Then speak it...instead of attacking me...enlighten us.cpl_atc wrote:Oh yeah, it's me alright....
I've always spoken my mind on here, regarding of the topic. I don't need a SECOND anonymous ID to do that.
Nav Canada & safety concerns
Moderators: sky's the limit, sepia, Sulako, North Shore
Re: Nav Canada & safety concerns
Re: Nav Canada & safety concerns
You would email to an anonymous poster? How do you know that he isn't one of the people you don't trust? He has yet to give any info regarding who he is and what his agenda is.cpl_atc wrote:If I had any of this nature, I'd be doing it through the email address, and not on here. Sadly there are too many backstabbers in the building, most of whom I don't trust any further than I could throw.
Re: Nav Canada & safety concerns
I still dont get why you chose to attack me...Im defending my company and its operations, which is my responsibility. Your's too by the way, check MANOPs.
Re: Nav Canada & safety concerns
111.2
Avoid gossip or criticism reflecting on users of
air traffic services or on other ATC units or
personnel. You should, however, provide advice
and criticism through normal channels for
action. (N)
111.2 Note:
As representatives of NAV CANADA in direct
contact with the public, all personnel are expected
to exercise a high degree of tact and good
judgment.
You think you are excercising tact in your personal attacks on me? What about good judgement in your statement
"The Company regards courteous and responsible behaviour as the foundation of respectful
interpersonal behaviour. Additional dimensions of respect that also apply in our workplace
include trust, fairness, equity, honesty, integrity, commitment and loyalty.
On the other hand, respect does not mean that we cannot disagree, in good faith, on matters
of principle or interpretation or perception of factual situations. It does mean that when such
situations arise, we will disagree in a tactful and diplomatic manner."
Our responsibility in avoiding gossip and criticism of our company includes the responsibility to defend it. I strongly disagree with any implication that you or any other pseudonym makes about the unsafe handling of our operations.
Avoid gossip or criticism reflecting on users of
air traffic services or on other ATC units or
personnel. You should, however, provide advice
and criticism through normal channels for
action. (N)
111.2 Note:
As representatives of NAV CANADA in direct
contact with the public, all personnel are expected
to exercise a high degree of tact and good
judgment.
You think you are excercising tact in your personal attacks on me? What about good judgement in your statement
I would also like to direct your attention to the Company Code of Conduct which clearly defines company values, number one being respecttesox2 wrote:Hey tesox, how about parking your small-penis-syndrome and recognize that he's talking about the system sweeping incidents,
"The Company regards courteous and responsible behaviour as the foundation of respectful
interpersonal behaviour. Additional dimensions of respect that also apply in our workplace
include trust, fairness, equity, honesty, integrity, commitment and loyalty.
On the other hand, respect does not mean that we cannot disagree, in good faith, on matters
of principle or interpretation or perception of factual situations. It does mean that when such
situations arise, we will disagree in a tactful and diplomatic manner."
Our responsibility in avoiding gossip and criticism of our company includes the responsibility to defend it. I strongly disagree with any implication that you or any other pseudonym makes about the unsafe handling of our operations.
Re: Nav Canada & safety concerns
Now that was funny. Why this "my kung fu is better than yours" kids? Grow up already, there's no need to get personal on this, plus, it's pretty off topic.
Anyway, my thoughts on the subject: I hate when you report an incident to NavCan they end up changing the wording (and the complete sense) of what really happens if it gets to TC CADORs. I know, we have to report the facts ans only the facts but when the facts are changed on the way, I think THIS should be reported as an incident!
Cheers!
FSS2552
Anyway, my thoughts on the subject: I hate when you report an incident to NavCan they end up changing the wording (and the complete sense) of what really happens if it gets to TC CADORs. I know, we have to report the facts ans only the facts but when the facts are changed on the way, I think THIS should be reported as an incident!
Cheers!
FSS2552
