Snow Lake Crash Nov18 (Speculation Thread)
Moderators: sky's the limit, sepia, Sulako, lilfssister, North Shore
Re: Snow Lake Crash Nov18 (Speculation Thread)
Not the first time a contaminated heavy Caravan stalled on flap retraction. Very sad.
Re: Snow Lake Crash Nov18 (Speculation Thread)
"Contaminated" usually means it's cold and moist, and "heavy" requires more engine power. (TSB can find out if ice or not, since it stayed cold all day, no melting until late.)
They're showing the bent prop with an explanation that the turbine was indeed making power. Yet how much power was this particular engine/prop combo capable of producing under these conditions, ... against what was needed to allow this particular load to reach its safe flying speed under present rwy conditions ?
If contamination is not noticed or in progress while taxiing, that (flap) problem may also be in the category of allowing flap retraction while still too slow in climb ... when under those conditions very humid and cold. A 208 accident report from Abbottsford BC @ 9:17 AM on Dec 28 1999 describes this flap issue very well, but not the same circumstances by far (in those days knew that ice is there or didn't check).
They're showing the bent prop with an explanation that the turbine was indeed making power. Yet how much power was this particular engine/prop combo capable of producing under these conditions, ... against what was needed to allow this particular load to reach its safe flying speed under present rwy conditions ?
If contamination is not noticed or in progress while taxiing, that (flap) problem may also be in the category of allowing flap retraction while still too slow in climb ... when under those conditions very humid and cold. A 208 accident report from Abbottsford BC @ 9:17 AM on Dec 28 1999 describes this flap issue very well, but not the same circumstances by far (in those days knew that ice is there or didn't check).
-
ReserveTank
- Rank 6

- Posts: 493
- Joined: Thu Nov 29, 2012 6:32 am
Re: Snow Lake Crash Nov18 (Speculation Thread)
I'm no Van driver, but isn't there a specific directive on the Caravan that the wings must be touched with the hand for verification of contamination?pdw wrote:If contamination is not noticed or in progress while taxiing, ...
Re: Snow Lake Crash Nov18 (Speculation Thread)
Exactly, so can't imagine ice-catch present prior to taxiing to position rwy21; but you've made a point. 208B pilots have said that it's not as simple as it sounds to make the extra stop before TKOF to climb out and check given the height of the wing and the time it takes to restart the engine, ... so maybe might not always do it unless in their experience are expecting something there ?
I'm fairly certain the TSB would make that their first priority to check in the immediate aftermath and report that sort of thing early. This could be eligible under that policy (check the TSB website for investigation protocol), where they inform of any immediate threat to safety well in advance of a final report. Icing detection and safety requires a renewed effort every year to promote, thus makes it extremely important to divulge that accident type immediately (esp now in fall-time) to prevent any threat of second-guessing 'if it is or it isn't' (no doubt about zero ice/frost tolerance on TKOF). Any 'uncertainty' to do with ground icing/frosting can be seen as a threat all by itself....
I'm fairly certain the TSB would make that their first priority to check in the immediate aftermath and report that sort of thing early. This could be eligible under that policy (check the TSB website for investigation protocol), where they inform of any immediate threat to safety well in advance of a final report. Icing detection and safety requires a renewed effort every year to promote, thus makes it extremely important to divulge that accident type immediately (esp now in fall-time) to prevent any threat of second-guessing 'if it is or it isn't' (no doubt about zero ice/frost tolerance on TKOF). Any 'uncertainty' to do with ground icing/frosting can be seen as a threat all by itself....
Re: Snow Lake Crash Nov18 (Speculation Thread)
You would make a comment like that based on exactly WHAT? Now, we have it all iced up, and heavy? I'm going out on a limb here to state I have MORE Caravan time than you do, stef. Have you ever actually even been to an airport?stef wrote:Not the first time a contaminated heavy Caravan stalled on flap retraction. Very sad.
pdw wrote:
If contamination is not noticed or in progress while taxiing, ...
RserveTank wrote....
I'm no Van driver, but isn't there a specific directive on the Caravan that the wings must be touched with the hand for verification of contamination?
You're correct...you're "no Van driver" That's called a "tactile" inspection. Not a bad idea in smaller aircraft where you actually can touch a surface.
pdw...."
If contamination is not noticed or in progress while taxiing, that (flap) problem may also be in the category of allowing flap retraction while still too slow in climb ...
when under those conditions very humid and cold."
If there's enough contamination to bring down an airplane, it would be very hard not to "notice" it. Usually, right in front of you face.....windshield, struts, gear legs,....but then, you don't fly, do you?
Oh yah, the temperature and moisture flap retract prevention module....We'll be sure to get right o that, there, pdw
Love to have some idea as the the total experience level of stef and pdw?
Re: Snow Lake Crash Nov18 (Speculation Thread)
Based on a delay due to freezing fog with seven drillers and gear and fuel to Winnipeg. Pure speculation. Guess we'll have to wait to see what TSB comes up with.
Re: Snow Lake Crash Nov18 (Speculation Thread)
From Winnipeg Free Press
http://www.globalwinnipeg.com/investiga ... story.html
This link has a photo of the propeller, the TSB stated the engine was producing power at the time of the crash.There’s no cause yet for the Snow Lake plane crash Nov. 18 that killed pilot Mark Gogal and injured seven passengers.
But neither has anything been ruled out, Transportation Safety Board of Canada Regional Manager Peter Hildebrand said this afternoon.
The Cessna 208 owned by Gogal Air Services successfully took off and flew about a kilometre, said Hildebrand. "It descended at a steep angle -- it hit the ground and stopped in 50 feet."
Hildebrand said that the TSBC has made several recommendations over the years for more equipment on small aircraft, including flight data recorders, none of which Transport Canada has adopted.
He said that 95 per cent of air accidents in the past decade in Canada involved planes of nine seats or fewer, and involved 93 per cent of the air fatalities in the country.
http://www.globalwinnipeg.com/investiga ... story.html
Re: Snow Lake Crash Nov18 (Speculation Thread)
Thank you for saving me the time to write out essentially the same comments.Doc wrote:You would make a comment like that based on exactly WHAT? Now, we have it all iced up, and heavy? I'm going out on a limb here to state I have MORE Caravan time than you do, stef. Have you ever actually even been to an airport?stef wrote:Not the first time a contaminated heavy Caravan stalled on flap retraction. Very sad.
pdw wrote:
If contamination is not noticed or in progress while taxiing, ...
RserveTank wrote....
I'm no Van driver, but isn't there a specific directive on the Caravan that the wings must be touched with the hand for verification of contamination?
You're correct...you're "no Van driver" That's called a "tactile" inspection. Not a bad idea in smaller aircraft where you actually can touch a surface.
pdw...."
If contamination is not noticed or in progress while taxiing, that (flap) problem may also be in the category of allowing flap retraction while still too slow in climb ...
when under those conditions very humid and cold."
If there's enough contamination to bring down an airplane, it would be very hard not to "notice" it. Usually, right in front of you face.....windshield, struts, gear legs,....but then, you don't fly, do you?
Oh yah, the temperature and moisture flap retract prevention module....We'll be sure to get right o that, there, pdw
Love to have some idea as the the total experience level of stef and pdw?
pdw your posts are always interesting but leave me banging my head against the table wondering if you've ever left the ground.
- Colonel Sanders
- Top Poster

- Posts: 7512
- Joined: Sun Jun 14, 2009 5:17 pm
- Location: Over Macho Grande
Re: Snow Lake Crash Nov18 (Speculation Thread)
Ok, that's it then - I'm going to install 8 more seats95 per cent of air accidents in the past decade in Canada involved planes of nine seats or fewer, and involved 93 per cent of the air fatalities in the country
in my (two seat) Pitts, and then they should never
crash!
God, I love statistics.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Correlatio ... _causation
I can't possibly be the only person in Canada thatExample 3
As ice cream sales increase, the rate of drowning deaths increases sharply.
Therefore, ice cream consumption causes drowning.
The aforementioned example fails to recognize the importance of time and temperature in relationship to ice cream sales. Ice cream is sold during the hot summer months at a much greater rate than during colder times, and it is during these hot summer months that people are more likely to engage in activities involving water, such as swimming. The increased drowning deaths are simply caused by more exposure to water-based activities, not ice cream. The stated conclusion is false.
opines that the Canadian taxpayer gets a very poor
return.
Re: Snow Lake Crash Nov18 (Speculation Thread)
That's why everyone should carry a bomb with them when they fly. The chances of there being a bomb on a plane are pretty good, but two bombs are highly unlikely!!!Colonel Sanders wrote:Ok, that's it then - I'm going to install 8 more seats95 per cent of air accidents in the past decade in Canada involved planes of nine seats or fewer, and involved 93 per cent of the air fatalities in the country
in my (two seat) Pitts, and then they should never
crash!
God, I love statistics...
Had a few lectures on statistics during a course at McMaster and found it amazing that apparently everyone is an expert in interpretation in this highly specialized field.
PS a good statistical analysis acounts for many error generating inputs such as the correlation between temperature, ice cream and drownings. In epidemiology they are called confounders.
Re: Snow Lake Crash Nov18 (Speculation Thread)
Way behind you. I'm still trying to figure out if they had an IFR OC?stef wrote:Based on a delay due to freezing fog with seven drillers and gear and fuel to Winnipeg. Pure speculation. Guess we'll have to wait to see what TSB comes up with.
Re: Snow Lake Crash Nov18 (Speculation Thread)
Did I miss something or were all the pilots of the 9 seats or fewer fatal accidents eating icecream in the winter while wearing sandals?
Pretty hard to argue that 95% of the past decades accidents had 9 or less seats, unless you think that maybe they're misleading us and 88% of those were 705 category, configured with 9 seat or less. Idiot
Pretty hard to argue that 95% of the past decades accidents had 9 or less seats, unless you think that maybe they're misleading us and 88% of those were 705 category, configured with 9 seat or less. Idiot
-
yukon bound
- Rank 1

- Posts: 15
- Joined: Sat May 21, 2011 9:46 am
Re: Snow Lake Crash Nov18 (Speculation Thread)
day vfr only..........any idea if the chieftan climbed on top?
Re: Snow Lake Crash Nov18 (Speculation Thread)
Condolences to the pilot and his family.
As previously alluded to, they are a Day VFR operation.
http://wwwapps.tc.gc.ca/Saf-Sec-Sur/2/o ... &c_id=4477
As previously alluded to, they are a Day VFR operation.
http://wwwapps.tc.gc.ca/Saf-Sec-Sur/2/o ... &c_id=4477
Re: Snow Lake Crash Nov18 (Speculation Thread)
stef wrote:Based on a delay due to freezing fog with seven drillers and gear and fuel to Winnipeg. Pure speculation. Guess we'll have to wait to see what TSB comes up with.
The passengers were not drillers. They are mine workers on a set rotation, usually have just a carry on bag not a gigantic hockey bag filled with everything thy own.
-
lilflyboy262
- Rank 3

- Posts: 167
- Joined: Wed Sep 14, 2011 4:35 am
Re: Snow Lake Crash Nov18 (Speculation Thread)
The passengers all had connecting flights. Apparently there was an urgency to get them out on time. And the plane had been sitting outside all day.
At least there were survivors in this accident so the report should be pretty quick to come out.
At least there were survivors in this accident so the report should be pretty quick to come out.
Re: Snow Lake Crash Nov18 (Speculation Thread)
...should be, but won't be. 95% of all accident reports are 65% too slow to come out.
Re: Snow Lake Crash Nov18 (Speculation Thread)
Rwy 21 at Snow Lake is 209M, with a 4.2E variation is 213.2 degrees True.
SPECI for CYFO at 1521 ZULU (9:21 AM local) is 12006KTS. Left crosswind for the TKOF would be nearing perpendicular if wind is similar direction upwind at Snow Lake. On this day, Cold Air Advection from southeast strengthens 'backing and increasing' wind with height. The pressure gradient force from the east is very strong on this morning. TKOF is southwest, towards low pressure (the trough looks tilted in to that area from the west). Anticipated increase in climb-rate out of ground-effect is suddenly a lot weaker than usual.
SPECI for CYFO at 1521 ZULU (9:21 AM local) is 12006KTS. Left crosswind for the TKOF would be nearing perpendicular if wind is similar direction upwind at Snow Lake. On this day, Cold Air Advection from southeast strengthens 'backing and increasing' wind with height. The pressure gradient force from the east is very strong on this morning. TKOF is southwest, towards low pressure (the trough looks tilted in to that area from the west). Anticipated increase in climb-rate out of ground-effect is suddenly a lot weaker than usual.
Re: Snow Lake Crash Nov18 (Speculation Thread)
Oh, ok.pdw wrote:Rwy 21 at Snow Lake is 209M, with a 4.2E variation is 213.2 degrees True.
SPECI for CYFO at 1521 ZULU (9:21 AM local) is 12006KTS. Left crosswind for the TKOF would be nearing perpendicular if wind is similar direction upwind at Snow Lake. On this day, Cold Air Advection from southeast strengthens 'backing and increasing' wind with height. The pressure gradient force from the east is very strong on this morning. TKOF is southwest, towards low pressure (the trough looks tilted in to that area from the west). Anticipated increase in climb-rate out of ground-effect is suddenly a lot weaker than usual.
Re: Snow Lake Crash Nov18 (Speculation Thread)
Years after my own accident experience the weather info for that day became available on the Internet. During that time of study the Pellee Island Caravan accident occurred (close to home) and then discovered the databases of previous accidents. I learned to fly on rainy days, 1000's of TFOFs/landings, often marginal VFR, and lots of days with frost to clear. I too was banging my head against the table ... just trying to find a way to explain the very profile that seemed obviously to be affecting some of the Caravans as echoed in the (mostly) NTSB reports. Here you have marginal VFR but improving (looking manageable) for the course southeast of the departure airport and no way to prove it well in aftermath, ... but in the process of that arguement might also miss the real cause of the accident ?GUMPS wrote:pdw your posts are always interesting but leave me banging my head against the table wondering if you've ever left the ground.
At the caravan safety seminars the organizers did their best to show what to watch for when it comes to icing, but those in attendance were mainly there to refresh and to stay current with all the concerns of winter flying. I believe they are still going on every year.
Re: Snow Lake Crash Nov18 (Speculation Thread)
I've been flying for 10 years, and have yet to do "1000's of TFOFs/landings". You must be one remarkable student.
You have no concept of turbine engine cycles either, do you?pdw wrote:208B pilots have said that it's not as simple as it sounds to make the extra stop before TKOF to climb out and check given the height of the wing and the time it takes to restart the engine
I must say that I'm guilty of not always wearing the shoulder strap (PA31). I find that it pulls too high on my neck and is uncomfortable, though I'm trying to use it more now.Cloudhumper wrote:May not be an issue here, but I'd like to remind guys to remember to wear their shoulder straps. Too many people have been killed in survivable accidents due to a bump on the head.
Re: Snow Lake Crash Nov18 (Speculation Thread)
Do we know how long they've been operating the 208 or the PIC's time on type?
Re: Snow Lake Crash Nov18 (Speculation Thread)
From the Civil Aircraft Registry for GAGP:
Owner Registered Since: 2011-02-25
Latest Certificate of Registration Issued: 2011-02-25
Owner Registered Since: 2011-02-25
Latest Certificate of Registration Issued: 2011-02-25
-
flyinthebug
- Rank (9)

- Posts: 1689
- Joined: Wed Feb 18, 2004 8:36 am
- Location: CYPA
Re: Snow Lake Crash Nov18 (Speculation Thread)
Seriously, go sit in the corner while the grown ups talk.pdw wrote:Rwy 21 at Snow Lake is 209M, with a 4.2E variation is 213.2 degrees True.
SPECI for CYFO at 1521 ZULU (9:21 AM local) is 12006KTS. Left crosswind for the TKOF would be nearing perpendicular if wind is similar direction upwind at Snow Lake. On this day, Cold Air Advection from southeast strengthens 'backing and increasing' wind with height. The pressure gradient force from the east is very strong on this morning. TKOF is southwest, towards low pressure (the trough looks tilted in to that area from the west). Anticipated increase in climb-rate out of ground-effect is suddenly a lot weaker than usual.
OR better yet, just shut up.
Re: Snow Lake Crash Nov18 (Speculation Thread)
+1flyinthebug wrote:Seriously, go sit in the corner while the grown ups talk.pdw wrote:Rwy 21 at Snow Lake is 209M, with a 4.2E variation is 213.2 degrees True.
SPECI for CYFO at 1521 ZULU (9:21 AM local) is 12006KTS. Left crosswind for the TKOF would be nearing perpendicular if wind is similar direction upwind at Snow Lake. On this day, Cold Air Advection from southeast strengthens 'backing and increasing' wind with height. The pressure gradient force from the east is very strong on this morning. TKOF is southwest, towards low pressure (the trough looks tilted in to that area from the west). Anticipated increase in climb-rate out of ground-effect is suddenly a lot weaker than usual.
OR better yet, just shut up.





