King Air in YQT

Topics related to accidents, incidents & over due aircraft should be placed in this forum.

Moderators: sky's the limit, sepia, Sulako, lilfssister, North Shore

2112
Rank 3
Rank 3
Posts: 151
Joined: Wed Nov 29, 2017 2:33 pm

King Air in YQT

Post by 2112 »

Just saw this come across my feed, Luckily all walked away. 300 series leased by the RCAF one article said but appears to be registered to Tindi.

https://www.country1053.ca/2022/01/31/n ... ane-crash/
---------- ADS -----------
 
User avatar
RoAF-Mig21
Rank 6
Rank 6
Posts: 439
Joined: Sun Sep 05, 2021 6:43 am

Re: King Air in YQT

Post by RoAF-Mig21 »

That looks to be "The Government of Saskatchewan" aircraft, or it USED to be at one point.

https://www.jetphotos.com/photo/6673230
---------- ADS -----------
 
DHC-1 Jockey
Rank 8
Rank 8
Posts: 822
Joined: Mon Jan 28, 2008 6:41 pm

Re: King Air in YQT

Post by DHC-1 Jockey »

It was an RCAF King Air operating as NSTAR2 (North Star 2) from Trenton.

It looks like an RCAF Challenger just landed in Thunder Bay as CFC3803 and is filed back to Trenton, probably bringing the crew back to base.
---------- ADS -----------
 
Gonzodriver
Rank 1
Rank 1
Posts: 47
Joined: Thu Jan 26, 2017 6:23 pm

Re: King Air in YQT

Post by Gonzodriver »

Glad to hear everyone is ok.
---------- ADS -----------
 
User avatar
Bede
Rank 11
Rank 11
Posts: 4433
Joined: Tue Mar 09, 2004 5:52 am

Re: King Air in YQT

Post by Bede »

DHC-1 Jockey wrote: Mon Jan 31, 2022 5:00 pm It was an RCAF King Air operating as NSTAR2 (North Star 2) from Trenton.
What do they use those for? Didn't know they had King Air's.
---------- ADS -----------
 
User avatar
RoAF-Mig21
Rank 6
Rank 6
Posts: 439
Joined: Sun Sep 05, 2021 6:43 am

Re: King Air in YQT

Post by RoAF-Mig21 »

Bede wrote: Mon Jan 31, 2022 8:15 pm
DHC-1 Jockey wrote: Mon Jan 31, 2022 5:00 pm It was an RCAF King Air operating as NSTAR2 (North Star 2) from Trenton.
What do they use those for? Didn't know they had King Air's.
I didn't know about the 350 either, but the RCAF uses King Airs out of Southport (Portage la Prairie) Manitoba to train their pilots. It's the King Air C90A (BEECH CT-145 KING AIR, RCAF designation)

There is also info on the King Air 350s here:
https://static1.squarespace.com/static/ ... erials.pdf
---------- ADS -----------
 
ant_321
Rank 8
Rank 8
Posts: 858
Joined: Wed Jun 30, 2010 8:43 pm

Re: King Air in YQT

Post by ant_321 »

Bede wrote: Mon Jan 31, 2022 8:15 pm
DHC-1 Jockey wrote: Mon Jan 31, 2022 5:00 pm It was an RCAF King Air operating as NSTAR2 (North Star 2) from Trenton.
What do they use those for? Didn't know they had King Air's.
I believe for “corporate” type flying. I used to see them in YQX once in a while. Saw a couple of the senior officers at the base get into the back of it and taxi away once or twice.
---------- ADS -----------
 
tsgarp
Rank 7
Rank 7
Posts: 514
Joined: Thu Apr 01, 2004 3:18 pm

Re: King Air in YQT

Post by tsgarp »

They are part of the Multi Engine Utility Flight out of Trenton. Used for light transport (personnel, parts for a mobile repair party).
---------- ADS -----------
 
User avatar
Bede
Rank 11
Rank 11
Posts: 4433
Joined: Tue Mar 09, 2004 5:52 am

Re: King Air in YQT

Post by Bede »

IMG_20220201_084848761.jpg
IMG_20220201_084848761.jpg (1.46 MiB) Viewed 5389 times
Right in front of employee parking lot.
---------- ADS -----------
 
rudder
Rank 11
Rank 11
Posts: 3859
Joined: Wed Mar 08, 2006 12:10 pm

Re: King Air in YQT

Post by rudder »

That is one seriously broken airplane.

Definitely headed for the scrap heap.
---------- ADS -----------
 
User avatar
Bede
Rank 11
Rank 11
Posts: 4433
Joined: Tue Mar 09, 2004 5:52 am

Re: King Air in YQT

Post by Bede »

---------- ADS -----------
 
DHC-1 Jockey
Rank 8
Rank 8
Posts: 822
Joined: Mon Jan 28, 2008 6:41 pm

Re: King Air in YQT

Post by DHC-1 Jockey »

Here's the details on the leased King Air's from the RCAF website @http://www.rcaf-arc.forces.gc.ca/en/air ... e-350.page
I guess the one that crashed wasn't painted in RCAF colours yet.
Screen Shot 2022-02-01 at 11.56.00 AM.png
Screen Shot 2022-02-01 at 11.56.00 AM.png (1.42 MiB) Viewed 5138 times
---------- ADS -----------
 
NotDirty!
Rank 7
Rank 7
Posts: 554
Joined: Wed May 21, 2014 4:04 pm

Re: King Air in YQT

Post by NotDirty! »

There are more than a few similarities to the incident discussed in this thread: Asymmetric Reverse Leads to King Air Excursion

Too soon to jump to conclusions, but I start to wonder….
---------- ADS -----------
 
WestTexasDeathPencil
Rank 1
Rank 1
Posts: 24
Joined: Sun Sep 01, 2019 12:10 am

Re: King Air in YQT

Post by WestTexasDeathPencil »

This King Air along with C-GPDC and C-GSYC are owned by Pat Campling/Avalerion Corporation and are operated under contract to the RCAF. They're registered to Tindi, but they don't really have anything to do with them. They were previously registered to Transwest until last year under the same arrangement, though C-GEAS was Campling's personal aircraft until it switched OCs.
---------- ADS -----------
 
The Hammer
Rank 6
Rank 6
Posts: 437
Joined: Tue Mar 16, 2004 6:46 am

Re: King Air in YQT

Post by The Hammer »

WestTexasDeathPencil wrote: Wed Feb 02, 2022 5:25 pm This King Air along with C-GPDC and C-GSYC are owned by Pat Campling/Avalerion Corporation and are operated under contract to the RCAF. They're registered to Tindi, but they don't really have anything to do with them. They were previously registered to Transwest until last year under the same arrangement, though C-GEAS was Campling's personal aircraft until it switched OCs.
Jr is still naming planes after his folks? SYC looked better when it was B58. The 350 is definitely un upgrade from the "Wetdream" PDC used to be.
---------- ADS -----------
 
User avatar
Bede
Rank 11
Rank 11
Posts: 4433
Joined: Tue Mar 09, 2004 5:52 am

Re: King Air in YQT

Post by Bede »

Any update on this investigation? It's not on the TSB site and I assume that's because it's RCAF.
---------- ADS -----------
 
JL
Rank 3
Rank 3
Posts: 143
Joined: Fri May 21, 2004 12:56 pm
Location: Edmonton

Re: King Air in YQT

Post by JL »

---------- ADS -----------
 
digits_
Top Poster
Top Poster
Posts: 5970
Joined: Mon Feb 14, 2011 2:26 am

Re: King Air in YQT

Post by digits_ »

JL wrote: Sat Sep 03, 2022 9:19 am DFS investigation.

https://www.canada.ca/en/air-force/corp ... gator.html
Interesting. Could they have pushed the left prop in reverse?
---------- ADS -----------
 
As an AvCanada discussion grows longer:
-the probability of 'entitlement' being mentioned, approaches 1
-one will be accused of using bad airmanship
porcsord
Rank 5
Rank 5
Posts: 352
Joined: Tue May 31, 2016 7:09 pm

Re: King Air in YQT

Post by porcsord »

digits_ wrote: Sat Sep 03, 2022 10:26 am Could they have pushed the left prop in reverse?
Unlikely, the 350 has 2 gates, conceivably they could have got one into ground fine. They do fall out of the sky if you go over the first gate in the air. You'd also have to work to get these things to stall on approach... so I'm not sure what happened.

My money is on pilot error in some form though.
---------- ADS -----------
 
WestTexasDeathPencil
Rank 1
Rank 1
Posts: 24
Joined: Sun Sep 01, 2019 12:10 am

Re: King Air in YQT

Post by WestTexasDeathPencil »

porcsord wrote: Sat Sep 03, 2022 10:40 am
digits_ wrote: Sat Sep 03, 2022 10:26 am Could they have pushed the left prop in reverse?
Unlikely, the 350 has 2 gates, conceivably they could have got one into ground fine. They do fall out of the sky if you go over the first gate in the air. You'd also have to work to get these things to stall on approach... so I'm not sure what happened.

My money is on pilot error in some form though.
From what I recall, the 300/350 does have a bit of a temperamental flight/ground idle system. The flight idle stops are mechanically set by the beta valves, but the ground idle stops are set by solenoids energized by one of the squat switches. If it fails in the on position, it'll set the blade angles to the ground idle stop in an under-speed condition, even if the powers are ahead of the flight idle gate. There is an annunciator if either of the solenoids are still receiving power after takeoff, but I know that was added part way into production. EAS was a very early production 350, so there's a solid chance it didn't have it unless it was retrofitted at some point. There are low pitch annunciators, but those wouldn't illuminate until the blade angle had already dropped well below flight idle.
---------- ADS -----------
 
Post Reply

Return to “Accidents, Incidents & Overdue Aircraft”