rebuild the arrow petition
Moderators: North Shore, sky's the limit, sepia, Sulako, avcanada
-
- Rank 0
- Posts: 4
- Joined: Wed Oct 20, 2021 12:24 pm
-
- Rank 10
- Posts: 2577
- Joined: Wed Mar 16, 2005 11:07 pm
- Location: Negative sequencial vortex
Re: rebuild the arrow petition
Although a romantic and exciting idea to see an Arrow flying, this idea makes about as much sense as NASA basing their return to the moon on The Saturn V and Apollo-era CSM/LEM. Actually it makes less sense, because the '60s era stuff, if built correctly, would still probably be able to go to the moon, at great cost. But a re-vamped Arrow would have to be altered beyond recognition in order to stand a chance of being a viable platform for combat.
If I'd known I was going to live this long, I'd have taken better care of myself
Re: rebuild the arrow petition
https://www.avromuseum.com/
60% scale in composite slowly being built in Springbank AB. As Meatservo says, it's a nice idea but......
60% scale in composite slowly being built in Springbank AB. As Meatservo says, it's a nice idea but......
-
- Rank 11
- Posts: 4716
- Joined: Mon Feb 16, 2004 2:33 am
- Location: YYC 230 degree radial at about 10 DME
Re: rebuild the arrow petition
Holy shit, they're not building a model, they took two engines out of a Lear 35 and are planning to fly that thing?
Re: rebuild the arrow petition
I know, ridiculous. Instead they are using the best 1970s technology like boosters based on the SRBs and the actual SSMEs (except they are expendable now) to propel the 'You Won't Believe it isn't Apollo!" Orion capsule.Meatservo wrote: ↑Thu Nov 04, 2021 10:47 am Although a romantic and exciting idea to see an Arrow flying, this idea makes about as much sense as NASA basing their return to the moon on The Saturn V and Apollo-era CSM/LEM. Actually it makes less sense, because the '60s era stuff, if built correctly, would still probably be able to go to the moon, at great cost. But a re-vamped Arrow would have to be altered beyond recognition in order to stand a chance of being a viable platform for combat.
-
- Rank (9)
- Posts: 1352
- Joined: Thu Feb 08, 2007 10:44 am
Re: rebuild the arrow petition
The biggest issue is that the original design was analog and everything now is digital.
Not a simple task to convert an analog platform to a digital platform. You'd need to write software from scratch for example.
This is also one of the main reasons why you couldn't build a Saturn V - the ring that was shed during staging contained a lot of analog modules (if I understood the documentary correctly).
You would need to start with a blank sheet of paper. Jmho
Not a simple task to convert an analog platform to a digital platform. You'd need to write software from scratch for example.
This is also one of the main reasons why you couldn't build a Saturn V - the ring that was shed during staging contained a lot of analog modules (if I understood the documentary correctly).
You would need to start with a blank sheet of paper. Jmho
Always fly a stable approach - it's the only stability you'll find in this business
-
- Rank (9)
- Posts: 1989
- Joined: Sun Oct 16, 2022 9:33 am
Re: rebuild the arrow petition
Some cool ass things best left in the past and new cool ass things need to be drawn up. Maybe this time it’ll be on autocad instead of paper.
Shit, let AI draw it up, we can drink more Starbucks that way
Shit, let AI draw it up, we can drink more Starbucks that way
- Beefitarian
- Top Poster
- Posts: 6610
- Joined: Wed Dec 01, 2010 10:53 am
- Location: A couple of meters away from others.
Re: rebuild the arrow petition
A modernized altered Arrow replica might make a kick ass private recreational jet. What’s the minimum cost per unit.
As for a modern fighter plane? I would suggest the Diemert Defender instead.
As for a modern fighter plane? I would suggest the Diemert Defender instead.
-
- Rank 10
- Posts: 2371
- Joined: Wed Mar 13, 2013 9:24 am
Re: rebuild the arrow petition
The Arrow would have made a great interceptor. However dedicated interceptor aircraft became an obsolete concept a long time ago.
If some rich people want to fly a replica, that would be fantastic. It wouldn't have been a viable weapons system even in the 70s, it would be a liability today.
The truly sad thing about the Arrow program is the brain drain it's cancelation caused. It destroyed Canada's aviation prowess.
If some rich people want to fly a replica, that would be fantastic. It wouldn't have been a viable weapons system even in the 70s, it would be a liability today.
The truly sad thing about the Arrow program is the brain drain it's cancelation caused. It destroyed Canada's aviation prowess.