Just another possible medical incapacitation event

Covid related topics that are connected to travel or the aviation industry.
JerryRig
Rank 7
Rank 7
Posts: 516
Joined: Fri May 18, 2007 10:25 am

Re: Just another possible medical incapacitation event

Post by JerryRig »

hotdog1 wrote: Tue Mar 01, 2022 8:32 am
broken_slinky wrote: Tue Feb 22, 2022 6:02 am
JerryRig wrote: Fri Feb 18, 2022 2:19 pm I know WAY too many that have gotten serious reactions, permanent damage, or death from these.
You have yet to provide credible proof that any of the people mentioned in your other posts actually died of a reaction to the COVID jabs.


Credible proof =VAERS
It’s been out for a while now, the people vaxers like to make excuses to justify the deaths.
But the data is indisputable.

Here’s an analysis of the failure of the system to head the data of VAERS.

Don’t bother to reply with some crazy, immature name calling as evidence.
And for reference, the H1N1 swine flu vaccine trial was stopped after 53 deaths, because that was too many to be considered safe. Go look it up for yourself.

https://cf5e727d-d02d-4d71-89ff-9fe2d3a ... a07322.pdf
Thank you hotdog1. It’s nice to know there are some who see what is going on.
---------- ADS -----------
 
photofly
Top Poster
Top Poster
Posts: 11306
Joined: Tue Jan 18, 2011 4:47 pm
Location: Hangry and crankypated

Re: Just another possible medical incapacitation event

Post by photofly »

When is the airline industry going to collapse as all pilots die at the controls? Just curious what your predictions are.
---------- ADS -----------
 
DId you hear the one about the jurisprudence fetishist? He got off on a technicality.
User avatar
Bede
Rank 11
Rank 11
Posts: 4433
Joined: Tue Mar 09, 2004 5:52 am

Re: Just another possible medical incapacitation event

Post by Bede »

hotdog1 wrote: Tue Mar 01, 2022 8:32 am Credible proof =VAERS
It’s been out for a while now, the people vaxers like to make excuses to justify the deaths.
But the data is indisputable.
You don't understand how VAERS works. It's a database tracking symptoms following vaccination. Just because someone had a heart attack 3 months after being vaccinated doesn't mean that the heart attack was caused by the vaccine. Researchers compare those numbers to the baseline. If there is no difference between the treatment group and the control group, you can't claim causation.
hotdog1 wrote: Tue Mar 01, 2022 8:32 am And for reference, the H1N1 swine flu vaccine trial was stopped after 53 deaths, because that was too many to be considered safe. Go look it up for yourself.
So the malevolent government forces shut down a vaccine because it wasn't safe and now, all of a sudden, they won't shut one down? Why the inconsistency?
---------- ADS -----------
 
marlin
Rank 1
Rank 1
Posts: 33
Joined: Thu May 28, 2015 11:06 pm
Location: NWT

Re: Just another possible medical incapacitation event

Post by marlin »

---------- ADS -----------
 
Aviatard
Rank 8
Rank 8
Posts: 955
Joined: Fri Aug 05, 2005 2:45 am
Location: In a box behind Walmart

Re: Just another possible medical incapacitation event

Post by Aviatard »

hotdog1 wrote: Tue Mar 01, 2022 8:32 am
broken_slinky wrote: Tue Feb 22, 2022 6:02 am
JerryRig wrote: Fri Feb 18, 2022 2:19 pm I know WAY too many that have gotten serious reactions, permanent damage, or death from these.
You have yet to provide credible proof that any of the people mentioned in your other posts actually died of a reaction to the COVID jabs.


Credible proof =VAERS
It’s been out for a while now, the people vaxers like to make excuses to justify the deaths.
But the data is indisputable.
Oh no the data is very much disputable.

The Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System or VAERS is being misused by anti-vaxxers to terrify the public. It’s a shame because VAERS plays a vital role in detecting important but rare reactions caused by vaccines. The weaponization of VAERS by anti-vaccine activists serves as a reminder that having access to more information does not always lead to better decisions. Information needs to be correctly interpreted to guide us in the right direction.

https://www.mcgill.ca/oss/article/covid ... are-tactic

You’re just another example of how anti-vaxxers always lie.
---------- ADS -----------
 
CortoMaltese
Rank 1
Rank 1
Posts: 30
Joined: Sat Feb 26, 2022 7:46 pm

Re: Just another possible medical incapacitation event

Post by CortoMaltese »

Aviatard wrote: Tue Mar 01, 2022 5:30 pm
hotdog1 wrote: Tue Mar 01, 2022 8:32 am
broken_slinky wrote: Tue Feb 22, 2022 6:02 am

You have yet to provide credible proof that any of the people mentioned in your other posts actually died of a reaction to the COVID jabs.


Credible proof =VAERS
It’s been out for a while now, the people vaxers like to make excuses to justify the deaths.
But the data is indisputable.
Oh no the data is very much disputable.

The Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System or VAERS is being misused by anti-vaxxers to terrify the public. It’s a shame because VAERS plays a vital role in detecting important but rare reactions caused by vaccines. The weaponization of VAERS by anti-vaccine activists serves as a reminder that having access to more information does not always lead to better decisions. Information needs to be correctly interpreted to guide us in the right direction.

https://www.mcgill.ca/oss/article/covid ... are-tactic

You’re just another example of how anti-vaxxers always lie.


You ignore eyewitness testimonies from victims and perpetrators alike.
You dismiss the deaths of countless victims, attributing it to other causes.
You doubt the survivors’ stories about their experiences and losses.
You think the monumental amount of bureaucratic, photographic, and film documentary evidence is faked or misinterpreted.
You believe the propagandists when they tell you the rumors are enemy propaganda.
You cherry-pick secondary sources that corroborate your convictions.
You cling to your faith in an insupportable position with the fervency of a Scientologist.
You use every opportunity to evangelize.
You attack anyone who presents evidence to the contrary.
You feel those who believe the accounts of witnesses and survivors need to be “educated” about the “truth.”
You valorize the genocidists and expectorate upon their targets.
You sanction the disciplining, ostracization, and even incarceration of the designated enemies.
You devise labyrinthine explanations to discredit the incontrovertible proof of mass murder.
You refuse to believe that degree of evil could be orchestrated on such an immense scale when it requires the participation and willing silence of so many colluders.
You mock the suffering of people who lost loved ones or endured permanent afflictions.
You build a wall to repel threatening facts and lock yourself inside a circle of fellow deniers who reinforce your beliefs.


Oh wait, you thought I was talking about the World War II Holocaust?
No, no. Sorry for the misunderstanding. I’m talking about the Holocaust that’s happening at this very moment—and on a scale Hitler, Stalin, Mao, Idi Amin, Kim Il-Sung, Pinochet, and Pol Pot would never have dared conceive.

And I’m talking to you, the propaganda-suckling, pro-censorship, pro-slavery, anti-reality, anti-humanity totalitarianism apologist who is denying the validity of millions of medical reports regarding adverse reactions, including tens of thousands of deaths.

Oh, that’s right, you pooh-pooh VAERS and similar surveillance systems as a “dropbox” where anyone can submit reports—that’s the talking point your persuaders have sledgehammered into your spin-washed and fabric-softened brain, right?

Do realize that whatever twaddle you’ve heard about VAERS from the BigPharma–Big Brother–Big Media–Big Tech propaganda complex was concocted to smear a reporting system that has been successfully used in the early detection of adverse events for three decades, is frequently referenced in peer-reviewed papers, is understood in the scientific community to be significantly underreported, and has been used to pull previous vaccines after as few as 15 reports of adverse events in the past (that is, when pharmaceutical corporations actually had to face the possibility of liability for their products and hadn’t been guaranteed impunity via Emergency Use Authorizations).

This CDC article (https://www.cdc.gov/mmwr/preview/mmwrhtml/mm5334a3.htm), for example, notes:

“On July 16, 1999, CDC recommended that health-care providers suspend use of the licensed rhesus-human rotavirus reassortant-tetravalent vaccine (RRV-TV) (RotaShield®, Wyeth Laboratories, Inc., Marietta, Pennsylvania) in response to 15 cases of intussusception.… By July 6, 1999, the number of cases reported to VAERS had increased to 15, a higher number than expected, accounting for likely underreporting, available baseline estimates of intussusception, and the estimated number of doses of RRV-TV distributed.… Because VAERS is a national surveillance system with a simple reporting mechanism, it yields timely information and has high sensitivity for new vaccine safety concerns. Despite estimated underreporting of intussusception after RRV-TV of approximately 50% (7), VAERS successfully provided an alert.”

Let’s take a little tour through the peer-reviewed science on VAERS and see what we find out.

But first, let’s address the matter of correlation and causation since “correlation does not equal causation” is one of the regularly regurgitated bullet points from the VAERS disinformation campaign.

The American Council on Science & Health notes:

“It is oft-repeated that correlation does not imply causation. But it does. That’s precisely why epidemiologists and economists are so fascinated by correlations. Thus, it is far more accurate to say that correlation does not prove causation.”

That is where Hill’s Criteria of Causality comes in. It can be used to assess causation in cases of statistically anomalous correlations—like the colossal ones that started occurring in January 2021 and have been rising at historically unprecedented rates ever since.

Dr. Jessica Rose, a viral immunologist and computational virologist with a PhD in computational biology and two postdoc degrees in molecular biology, demonstrated the satisfaction of the Bradford Hill criteria in a recent presentation (https://originalrebel.net/wp-content/up ... e_talk.pdf), but it doesn’t take a PhD and an understanding of statistics to see what is glaringly obvious to anyone who hasn’t been lobotomized by Big Pharma propaganda.

You can review the latest data and read reports for yourself at OpenVAERS, including mortality data. Igor Chudov offers some tips on assessing your localized VAERS data in this article: https://igorchudov.substack.com/p/vaers ... d-not-made

On September 17, 2021, COVID-19 Early Treatment Fund (CETF) Founder Steve Kirsch delivered a bombshell presentation to the FDA’s Vaccines and Related Biological Products Advisory Committee (full hearing available here, with Steve’s presentation starting @ 04:20:14; I recommend sticking around for Dr. David Wiseman’s presentation following Steve’s):

https://youtu.be/WFph7-6t34M


His trenchant PowerPoint is well worth downloading, reviewing, and sharing. https://www.skirsch.com/covid/All.pdf


According to the analysis in this exhaustive document authored by Dr. Rose, Steve Kirsch, and Mathew Crawford, “The vaccines have killed over 150,000 Americans so far.” Notice that is Americans only. That doesn’t include deaths and adverse reactions tracked in other surveillance systems such as EudraVigilance (note the videos after the statistics), the UK’s Yellow Card system, and Australia’s Database of Adverse Event Notifications (see my analysis of data from the latter in the Down Under Edition of my Recommendations Roundup).

If you’re still skeptical of the validity of VAERS data, let’s rewind to pre-2021 to see how peer-reviewed papers describe it. This quote, taken from a paper titled, The Reporting Sensitivity of the Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS) for Anaphylaxis and for Guillain-Barré Syndrome, is one of hundreds of such examples:

“Underreporting is a limitation common to passive surveillance systems, including the Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS) that monitors the safety of U.S.-licensed vaccines. Nonetheless, previous reports demonstrate substantial case capture for clinically severe adverse events (AEs).” —Vaccine (October 2020)

Also published in Vaccine, the paper Causality Assessment of Adverse Events Reported to the Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS) concludes:

“Using VAERS reports and additional documentation, causality could be assessed by expert review in the majority of VAERS reports.” (November 2012)

The VAERS website itself explains:

“‘Underreporting’ is one of the main limitations of passive surveillance systems, including VAERS. The term, underreporting refers to the fact that VAERS receives reports for only a small fraction of actual adverse events. The degree of underreporting varies widely. As an example, a great many of the millions of vaccinations administered each year by injection cause soreness, but relatively few of these episodes lead to a VAERS report. Physicians and patients understand that minor side effects of vaccinations often include this kind of discomfort, as well as low fevers. On the other hand, more serious and unexpected medical events are probably more likely to be reported than minor ones, especially when they occur soon after vaccination, even if they may be coincidental and related to other causes.”

And if VAERS is so unreliable—as BigPharma sock puppets suddenly started claiming in 2021—why does the CDC admit to using it in its determination about whether or not to recall a vaccine?

“CDC analyzed reports to the Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS) to search for any side effects that might have been caused by the irregularity …”

If you’re still a denier after having read this far, Swiss Policy Research provides rigorous documentation for some of the more common injuries on their Covid Vaccine Adverse Events page.


In this revelatory interview, (now-terminated) Hospitalist Physician’s Assistant Deborah Conrad explains how VAERS reporting works and describes the surge in adverse events she witnessed. (If you watch only one video, make it this one.)
https://youtu.be/vIydr2ZqZto

ICU physician Patricia Lee, MD, recently submitted this letter (https://www.sirillp.com/wp-content/uplo ... ia-Lee.pdf) to the FDA documenting the alarming number of anomalous post-injection injuries and fatalities she has seen in her ward. That courageous act has led eleven other physicians to follow suit so far.

I understand peer-reviewed papers and abstract statistics may convince your head but not your heart. That is one reason it was necessary for Facebook to delete the 120,000-member group where people who have been injured by and lost loved ones to the injections could commiserate and share their experiences. Think about the vicious cruelty of such an act. And also consider the size of that group—120,000 members by April, just a few months after the rollout.

When ABC put out a call on Facebook for stories of unvaxxed COVID deaths, they were instead flooded with hundreds of thousands of responses from those suffering heartrending losses or injuries caused by the “cure.” Something tells me ABC won’t be covering those stories.

The Testimonies Project (https://www.vaxtestimonies.org/en/) shares stories of vaccine-injured and grieving family members from Israel, and there are innumerable accounts of those who’ve died following injection, such as this 32-year-old man named Benjamin, 16-year-old Ernesto Ramirez Jr., 19-year-old Simone Scott, 18-year-old Camilla Canepa, a 12-year-old child, 21-year-old personal trainer Shawn Kuhn, 23-year-old army conscript Khanti Anantasiri, this 22-year-old French man, 37-year-old Jessica Berg Wilson, 35-year-old Anne VanGeest, 43-year-old Brad Malagarie, 56-year-old health care worker, 60-year-old Sandra Jacobs, BBC radio presenter Lisa Shaw, Pakistani Police Superintendent Malik Mahmood, 46-year-old Indian actor Puneeth Rajkumar, Indian actor Vivek, numerous professional athletes, multiple pilots, and a bevy of other victims who “died suddenly” or whose cause of death was listed as a “short illness” to obscure the cause. Although I have been unable to confirm their vaccination status, examples of young, healthy individuals in highly-vaccinated sectors who died include 38-year-old Green Beret NCO Calvin T. Rockward, 43-year-old London celebrity chef Gurpareet Bains, and 43-year-old Brazilian conductor Leonardo David.

The number of athletes dying or injured following injection has grown so enormous that many have started compiling lists, such as this Reddit thread, Not on the Beeb, Threadreader, this D. O’Genius twitter thread, el gato malo of the must-follow bad cattitude, Plebeian Resistance, and BAM! Belgian Alternative Media, among many others.

New York University Professor of Media, Culture, and Communication Mark Crispin Miller documents more spike casualties here: https://markcrispinmiller.substack.com/ ... r-if-those, here: https://markcrispinmiller.substack.com/ ... accination , and here: https://markcrispinmiller.substack.com/ ... ed-out-the

Those who don’t suffer fatalities may wind up contracting COVID, anyway, like Minnesota Vikings member Dakota Dozier, or worse, endure debilitating, painful, and life-threatening afflictions, such as 18-year-old Emma Burkey; 17-year-old Everest Romney; a 17-year-old previously healthy male; 35-year-old mom Brittany Galvin, SPARTN Monkey Rescue Founder Michael Robison; NBA player Brandon Goodwin; soccer player Sergio Agüero; 28-year-old Emil Pálsson and baseball player Daniel Brito1; and mountain biker Kyle Warner:
https://youtu.be/H7inaTiDKaU

When 12-year-old Maddie De Garay volunteered for the Pfizer COVID-19 vaccine trial for adolescents, she lost feeling from the waist down and became wheelchair-bound and dependent on a feeding tube, as her mother describes in this disquieting interview and this public hearing. Pfizer appears to have no interest in investigating the “side effects” their trial was supposedly designed to identify.

Way back in early January 2021, right after the inoculation program was launched in Ireland, award-winning investigative journalist Gemma O’Doherty gave a comprehensive summation in which she exposed some of the casualties and adverse effects that began occurring immediately after injection.

And since you’re so fond of Listening To The Experts™, here’s what a few actual experts have to say on the matter: https://escapingmasspsychosis.substack. ... y/comments


Still a denier? Then you’d better turn in your moral superiority card when it comes to the “good Germans” who trusted their government, their media, their leaders, their doctors, their scientists, their educators, their corporations, and every other representative of the State tapping into people’s fears of disease and death to divide the followers from the freethinkers and dehumanize the branded enemy.

And you’d certainly better stop sneering at your Holocaust denier predecessors, much less deluding yourself into believing you’re on “the right side of history.”

Reconsidering your position? Great. Now you can be part of the solution—instead of the Final Solution.
---------- ADS -----------
 
User avatar
geodoc
Rank 4
Rank 4
Posts: 293
Joined: Sun Sep 30, 2007 7:50 am
Location: Closer than Objects Usually Appear

Re: Just another possible medical incapacitation event

Post by geodoc »

Welcome fellow aviation enthusiast!



.
---------- ADS -----------
 
Aviatard
Rank 8
Rank 8
Posts: 955
Joined: Fri Aug 05, 2005 2:45 am
Location: In a box behind Walmart

Re: Just another possible medical incapacitation event

Post by Aviatard »

CortoMaltese wrote: Tue Mar 01, 2022 8:10 pm
Aviatard wrote: Tue Mar 01, 2022 5:30 pm
hotdog1 wrote: Tue Mar 01, 2022 8:32 am



Credible proof =VAERS
It’s been out for a while now, the people vaxers like to make excuses to justify the deaths.
But the data is indisputable.
Oh no the data is very much disputable.

The Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System or VAERS is being misused by anti-vaxxers to terrify the public. It’s a shame because VAERS plays a vital role in detecting important but rare reactions caused by vaccines. The weaponization of VAERS by anti-vaccine activists serves as a reminder that having access to more information does not always lead to better decisions. Information needs to be correctly interpreted to guide us in the right direction.

https://www.mcgill.ca/oss/article/covid ... are-tactic

You’re just another example of how anti-vaxxers always lie.
[a very large number of words spouting nonsense]
Imagine creating an account on an aviation website for the sole purpose of spreading anti-vaccine bullshit and pro-crybaby trucker “protest” support.
---------- ADS -----------
 
cncpc
Rank (9)
Rank (9)
Posts: 1632
Joined: Tue Oct 19, 2010 10:17 am

Re: Just another possible medical incapacitation event

Post by cncpc »

CortoMaltese wrote: Tue Mar 01, 2022 8:10 pm
Aviatard wrote: Tue Mar 01, 2022 5:30 pm
hotdog1 wrote: Tue Mar 01, 2022 8:32 am



Credible proof =VAERS
It’s been out for a while now, the people vaxers like to make excuses to justify the deaths.
But the data is indisputable.
Oh no the data is very much disputable.

The Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System or VAERS is being misused by anti-vaxxers to terrify the public. It’s a shame because VAERS plays a vital role in detecting important but rare reactions caused by vaccines. The weaponization of VAERS by anti-vaccine activists serves as a reminder that having access to more information does not always lead to better decisions. Information needs to be correctly interpreted to guide us in the right direction.

https://www.mcgill.ca/oss/article/covid ... are-tactic

You’re just another example of how anti-vaxxers always lie.


You ignore eyewitness testimonies from victims and perpetrators alike.
You dismiss the deaths of countless victims, attributing it to other causes.
You doubt the survivors’ stories about their experiences and losses.
You think the monumental amount of bureaucratic, photographic, and film documentary evidence is faked or misinterpreted.
You believe the propagandists when they tell you the rumors are enemy propaganda.
You cherry-pick secondary sources that corroborate your convictions.
You cling to your faith in an insupportable position with the fervency of a Scientologist.
You use every opportunity to evangelize.
You attack anyone who presents evidence to the contrary.
You feel those who believe the accounts of witnesses and survivors need to be “educated” about the “truth.”
You valorize the genocidists and expectorate upon their targets.
You sanction the disciplining, ostracization, and even incarceration of the designated enemies.
You devise labyrinthine explanations to discredit the incontrovertible proof of mass murder.
You refuse to believe that degree of evil could be orchestrated on such an immense scale when it requires the participation and willing silence of so many colluders.
You mock the suffering of people who lost loved ones or endured permanent afflictions.
You build a wall to repel threatening facts and lock yourself inside a circle of fellow deniers who reinforce your beliefs.


Oh wait, you thought I was talking about the World War II Holocaust?
No, no. Sorry for the misunderstanding. I’m talking about the Holocaust that’s happening at this very moment—and on a scale Hitler, Stalin, Mao, Idi Amin, Kim Il-Sung, Pinochet, and Pol Pot would never have dared conceive.

And I’m talking to you, the propaganda-suckling, pro-censorship, pro-slavery, anti-reality, anti-humanity totalitarianism apologist who is denying the validity of millions of medical reports regarding adverse reactions, including tens of thousands of deaths.

Oh, that’s right, you pooh-pooh VAERS and similar surveillance systems as a “dropbox” where anyone can submit reports—that’s the talking point your persuaders have sledgehammered into your spin-washed and fabric-softened brain, right?

Do realize that whatever twaddle you’ve heard about VAERS from the BigPharma–Big Brother–Big Media–Big Tech propaganda complex was concocted to smear a reporting system that has been successfully used in the early detection of adverse events for three decades, is frequently referenced in peer-reviewed papers, is understood in the scientific community to be significantly underreported, and has been used to pull previous vaccines after as few as 15 reports of adverse events in the past (that is, when pharmaceutical corporations actually had to face the possibility of liability for their products and hadn’t been guaranteed impunity via Emergency Use Authorizations).

This CDC article (https://www.cdc.gov/mmwr/preview/mmwrhtml/mm5334a3.htm), for example, notes:

“On July 16, 1999, CDC recommended that health-care providers suspend use of the licensed rhesus-human rotavirus reassortant-tetravalent vaccine (RRV-TV) (RotaShield®, Wyeth Laboratories, Inc., Marietta, Pennsylvania) in response to 15 cases of intussusception.… By July 6, 1999, the number of cases reported to VAERS had increased to 15, a higher number than expected, accounting for likely underreporting, available baseline estimates of intussusception, and the estimated number of doses of RRV-TV distributed.… Because VAERS is a national surveillance system with a simple reporting mechanism, it yields timely information and has high sensitivity for new vaccine safety concerns. Despite estimated underreporting of intussusception after RRV-TV of approximately 50% (7), VAERS successfully provided an alert.”

Let’s take a little tour through the peer-reviewed science on VAERS and see what we find out.

But first, let’s address the matter of correlation and causation since “correlation does not equal causation” is one of the regularly regurgitated bullet points from the VAERS disinformation campaign.

The American Council on Science & Health notes:

“It is oft-repeated that correlation does not imply causation. But it does. That’s precisely why epidemiologists and economists are so fascinated by correlations. Thus, it is far more accurate to say that correlation does not prove causation.”

That is where Hill’s Criteria of Causality comes in. It can be used to assess causation in cases of statistically anomalous correlations—like the colossal ones that started occurring in January 2021 and have been rising at historically unprecedented rates ever since.

Dr. Jessica Rose, a viral immunologist and computational virologist with a PhD in computational biology and two postdoc degrees in molecular biology, demonstrated the satisfaction of the Bradford Hill criteria in a recent presentation (https://originalrebel.net/wp-content/up ... e_talk.pdf), but it doesn’t take a PhD and an understanding of statistics to see what is glaringly obvious to anyone who hasn’t been lobotomized by Big Pharma propaganda.

You can review the latest data and read reports for yourself at OpenVAERS, including mortality data. Igor Chudov offers some tips on assessing your localized VAERS data in this article: https://igorchudov.substack.com/p/vaers ... d-not-made

On September 17, 2021, COVID-19 Early Treatment Fund (CETF) Founder Steve Kirsch delivered a bombshell presentation to the FDA’s Vaccines and Related Biological Products Advisory Committee (full hearing available here, with Steve’s presentation starting @ 04:20:14; I recommend sticking around for Dr. David Wiseman’s presentation following Steve’s):

https://youtu.be/WFph7-6t34M


His trenchant PowerPoint is well worth downloading, reviewing, and sharing. https://www.skirsch.com/covid/All.pdf


According to the analysis in this exhaustive document authored by Dr. Rose, Steve Kirsch, and Mathew Crawford, “The vaccines have killed over 150,000 Americans so far.” Notice that is Americans only. That doesn’t include deaths and adverse reactions tracked in other surveillance systems such as EudraVigilance (note the videos after the statistics), the UK’s Yellow Card system, and Australia’s Database of Adverse Event Notifications (see my analysis of data from the latter in the Down Under Edition of my Recommendations Roundup).

If you’re still skeptical of the validity of VAERS data, let’s rewind to pre-2021 to see how peer-reviewed papers describe it. This quote, taken from a paper titled, The Reporting Sensitivity of the Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS) for Anaphylaxis and for Guillain-Barré Syndrome, is one of hundreds of such examples:

“Underreporting is a limitation common to passive surveillance systems, including the Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS) that monitors the safety of U.S.-licensed vaccines. Nonetheless, previous reports demonstrate substantial case capture for clinically severe adverse events (AEs).” —Vaccine (October 2020)

Also published in Vaccine, the paper Causality Assessment of Adverse Events Reported to the Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS) concludes:

“Using VAERS reports and additional documentation, causality could be assessed by expert review in the majority of VAERS reports.” (November 2012)

The VAERS website itself explains:

“‘Underreporting’ is one of the main limitations of passive surveillance systems, including VAERS. The term, underreporting refers to the fact that VAERS receives reports for only a small fraction of actual adverse events. The degree of underreporting varies widely. As an example, a great many of the millions of vaccinations administered each year by injection cause soreness, but relatively few of these episodes lead to a VAERS report. Physicians and patients understand that minor side effects of vaccinations often include this kind of discomfort, as well as low fevers. On the other hand, more serious and unexpected medical events are probably more likely to be reported than minor ones, especially when they occur soon after vaccination, even if they may be coincidental and related to other causes.”

And if VAERS is so unreliable—as BigPharma sock puppets suddenly started claiming in 2021—why does the CDC admit to using it in its determination about whether or not to recall a vaccine?

“CDC analyzed reports to the Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS) to search for any side effects that might have been caused by the irregularity …”

If you’re still a denier after having read this far, Swiss Policy Research provides rigorous documentation for some of the more common injuries on their Covid Vaccine Adverse Events page.


In this revelatory interview, (now-terminated) Hospitalist Physician’s Assistant Deborah Conrad explains how VAERS reporting works and describes the surge in adverse events she witnessed. (If you watch only one video, make it this one.)
https://youtu.be/vIydr2ZqZto

ICU physician Patricia Lee, MD, recently submitted this letter (https://www.sirillp.com/wp-content/uplo ... ia-Lee.pdf) to the FDA documenting the alarming number of anomalous post-injection injuries and fatalities she has seen in her ward. That courageous act has led eleven other physicians to follow suit so far.

I understand peer-reviewed papers and abstract statistics may convince your head but not your heart. That is one reason it was necessary for Facebook to delete the 120,000-member group where people who have been injured by and lost loved ones to the injections could commiserate and share their experiences. Think about the vicious cruelty of such an act. And also consider the size of that group—120,000 members by April, just a few months after the rollout.

When ABC put out a call on Facebook for stories of unvaxxed COVID deaths, they were instead flooded with hundreds of thousands of responses from those suffering heartrending losses or injuries caused by the “cure.” Something tells me ABC won’t be covering those stories.

The Testimonies Project (https://www.vaxtestimonies.org/en/) shares stories of vaccine-injured and grieving family members from Israel, and there are innumerable accounts of those who’ve died following injection, such as this 32-year-old man named Benjamin, 16-year-old Ernesto Ramirez Jr., 19-year-old Simone Scott, 18-year-old Camilla Canepa, a 12-year-old child, 21-year-old personal trainer Shawn Kuhn, 23-year-old army conscript Khanti Anantasiri, this 22-year-old French man, 37-year-old Jessica Berg Wilson, 35-year-old Anne VanGeest, 43-year-old Brad Malagarie, 56-year-old health care worker, 60-year-old Sandra Jacobs, BBC radio presenter Lisa Shaw, Pakistani Police Superintendent Malik Mahmood, 46-year-old Indian actor Puneeth Rajkumar, Indian actor Vivek, numerous professional athletes, multiple pilots, and a bevy of other victims who “died suddenly” or whose cause of death was listed as a “short illness” to obscure the cause. Although I have been unable to confirm their vaccination status, examples of young, healthy individuals in highly-vaccinated sectors who died include 38-year-old Green Beret NCO Calvin T. Rockward, 43-year-old London celebrity chef Gurpareet Bains, and 43-year-old Brazilian conductor Leonardo David.

The number of athletes dying or injured following injection has grown so enormous that many have started compiling lists, such as this Reddit thread, Not on the Beeb, Threadreader, this D. O’Genius twitter thread, el gato malo of the must-follow bad cattitude, Plebeian Resistance, and BAM! Belgian Alternative Media, among many others.

New York University Professor of Media, Culture, and Communication Mark Crispin Miller documents more spike casualties here: https://markcrispinmiller.substack.com/ ... r-if-those, here: https://markcrispinmiller.substack.com/ ... accination , and here: https://markcrispinmiller.substack.com/ ... ed-out-the

Those who don’t suffer fatalities may wind up contracting COVID, anyway, like Minnesota Vikings member Dakota Dozier, or worse, endure debilitating, painful, and life-threatening afflictions, such as 18-year-old Emma Burkey; 17-year-old Everest Romney; a 17-year-old previously healthy male; 35-year-old mom Brittany Galvin, SPARTN Monkey Rescue Founder Michael Robison; NBA player Brandon Goodwin; soccer player Sergio Agüero; 28-year-old Emil Pálsson and baseball player Daniel Brito1; and mountain biker Kyle Warner:
https://youtu.be/H7inaTiDKaU

When 12-year-old Maddie De Garay volunteered for the Pfizer COVID-19 vaccine trial for adolescents, she lost feeling from the waist down and became wheelchair-bound and dependent on a feeding tube, as her mother describes in this disquieting interview and this public hearing. Pfizer appears to have no interest in investigating the “side effects” their trial was supposedly designed to identify.

Way back in early January 2021, right after the inoculation program was launched in Ireland, award-winning investigative journalist Gemma O’Doherty gave a comprehensive summation in which she exposed some of the casualties and adverse effects that began occurring immediately after injection.

And since you’re so fond of Listening To The Experts™, here’s what a few actual experts have to say on the matter: https://escapingmasspsychosis.substack. ... y/comments


Still a denier? Then you’d better turn in your moral superiority card when it comes to the “good Germans” who trusted their government, their media, their leaders, their doctors, their scientists, their educators, their corporations, and every other representative of the State tapping into people’s fears of disease and death to divide the followers from the freethinkers and dehumanize the branded enemy.

And you’d certainly better stop sneering at your Holocaust denier predecessors, much less deluding yourself into believing you’re on “the right side of history.”

Reconsidering your position? Great. Now you can be part of the solution—instead of the Final Solution.
The Dunning Kruger Effect...Stage 4.
---------- ADS -----------
 
Good judgment comes from experience. Experience often comes from bad judgment.
linecrew
Rank (9)
Rank (9)
Posts: 1887
Joined: Fri Feb 20, 2004 6:53 am
Location: On final so get off the damn runway!

Re: Just another possible medical incapacitation event

Post by linecrew »

Can an admin toss this thread into the garbage bin of COVID posts please?
---------- ADS -----------
 
JerryRig
Rank 7
Rank 7
Posts: 516
Joined: Fri May 18, 2007 10:25 am

Re: Just another possible medical incapacitation event

Post by JerryRig »

linecrew wrote: Mon Mar 07, 2022 9:31 am Can an admin toss this thread into the garbage bin of COVID posts please?
Why do you say this? Cognitive Dissonance?
---------- ADS -----------
 
broken_slinky
Rank 4
Rank 4
Posts: 266
Joined: Wed Aug 29, 2018 5:48 am

Re: Just another possible medical incapacitation event

Post by broken_slinky »

JerryRig wrote: Mon Mar 07, 2022 9:42 am
linecrew wrote: Mon Mar 07, 2022 9:31 am Can an admin toss this thread into the garbage bin of COVID posts please?
Why do you say this? Cognitive Dissonance?
Because every single post of yours is nothing but anti-vaccine posturing. You try to associate every aircraft accident/incident with COVID vaccinations even though you have zero evidence to support your claim.
---------- ADS -----------
 
JerryRig
Rank 7
Rank 7
Posts: 516
Joined: Fri May 18, 2007 10:25 am

Re: Just another possible medical incapacitation event

Post by JerryRig »

broken_slinky wrote: Mon Mar 07, 2022 10:02 am
JerryRig wrote: Mon Mar 07, 2022 9:42 am
linecrew wrote: Mon Mar 07, 2022 9:31 am Can an admin toss this thread into the garbage bin of COVID posts please?
Why do you say this? Cognitive Dissonance?
Because every single post of yours is nothing but anti-vaccine posturing. You try to associate every aircraft accident/incident with COVID vaccinations even though you have zero evidence to support your claim.
That’s your erroneous opinion. I’m only pointing out that the experimental drugs forcefully implemented on the population as a whole have NOT been tested for safety and effectiveness DESPITE your believes. Pfizer just released their initial trial results confirming this. It’s not MY responsibility to provide this evidence for you. Stop looking on TikTok, and start doing your homework. It’s YOUR choice.
---------- ADS -----------
 
newlygrounded
Rank 5
Rank 5
Posts: 386
Joined: Wed Nov 25, 2020 8:28 pm

Re: Just another possible medical incapacitation event

Post by newlygrounded »

JerryRig wrote: Mon Mar 07, 2022 10:38 am
broken_slinky wrote: Mon Mar 07, 2022 10:02 am
JerryRig wrote: Mon Mar 07, 2022 9:42 am

Why do you say this? Cognitive Dissonance?
Because every single post of yours is nothing but anti-vaccine posturing. You try to associate every aircraft accident/incident with COVID vaccinations even though you have zero evidence to support your claim.
That’s your erroneous opinion. I’m only pointing out that the experimental drugs forcefully implemented on the population as a whole have NOT been tested for safety and effectiveness DESPITE your believes. Pfizer just released their initial trial results confirming this. It’s not MY responsibility to provide this evidence for you. Stop looking on TikTok, and start doing your homework. It’s YOUR choice.
What were the results of the trial?
---------- ADS -----------
 
linecrew
Rank (9)
Rank (9)
Posts: 1887
Joined: Fri Feb 20, 2004 6:53 am
Location: On final so get off the damn runway!

Re: Just another possible medical incapacitation event

Post by linecrew »

JerryRig wrote: Mon Mar 07, 2022 9:42 am
linecrew wrote: Mon Mar 07, 2022 9:31 am Can an admin toss this thread into the garbage bin of COVID posts please?
Why do you say this? Cognitive Dissonance?
No JerryRig, it's because these threads inevitably turn into an "opinion waving" contest. I didn't and won't share my thoughts and opinions on the subject either way and yet, here you are, coming at me on the offensive like you're ready for a fight. I know the subject incites people and strays well away from aviation and becomes a "you're dumb! No, YOU'RE dumb" insult fest. It's not constructive on any level and only serves to be divisive. This is way off topic from the subject area that the thread was posted in, which is "Accidents, Incidents & Overdue Aircraft". I simply asked a mod to toss it into the repository where all of the COVID posts are because I'm tired of the subject and don't care to see it in a part of the forum where it has no place.
---------- ADS -----------
 
Last edited by linecrew on Mon Mar 07, 2022 4:04 pm, edited 1 time in total.
JerryRig
Rank 7
Rank 7
Posts: 516
Joined: Fri May 18, 2007 10:25 am

Re: Just another possible medical incapacitation event

Post by JerryRig »

newlygrounded wrote: Mon Mar 07, 2022 10:51 am
JerryRig wrote: Mon Mar 07, 2022 10:38 am
broken_slinky wrote: Mon Mar 07, 2022 10:02 am
Because every single post of yours is nothing but anti-vaccine posturing. You try to associate every aircraft accident/incident with COVID vaccinations even though you have zero evidence to support your claim.
That’s your erroneous opinion. I’m only pointing out that the experimental drugs forcefully implemented on the population as a whole have NOT been tested for safety and effectiveness DESPITE your believes. Pfizer just released their initial trial results confirming this. It’s not MY responsibility to provide this evidence for you. Stop looking on TikTok, and start doing your homework. It’s YOUR choice.
What were the results of the trial?
Over 30% of participants experience some sort of adverse reaction or in some cases death. It was only for a 2 month period, so one really knows what the long term effects are. That phase of human trials is currently in progress. We don’t know what the contents or concentrations are for the current phase....we are not being told, but I suspect it’s why we aren’t witnessing more reactions, but the point is we just don’t know.
---------- ADS -----------
 
JerryRig
Rank 7
Rank 7
Posts: 516
Joined: Fri May 18, 2007 10:25 am

Re: Just another possible medical incapacitation event

Post by JerryRig »

newlygrounded wrote: Mon Mar 07, 2022 10:51 am
JerryRig wrote: Mon Mar 07, 2022 10:38 am
broken_slinky wrote: Mon Mar 07, 2022 10:02 am
Because every single post of yours is nothing but anti-vaccine posturing. You try to associate every aircraft accident/incident with COVID vaccinations even though you have zero evidence to support your claim.
That’s your erroneous opinion. I’m only pointing out that the experimental drugs forcefully implemented on the population as a whole have NOT been tested for safety and effectiveness DESPITE your believes. Pfizer just released their initial trial results confirming this. It’s not MY responsibility to provide this evidence for you. Stop looking on TikTok, and start doing your homework. It’s YOUR choice.
What were the results of the trial?
Over 30% of participants experience some sort of adverse reaction or in some cases death. It was only for a 2 month period, so one really knows what the long term effects are. That phase of human trials is currently in progress. We don’t know what the contents or concentrations are for the current phase....we are not being told, but I suspect it’s why we aren’t witnessing more reactions, but the point is we just don’t know.
---------- ADS -----------
 
broken_slinky
Rank 4
Rank 4
Posts: 266
Joined: Wed Aug 29, 2018 5:48 am

Re: Just another possible medical incapacitation event

Post by broken_slinky »

JerryRig wrote: Mon Mar 07, 2022 11:45 am Over 30% of participants experience some sort of adverse reaction or in some cases death. It was only for a 2 month period, so one really knows what the long term effects are. That phase of human trials is currently in progress. We don’t know what the contents or concentrations are for the current phase....we are not being told, but I suspect it’s why we aren’t witnessing more reactions, but the point is we just don’t know.
More numbers stated by you with zero credible research data to back it up. Add another one to JerryRig's useless "the man is killing us" post count.
---------- ADS -----------
 
JerryRig
Rank 7
Rank 7
Posts: 516
Joined: Fri May 18, 2007 10:25 am

Re: Just another possible medical incapacitation event

Post by JerryRig »

FFS, DO you want me to feed you too?

Read the attachment below and perhaps you all can test each other.

I’ve also included a commentary video to help the less literate.

https://www.bitchute.com/video/8wyZWfxoCT85/
---------- ADS -----------
 
Attachments
Pfizer-trial-results-first-3-months.pdf
(983.55 KiB) Downloaded 47 times
User avatar
Arnie Pye
Rank 4
Rank 4
Posts: 246
Joined: Sun Aug 12, 2018 3:54 pm

Re: Just another possible medical incapacitation event

Post by Arnie Pye »

3 months ago I got my booster shot. Last night, I had the R1 and R2 window overheat light come on after startup. Since these two items are related, I'm preparing for my imminent demise as we speak.
---------- ADS -----------
 
Post Reply

Return to “Covid”