Caravan hits a paraglider at 5000'
Moderators: sky's the limit, sepia, Sulako, lilfssister, North Shore
-
- Rank (9)
- Posts: 1888
- Joined: Fri Feb 20, 2004 6:53 am
- Location: On final so get off the damn runway!
Re: Caravan hits a paraglider at 5000'
My first thoughts were, is it normal to be flying a powered parachute to be way up at around 5000 feet?! You usually see them way down low. I'd be super paranoid about getting into this exact situation at that altitude.
Re: Caravan hits a paraglider at 5000'
Do paragliders even have an altimeter?
Re: Caravan hits a paraglider at 5000'
Where are you going to get power for a transponder from, where are you going to locate a static port, and how are you going to calibrate the altimetric system IAW CAR Standard 571 Apppendix B? Where should the antenna be? And do you have a ground plane for it?Prodriver wrote: ↑Wed Dec 29, 2021 12:52 am Time for mandatory transponder on any AC?
http://www.kathrynsreport.com/2021/12/c ... fatal.html
DId you hear the one about the jurisprudence fetishist? He got off on a technicality.
Re: Caravan hits a paraglider at 5000'
If they can put ADSB in a nav light, I am sure someone has a solution to this, I thought there is a drone transponder in use. They could possible power it with a solar panel or a disposable battery?
Last edited by Prodriver on Thu Dec 30, 2021 8:50 pm, edited 1 time in total.
"I need a time machine"
Re: Caravan hits a paraglider at 5000'
This was in the states but in Canada I’m pretty sure under 12 500lbs you don’t need TCAS so all the transponders in the world won’t help
Re: Caravan hits a paraglider at 5000'
Just a regular parachute but wow.
Let’s Go Brandon
Re: Caravan hits a paraglider at 5000'
Lovely ideas, but when you suggest mandating something you ought to know for sure the technology is mature, available, affordable, accurate, achieves the goal you intend and has no (or limited) negative unintended consequences.
There’s also usually a decade or two, or more, of optional adoption for new tech before it becomes mandatory.
I don’t think “I though there is..” and “…a disposable battery?” comes close. I suggest some more homework before you suggest laws.
DId you hear the one about the jurisprudence fetishist? He got off on a technicality.
Re: Caravan hits a paraglider at 5000'
Looks like just outside the boundary of Houston radar by a mile and both going same direction at odd alt (news info says both westbound). Then both operators somewhat at a loss to watch for each other. Noisy Paraglider hit from behind, it’s pilot not seeing or hearing nor expecting. The 208 still on radar at a proximity where ATC would still see any other aircraft (but not a parachute).
Re: Caravan hits a paraglider at 5000'
I'm a Canadian whom likes to think that the Government will protect my ass and help me protect my career with endless miles of red tape and senseless regulations. Come on Comrades, it's Canada, what's wrong with one more CAR's rule. Safety first.photofly wrote: ↑Thu Dec 30, 2021 11:32 amLovely ideas, but when you suggest mandating something you ought to know for sure the technology is mature, available, affordable, accurate, achieves the goal you intend and has no (or limited) negative unintended consequences.
There’s also usually a decade or two, or more, of optional adoption for new tech before it becomes mandatory.
I don’t think “I though there is..” and “…a disposable battery?” comes close. I suggest some more homework before you suggest laws.
"I need a time machine"
Re: Caravan hits a paraglider at 5000'
EDIT: I posted a non-serious comment about new regulations, but remembering that two people died in the accident that prompted this thread, I changed my mind.Prodriver wrote: ↑Thu Dec 30, 2021 8:55 pmI'm a Canadian whom likes to think that the Government will protect my ass and help me protect my career with endless miles of red tape and senseless regulations. Come on Comrades, it's Canada, what's wrong with one more CAR's rule. Safety first.photofly wrote: ↑Thu Dec 30, 2021 11:32 amLovely ideas, but when you suggest mandating something you ought to know for sure the technology is mature, available, affordable, accurate, achieves the goal you intend and has no (or limited) negative unintended consequences.
There’s also usually a decade or two, or more, of optional adoption for new tech before it becomes mandatory.
I don’t think “I though there is..” and “…a disposable battery?” comes close. I suggest some more homework before you suggest laws.
DId you hear the one about the jurisprudence fetishist? He got off on a technicality.
-
- Rank 4
- Posts: 266
- Joined: Wed Aug 29, 2018 5:48 am
Re: Caravan hits a paraglider at 5000'
While it as a tragic accident and condolences to the families of the two pilots, does one accident warrant the implementation of TCAS/ADS-B or other electronics on aircraft? This accident could have easily been two certified aircraft flying with basic instruments and running NORDO.
Re: Caravan hits a paraglider at 5000'
No; but some people will use it as a driver for such.broken_slinky wrote: ↑Fri Dec 31, 2021 9:39 am While it as a tragic accident and condolences to the families of the two pilots, does one accident warrant the implementation of TCAS/ADS-B or other electronics on aircraft?
DId you hear the one about the jurisprudence fetishist? He got off on a technicality.
Re: Caravan hits a paraglider at 5000'
Unfortunately, we see this sort of thing with safety boards. They will have a mindset that more and more must be spent to prevent the rare event which allows them to trumpet what has been accomplished while pushing what is a calculated risk further and further away from the ordinary person in terms of affordability.photofly wrote: ↑Fri Dec 31, 2021 10:40 amNo; but some people will use it as a driver for such.broken_slinky wrote: ↑Fri Dec 31, 2021 9:39 am While it as a tragic accident and condolences to the families of the two pilots, does one accident warrant the implementation of TCAS/ADS-B or other electronics on aircraft?
Re: Caravan hits a paraglider at 5000'
LIke a professional IFR-rated crew in an IFR-equipped helicopter who can't maintain control of their aircraft at night, and night VFR rules. Cough cough.pelmet wrote: ↑Fri Dec 31, 2021 1:16 pmUnfortunately, we see this sort of thing with safety boards. They will have a mindset that more and more must be spent to prevent the rare event which allows them to trumpet what has been accomplished while pushing what is a calculated risk further and further away from the ordinary person in terms of affordability.photofly wrote: ↑Fri Dec 31, 2021 10:40 amNo; but some people will use it as a driver for such.broken_slinky wrote: ↑Fri Dec 31, 2021 9:39 am While it as a tragic accident and condolences to the families of the two pilots, does one accident warrant the implementation of TCAS/ADS-B or other electronics on aircraft?
DId you hear the one about the jurisprudence fetishist? He got off on a technicality.
Re: Caravan hits a paraglider at 5000'
Don't be ridiculous... uAvionix is making transponders for drones. Fitting something that small, that clearly runs off a battery, into a powered parachute harness should be trivial. Calibrate it the same way you calibrate any of them, on a bench in a shop. Or remove the antiquated repeat calibration requirement, which is hardly even necessary anymore with the latest technology.photofly wrote: ↑Wed Dec 29, 2021 3:58 pm Where are you going to get power for a transponder from, where are you going to locate a static port, and how are you going to calibrate the altimetric system IAW CAR Standard 571 Apppendix B? Where should the antenna be? And do you have a ground plane for it?