Gilles, below are excerpts of two of the posts you have made recently in this thread. The first is where I think you make your point the best. Simply the facts as they stand with very little editorializing. (That being said, it does say that your post was edited 4 times so I'm not sure how accurate these facts were when originally posted). The second is where I think you start to lose people in your argument. Saying that the current situation at Sunwing borders on a violation of the Human Rights Act is just a bit of an over-reach in my opinion and makes you come off as a zealot. This is just one of the more recent examples of you reaching to an extreme in order to try and make your point and part of the reason why there are some on this board who try to dismiss you completely instead of discussing some of the (very valid) points you bring up.
Gilles Hudicourt wrote:CMD-A wrote:
But again, I don't think it's important to you to follow facts.
You guys are a riot, always accusing me of lying etc. What facts have you provided ?
Lets go over my statements, one by one. Please correct me where I am wrong...
Gilles Hudicourt wrote:Prohibiting Canadians from being seasonal captains and then hiring Foreign seasonal Captains is illegal. It is a violation of Article 7 of the Human Rights Act which prohibits discriminating based on ethnic origin or nationality. In this case, you Canadians are being discriminated against. So file a complaint to the Human Rights Commissioner and let ESDC know about it. I fail to see how Sunwing can have hiring practices which are contrary to the laws of this country but still have their TFW applications approved as though everything was legal.
Now in response to the question you asked in your first post, I will go over the points you have raised and try to address them as best as I can.:
1) I said Sunwing will hire 120 TFW pilots next winter. True or False ?
2) I said that half or more of those TFW pilots will be hired as Captains. True or False ?]
Yes, both of these points are true. What's open to debate is the context in which they are framed in. If one chooses to focus simply on absolutes and ignore context, both of these points can be taken as bad news. However I have found that many people like to ignore the context of facts because context always makes it more difficult to deal in absolutes and therefore more difficult to frame them as something evil versus something good. It is this matter of context and perspective where I tend to find issue with some of your posts and where we will most likely simply have to agree to disagree.
Is Sunwing planning on hiring 120 TFW pilots next winter? Yes, however as I'm sure you're aware, this number has held steady over the last several seasons even though Sunwing has almost doubled the size of its winter program. Why has this number held steady in the face of incredible growth? It is due to the fact that Sunwing has been making large efforts to hire Canadians pilots in both a seasonal and full time capacity. So is 120 TFW pilots still a big number? Yes, it is. But that number hasn't changed for a while. What has changed? The ratio between TFW pilots and Canadian pilots being used by Sunwing to operate the winter schedule has changed dramatically and in a way that's good for Canadians. Focussing on the number while ignoring the ratio only paints half the picture.
Are half or more of those TFW pilots being hired as Captains? Yes and based on the CBA and what is currently going on with upgrades at Sunwing, that number should be exactly half and no more. Why half? Because when it comes to sending pilots back and forth between Europe, the question has always been approached as requiring a certain number of crews and not pilots. This is good for Canadians because it means that when Sunwing pilots head to Europe, they are always headed there as crews. Otherwise everyone would just be sending FOs back and forth. The fact of the matter is that the pilot unions on both sides of the Atlantic have decided that it is more beneficial to have one person serve as a Captain year round then to continually seasonally upgrade/downgrade that person. Some may disagree with this but those directly impacted by it do not and therefore it can also be seen as something good for Canadians as it's Canadians who are also asking for it.
3) I said that all Canadian seasonal contract pilots will be hired as First Officers, even if they were previously Captains on the 737NG for another airline. True or False ?
4) I said that the Sunwing Collective agreement with its pilots prohibits Canadian seasonal contract pilots to be Captains. True or False ?
5) I said that the Sunwing Collective Agreement with its pilots allows Foreign seasonal contract pilots to be Captains. True or False ?
6) I said that even if Sunwing finds a certain number of Canadian B737NG type rated pilots to hire, these will be hired as non rated first officers and will not reduce the number of type rated foreign pilots (120) Sunwing intends to hire. True or False ?
These points are also all true, however again the context is important. These sections of the Sunwing CBA that you quote were put there at the request of Sunwing pilots and were done to protect the interests of Canadian pilots. When Sunwing began to explore the idea of using Canadian pilots on a seasonal basis, there was a legitimate fear by the Sunwing pilot group that these Canadian contractors would be used to erode the working conditions of the permanent pilots at Sunwing... essentially creating a cheaper workforce within a workforce.
One measure that was felt was key to prevent this from happening was ensuring that the Company was only permitted to hire Canadian seasonal pilots as First Officers. It was done with the idea that as the company continued to grow there would be a need for more Captains. Since the company is only permitted to upgrade from its permanent staff, it would therefore be forced to hire more Canadians into permanent positions in order to increase the pool of eligible candidates. Since the Sunwing CBA also guarantees that Canadians who are hired as seasonal pilots must be given the first shot at any open permanent positions, it means that the company is pressured into hiring more and more Canadian seasonal pilots on a full time basis in order to meet the demand for qualified Captains. It creates a natural career progression for Canadians who are being hired as seasonal pilots and that is beneficial to them. Contrary to assertations made on here, any Canadian can become a Captain at Sunwing.... they'll just have to wait until their seniority number affords them that privilege.
This measure has accomplished exactly what it was supposed to. Over the last several years, a large number of Canadians who were hired on a seasonal basis have been taken on full time. A number of these pilots are now in the position where they will now be receiving an upgrade at Sunwing but as full time employees and not as contractors. If the Sunwing pilots had not insisted on this clause being placed into the CBA may there have been a small handful of pilots who would have been hired on as seasonal Sunwing Captains? Yes. But doing so would have also put downward pressure on the salaries and working conditions of every single Captain at every airline in the country including Sunwing. So what better serves the greater good of Canadian pilots? Well that's a fine balancing act and I don't pretend to know the answer but based on the outrage we have seen from Canadian pilots over the WAWCON of Rouge, Encore etc... I think that the choice made by the Sunwing pilot group was the correct one.
7) I said that Sunwing advertised for 120 type rated pilots, captains and first officers, and that this is a fake ad meant only to satisfy ESDC advertising requirements, and that the ad mean to hire Canadians is the other one, for non rated First Officers, even if the Canadians are Boeing 737NG captains. True or False
Yes, this ad was put out to help satisfy ESDC requirements but to call it fake is a bit of a stretch. Sunwing would obviously prefer to hire candidates with type ratings over those who have never flown a jet and given that upgrade times are currently sitting at less than 2 years I think that giving priority to type rated Captains over other pilots also makes sense. The fact that these type rated Captains will still have to sit in the right seat doesn't make the ad fake, it just means that type rated Captains will have to deal with the same reality when it comes to upgrades as they would have if they had been hired at WestJet.
As I said, I know we will most likely have to agree to disagree, but the fact is that although these facts are true, the context behind them isn't fully explained. Reading various posts on these threads makes it sound like every single action taken by Sunwing is done to intentionally screw some poor Canadian Navajo pilot out of the jet job it is their god given right as a Canadian pilot to have. They also make it sound like all of these decisions are made to serve mythical evil European corporate masters and have nothing to do with growing a business. This issue is a very complicated one and anything that is presented as an absolute with no context should not be taken at face value. Speaking of context, I would also encourage people to try and take a step back to look at the bigger picture every now and then. So often this debate focuses on pilots and nothing more. One fact that is almost always ignored is the fact that bringing in 2 TFW pilots to crew one aircraft means that 4 Canadian FAs, 1 Canadian fueller, 4 Canadian rampies, 2 Canadian gate agents, and 1 Canadian AME are also hired to work that flight. That's not even getting into all the other employment benefits that come from the flight operating (catering, etc...) So is temporarily employing 2 European pilots so that 12+ Canadians can be gainfully employed in jobs in a well paying aviation sector a bad thing? Well again, that's a balancing act. But remember, when the government looks at these issues, they are looking at the big picture... even if so many others don't.