eddyb123 wrote:
I talked to a great mechanic yesterday who helped me with the problemn. And again I'd like to thank you all.
@eddyb123 What did the problem turn out to be?
One thing missing in this discussion is the other two sides of the story; the mechanic's and the truth.
It's not unreasonable at all to think that a 50 year old aircraft might have more than one problem at a time. 50 year old starter cables (if original) would be lucky not to have any corrosion or other damage leaving their performance somewhat lacking.
It sounds also like your charging system wasn't hard failed, as it was charging on the ground.
This is speculation here but I'm guessing that the AME charged your battery, found it still didn't crank over properly even with ground power or boost, changed out your starter (possibly erroneously) then found some cables overheating somewhere in the circuit between battery and starter.
Once the engine was starting properly, your intermittent charging problem couldn't be replicated on ground, so a logbook entry was made for the work performed and you went on your way, just to have it fail on you again.
This was the point where the AME was in a thankless position; if he started going through the system with a fine toothed comb, looking for the hidden problem that was not presenting at the moment, the hours rack up. If he started guessing which component may be bad and changed a component to see if it fixes the problem, he's accused of applying the shotgun approach to troubleshooting. If he does nothing and lets you go flying only to have the problem reappear, he's seen as incompetent or negligent.
Why it would fail in the air and not on the ground? That's where the guessing is likely to start, as it's hard to use a multimeter inside the cowl in flight. Vibration, airflow or engine torque in flight pulling a wire that's more relaxed on the ground causing a bad connection? Heat soaking affecting some tired component?
Anyways, I hope you’ve found the end of the tunnel on this snag.