I'd have a way bigger boat.
I'd probably have been better of taking the CSA job in 1996 too. I know a few of them with pretty big ass houses that are paid for.
Moderators: lilfssister, North Shore, sky's the limit, sepia, Sulako, I WAS Birddog
How about a difference in a opinion, a different point of view. Oh that's right you work for Westjet, your not allowed to have an opinion that the company has not already had for you. You say I am "spouting lies" yet have not provided any evidence. The reason i stopped talking about the fine, is your retort was simply "bullshit". That's hardly proof of any sort. You asked for more information, regarding the amount, I gave it to you, and you then again simply replied with bullshit and attacked my grammar. Since its obvious there is nothing I can say to you to change your mind, why would I continue to provide you information. My original point was made because people where blaming Air Canada for Westjet having a tough quarter, I simply thought that was hypocritical given Westjets past. But since you can't seem to accept that Westjets success might be due to more than happy thoughts and pixie dust I see no point in continuing. So keep reading Flowers for Algernon and I am sure things will always have a sunny glow for you.Huge Hammer wrote:ust calling as I see 'em.
Someone comes on here spouting lies and they get called on it. They keep up with the crap then I have to question their motivation for spouting such crap.
Still waiting for more info about the 10,000 fine.

truedude wrote:How about a difference in a opinion, a different point of view. Oh that's right you work for Westjet, your not allowed to have an opinion that the company has not already had for you. You say I am "spouting lies" yet have not provided any evidence. The reason i stopped talking about the fine, is your retort was simply "bullshit". That's hardly proof of any sort. You asked for more information, regarding the amount, I gave it to you, and you then again simply replied with bullshit and attacked my grammar. Since its obvious there is nothing I can say to you to change your mind, why would I continue to provide you information. My original point was made because people where blaming Air Canada for Westjet having a tough quarter, I simply thought that was hypocritical given Westjets past. But since you can't seem to accept that Westjets success might be due to more than happy thoughts and pixie dust I see no point in continuing. So keep reading Flowers for Algernon and I am sure things will always have a sunny glow for you.Snagmaster E wrote:ust calling as I see 'em.
Someone comes on here spouting lies and they get called on it. They keep up with the crap then I have to question their motivation for spouting such crap.
Still waiting for more info about the 10,000 fine.

tailgunner wrote:Spit IX, they may be 'fundamentalist' owners...They have bought in to Durf man's rhetoric, and they worship at the Church of Clive. They could be called the Jerry Falwell's of canadian aviation, but that may be a huge insult to the good pastor.![]()
If you don't have the kool-aid, you ain't got nothing brother....!
"hey gang....my name is Durf....I just took a million plus, but now I am gonna cut , cut , cut!! Enjoy."

Truedude, can you edit your post so it doesn't look like I said the above? I didn't say that. I would PM you, but you're offline, and I don't want people thinking I said that.truedude wrote:How about a difference in a opinion, a different point of view. Oh that's right you work for Westjet, your not allowed to have an opinion that the company has not already had for you. You say I am "spouting lies" yet have not provided any evidence. The reason i stopped talking about the fine, is your retort was simply "bullshit". That's hardly proof of any sort. You asked for more information, regarding the amount, I gave it to you, and you then again simply replied with bullshit and attacked my grammar. Since its obvious there is nothing I can say to you to change your mind, why would I continue to provide you information. My original point was made because people where blaming Air Canada for Westjet having a tough quarter, I simply thought that was hypocritical given Westjets past. But since you can't seem to accept that Westjets success might be due to more than happy thoughts and pixie dust I see no point in continuing. So keep reading Flowers for Algernon and I am sure things will always have a sunny glow for you.Snagmaster E wrote:ust calling as I see 'em.
Someone comes on here spouting lies and they get called on it. They keep up with the crap then I have to question their motivation for spouting such crap.
Still waiting for more info about the 10,000 fine.


Too late. Those days are long gone. But hey, happy is the word bro. remember, HAPPY!!! At any cost.I'd have a way bigger boat.

I'm glad to hear that pilot hiring will continue through-out the year. A hiring freeze at any airline just hurts us all in the long run.KAG wrote:For the hiring freeze, it's true for the rest of the company, but the pilot pool is an unknown. We still have planes coming this fall (could change I suppose), how they will be crewed is up in the air. I'm going to guess we'll be hiring, as it seems (according to the papers anyway) we've seen to bottom of the economic crash. The next few months will tell a lot in terms of advanced bookings.
As for the mud slinging, say what you want about any company. We all have our strengths/weaknesses. Sure, we drink the Kool-aid, but at the end of the day we make money. So I guess were charging enough eh? I also guess SD is doing his job, wouldn’t ya say?!
This quarter is going to be a test for all companies.
Stand by for new ATIS.

That makes me laugh. After the problems with Version 1.0 the man takes time out of his busy schedule and for nearly a month sat down and talked with pilots. Our CEO was having beers with us trying to figure out how to make Version 2.0 a success while AC's is scrambling to make a pension payment.tailgunner wrote:Spit IX, they may be 'fundamentalist' owners...They have bought in to Durf man's rhetoric, and they worship at the Church of Clive. They could be called the Jerry Falwell's of canadian aviation, but that may be a huge insult to the good pastor.![]()
If you don't have the kool-aid, you ain't got nothing brother....!
"hey gang....my name is Durf....I just took a million plus, but now I am gonna cut , cut , cut!! Enjoy."

Next time you bitch about WJ'ers and the cheap shots, I'll just post this little ditty again. Real nice, Tony, real nice.tonysoprano wrote:Too late. Those days are long gone. But hey, happy is the word bro. remember, HAPPY!!! At any cost.I'd have a way bigger boat.

A better explanation could be that many of us who post have worked for the red team in the past and lived through all the garbage that is every day life there.tailgunner wrote:Spit IX, they may be 'fundamentalist' owners...They have bought in to Durf man's rhetoric, and they worship at the Church of Clive. They could be called the Jerry Falwell's of canadian aviation, but that may be a huge insult to the good pastor.![]()
If you don't have the kool-aid, you ain't got nothing brother....!
"hey gang....my name is Durf....I just took a million plus, but now I am gonna cut , cut , cut!! Enjoy."


I agree with you as well on everything but this. The pricing environment was not rational based on the economy. Yes Westjet was reveling, but not on real economics. Rather on AC's necessity to produce higher yield. AC gave up. Now we all live with it.ivanhoe wrote:
Absolutley agree , except the pulling the plug comment. WestJet was revelling in a "rational pricing environment" and printing cash.
