Any increase in bookings is good news. Any increase in the actual number of bums flown from A to B, even better. But I have to wonder for any carrier with nearly a 90-95% reduction in normal operating capacity what the actual significance of a 300% or 600% increase in "anything" actually means. Other than better news than we've been used to.
The industry is nowhere near what it used to be a year ago and isn't about to be anytime soon. In Canada, at least. Sadly.
Passenger demand could well exceed our carriers ability to respond when the consumers return and want to travel. They may not get what they'd otherwise expect, unfortunately. Disappointment will only create more hostility toward the airlines.
Asset recovery from storage to ensure appropriate capacity will take how long?
What about the maintenance time needed to place these stored aircraft into service?
Pilot training requirements to have sufficient crew available to operate services?
Flight Attendant training and requalification time needed to have sufficient cabin crew available to operate services?
Sufficient maintenance personnel recall to prep the aircraft?
Sufficient numbers of ground service staff needed to operate at a sudden and vastly increased operational level?
Financially, can our carriers survive the funding needed to complete all the above successfully at lightening speed?
This is going to be interesting to watch and I'm not overly optimistic regarding the outcome many seem to be expecting.
But, it's better to be optimistic than pessimistic.
Gino Under

"I'll tell you what's wrong with society. No one drinks from the skulls of their enemies!"