Firstly, not all operators are going to do it....at least not with SMS in place to allow self surveillance.snoopy wrote:
If all the DHC-6 operators operated in the same way, everyone would be flying legally, safely and making more money.
So what is wrong with that? Why sell the airplane short just because "its always been done that way?"
If it is really critical for the maximum efficiency of the aircraft to load it in the way you've been doing it, why didn't DeHavilland, Bombardier and now Viking, include provisions for this in the type design for the airplane. I'm guessing the manufacturer would want the liability/responsibility - but why not ask them?
Anyway, thanks for listening, and carry on....
cheers,
snoopy
And quite frankly what pisses me off about this sort of thing is the lack of common sense. I know what the regs say. When you're moving 3 beakers to some camp on Ellef Rignes Island and have to tell them that you have to do it in 2 trips because "thats what the rules say, despite the stupidity of it". They don't have the money for 2 trips. And for those who will say "well if they dont have the money then they dont fly", STUFF IT. There is common sense here. And if I had alot of cargo stuffed in the old girl with 2 peeps in the back and I HAD TO GET TO THEM for some reason, I could. It might take me a minute or two but I could always communicate with them if I HAD TO.
Sorry, lack of common sense just makes my blood boil.
Cheers,
ETTW




