I know what others are planning to pay their guys and it’s a quantum leap above that.
I ran it by a number of very senior guys I know who still fly the line.
It’s a good number.

Moderators: North Shore, sky's the limit, sepia, Sulako, lilfssister, I WAS Birddog
Hi Realitychex,Realitychex wrote: ↑Sun Dec 24, 2017 3:56 pm Let’s just say it’s a hell of a lot more than what it’ll be for everyone if WJ abdicates it’s spot in the Cdn industry as the low cost leader.
I know what others are planning to pay their guys and it’s a quantum leap above that.
...
It’s a good number.
![]()
Well, let’s hear all about it. There truly is only one word that counts....Parity...anything short of that is not acceptable. If Swoop can only make $ by short changing the pilots (and any other working group for that matter) then this is a failed business plan.Realitychex wrote: ↑Sun Dec 24, 2017 3:56 pm Let’s just say it’s a hell of a lot more than what it’ll be for everyone if WJ abdicates it’s spot in the Cdn industry as the low cost leader.
I know what others are planning to pay their guys and it’s a quantum leap above that.
I ran it by a number of very senior guys I know who still fly the line.
It’s a good number.
![]()
I might be mistaken here but, if you are not a member does that mean you will not be able to vote upon a contract when one is finally presented to the working group? No vote, no say in the outcome.NewCommercialPilot wrote: ↑Sun Dec 24, 2017 5:49 am I'm not a member and not going to be a member. It's not my thing.
A business case WJ is no longer using. Why is that? Why did they move the company so far away from it's original and successful model that they feel the need to reboot the whole thing by starting a new carrier? I honestly don't know but it sounds like the sort of thing you might understand. I was very attracted to the model of management and compensation at WJ. One where all parties were tied to the success or lack thereof, where everyone was on the same team and were rewarded with the successes of the company. But that's not the way it works anymore. Why change something that worked to something that they feel doesn't work? Those choices were made at the top by the executive and not by the pilots or a union that was not on property at the time.Realitychex wrote: ↑Sun Dec 24, 2017 7:09 am Is the analysis accurate? Given that WJ wouldn’t exist today without the analysis that I did way back when, and that the WJ analysis went on to be the basis of the analysis of what became JetBlue and a couple of other airlines now flying today, I wouldn’t ignore it.
That's part of the problem, the pilots haven't seen the analysis. The company has not talked to the pilots about anything. The pilots found out about Swoop when it was announced in the press... same way everything else the pilots have heard about Swoop and several other initiatives. The executive stopped talking to the pilots long before the union drive. I would posit that the union is a reaction the executive cutting the pilots out of the process and people feeling like they need some form of protection that they never felt the need for previously. It is nice that they are talking to you and giving you data to look at, perhaps they should try that with the pilots.Realitychex wrote: ↑Sun Dec 24, 2017 7:09 am If you saw the Cdn specific ULCC analysis, I think the posturing would end pretty quickly and a deal that everyone could live with would get done.
Good question. There are not enough pilots graduating from colleges to fill the hiring requirements for 2018, nevermind the years beyond. I don't think WJ management realizes the importance of getting this right the first time. The flow to AC is about to be ramped up starting next month and those who leave aren't coming back. WJ should be doing everything it can to keep pilots from leaving, the idea that they can afford to train and replace is not going to be viable for much longer.Mostly Harmless wrote: ↑Tue Dec 26, 2017 8:06 am I question where all these potential high skilled/low wage employees are to be found.
Swoop is launching with only 2 airplanes. That's 20 captains. I would bet that there are 20 people out there working at Flair, WestWind (ATR captains), Georgian RJ Captains, etc that would have enough time to qualify as a captain. They'll add aircraft much slower than Encore ever did and are only growing to 10 tails (per the current plan). Hell, I'd bet Georgian alone could probably supply all of the crews required and no matter what pay scale we launch with, it'll probably be a raise for them. There are likely 100 people across Canada that want some 737 PIC time so that they can go to China.Mr. North wrote: ↑Tue Dec 26, 2017 11:00 am Good question. There are not enough pilots graduating from colleges to fill the hiring requirements for 2018, nevermind the years beyond. I don't think WJ management realizes the importance of getting this right the first time. The flow to AC is about to be ramped up starting next month and those who leave aren't coming back. WJ should be doing everything it can to keep pilots from leaving, the idea that they can afford to train and replace is not going to be viable for much longer.
I agree, there are plenty of pilots I know that would eat their first born son to further their career, even slightly. It would set a precedent though in the industry to have pilots worth their weight banning the idea of lowering the bar in this industry. Keep Swoop isolated to the bottom feeders of this industry, if AC bans hiring from there at ACPA's request, Westjet threatens BOTL, then they'll be there for life, where they belong, making less than everyone else who wanted to improve the WAWCON for everyone.BE20 Driver wrote: ↑Wed Dec 27, 2017 2:29 pmSwoop is launching with only 2 airplanes. That's 20 captains. I would bet that there are 20 people out there working at Flair, WestWind (ATR captains), Georgian RJ Captains, etc that would have enough time to qualify as a captain. They'll add aircraft much slower than Encore ever did and are only growing to 10 tails (per the current plan). Hell, I'd bet Georgian alone could probably supply all of the crews required and no matter what pay scale we launch with, it'll probably be a raise for them. There are likely 100 people across Canada that want some 737 PIC time so that they can go to China.Mr. North wrote: ↑Tue Dec 26, 2017 11:00 am Good question. There are not enough pilots graduating from colleges to fill the hiring requirements for 2018, nevermind the years beyond. I don't think WJ management realizes the importance of getting this right the first time. The flow to AC is about to be ramped up starting next month and those who leave aren't coming back. WJ should be doing everything it can to keep pilots from leaving, the idea that they can afford to train and replace is not going to be viable for much longer.
Unfortunately, I don't see this hiring ban working like we want but I can't come up with a better solution that would encourage higher wages at Swoop.