My position, as an outsider, pro small business guy, is hands off on both sides:
1. Employees (in most everything except essential services ) should be free to bargain, including strikes, without interference. Airlines ain't essential.
2. Arbitration? WTF is that? Get lost…..
3. Companies should be free to be able to hire temp replacement workers, but it would obviously be disruptive to their business.
4. Can’t fire striking workers.
Is WestJet an essential service, where the government can mandate striking pilots back to work?
Moderators: North Shore, sky's the limit, sepia, Sulako
- rookiepilot
- Top Poster
- Posts: 5062
- Joined: Sat Apr 01, 2017 3:50 pm
Re: Is WestJet an essential service, where the government can mandate striking pilots back to work?
Re: Is WestJet an essential service, where the government can mandate striking pilots back to work?
So employees should be free to bargain and strike to achieve gains... but employers should be able to bring in scabs when their employees strike? How exactly does that work, when strikes are designed to increase leverage on an employer?rookiepilot wrote: ↑Thu Jun 27, 2024 4:59 pm My position, as an outsider, pro small business guy, is hands off on both sides:
1. Employees (in most everything except essential services ) should be free to bargain, including strikes, without interference. Airlines ain't essential.
2. Arbitration? WTF is that? Get lost…..
3. Companies should be free to be able to hire temp replacement workers, but it would obviously be disruptive to their business.
4. Can’t fire striking workers.
- rookiepilot
- Top Poster
- Posts: 5062
- Joined: Sat Apr 01, 2017 3:50 pm
Re: Is WestJet an essential service, where the government can mandate striking pilots back to work?
Qualified replacement workers, I am guessing, would be rather hard to find enough of, and expensive to train. And why would they work cheaper?7ECA wrote: ↑Thu Jun 27, 2024 5:08 pmSo employees should be free to bargain and strike to achieve gains... but employers should be able to bring in scabs when their employees strike? How exactly does that work, when strikes are designed to increase leverage on an employer?rookiepilot wrote: ↑Thu Jun 27, 2024 4:59 pm My position, as an outsider, pro small business guy, is hands off on both sides:
1. Employees (in most everything except essential services ) should be free to bargain, including strikes, without interference. Airlines ain't essential.
2. Arbitration? WTF is that? Get lost…..
3. Companies should be free to be able to hire temp replacement workers, but it would obviously be disruptive to their business.
4. Can’t fire striking workers.
Very expensive option for the company.
Less regulation both ways.
Re: Is WestJet an essential service, where the government can mandate striking pilots back to work?
They can’t. There’s a provision in the CLC allowing arbitration if one side asks for a first contract. Not even close to AC’s situation.rookiepilot wrote: ↑Thu Jun 27, 2024 4:40 pm5degrees wrote: ↑Thu Jun 27, 2024 4:00 pmThere's a provision that can be used to force the first CBA into arbitration. Are you suggesting that PP or some other con would be any better ? Also what's todays case have to do with replacement workers?rookiepilot wrote: ↑Thu Jun 27, 2024 3:30 pm
What happened today?
Sucks you who trusted the Liberals to protect you.
20 bucks says they will be quick to order the AC pilots back to work too.