Posted: Mon Apr 09, 2007 12:22 pm
Max wrote:
As you seem to want to take this seriously, there are so many factors involved including, but not limited, to frequence of lessons, instructor ability, student ability, etc, that giving someone a time frame is just setting them up to unfairly compare themselves....so my post was meant to be irreverent...I thought by using such low hours people would see the humor.....I guess I underestimated your obvious serious dedication to such numbers and your willingness to jump right in and demonstrate how knowledgable you are.
r
How many hours do you think it would take to solo, Max, for someone who could not see the humor in my post?What?
I'd say more like average 10, good one 6-7.
Max
As you seem to want to take this seriously, there are so many factors involved including, but not limited, to frequence of lessons, instructor ability, student ability, etc, that giving someone a time frame is just setting them up to unfairly compare themselves....so my post was meant to be irreverent...I thought by using such low hours people would see the humor.....I guess I underestimated your obvious serious dedication to such numbers and your willingness to jump right in and demonstrate how knowledgable you are.
r