadjusted, unprocessed, unrefined. That is how the term is used in statistics; e.g. crude mortality rate vs age adjusted mortality rate. The crude rate tells you something (i.e. how many people are in the hospital from the vaccinated and unvaccinated groups) but it doesn't tell you everything (i.e. vaccine efficacy) until you adjust for confounding factors.
Since the ICU percentage really is the end result of what the efficacy of vaccinations should represent, it should just be as simple as ICU True/False and Vaccinated True/False, compared to the population. And since, in our health care system, there isn't a bias or barrier in the sample group, it should be an accurate cross-section and theoretically should yield a near 0% residual.
This is where your error lies. There is a definite bias in the sample group. In order to test for vaccine efficacy you would need to have two groups that are roughly equal in all variables except the one being tested (vaccination status). Since the two groups have other differences between them besides vaccination status (age being the big one) then you are not testing one variable by looking at ICU admissions, but a combination of several variables. This is an example of Simpson's Paradox (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Simpson%27s_paradox).

Let me see if I can make that a bit clearer:
People in the 70+ age group in Canada are vaccinated at a rate of 95%+, people in the <12 age group are vaccinated at a rate of less than 5%, and the ages in between vary from low 80%s to mid 90%s, scaling positively with age. The median age of a vaccinated person is significantly higher than that of an unvaccinated person, so if the vaccine had 0% efficacy you would expect the mortality rate in vaccinated group to be significantly higher than the unvaccinated group, not equal to it.

As an example, take the hospitalization data from Alberta. As of 12 Jan they had 3981 unvaccinated hospitalizations and 1857 fully vaccinated hospitalizations in the preceding 120 days. As a crude analysis you could say that the number of unvaccinated hospitalized people were 2.14 times greater, and with a vaccine coverage of 72% in Alberta the rate of hospitalization was about 5 times greater. However, once you age stratify it you get a much different picture:
ABhosp12Jan.JPG
ABhosp12Jan.JPG (169.98 KiB) Viewed 3055 times
As you can see, a person in the 40-49 age range is about 35x more likely to be hospitalized if unvaccinated compared to their vaccinated counterparts.

Regardless, I'm standing by my own opinion, based on my own observations on published data, and peer-reviewed studies without funding or beneficiaries from any pharmaceuticals- and no wacko third party sources or websites. Yes, immunization absolutely has an positive effect, but I don't personally believe the benefits justify this insane division we've created amongst ourselves. It's utterly tragic the rhetoric and vitriol from "both sides" (Ug). We need to be a bit nicer, this will hopefully be long gone in a year and there doesn't need to be lasting scars from our own actions.

Everyone is entitled to their own opinion and ability to govern themselves in whatever way necessary to feel safe. I absolutely won't ascribe my opinions onto anyone else, hurl any insults or give those received any credibility. I'm merely describing how I've arrived at my own conclusions in recent months.

Cheers.
I don't disagree with you about the idea that everyone needs to be nicer to each other. I'm not big on making things mandatory; rather I'm a fan of natural selection. However, people need to have the correct information in order to make informed decisions. If an "informed opinion" is based on bad data or incorrect analysis, then it is not an informed opinon at all. I'm merely correcting the logical error you made in arriving at your conclusion that the vaccine efficacy is nowhere near what was advertised.
---------- ADS -----------
 
"People who say it cannot be done should not interrupt those who are doing it." -George Bernard Shaw
7ECA
Rank (9)
Rank (9)
Posts: 1346
Joined: Thu Jul 03, 2014 4:33 pm

Re: Toronto Hospital 70% Unvaccinated

Post by 7ECA »

The latest data from BC shows the unvaccinated at at a significantly elevated risk of negative outcomes, compared to their vaccinated peers.

Unvaccinated adults are:

12 times more likely to be hospitalized.

27 times more likely to be in the ICU or CCU.

40 times more likely to die.

But hey, it's just a cold... :roll:
---------- ADS -----------
 
Vaticinator
Rank 4
Rank 4
Posts: 222
Joined: Mon Nov 29, 2021 11:29 am

Re: Toronto Hospital 70% Unvaccinated

Post by Vaticinator »

40 times more than what number?
---------- ADS -----------
 
JonMom
Rank 1
Rank 1
Posts: 22
Joined: Mon Dec 13, 2021 10:21 am
Location: Ontario
Contact:

Re: Toronto Hospital 70% Unvaccinated

Post by JonMom »

https://headlineusa.com/cdc-8-10-omicron-fully-vaxxed/

Looks like Omicron is hitting the hospital admissions in the U.S. with almost 80% being vaccinated per the CDC.

If the vaccine, vaccine passports, lockdowns and such worked you would think Israel would be able to show a victory. This is not the case however. More cases then ever in Israel. But the fifth shot will work just you wait. Also interesting to see four spikes in cases/death and four shots to be fully vaccinated.

https://www.worldometers.info/coronavir ... ry/israel/

I don't see how vaccinating an entire country has proven to be successful anywhere in the world. Can you send me an example of success?
---------- ADS -----------
 
CpnCrunch
Rank 11
Rank 11
Posts: 4140
Joined: Mon Feb 08, 2010 9:38 am

Re: Toronto Hospital 70% Unvaccinated

Post by CpnCrunch »

JonMom wrote: Fri Jan 14, 2022 5:01 pm https://headlineusa.com/cdc-8-10-omicron-fully-vaxxed/

Looks like Omicron is hitting the hospital admissions in the U.S. with almost 80% being vaccinated per the CDC.
No, you're lying. Here is the cnbc source they are apparently quoting:

https://www.cnbc.com/2021/12/10/new-cdc ... ov-15.html

Read it. It doesn't say what "headline usa" says it says. It's nothing to do with hospital admissions. It's surveillance data from 43 early omicron cases in early December. Why do you post this lying bs? Can you not do some basic fact checking?

Here is a cnbc article which does talk about vaccine status vs hospitalisation:

https://www.cnbc.com/2021/12/31/omicron ... tudy-.html

"One vaccine dose is 52% effective at preventing hospitalization from the omicron variant, while two doses were 72% effective, according to the study."
---------- ADS -----------
 
Aviatard
Rank 8
Rank 8
Posts: 966
Joined: Fri Aug 05, 2005 2:45 am
Location: In a box behind Walmart

Re: Toronto Hospital 70% Unvaccinated

Post by Aviatard »

JonMom wrote: Fri Jan 14, 2022 5:01 pm [a bunch of bullshit from a misinformation site that isn’t remotely true]
Anti-vaxxers always lie
---------- ADS -----------
 
DanWEC
Rank 10
Rank 10
Posts: 2537
Joined: Sun Jul 26, 2009 1:05 pm
Location: 404

Re: Toronto Hospital 70% Unvaccinated

Post by DanWEC »

What we should really be focusing on is 80% capacity in the US is making news mid-pandemic, while our relentlessly amputated health care system was at 90% BEFORE covid.
Every year there are hundreds of articles during flu season describing hospitals as being overwhelmed.

At 2.5 hospital beds per 1000 people we're near the bottom of all developed nations. It's embarassing, an utter failure that was long predicted, and THE reason you can't eat in a restaurant or have a family party right now. We should be a lot more angry and more vocal about this from here on out.
---------- ADS -----------
 
CpnCrunch
Rank 11
Rank 11
Posts: 4140
Joined: Mon Feb 08, 2010 9:38 am

Re: Toronto Hospital 70% Unvaccinated

Post by CpnCrunch »

FOD wrote: Fri Jan 14, 2022 11:49 pm
Aviatard wrote: Fri Jan 14, 2022 7:06 pm
JonMom wrote: Fri Jan 14, 2022 5:01 pm [a bunch of bullshit from a misinformation site that isn’t remotely true]
Anti-vaxxers always lie
The Pandemicist’s lies are far more dangerous.
So there is no pandemic?
---------- ADS -----------
 
cdnavater
Rank 10
Rank 10
Posts: 2550
Joined: Wed Apr 21, 2021 11:25 am

Re: Toronto Hospital 70% Unvaccinated

Post by cdnavater »

FOD wrote: Sat Jan 15, 2022 3:50 am
CpnCrunch wrote: Sat Jan 15, 2022 3:23 am
FOD wrote: Fri Jan 14, 2022 11:49 pm

The Pandemicist’s lies are far more dangerous.
So there is no pandemic?
Bit of a leap there captain breakfast cereal. Feel like I’m talking to a toddler.
FOD, you literally contribute absolutely nothing to this forum, other than made up words.
So, I reiterate, FOCUS!
---------- ADS -----------
 
CpnCrunch
Rank 11
Rank 11
Posts: 4140
Joined: Mon Feb 08, 2010 9:38 am

Re: Toronto Hospital 70% Unvaccinated

Post by CpnCrunch »

FOD wrote: Sat Jan 15, 2022 5:36 am
cdnavater wrote: Sat Jan 15, 2022 4:40 am
FOD wrote: Sat Jan 15, 2022 3:50 am

Bit of a leap there captain breakfast cereal. Feel like I’m talking to a toddler.
FOD, you literally contribute absolutely nothing to this forum, other than made up words.
So, I reiterate, FOCUS!
I cordially invite you to focus as well. You have become radicalized, yet you don’t see it. Your pandemicist rhetoric is offensive and bigoted. I’m here to make sure you know it. But of course you know this already.
Whats a pandemicist?
---------- ADS -----------
 
rxl
Rank 7
Rank 7
Posts: 691
Joined: Tue Jan 08, 2013 6:17 am
Location: Terminal 4

Re: Toronto Hospital 70% Unvaccinated

Post by rxl »

FOD wrote: Fri Jan 14, 2022 11:49 pm
Aviatard wrote: Fri Jan 14, 2022 7:06 pm
JonMom wrote: Fri Jan 14, 2022 5:01 pm [a bunch of bullshit from a misinformation site that isn’t remotely true]
Anti-vaxxers always lie
The Pandemicist’s lies are far more dangerous.
“The Pandemicist’s lies are far more dangerous.”

I would encourage you to think about that statement for just a moment …
---------- ADS -----------
 
Last edited by rxl on Sat Jan 15, 2022 9:54 am, edited 1 time in total.
Aviatard
Rank 8
Rank 8
Posts: 966
Joined: Fri Aug 05, 2005 2:45 am
Location: In a box behind Walmart

Re: Toronto Hospital 70% Unvaccinated

Post by Aviatard »

CpnCrunch wrote: Sat Jan 15, 2022 8:45 am
FOD wrote: Sat Jan 15, 2022 5:36 am
cdnavater wrote: Sat Jan 15, 2022 4:40 am
FOD, you literally contribute absolutely nothing to this forum, other than made up words.
So, I reiterate, FOCUS!
I cordially invite you to focus as well. You have become radicalized, yet you don’t see it. Your pandemicist rhetoric is offensive and bigoted. I’m here to make sure you know it. But of course you know this already.
Whats a pandemicist?
It’s a word that angry, contrarian anti-vaxxers use to describe normal people when their lies and phony arguments are exposed as utter bullshit.
---------- ADS -----------
 
Just another canuck
Rank 10
Rank 10
Posts: 2083
Joined: Wed May 21, 2008 6:21 am
Location: The Lake.

Re: Toronto Hospital 70% Unvaccinated

Post by Just another canuck »

---------- ADS -----------
 
Last edited by Just another canuck on Sat Feb 19, 2022 11:23 am, edited 1 time in total.
Twenty years from now you'll be more disappointed by the things you didn't do than by the things you did do.
So throw off the bowlines.
Sail away from the safe harbor.
Catch the trade winds in your sails.
Explore. Dream. Discover.
C-GKNT
Rank 4
Rank 4
Posts: 241
Joined: Sun Mar 21, 2010 1:49 pm
Location: Red Deer, AB

Re: Toronto Hospital 70% Unvaccinated

Post by C-GKNT »

DanWEC wrote: Fri Jan 14, 2022 11:05 am ...
First off, I am far from a statistician. I've had to use modelling and population economics in the past in some genetics studies, but stats can be utterly bonkers to try and reign in the more levels you add. You know the expression about stats!
...
I am, at least was trained as, a statistician (B.Math/M.Math in Statistics). Statisticians are trained to examine data with varying levels of quality (how and why is it collected makes a BIG difference) and use that data to form conclusions (?opinions?). These opinions are changed or strengthened as more data is collected/verified.

The problem is when people do the opposite. They instead form their opinion and then accept or reject data based on how it supports their opinion.

The biggest gap I see is the lack of understanding of what statistics can and cannot do. A rigorous mathematical analysis concludes with "Based on the data it is/is not statistically significant that..."
Anything beyond that is subject to personal biases.
---------- ADS -----------
 
palebird
Rank 4
Rank 4
Posts: 265
Joined: Thu Sep 11, 2008 6:17 am

Re: Toronto Hospital 70% Unvaccinated

Post by palebird »

You sure like that word… anti-vaxxer. I wish you and the rest of the “government and their media is god” crowd would stop using it as if it makes any sense whatsoever. An anti-vaxxer is someone who isn’t vaccinated against MMR, Polio, Tetanus, Hepatitis, etc., not someone who would like to hold off on having themselves injected with an experimental MRNA vaccine for which we know little of the long term side effects. More and more experts on the subject (sorry, your local GP doesn’t count) are advising against it’s use to the extent at which it is now being pushed. How many boosters are you willing to take? 5? 10? 100?
Excellent post. Let's see who tries to tear this one down. There are some very feeble minds on here.
---------- ADS -----------
 
CpnCrunch
Rank 11
Rank 11
Posts: 4140
Joined: Mon Feb 08, 2010 9:38 am

Re: Toronto Hospital 70% Unvaccinated

Post by CpnCrunch »

We know that the vaccine is safe and highly effective against hospitalization and death, and we have a lot of data. An antivaxxer is someone who denies this. It's strange that people are concerned about the long-term effects of a vaccine (none apparent so far), but don't seem to care about long covid.
palebird wrote: Sat Jan 15, 2022 1:01 pm There are some very feeble minds on here.
Indeed.
---------- ADS -----------
 
Just another canuck
Rank 10
Rank 10
Posts: 2083
Joined: Wed May 21, 2008 6:21 am
Location: The Lake.

Re: Toronto Hospital 70% Unvaccinated

Post by Just another canuck »

---------- ADS -----------
 
Last edited by Just another canuck on Sat Feb 19, 2022 11:23 am, edited 1 time in total.
Twenty years from now you'll be more disappointed by the things you didn't do than by the things you did do.
So throw off the bowlines.
Sail away from the safe harbor.
Catch the trade winds in your sails.
Explore. Dream. Discover.
CpnCrunch
Rank 11
Rank 11
Posts: 4140
Joined: Mon Feb 08, 2010 9:38 am

Re: Toronto Hospital 70% Unvaccinated

Post by CpnCrunch »

Just another canuck wrote: Sat Jan 15, 2022 6:35 pm
CDC is reporting almost 8,000 deaths due to the vaccine and over 30,000 permanent disabilities.
No, they're not. I think you're talking about VAERS, which is NOT "deaths due to vaccine".
Is it safer than getting COVID itself? Probably. Maybe. I don’t know and neither do you.
We have multiple large studies which tell us it is much safer than getting COVID.
I suspect getting multiple boosters is not a good idea based on much of the information I’ve seen.
It definitely is a good idea, as it significantly reduces risk of death and hospitalisation. But if you don't want it, that's fine with me.
I just don’t think it should be mandated, much like every other vaccine out there.
I completely agree. I think people should be given freedom to choose, and take the consequences. They should also be triaged appropriately at hospitals.
To those who think unvaccinated should be put at the back of the line with regards to health care, well shame on you. Also, you’re stupid.
Why should the unvaccinated cause other people to die?
---------- ADS -----------
 
Just another canuck
Rank 10
Rank 10
Posts: 2083
Joined: Wed May 21, 2008 6:21 am
Location: The Lake.

Re: Toronto Hospital 70% Unvaccinated

Post by Just another canuck »

---------- ADS -----------
 
Last edited by Just another canuck on Sat Feb 19, 2022 11:23 am, edited 1 time in total.
Twenty years from now you'll be more disappointed by the things you didn't do than by the things you did do.
So throw off the bowlines.
Sail away from the safe harbor.
Catch the trade winds in your sails.
Explore. Dream. Discover.
Just another canuck
Rank 10
Rank 10
Posts: 2083
Joined: Wed May 21, 2008 6:21 am
Location: The Lake.

Re: Toronto Hospital 70% Unvaccinated

Post by Just another canuck »

...
---------- ADS -----------
 
Last edited by Just another canuck on Sun Jan 16, 2022 6:17 am, edited 1 time in total.
Twenty years from now you'll be more disappointed by the things you didn't do than by the things you did do.
So throw off the bowlines.
Sail away from the safe harbor.
Catch the trade winds in your sails.
Explore. Dream. Discover.
TG
Rank 10
Rank 10
Posts: 2102
Joined: Sun Feb 22, 2004 11:32 am
Location: Around

Re: Toronto Hospital 70% Unvaccinated

Post by TG »

Duplicate post.
---------- ADS -----------
 
Last edited by TG on Sun Jan 16, 2022 2:33 am, edited 1 time in total.
TG
Rank 10
Rank 10
Posts: 2102
Joined: Sun Feb 22, 2004 11:32 am
Location: Around

Re: Toronto Hospital 70% Unvaccinated

Post by TG »

Just another canuck wrote: Sat Jan 15, 2022 12:11 pm
Aviatard wrote: Sat Jan 15, 2022 9:49 am
It’s a word that angry, contrarian anti-vaxxers use to describe normal people when their lies and phony arguments are exposed as utter bullshit.
You sure like that word… anti-vaxxer. I wish you and the rest of the “government and their media is god” crowd would stop using it as if it makes any sense whatsoever. An anti-vaxxer is someone who isn’t vaccinated against MMR, Polio, Tetanus, Hepatitis, etc., not someone who would like to hold off on having themselves injected with an experimental MRNA vaccine for which we know little of the long term side effects. More and more experts on the subject (sorry, your local GP doesn’t count) are advising against it’s use to the extent at which it is now being pushed. How many boosters are you willing to take? 5? 10? 100?

All you covid hysteria fanatics count yourself in this majority of Canadians who got the covid vax because it’s safe and effective and the right thing to do, blah, blah, blah. But the truth is, the majority of healthy individuals, like myself, only received this clearly largely ineffective vaccine so we could keep the mortgage paid and food on the table. Ask around, you’ll find that to be the case amongst the majority of your peers and colleagues.

What previous vaccine have you received that forced you to wear a mask and socially distance?
What vaccine allows the spread of the virus after vaccination?
What vaccine has been incentivized via rewards, discounts and lotteries?
What vaccine have members of society been discriminated against and demonized for not getting?
Family, work and other personal relationships threatened for or completely annihilated?
Livelihoods, work and school life threatened?
What about a vaccine that allows parental consent to be overruled?
This vaccine (tough calling it that) seems to do a lot and everything except of course provide immunization it seems.
Fully vaxxed, but need a booster… and a negative test… and wear a mask… and still be hospitalized.

At what point will the majority of us realized we’re being deceived?

And another one I don’t like is the term “science denier”… to question science is in itself, the very essence of science. For someone like Fauci to say he “is science” is a joke. Good post floating around states, if we never questioned science, we’d still be using DDT’s, your doctor would be recommending a brand of cigarettes, you’d be drinking cocaine and your kids cough medicine would have opiates and chloroform in it. Go back a little further and the I suppose the world would still be flat.

The extent to which this vaccine has been pushed is ludicrous. It doesn’t work. Or at least does very little. And getting the remaining population vaccinated isn’t going to make things any better. And if we did get them vaxxed and it doesn’t work, you’ll be screaming at the folks who didn’t get a booster, then their 4th and 5th and so on.

Time to live with covid. Eat better. Exercise. Live a healthy lifestyle. Most of us will be fine. Some of us won’t. At the end of the day, people still die for one reason or another. I don’t want to hear about your “perfectly healthy” 85 year old grandfather that died of covid. He died of old age.
Nobody dies of old age anymore and most of what you are saying has been debunked left and right.

Yes! You are some sort of a science denier. Basically feeling threatened by something you don’t gasp or understand. Show me your PhD in Virology if I’m wrong.
Me I don’t understand either all the exact science behind it but I can gasp the problem and see that vaccination’s recommendation is the best solution. Nobody will need to force my hand getting it and all the required shots afterwards.

Back in the middle age when people felt threatened by something they would not gasp or understand (Sciences) They would simply invoke Witchcraft and burn at stake the “Problem”
Somehow we managed to evolve past that but still, they will always be those who will have it “all figured out” and think they know better.



I could see Faucy being put on top of the pyre by some.
---------- ADS -----------
 
Vaticinator
Rank 4
Rank 4
Posts: 222
Joined: Mon Nov 29, 2021 11:29 am

Re: Toronto Hospital 70% Unvaccinated

Post by Vaticinator »

Ahhh. Another example of a fully vaccinated person being attacked by the mob for the heinous crime of being compliant in action, but not in thought. Once again demonstrating that it isn't enough to merely partake in the sacrament. If your belief isn't strong enough, you still belong in hell.
---------- ADS -----------
 
photofly
Top Poster
Top Poster
Posts: 11306
Joined: Tue Jan 18, 2011 4:47 pm
Location: Hangry and crankypated

Re: Toronto Hospital 70% Unvaccinated

Post by photofly »

Just another canuck wrote: Sat Jan 15, 2022 9:05 pm
VAERS. Yes. But you can not, nor can anyone say that these deaths were not the result of the vaccine either. They very well could be and it’s highly likely that many of them were.
Fantastic. You've gone from "nobody can say" to saying exactly that, in two sentences. "Nobody can say these deaths are caused by the vaccine, but they could be, and I think they are, so ... they are."
But let’s not forget, sometimes a person’s number is just up. That’s life.
No, no, no. You don't get to give away other people's lives.
---------- ADS -----------
 
DId you hear the one about the jurisprudence fetishist? He got off on a technicality.
Post Reply

Return to “Covid”