Air support is part of any well planned mission.
Say that convoy does roll over an IED. Do you think we just drive the victims back to the nearest aid station? Or do you think we try to organize a medevac?
Where do you think that extra fire power comes from when the ground forces run into resistance?
Air power is very alive and well in this (these) war.
Guido, we as Marines, have been walking the streets since day one, getting "facetime". Perhaps your confusing what your seeing on CNN.
CF-18's were to have been sent to Afghanistan but....
Moderators: sky's the limit, sepia, Sulako, lilfssister, North Shore, I WAS Birddog
Re: CF-18's were to have been sent to Afghanistan but....
Qui desiderat pacem, praeparet bellum
Semper Fidelis
“De inimico non loquaris male, sed cogites"-
Do not wish death for your enemy, plan it.
Semper Fidelis
“De inimico non loquaris male, sed cogites"-
Do not wish death for your enemy, plan it.
Re: CF-18's were to have been sent to Afghanistan but....
Like I watch CNN...Nark wrote:Guido, we as Marines, have been walking the streets since day one, getting "facetime". Perhaps your confusing what your seeing on CNN.
edit
Here it is : http://www.wired.com/politics/security/ ... rentPage=1
/edit
Re: CF-18's were to have been sent to Afghanistan but....
As far as additional chopper support goes the emphasis has been on the Griffons when the armoured side showed how it can be done - get a nation with suitable spare equipment who's not really using it and lease/loan/buy it.
The British are solving part of their support helicopter gap by finally admitting their grounded Chinook HC3s are a bust and downgrading them to HC2s so they can actually be used, and by acquiring Merlin HC3As from Denmark (who didn't need them at the time).
As for not taking the -18s to Afstan, the US was pretty glad to have -18s in Alaska for a while when the F-15 fleet was grounded.
The British are solving part of their support helicopter gap by finally admitting their grounded Chinook HC3s are a bust and downgrading them to HC2s so they can actually be used, and by acquiring Merlin HC3As from Denmark (who didn't need them at the time).
As for not taking the -18s to Afstan, the US was pretty glad to have -18s in Alaska for a while when the F-15 fleet was grounded.
- GilletteNorth
- Rank 7

- Posts: 704
- Joined: Sun Apr 15, 2007 1:09 pm
- Location: throw a dart dead center of Saskatchewan
Re: CF-18's were to have been sent to Afghanistan but....
I find this an interesting quirk of modern warfare. Can't afford proper military equipment (guess budgeting for $200,000 toilets is too much) and a government actually putting a 5-10 million? dollar helicopter in harms way is flaunting the odds, so get civvies to fight the wars instead. Guess capitalism wins the day for the free market to do the job the military should be doing LOL.At an informal meeting of NATO defence ministers last fall in Noordwick, Holland, the shortage of helicopters was among the biggest issues. With members either unable or reluctant to deploy their aircraft, the alliance approved a scheme to rent civilian choppers for hauling cargo in Afghanistan.
Having a standard that pilots lose their licence after making a mistake despite doing no harm to aircraft or passengers means soon you needn't worry about a pilot surplus or pilots offering to fly for free. Where do you get your experience from?


