Wait a minute...that's what they all said in 1996 too.

Moderators: lilfssister, North Shore, sky's the limit, sepia, Sulako, I WAS Birddog
Using that logic then, Westjet should never had started in the first place.anonymity wrote:"Those that fail to learn from history, are doomed to repeat it"
Winston Churchill.
If you don't want to take lessons from the past you deserve what you get. Unfortunately the rest will suffer along with you.
I don't believe anyone is saying,"shelve the whole regional idea", just saying a seperate company is a bad idea frought with many other's who have done the same and suffered the consequences or reaped the benefits, depending on where you sit(inside the boardroom or out).
I've seen a few LCC launches in my day. All have been successful and all still operate independently.anonymity wrote:Realitychex, I had to read your post several times and still don't get it. Are you being sarcastic or ironic?
RussD wrote:WTF are you babbling about pal. This isn't a start up any more than ZIP was for AC. You clearly are pipe lining the disinformation that GS has mislead the troops with. This so called 'vote' was a red herring to divert the interest from the real concern (different employee group, different seniority list,different representation) to the minor issue of Wawcon. The vote is bogus. The less than totally subverted get it. Shame on you and the other for the clear misrepresentation of the facts. I take it back. Some REAL WestJetters get it. You ain't one of themRealitychex wrote:I've seen a few LCC launches in my day. All have been successful and all still operate independently.anonymity wrote:Realitychex, I had to read your post several times and still don't get it. Are you being sarcastic or ironic?
The proposed venture is a start up, and, like WS in 1996, needs to enter the marketplace with the lowest possible costs, at all levels within the organization.
RD Out
It must be tough going through life as bitter and twisted as you are. Best of luck to you.RussD wrote:WTF are you babbling about pal. This isn't a start up any more than ZIP was for AC. Except that AC was WAY more honest about the nature of ZIP(common seniority ,common employer, common representation) than you are being. You clearly are pipe lining the disinformation that GS has mislead the troops with. This so called 'vote' was a red herring to divert the interest from the real concern (different employee group, different seniority list,different representation) to the minor issue of Wawcon. The vote is bogus. The 'fix' was in. The less than totally subverted get it. Shame on you and the other for the clear misrepresentation of the facts. I take it back about losing faith with the REAL WestJetters. Some REAL WestJetters get it. You ain't one of themRealitychex wrote:I've seen a few LCC launches in my day. All have been successful and all still operate independently.anonymity wrote:Realitychex, I had to read your post several times and still don't get it. Are you being sarcastic or ironic?
The proposed venture is a start up, and, like WS in 1996, needs to enter the marketplace with the lowest possible costs, at all levels within the organization.
RD Out
I don't believe you need a certified union to use the terminology.tallyho wrote:What is this WAWCON of which everyone speaks? Thought WJ didn't have a union.