PR? Theyre the armed forces they dont need to be concerned about maintaining their public image let alone celebrity endorsements from the Duke of Cambridge (or whatever he is). Quite the opposite in fact, (military correct me if Im wrong), doesnt it go against military strategy to show what our capabilities are? What if Canada had real enemies? Do we want them knowing we have helicopters that can land on a lake?? I mean keep a card up your sleeve just in case no?Brewguy wrote:"Free flight training"? Really, that's what you think this should be considered? The CF just got more positive, public exposure, then all their recruiting & PR ads over the past 10 years have given them, and for a fraction of the cost.
For the cost of one hour of flying on the Sea Thing (which is what, somewhere in the $8K range) - hundreds of thousands of Canadians, not to mention the larger world-wide audience, learned something new about the CF. That our pilots train to do something that no other air force or navy in the world teaches their pilots.
RAF Flight Lieutenant Wales just told Canadians, the citizens of other NATO countries, and the rest of the world, that the quality of training in the CF is second to none. Thanks F/L Wales, that was very nice of you. I'm sure CF Public Affairs really appreciates you giving them a hand at doing their job.
They could send a demo team to every air show in Canada and not get as much exposure.
William and the Sea King
Moderators: Sulako, lilfssister, North Shore, sky's the limit, sepia
-
azimuthaviation
- Rank (9)

- Posts: 1409
- Joined: Sat Jun 21, 2008 9:34 pm
Re: William and the Sea King
Re: William and the Sea King
You ever watch one of those May Day parades? There's a fine (or not-so-fine perhaps) line between bragging about your capabilities and divulging strategic secrets. As per the Sea Thing is far from modern technology, and not exactly an offensive platform, showing off its capabilities has far more benefit than risk.azimuthaviation wrote: PR? Theyre the armed forces they dont need to be concerned about maintaining their public image let alone celebrity endorsements from the Duke of Cambridge (or whatever he is). Quite the opposite in fact, (military correct me if Im wrong), doesnt it go against military strategy to show what our capabilities are? What if Canada had real enemies? Do we want them knowing we have helicopters that can land on a lake?? I mean keep a card up your sleeve just in case no?
-
. ._
- Top Poster

- Posts: 7374
- Joined: Fri Feb 20, 2004 5:50 pm
- Location: Cowering in my little room because the Water Cooler is locked.
- Contact:
Re: William and the Sea King
And ya gotta admit- it's kinda funny our guys can do that and if the Marines tried to do it in the Potomac, good old POTUS would be going for a swim.
(Even though, yeah, THOSE guys can probably do it better than our guys, but hey, let's keep the dream alive that we're so badass.)
(Even though, yeah, THOSE guys can probably do it better than our guys, but hey, let's keep the dream alive that we're so badass.)
- flyinggreasemonkey
- Rank 6

- Posts: 454
- Joined: Mon Nov 26, 2007 12:26 pm
Re: William and the Sea King
the prince pay? HAHAHAHA riiiiight
we're wasting over $2 million having them here to begin with....
we're wasting over $2 million having them here to begin with....
- Beefitarian
- Top Poster

- Posts: 6610
- Joined: Wed Dec 01, 2010 10:53 am
- Location: A couple of meters away from others.
Sorry Nark you know I love you but... I think our guys can probably do it better than them, they would just have equipment designed to do it without the yellow tape if they wanted it for that role.istp wrote:And ya gotta admit- it's kinda funny our guys can do that and if the Marines tried to do it in the Potomac, good old POTUS would be going for a swim.![]()
(Even though, yeah, THOSE guys can probably do it better than our guys, but hey, let's keep the dream alive that we're so badass.)
- cdnpilot77
- Rank 10

- Posts: 2467
- Joined: Thu Jun 11, 2009 6:24 pm
Re: William and the Sea King
You are joking right?Theyre the armed forces they dont need to be concerned about maintaining their public image
- Beefitarian
- Top Poster

- Posts: 6610
- Joined: Wed Dec 01, 2010 10:53 am
- Location: A couple of meters away from others.
-
azimuthaviation
- Rank (9)

- Posts: 1409
- Joined: Sat Jun 21, 2008 9:34 pm
Re: William and the Sea King
flyinggreasemonkey wrote:the prince pay? HAHAHAHA riiiiight
we're wasting over $2 million having them here to begin with....
2 million in currency that will soon have his picture on it.
-
niss
- Top Poster

- Posts: 6745
- Joined: Sat Jun 25, 2005 8:54 pm
- Location: I'm a CPL trapped in a PPL's Body.
- Contact:
Re: William and the Sea King
I'd rather have his wife's pic on it. Then I would keep my money in the spank bank.azimuthaviation wrote:flyinggreasemonkey wrote:the prince pay? HAHAHAHA riiiiight
we're wasting over $2 million having them here to begin with....
2 million in currency that will soon have his picture on it.
She’s built like a Steakhouse, but she handles like a Bistro.
Let's kick the tires, and light the fires.... SHIT! FIRE! EMERGENCY CHECKLIST!
Let's kick the tires, and light the fires.... SHIT! FIRE! EMERGENCY CHECKLIST!
Re: William and the Sea King
You obviously don't remember the 1980's and heck, even into the 90's. Back then if someone said they were in the forces, or thinking of joining the forces, a lot of our fellow Canadians would respond "We have a military? Really? Huh, who knew!". Unlike the US, you don't see a lot of CF members appearing on game shows in uniform.azimuthaviation wrote:PR? Theyre the armed forces they dont need to be concerned about maintaining their public image...
The military needs to maintain a massive and ongoing PR campaign to keep them in the public's mind. Otherwise, they (the public) don't bat an eye as the military is eroded away to nothing by budget cutbacks. And now that there is a government in office that's doing a military spending spree - its just as important for Canadians to see and understand what the CF actually does on a day to day basis.
Cheers,
Brew
Brew
-
azimuthaviation
- Rank (9)

- Posts: 1409
- Joined: Sat Jun 21, 2008 9:34 pm
Re: William and the Sea King
Shes not too bad looking, and right now just a few hours drive away. Princess Diana dumped her prince for some greasy Arab guy so Im sure I have a shot too.niss wrote:I'd rather have his wife's pic on it. Then I would keep my money in the spank bank.azimuthaviation wrote:flyinggreasemonkey wrote:the prince pay? HAHAHAHA riiiiight
we're wasting over $2 million having them here to begin with....
2 million in currency that will soon have his picture on it.
Re: William and the Sea King
Not on your paycheque.azimuthaviation wrote:...so Im sure I have a shot too.
____________________________________
I'm just two girls short of a threesome.
I'm just two girls short of a threesome.
-
azimuthaviation
- Rank (9)

- Posts: 1409
- Joined: Sat Jun 21, 2008 9:34 pm
Re: William and the Sea King
You may be shocked to learn but theres actually women out there who will give you attention without having to be paid.
-
winds_in_flight_wtf
- Rank 5

- Posts: 372
- Joined: Fri Apr 23, 2010 7:35 pm
Re: William and the Sea King
If you cannot embrace the people which make up your countries history +traditions then I suggest you find another home. I hope they buy him a private C17 so you shit your pants.flyinggreasemonkey wrote:the prince pay? HAHAHAHA riiiiight
we're wasting over $2 million having them here to begin with....
- Siddley Hawker
- Rank 11

- Posts: 3353
- Joined: Tue Aug 10, 2004 6:56 pm
- Location: 50.13N 66.17W
Re: William and the Sea King
Edited.
Oops. Already said he same thing on another thread.
Oops. Already said he same thing on another thread.
Re: William and the Sea King
AA, son, when it comes to women you always end up paying for it one way or another.
____________________________________
I'm just two girls short of a threesome.
I'm just two girls short of a threesome.
-
. ._
- Top Poster

- Posts: 7374
- Joined: Fri Feb 20, 2004 5:50 pm
- Location: Cowering in my little room because the Water Cooler is locked.
- Contact:
Re: William and the Sea King
+1mcrit wrote:... when it comes to women you always end up paying for it one way or another.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2o0V6VPX_E0
Re: William and the Sea King
I'm relatively anti-monarchy these days, but even I have to admit that they're probably bringing more than $2 million in benefits to Canada. I'm on vacation in PEI at the moment and they've drawn lots of tourists to the North Shore on top of the usual busy season... I think financially it's probably a wash overall.flyinggreasemonkey wrote:the prince pay? HAHAHAHA riiiiight
we're wasting over $2 million having them here to begin with....
My concern with the monarchy isn't so much that it's a waste of money, but that no person should have a blood right to rule over another - we're not in feudal times (yet) and we shouldn't act like it either.
Re: William and the Sea King
Royal rule effectively ended with the signing of the Magna Carta on June 15, 1215. It is the democratically elected government that rules in Great Britain and Canada today. Perhaps you're thinking of Saudi Arabia?Guido wrote:My concern with the monarchy isn't so much that it's a waste of money, but that no person should have a blood right to rule over another - we're not in feudal times (yet) and we shouldn't act like it either.
- Siddley Hawker
- Rank 11

- Posts: 3353
- Joined: Tue Aug 10, 2004 6:56 pm
- Location: 50.13N 66.17W
Re: William and the Sea King
Probably why it's called a Constitutional Monarchy. I can supply a reason why it's a good idea using just four words: Chairman Pierre Elliot Trudeau. Hell, I can do it with three words: President Jean Chretien. 
Re: William and the Sea King
As far as I'm concerned, a Constitutional Monarchy is just about the best system of government you can hope for.
Sure, on paper other systems of government may look more appealing - but in practice, we have one thing others don't. And that one thing, is a fail-safe or a 'trump card' if you will, against any possibility of a dictatorship. Our monarch's only real power or authority, is in being able to pull the plug on a government that over steps it's legal bounds. And also having the monarch as the head of the armed forces, gives us pretty good protection against the possibility of a military coup.
If you look at most other forms of government, particularly republics, it's actually a bit scary the level of unquestioning loyalty most soldiers give to an individual elected person as their commander-in-chief.
Had Germany become a constitutional monarchy after WWI (in a similar manner to what we have now), what chance do you think Hitler would have had in gaining absolute control of the government & military?
Given the right set of circumstances (martial law or similar after a catastrophic disaster or major terrorist act) do you think it's remotely possible, even if improbable, that a US or Russian president could stage a military coup and become a dictator? i.e. Soldiers "just following orders", and their Officers with orders that come "directly from the commander-in-chief"?
Not to sound all conspiracy theorist - just food for thought for all of those who are so quick to damn the monarchy in favour of a republic.
Sure, on paper other systems of government may look more appealing - but in practice, we have one thing others don't. And that one thing, is a fail-safe or a 'trump card' if you will, against any possibility of a dictatorship. Our monarch's only real power or authority, is in being able to pull the plug on a government that over steps it's legal bounds. And also having the monarch as the head of the armed forces, gives us pretty good protection against the possibility of a military coup.
If you look at most other forms of government, particularly republics, it's actually a bit scary the level of unquestioning loyalty most soldiers give to an individual elected person as their commander-in-chief.
Had Germany become a constitutional monarchy after WWI (in a similar manner to what we have now), what chance do you think Hitler would have had in gaining absolute control of the government & military?
Given the right set of circumstances (martial law or similar after a catastrophic disaster or major terrorist act) do you think it's remotely possible, even if improbable, that a US or Russian president could stage a military coup and become a dictator? i.e. Soldiers "just following orders", and their Officers with orders that come "directly from the commander-in-chief"?
Not to sound all conspiracy theorist - just food for thought for all of those who are so quick to damn the monarchy in favour of a republic.
Cheers,
Brew
Brew
Re: William and the Sea King
just think, with 4more hours, and some more touch and go's he can get tc to stamp a float rating on his license.
Re: William and the Sea King
I think he did a hell of a job in front of the cameras
Re: William and the Sea King
You make a good point, Brewguy - definite food for thought.Brewguy wrote:As far as I'm concerned, a Constitutional Monarchy is just about the best system of government you can hope for.

