Say the doctor was in the isle helping this person as per the airlines request and some clear air turbulence hit the craft paralyzing the doctor, who would be liable then?
Or, better yet, say while administering the sedative he poked the patient in the eye... who would be responsible?
The fact is, when he agreed to help the patient he also agreed to assume some risk on behalf of the airline. With risk and service always comes compensation...
Then where do we draw the line with altruism? Speaking in your philosophical terms, shouldn't the airline have offered payment in order to give the doctor a chance to refuse? This is true altruism, someone is asked for a service, offered payment and then denies the payment thereby creating the circumstances you deem appropriate, however when the airline did not offer any payment it removed any form of altruistic motives thereby enabling the doctor to request compensation.When someone needs help and you have the skills to help, you should help. Getting hit on to provide this type of help goes with the turf. Doctors get asked to help with medical issues. Cops get asked by frightened neighbours to check out noises in the the night, etc, etc, etc.
you talk about unexpected workload 'going with the turf' but where do you draw the line? Shouldnt the cabinet maker install his neighbours cabinets for free merely because he posesses the skill, or how about a mechanic rebuilding a strangers transmission merely because he is competent in the field... reality does not quite work like that, and in the real world when you work you get payed.



