Page 3 of 5
Re: Morningstar
Posted: Sun Aug 16, 2020 11:52 am
by Bacunayagua
.
Re: Morningstar
Posted: Mon Aug 17, 2020 12:17 pm
by Chaxterium
iflyforpie wrote: ↑Sun Aug 16, 2020 11:18 am
but because of the simple fact that not everyone can or wants (wanted) to flow through to the YYZ based,
non-commutable, likely years for an upgrade 757 spot
It's absolutely commutable. And right now we have guys upgrading into the left seat with two years at the company. When I was hired I was told two years. That was one year ago. COVID has certainly changed things so I'm assuming it will be longer, but I'm not expecting it to be significantly longer than that.
Re: Morningstar
Posted: Mon Aug 17, 2020 12:32 pm
by iflyforpie
Ok. But what does the commuting look like? Probably not possible on company aircraft unless you want to eat further into your GDO so you have to go inter line or jump seat which gets old quick.
YYZ is a junior base for most of the majors because nobody wants to be there. Unless you’re from the GTA, most bid other bases as soon as they have enough seniority to do so. That’s what killed any idea of working for WJ for me.. even with guaranteed standby travel I’d be stuck in YYZ for a long time. With Morningstar, I’d be stuck there forever.
Maybe that’s why there’s movement on the 757 as well? No chances of getting out of dodge unless you jump ship?
And I still doubt there’s enough movement to absorb every 208 pilot who moves through the organization unless they want to wait years.
Re: Morningstar
Posted: Mon Aug 17, 2020 6:40 pm
by genetic jack hammer
I could be wrong, but I don't recall seeing Morningstar on AC's jumpseat agreement. If you get YYZ and commute from YUL, could one travel on company aircraft?
Re: Morningstar
Posted: Mon Aug 17, 2020 8:24 pm
by fish4life
I heard that fed ex won’t authorize them to put non company people on the plane making it impossible to sign jump seat agreements
Re: Morningstar
Posted: Tue Aug 18, 2020 4:50 am
by Chaxterium
Correct. We have no jumpseat agreements with anyone. All commuting is done on company aircraft.
Re: Morningstar
Posted: Wed Aug 19, 2020 7:26 am
by viccoastdog
AirportCoffee wrote: ↑Fri Aug 14, 2020 6:35 pm
I can certainly see how on one hand they don't want to invest their time in someone who will leave as soon as they are recalled back to AC or WS, but do they not realize that the same thing will happen to 704/705 lite captains who will go back to wherever they were making good $$$ prior?
While a job in this climate sure is nice, 55K in YVR only goes so far...
It actually works out closer to $70K to start.
Re: Morningstar
Posted: Wed Aug 19, 2020 12:00 pm
by iflyforpie
Chaxterium wrote: ↑Tue Aug 18, 2020 4:50 am
Correct. We have no jumpseat agreements with anyone. All commuting is done on company aircraft.
So I’m assuming that you’ll by flying out on the go home leg you’ll be flying 24 hours later.. and probably holding for most of the day before you can get the outbound leg back home? Is it a milk run? Can you hitch a ride on 208s or ATRs to live in a small city rather than YVR, YYC, etc?
Re: Morningstar
Posted: Wed Aug 19, 2020 12:50 pm
by igorcanuck
Does anyone know how many pilots on the last ATR GS?
Re: Morningstar
Posted: Wed Aug 19, 2020 1:33 pm
by BE20 Driver
I am told that they are adding 2 machines to start with. At 11 pilots per machine that's 22 pilots. I have heard this is only the start for Calgary and there is expected expansion beyond the initial 2 ATR's.
Re: Morningstar
Posted: Wed Aug 19, 2020 3:47 pm
by genetic jack hammer
iflyforpie wrote: ↑Wed Aug 19, 2020 12:00 pm
Chaxterium wrote: ↑Tue Aug 18, 2020 4:50 am
Correct. We have no jumpseat agreements with anyone. All commuting is done on company aircraft.
So I’m assuming that you’ll by flying out on the go home leg you’ll be flying 24 hours later.. and probably holding for most of the day before you can get the outbound leg back home? Is it a milk run? Can you hitch a ride on 208s or ATRs to live in a small city rather than YVR, YYC, etc?
How would a commute from YUL to YYZ look? Does MS do a YUL-YYZ-YUL run? Thanks.
Re: Morningstar
Posted: Wed Aug 19, 2020 7:22 pm
by Chaxterium
Well we only go to Mirabel. But we have an evening flight from Mirabel to Toronto (leaves around 9pm) and then an early morning flight from Toronto to Mirabel which leaves at 4:20am.
Re: Morningstar
Posted: Wed Dec 23, 2020 10:50 am
by pild04
Morningstar is hiring FO for the B757. Good luck all!
https://maei.bamboohr.com/jobs/view.php?id=39
Re: Morningstar
Posted: Tue Dec 29, 2020 9:00 pm
by GATRKGA
For those waiting,
They’re emailing people who used to have offers and who are not at a major airline asking if they want a job on the 757.
My guess, everyone who applied just Gave them a sample size of what’s out there and that they already knew who they wanted to hire.
Makes sense when the job ad was taken down first thing Monday morning.
Good luck!
Re: Morningstar
Posted: Tue Jan 19, 2021 7:56 am
by ted_stryker
How easy would it be to transfer bases eventually. Say yyc to ymx if you're not changing airframe?
Re: Morningstar
Posted: Tue Jan 19, 2021 5:17 pm
by Air.Field
Ad up again for ATR, if you're laid off from 705 don't bother, they threw out those apps last time
Re: Morningstar
Posted: Tue Jan 19, 2021 9:03 pm
by Freeport_Flyer
That's too bad. I'm sure there are folks that would want the stable life of a freight dog rather than the on again, off again airline job.
Re: Morningstar
Posted: Wed Jan 20, 2021 8:36 am
by Ash Ketchum
Freeport_Flyer wrote: ↑Tue Jan 19, 2021 9:03 pm
That's too bad. I'm sure there are folks that would want the stable life of a freight dog rather than the on again, off again airline job.
I agree, if I got on with a company like Morningstar I would have no problem leaving the airline life behind for increased stability. It seems that not many employers in Canada (aviation or otherwise) are willing to take on a furloughed airline pilot.
Re: Morningstar
Posted: Wed Jan 20, 2021 8:53 am
by woop_woop
The problem is that 99.9% of those telling you they would prefer the stable life of a freight dog, will go right back to their old seats as soon as they get recalled.
So the hiring department is faced with a situation of hiring people with a near 100% chance of leaving in the next two years. Or hire someone from the 703/04 world that may stick around for longer.
To answer the question about base movement between YYC and YMX, it just comes down to seniority and positions available. If a position becomes available in YMX, anyone can bid for it and will be awarded based on seniority. Mirabel has historically seen very little movement as the position is quite comfortable for those guy, even more so for the left seat.
Re: Morningstar
Posted: Wed Jan 20, 2021 8:57 am
by dhc#
Whats driving this expansion, and what routes are they growing out of YYC ?
Re: Morningstar
Posted: Wed Jan 20, 2021 9:13 am
by woop_woop
The immediate reason is the take over of the turboprop routes out of YYC from Carson. That being said, reasonable speculation would assume that there is more coming down the pipeline at some point. Since its not just taking over the runs, but a considerable up-gage in equipment, Metro to ATR.
As far as routes are concerned, a quick flight aware check will tell you everything you want about that.
Re: Morningstar
Posted: Wed Jan 20, 2021 3:03 pm
by Freeport_Flyer
woop_woop wrote: ↑Wed Jan 20, 2021 8:53 am
The problem is that 99.9% of those telling you they would prefer the stable life of a freight dog, will go right back to their old seats as soon as they get recalled.
Why is that? If working and wage conditions are similar, why would someone leave if it's stable? Especially after freight has prospered in a drastically negative aviation market? For example, someone who was recently hired onto 705 during pilot shortage-palooza but only working a year, really isn't walking away from that much seniority; and the prospect of return to work for them may be 1-2 years away anyway! Not to mention not much hope of moving out of the right seat for the foreseeable future.
It may be worth having a second look at former 705 folks rather than just burning the pile of resumes. You may find more skilled candidates rather than "just taking" whoever applies from 703/04.
And while this may sound self serving, I am one of the lucky happily employed.

Re: Morningstar
Posted: Wed Jan 20, 2021 7:47 pm
by woop_woop
The simple answer to that is that most would rather be at the airlines and not flying cargo. The reasons for that are as varied as the pilot itself, but the reality is that most do not want to fly night cargo for the rest of their career. Are there some that would prefer the stability? Absolutely! But that wasn't my point.
Again, why would they make their selection process more difficult on themselves trying to guess who may stay behind, when they can make things real simple on themselves and go for someone who has a higher chance of staying.
I don't fully agree with that comment about 705 guys being necessarily more skilled. We have actually had a much harder time training guys coming from 705 operations than guys upgrading from the Caravan or coming from some King Air outfit.
As far as wage and working conditions go, we are currently negotiating the next contract. Wage will probably be the same or right around what CJ is getting.
Re: Morningstar
Posted: Wed Jan 20, 2021 8:49 pm
by Freeport_Flyer
woop_woop wrote: ↑Wed Jan 20, 2021 7:47 pm
I don't fully agree with that comment about 705 guys being necessarily more skilled. We have actually had a much harder time training guys coming from 705 operations than guys upgrading from the Caravan or coming from some King Air outfit.
I'm not saying 705 pilots are better than the rest. I'm just saying that by discriminating against someone because of who their last employer was may be eliminating a qualified candidate before being given the chance. And with the way the world has changed, you may find a lot of people's views on what they want out of employment have changed too.
Re: Morningstar
Posted: Thu Jan 21, 2021 10:43 am
by ayseven
The good news is that there appear to be jobs available for young hungry people. We need good news.