c170b53 wrote:Hard to reason with any drunk and why bother. Often in the first statement on these forums the slurring is obvious so ignore and move on.
There's nothing wrong with small companies and the spin-offs that follow as long as everybody plays by the rules with regards to safety. As a small MRO provider TS as long as you have all the tools (such as high lifts to get to tail components) then you deserve whatever part of the business you can get. If a so-called provider is operating out of a van then there's likely to be some issue avoidance's made.
This is exactly to the point, a company starts up, gets some contracts, grows, invests in some facilities and infrastructure, then the new kid on the block shows up, has NO facilities, NO infrastructure and under bids the existing companies by being significantly cheaper.
The customer and the operator both take a "risk management" approach to the new operation and as long as everything goes according to plan it works OK, but if there are problems with nothing to back it up with everybody is stressed, disappointed and safety IS compromised.
Trying to work by yourself with nothing is stressful, and although I believe the vast majority will operate safely this way, it is only a matter of time before something gets missed for some reason and there will be an incident (or worse an accident).
I think the new motto in this age of competition is "We are so good at doing so much with so little, we can do everything with nothing!"
A little off topic I know, but ..