No. It isn't. Being a human being I have dealt with insurance companies before. Personally its my suspicion that a calculation is simply made whether it is worth paying out the claim and the insuree's ability to fight any denial of pay out. Aviation insurers seem to make a different calculation than say automobile insurers. That's just my perception from my dealings with them.
Employee with PPL flying for the Company
Moderators: North Shore, sky's the limit, sepia, Sulako, lilfssister, I WAS Birddog
-
- Rank 7
- Posts: 514
- Joined: Mon Jan 22, 2018 12:27 pm
Re: Employee with PPL flying for the Company
I'm not sure what's more depressing: That everyone has a price, or how low the price always is.
- RedAndWhiteBaron
- Rank 8
- Posts: 813
- Joined: Sat Jan 04, 2020 5:55 pm
- Location: In the left seat, admitting my mistakes
Re: Employee with PPL flying for the Company
I also know of a respected dog trainer, amongst the top in her field, who makes the odd buck being an expert witness in canine attack lawsuits for (and against) the the insurance companies. It's not just an aviation thing.
I will dance the sky on laughter-silvered wings.
-
- Rank (9)
- Posts: 1764
- Joined: Sat Feb 21, 2004 3:59 pm
Re: Employee with PPL flying for the Company
Why throw good money after bad? If all you're doing is taking pictures (which, with your experience level is all you should be doing) just get a drone. Considerably more cost effective and better suited/purpose built for the task.
Re: Employee with PPL flying for the Company
If there is ever a lawsuit due to a dog attacking an airplane, they'll get to meetRedAndWhiteBaron wrote: ↑Mon Mar 22, 2021 11:54 pmI also know of a respected dog trainer, amongst the top in her field, who makes the odd buck being an expert witness in canine attack lawsuits for (and against) the the insurance companies. It's not just an aviation thing.

An aviation-themed romcom. Just what we need in these corona times!
As an AvCanada discussion grows longer:
-the probability of 'entitlement' being mentioned, approaches 1
-one will be accused of using bad airmanship
-the probability of 'entitlement' being mentioned, approaches 1
-one will be accused of using bad airmanship
Re: Employee with PPL flying for the Company
Only for short distances. It will be a while until civilian drones can do long distance non line of sight work.shimmydampner wrote: ↑Tue Mar 23, 2021 6:42 am Why throw good money after bad? If all you're doing is taking pictures (which, with your experience level is all you should be doing) just get a drone. Considerably more cost effective and better suited/purpose built for the task.
- Beefitarian
- Top Poster
- Posts: 6610
- Joined: Wed Dec 01, 2010 10:53 am
- Location: A couple of meters away from others.
Re: Employee with PPL flying for the Company
If a guy has low experience, I suggest that someone else takes the pictures. Concentrate on flying.
- Beefitarian
- Top Poster
- Posts: 6610
- Joined: Wed Dec 01, 2010 10:53 am
- Location: A couple of meters away from others.
Re: Employee with PPL flying for the Company
Oops.
Pretend I wasn’t here.
In another thread photofly wrote: ↑Thu Mar 18, 2021 6:08 pm
Photography: If you want to carry a photographer on board, it looks like you need an OC. If the pilot is taking the pictures, you don't.
Pretend I wasn’t here.
-
- Rank (9)
- Posts: 1764
- Joined: Sat Feb 21, 2004 3:59 pm
Re: Employee with PPL flying for the Company
It's photos of job sites. Drones do this all the time.
-
- Rank 7
- Posts: 684
- Joined: Sat Sep 17, 2005 9:27 am
- Location: Toronto
Re: Employee with PPL flying for the Company
There's legality and then there's mortality. A few years ago a Commercial pilot flying a pipeline inspection crashed while in a low level turn taking pictures of a problem.
Some friends wanted pictures of their house in the country. They took the pictures and I stayed above 700'.
A company or business owner can use its own aircraft for its own business. Guests can be flown for free.
Insurance has been mentioned. You do need to make sure your insurance policy covers what you are doing. Flying high net worth guests and employees is a liability exposure.
Some friends wanted pictures of their house in the country. They took the pictures and I stayed above 700'.
A company or business owner can use its own aircraft for its own business. Guests can be flown for free.
Insurance has been mentioned. You do need to make sure your insurance policy covers what you are doing. Flying high net worth guests and employees is a liability exposure.
Re: Employee with PPL flying for the Company
I think there's a TATC case where a lodge got dinged for flying guests in. They said it was a "free" service offered to paying guests, and TC said otherwise. TC won.A company or business owner can use its own aircraft for its own business. Guests can be flown for free.
DId you hear the one about the jurisprudence fetishist? He got off on a technicality.
Re: Employee with PPL flying for the Company
That is correct.photofly wrote: ↑Wed Mar 24, 2021 2:04 pmI think there's a TATC case where a lodge got dinged for flying guests in. They said it was a "free" service offered to paying guests, and TC said otherwise. TC won.A company or business owner can use its own aircraft for its own business. Guests can be flown for free.
Flyibg clients is an indirect benefit and therefore is considered "for hire or reward". If you didn't fly them for free they likely wouldn't be your clients.
A lodge owner can't even fly their bags but can fly supplies and do camp checks with a private airplane.